Survival after resection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Introducing and validating a novel type-specific prognostic model.

Background: This study aimed to assess the performance of currently available risk calculators in a cohort of patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) and to create an MPNST-specific prognostic model including type-specific predictors for overall survival (OS). Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with MPNST from 11 secondary or tertiary centers in The Netherlands, Italy and the United States of America. All patients diagnosed with primary MPNST who underwent macroscopically complete surgical resection from 2000 to 2019 were included in this study. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model for OS was estimated with prespecified predictors (age, grade, size, NF-1 status, triton status, depth, tumor location, and surgical margin). Model performance was assessed for the Sarculator and PERSARC calculators by examining discrimination (C-index) and calibration (calibration plots and observed-expected statistic; O/E-statistic). Internal-external cross-validation by different regions was performed to evaluate the generalizability of the model. Results: A total of 507 patients with primary MPNSTs were included from 11 centers in 7 regions. During follow-up (median 8.7 years), 211 patients died. The C-index was 0.60 (95% CI 0.53-0.67) for both Sarculator and PERSARC. The MPNST-specific model had a pooled C-index of 0.69 (95%CI 0.65-0.73) at validation, with adequate discrimination and calibration across regions. Conclusions: The MPNST-specific MONACO model can be used to predict 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS in patients with primary MPNST who underwent macroscopically complete surgical resection. Further validation may refine the model to inform patients and physicians on prognosis and support them in shared decision-making.

Current Management of Desmoid Tumors: A Review.

Importance: Desmoid tumor (DT) is a rare and locally aggressive monoclonal, fibroblastic proliferation characterized by a variable and often unpredictable clinical course. Previously, surgery was the standard primary treatment modality; however, within the past decade, a paradigm shift toward less-invasive management has been introduced and an effort to harmonize the strategy among clinicians has been made. To update the 2020 global evidence-based consensus guideline on the management of patients with DT, the Desmoid Tumor Working Group convened a 1-day consensus meeting in Milan, Italy, on June 30, 2023, under the auspices of the European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers and Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network, the Desmoid Foundation Italy, and the Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation. The meeting brought together over 90 adult and pediatric sarcoma experts from different disciplines as well as patients and patient advocates from around the world. Observations: The 2023 update of the global evidence-based consensus guideline focused on the positioning of local therapies alongside surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment algorithm as well as the positioning of the newest class of medical agents, such as γ-secretase inhibitors. Literature searches of MEDLINE and Embase databases were performed for English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies to obtain data to support the consensus recommendations. Of the 18 full-text articles retrieved, only 4 articles met the inclusion criteria. The 2023 consensus guideline is informed by a number of new aspects, including data for local ablative therapies such as cryotherapy; other indications for surgery; and the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat, the first representative of the newest class of medical agents and first approved drug for DT. Management of DT is complex and should be carried out exclusively in designated DT referral centers equipped with a multidisciplinary tumor board. Selection of the appropriate strategy should consider DT-related symptoms, associated risks, tumor location, disease morbidities, available treatment options, and preferences of individual patients. Conclusions and Relevance: The therapeutic armamentarium of DT therapy is continually expanding. It is imperative to carefully select the management strategy for each patient with DT to optimize tumor control and enhance quality of life.

Clinical recommendations for treatment of localized angiosarcoma: A consensus paper by the Italian Sarcoma Group.

Angiosarcoma (AS) represents a rare and aggressive vascular sarcoma, posing distinct challenges in clinical management compared to other sarcomas. While the current European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) clinical practice guidelines for sarcoma treatment are applicable to AS, its unique aggressiveness and diverse tumor presentations necessitate dedicated and detailed clinical recommendations, which are currently lacking. Notably, considerations regarding surgical extent, radiation therapy (RT), and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy vary significantly in localized disease, depending on each different site of onset. Indeed, AS are one of the sarcoma types most sensitive to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Despite this, uncertainties persist regarding optimal management across different clinical presentations, highlighting the need for further investigation through clinical trials. The Italian Sarcoma Group (ISG) organized a consensus meeting on April 1st, 2023, in Castel San Pietro, Italy, bringing together Italian sarcoma experts from several disciplines and patient representatives from "Sofia nel Cuore Onlus" and the ISG patient advocacy working group. The objective was to develop specific clinical recommendations for managing localized AS within the existing framework of sarcoma clinical practice guidelines, accounting for potential practice variations among ISG institutions. The aim was to try to standardize and harmonize clinical practices, or at least highlight the open questions in the local management of the disease, to define the best evidence-based practice for the optimal approach of localized AS and generate the recommendations presented herein.

Initial local resection versus early referral for spermatic cord sarcoma: Any impact on treatment timelines and oncological outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: Spermatic cord sarcomas are exceedingly rare, often misdiagnosed and subsequently improperly treated at local hospitals. This retrospective study looked at the oncological outcomes of spermatic cord sarcoma cases managed with curative intent resection at a tertiary referral sarcoma centre. We specifically studied how initial inadequate resections impact the oncologic outcomes compared to primary tumour resections at the reference centre. METHODS: One hundred eighteen consecutive patients affected by primary, localized spermatic cord sarcoma surgically managed at our reference centre from January 2001 through January 2021 were included. Primary endpoints were local relapse free (LRFS), distant metastasis free (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). These outcomes were evaluated with multi-nomial logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models for a co-relation to known patient, tumour and treatment-related prognostic factors, including a prior inadequate resection and time from diagnosis to a complete oncologic resection as independent variables. Secondarily, we compared the above variables and treatment intervals among the subgroups of primary versus re-resection surgery. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 54 months (IQR 25-105), 12 patients (10.2%) developed local recurrence (LR) and 14 (11.6%) had distant metastasis (DM). 5-year local relapse (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 89.3% and 86.5%, respectively. Higher tumour grade and size were associated with a worse DMFS (p=<0.05). Likewise, marginal (R1) resection correlated with an inferior LRFS (p=< 0.05). Eighty-four patients (71.2%) had their initial diagnosis established on an inadequate surgical excision performed in a local hospital, followed by a re-excision at our centre (Re-resection group). During the same period, 34 (28.8%) were managed primarily with biopsy and treatment at our reference centre (Primary-resection group). The two groups had statistically significant differences in tumour size, histopathology, surgery duration, rate of postoperative complication and R0 resection (p < 0.005). Additionally, the difference in time intervals to achieve the treatment targets was statistically insignificant and did not correlate to the risk of recurrence as an independent variable. Residual disease was present in 51.2 % (n = 43) of the re-excision specimens. However, following a complete R0 resection, this did not correlate with a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.481). CONCLUSION: Prompt referral to a tertiary centre, where multidisciplinary evaluation and sound oncologic resections are the standard of treatment, can align the OS and DFS of patients receiving incomplete surgery elsewhere to those treated primarily in referral centres. The primary determinant of prognosis remains surgical margin, tumour size and grade.

New Sarculator Prognostic Nomograms for Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Case Volume Does Matter.

OBJECTIVE: To update the current Sarculator retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) prognostic nomograms considering the improvement in patient prognosis and the case volume effect. BACKGROUND: Survival of patients with primary RPS has been increasing over time, and the volume-outcome relationship has been well recognized. Nevertheless, the specific impact on prognostic nomograms is unknown. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients with primary localized RPS treated at 8 European and North American sarcoma reference centers between 2010 and 2017 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: high-volume centers (HVC, ≥13 cases/year) and low-volume centers (LVC, <13 cases/year). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariable analyses for OS and DFS were performed. The nomograms were updated by recalibration. Nomograms performance was assessed in terms of discrimination (Harrell C index) and calibration (calibration plot). RESULTS: The HVC and LVC groups comprised 857 and 244 patients, respectively. The median annual primary RPS case volume (interquartile range) was 24.0 in HVC (15.0-41.3) and 9.0 in LVC (1.8-10.3). Five-year OS was 71.4% (95% CI: 68.3%-74.7%) in the HVC cohort and 63.3% (56.8%-70.5%) in the LVC cohort ( P =0.012). Case volume was associated with both OS (LVC vs. HVC hazard ratio 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08-1.82, P =0.011) and DFS (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% CI: 1.57-2.37, P <0.001) at multivariable analyses. When applied to the study cohorts, the Sarculator nomograms showed good discrimination (Harrell C index between 0.68 and 0.73). The recalibrated nomograms showed good calibration in the HVC group, whereas the original nomograms showed good calibration in the LVC group. CONCLUSIONS: New nomograms for patients with primary RPS treated with surgery at high-volume versus low-volume sarcoma reference centers are available in the Sarculator app.

Deciding individual treatment for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare mesenchymal tumors that account for only 0.1-0.2% of all malignancies. Management of this disease is challenging, and resection remains the cornerstone of treatment. Ongoing international collaboration has expanded our knowledge of this disease, allowing for a more personalized approach to RPS patients resulting in improved survival over time. Due to the heterogeneity of RPS, with differing recurrence patterns and sensitivities to neoadjuvant therapies based on histology and grade, management of RPS should be tailored to the individual patient. AREAS COVERED: Our review focuses on a histology-driven approach in the management of primary RPS. We searched relevant articles from 1993 to 2023 that investigated prognostic factors and treatment of patients with RPS and summarized recent advances and future directions in the field. EXPERT OPINION: Deeper understanding of the role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and ongoing trials investigating the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will potentially contribute to the development of individualized treatment pathways.

Pathological and radiological response following neoadjuvant treatments in primary localized resectable myxofibrosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall.

BACKGROUND: To explore the correlation between pathological and radiological response to preoperative treatments and outcome in surgically treated patients with myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). METHODS: All consecutive patients with primary localized MFS and UPS of the extremities and trunk wall surgically treated with curative intent at our center (2005-2021) were included. Clinical data including residual visible tumor (VT%) on surgical specimen and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) were retrieved. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival and disease-free survival, and cumulative incidence of local relapse and distant metastasis were estimated in a competing risk framework according to RECIST and VT%, overall and by treatment group. Cox and Fine and Gray multivariable models were performed. RESULTS: Of 693 patients affected by primary MFS and UPS, 233 (66 MFS and 167 UPS) were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (naChT), radiotherapy (naRT), or both (naChT-RT). VT% was ≤5% in 13/46 (28.2%), 24/99 (24.2%), and 40/88 (45.4%) patients, respectively. There were 11/46 (29.7%), 22/99 (22.7%), and 23/88 (26.1%) RECIST partial responses and 18/46 (48.6%), 59/99 (60.8%), and 60/88 (68.2%) RECIST stable disease, respectively. In naChT, a trend for a better survival was observed when VT% ≤5% (p = .09), whereas RECIST partial responses and stable disease had the same outcome. VT% was not associated with outcome in naRT or naChT-RT, whereas RECIST response was. CONCLUSION: In primary localized MFS and UPS treated with neoadjuvant therapies, VT% seems more relevant than size reduction after naChT, whereas the opposite is true when naRT is administered alone or concurrent to ChT.

Six Surgical Stages in the Resection of Primary Right Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: A Standardized Comprehensive Approach.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the treatment mainstay in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), a frontline comprehensive approach based on tumor removal en bloc with adherent viscera is mandatory especially for liposarcoma, where the normal retroperitoneal fat is undistinguishable from the well-differentiated tumor component.1-5 In this video, a reproducible and standardized six-stage approach to a primary right retroperitoneal liposarcoma is presented. PATIENT AND METHODS: A 23-cm right retroperitoneal, well-differentiated liposarcoma was diagnosed in a 68-year-old female patient in December 2021. The tumor involved the right kidney and adrenal gland; displacing anteriorly the right colon, the duodenum, and the pancreatic head; and invading part of the ipsilateral psoas muscle. After the publication of the STRASS trial and STREXIT results,6,7 neoadjuvant radiotherapy was delivered to a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with stable disease. Virtual 3D reconstruction of regional anatomy by Visible Patient was performed preoperatively. RESULTS: The patient underwent right retroperitoneal mass resection en bloc with ipsilateral kidney and adrenal gland, colon, psoas muscle, and portion of ipsilateral diaphragm. Of note, the resection of the psoas muscle was performed to obtain a safe posterior margin and accomplish a better clearance of fat of the posterior abdominal wall. This can be limited to the psoas fascia whenever the tumor is not adherent to it. A six-stage approach was performed, as described in the supplementary video file. CONCLUSIONS: RPS resection is complex and requires a broad range of surgical expertise. A staged approach that can be followed in virtually all cases is highly recommended to achieve an optimal tumor resection.

Organ Infiltration and Patient Risk After Multivisceral Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcomas.

BACKGROUND: The extent of histological organ involvement (HOI) to organs and structures of a retroperitoneal liposarcoma may have prognostic implications. This study investigated incidence, characteristics, and risk association of HOI in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of patients who underwent multivisceral resection for primary liposarcoma (2009-2014) were retrospectively analyzed. HOI was the variable of interest and was classified into four degrees: absent (HOI-0), perivisceral (HOI-1), initial (HOI-2), and advanced (HOI-3). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The prognostic value of HOI was adjusted for preoperative treatment and the Sarculator nomogram score. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included. HOI-0, HOI-1, HOI-2, and HOI-3 were detected in 9 (8.3%), 11 (10.1%), 43 (39.4%), and 46 (42.2%) patients. Median follow-up was 8.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 7.2-9.6 years]. There were 68 recurrences and 50 patient deaths observed, resulting in a 10-year OS and DFS of 51.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.9-62.1%] and 34.1% (95% CI 25.2-46.1%), respectively. Clinically relevant HOIs (HOI-2 and HOI-3) were found in 35/45 (77.8%) and 54/64 (84.4%) cases of well- and de-differentiated liposarcomas, respectively. On multivariable survival analysis, patients with HOI-3 had significantly shorter OS (HOI-3 vs HOI-0/HOI-1 HR 2.92; p = 0.012) and DFS (HOI-3 vs HOI-0/HOI-1 HR 2.23; p = 0.045), independently of the nomogram score (OS: HR 2.93; p < 0.001; DFS: HR 1.78; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Initial and advanced HOIs are frequently detected in both well-differentiated and de-differentiated liposarcomas, supporting that multivisceral resection may be needed. HOI stratifies the risk of patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Long-term survivors with desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT): Results from a retrospective single-institution case series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To report on a retrospective study of primary DSRCT aiming at characterizing long-term survivors (LTS). METHODS: All consecutive patients treated at our institution for a primary DSRCT between 2000 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patients received multiagent chemotherapy ± surgery ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) ± whole abdomino-pelvic radiotherapy (WAP-RT) ± high-dose chemotherapy ± maintenance chemotherapy (MC). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Patients alive, without evidence of disease at ≥36 months from diagnosis, were defined as LTS. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were identified. All received multiagent chemotherapy; 27/38 (71%) surgery (7/27 [26%] plus HIPEC), 9/38 (24%) WAP-RT, 12/38 (32%) MC. At a median-follow-up of 37 months (IQR 18-63), overall median-EFS and median-OS were 15 and 37 months, respectively. All events occurred within 35 months. In patients who underwent surgery, median-EFS and median-OS were 19 and 37 months (23 and 43 months after R0/R1, and 10 and 19 months after R2 resection), respectively. LTS were 5/38 (13%), alive at 37, 39, 53, 64, 209 months. None had liver or extra-abdominal metastasis at diagnosis, they all received R0/R1 resection, 3/5 had WAP-RT, 2/5 MC, 1/5 received high-dose chemotherapy, none HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS: In our series cure was likely achieved in 13% of DSRCT. LTS had no liver/extra-abdominal disease, were treated with complete surgery, and possibly WAP-RT/MC.

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.

Preoperative Radiotherapy in Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: EORTC-62092 Trial (STRASS) Versus Off-trial (STREXIT) Results.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on abdominal recurrence-free survival (ARFS) in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma treated in the EORTC-STBSG-62092 (STRASS) phase 3 randomized controlled trial (STRASS cohort) and off-trial (STREXIT cohort) and to pool STRASS and STREXIT data to test the hypothesis that RT improves ARFS in patients with liposarcoma. BACKGROUND: The STRASS trial did not show any difference in ARFS between patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy+surgery (RT+S) versus surgery alone (S). METHODS: All consecutive adult patients not enrolled in STRASS and underwent curative-intent surgery for a primary retroperitoneal sarcoma with or without preoperative RT between 2012 and 2017 (STRASS recruiting period) among ten STRASS-recruiting centres formed the STREXIT cohort. The effect of RT in STREXIT was explored with a propensity score (PS)-matching analysis. Primary endpoint was ARFS defined as macroscopically incomplete resection or abdominal recurrence or death of any cause, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: STRASS included 266 patients, STREXIT included 831 patients (727 after excluding patients who received preoperative chemotherapy, 202 after 1:1 PS-matching). The effect of RT on ARFS in STRASS and 1:1 PS-matched STREXIT cohorts, overall and in patients with liposarcoma, was similar. In the pooled cohort analysis, RT administration was associated with better ARFS in patients with liposarcoma [N=321, hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.89]. In particular, patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 dedifferentiated liposarcoma (G1-2 DDLPS, n=266) treated with RT+S had better ARFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97) while patients with G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma had not. At the current follow-up, there was no association between RT and overall survival or distant metastases-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, preoperative RT was associated with better ARFS in patients with primary well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 DDLPS.

Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and a New Inflammatory Biomarkers Prognostic Index for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Retrospective Monocentric Study.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory biomarkers and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are associated with prognosis in several tumors. Data on sarcomas are limited, and insufficient on retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with primary RPS operated between 2002 and 2016 were included. Hemoglobin, monocytes, NLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were retrieved and analyzed both individually and combined into a prognostic index (IBPI). Correlation with clinicopathologic variables was studied, as well as postoperative morbidity according to NLR and IBPI risk categories. The association between overall survival (OS) and biomarkers and, in addition, the 7-year Sarculator-predicted OS probability (pOS) was analyzed using univariable and multivariable Cox models. RESULTS: 423/463 patients had complete data. The median follow-up was 84 months. The median NLR was 3.3 (IQR, 2.4-4.7), with significant variation across histologies. NLR was the only biomarker that independently predicted OS (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40; P = 0.02). The IBPI showed good discrimination for subgroups at different OS (log-rank test P < 0.0001). The Cox model for pOS alone showed a 7-year index of prediction accuracy of 26.9, which increased to 29.5 when IBPI was added to pOS as a complementary prognostic tool. IBPI was also associated with the risk of serious infectious postoperative complications (P = 0.0094; noninfectious complications, P = 0.6463). CONCLUSIONS: NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS in RPS. When combined into a prognostic index with hemoglobin, monocytes, and PLR, it serves as a readily available prognostic tool addressing tumor-related inflammation and helps in classifying RPS risk in addition to the Sarculator nomogram.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM) occurs infrequently in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), although certain STS subtypes have a higher propensity for RLNM. The identification of RLNM has significant implications for staging and prognosis; however, the precise impact of node-positive disease on patient survival remains a topic of controversy. Although the benefits of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are well documented in patients with melanoma and breast cancer, whether this procedure offers a benefit in STS is controversial. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed and articles reviewed to determine if SLNB in patients with extremity/truncal STS impacts disease-free or overall survival. RESULTS: Six studies were included. Rates of sentinel lymph node positivity were heterogeneous (range 4.3-50%). The impact of SLNB on patient outcomes remains unclear. The overall quality of available evidence was low, as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. CONCLUSIONS: The literature addressing the impact of nodal basin evaluation on the staging and management of patients with extremity/truncal STS is confounded by heterogeneous patient cohorts and clinical practices. Multicenter prospective studies are warranted to determine the true incidence of RLNM and whether SLNB could benefit patients with clinically occult RLNM at diagnosis.

Retrospective observational studies in ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS) community of experts on the minimum requirements for the evaluation of activity of systemic treatments.

BACKGROUND: In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS. METHODS: Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021). RESULTS: Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.