The Reliability of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Classification Systems: A Comparison Between the Rockwood and Kraus Classifications.

Background: The Rockwood system for the classification of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations has been associated with a lack of reliability. A novel system has been proposed (Kraus classification) that is based on dynamic posterior translation of these injuries. Purpose: To assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood and Kraus classification systems and also to examine the impact of surgeon experience on the assessments. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were 45 patients with acute AC joint injuries who underwent a radiographic examination using standard bilateral AP and modified Alexander views. For interobserver reliability, 6 shoulder surgeons (expert group) and 6 orthopaedic residents (novice group) reviewed the radiographs to classify injuries according to the Rockwood and Kraus classifications; for each categorization, the participants chose between nonoperative management and surgical treatment. The evaluation was repeated 6 weeks later to determine intraobserver reliability. Kappa (κ) coefficients and their 95% CIs were used to compare interobserver and intraobserver reliability for each classification system according to assessor experience. Statistical differences were considered significant when the upper and lower boundaries of the 95% CI did not overlap. Results: The overall interobserver agreement for diagnosis (both novice and expert groups) was moderate (κ = 0.52 [95% CI, 0.51-0.54]) for the Rockwood classification and substantial (κ = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.53-0.65]) for the Kraus classification; however, no significant differences were observed between the κ values. The overall interobserver agreement for treatment selection was substantial when using both the Rockwood (κ = 0.78 [95% CI, 0.72-0.81]) and Kraus (κ = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66-0.87]) classifications. The overall intraobserver agreement for diagnosis was substantial using both the Rockwood (κ = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.61-0.67]) and Kraus (κ = 0.73 [95% CI, 0.69-0.75]) classifications. There were no significant differences between the novice and expert groups on any of the evaluations. Conclusion: The Kraus system was slightly more reliable than the Rockwood system for classifying AC joint injuries both between assessor groups and overall. The level of surgeon experience had no impact on the evaluations.

Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with bicortical drilling procedures: anatomic analysis of chondral and axillary nerve risk with transhumeral pin guide.

BACKGROUND: Many biceps tenodesis (BT) procedures are described for treating proximal biceps pathology. Axillary nerve injury has been reported during BT using bicortical drilling techniques with variable results depending on the location. In addition, there is a risk of potential articular damage during suprapectoral BT. We sought to determine the distance between the axillary nerve and the posterior passage of a bicortical pin, as well as the risk of articular damage, and to analyze whether a lateral inclination of the pin could avoid the chondral risk during suprapectoral BT with bicortical drilling. METHODS: Ten cadaveric shoulders were divided into 2 groups. In the first group, we determined the axillary nerve distance from the posterior exit point of 3 pins in a suprapectoral position 15 mm distal to the humeral cartilage: perpendicular, 10° caudal, and 20° caudal inclination. We measured 2 distances from the pin: to the axillary nerve and to the cartilage border. In the second group, we set one pin at the same perpendicular position and set the second pin 15° laterally tilted to determine its extra-articular passage. RESULTS: No pin injured the nerve, whereas all pins showed a transchondral direction. The 20° caudal inclination was the nearest to the nerve (18.8 mm [95% confidence interval, 5.5-32 mm]), but the perpendicular position was the safer position (38.8 mm [95% confidence interval, 28-49.6 mm]). Tilting the pin direction 15° laterally prevented cartilage damage (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Suprapectoral BT with bicortical drilling performed 15 mm distal to the humeral cartilage is a safe procedure regarding the axillary nerve. A potential humeral chondral injury could be prevented with 15° of lateral inclination of the pin guide.

Femoral shaft fracture osteosynthesis in a critically ill patient under Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO).

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is an invasive procedure used in critically ill patients with catastrophic pulmonary failure or cardiogenic shock in which conventional management has failed. These patients are managed with permanent anticoagulation, with increased bleeding risk. Hemorrhage is the main reported complication. CASE: A 25-year-old polytraumatized woman, both lower limbs amputated and a left femoral shaft fracture with catastrophic pulmonary failure (Murray score 4) that required intensive management care with ECMO. During her evolution definitive femoral shaft osteosynthesis with a nail as required and the medical team decided to operate on the patient under ECMO. She recovered with fluctuations in her hematocrit, but was hemodynamically stable. The patient recovered satisfactorily, was weaned from ECMO and commenced her rehabilitation program. At 16 months, she was almost autovalent, and full consolidation was achieved, with no complication of the implants. DISCUSSION: ECMO is a life-saving support, but requires permanent anticoagulation, which implies a high risk of hemorrhages, specially for surgical treatment. This patient underwent an osteosynthesis surgery satisfactorily. Hematoma was the only complication of her intramedullary femoral nail, without compromising hemodynamics. This case shows that patients on ECMO can undergo a major orthopedic surgery in selected cases.