Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by the Dutch leakage score, serum procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein: study protocol of a prospective multicentre observational study by the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iC.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded major complication after colorectal surgery. There is no uniform definition of anastomotic dehiscence and leak. Over the years many risk factors have been identified (distance of anastomosis from anal verge, gender, BMI, ASA score) but none of these allows an early diagnosis of AL. The DUtch LeaKage (DULK) score, C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have been identified as early predictors for anastomotic leakage starting from postoperative day (POD) 2-3. The study was designed to prospectively evaluate AL rates after colorectal resections, in order to give a definite answer to the need for clear risk factors, and testing the diagnostic yeld of DULK score and of laboratory markers. Methods and analysis. A prospective enrollment for all patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis carried out from September 2017 to September 2018 in 19 Italian surgical centers. OUTCOME MEASURES: preoperative risk factors of anastomotic leakage; operative parameters; leukocyte count, serum CRP, serum PCT and DULK score assessment on POD 2 and 3. Primary endpoint is AL; secondary endpoints are minor and major complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification; morbidity and mortality rates; readmission and reoperation rates, length of postoperative hospital stay (Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03560180, on June 18, 2018). Ethics. The ethics committee of the "Comitato Etico Regionale delle Marche - C.E.R.M." reviewed and approved this study protocol on September 7, 2017 (protocol no. 2017-0244-AS). All the participating centers submitted the protocol and obtained authorization from the local Institutional Review Board.

Enhanced recovery pathways in colorectal surgery: a consensus paper by the Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI) and the PeriOperative Italian Society (POIS).

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway is a multi-disciplinary, patient-centered protocol relying on the implementation of the best evidence-based perioperative practice. In the field of colorectal surgery, the application of ERAS programs is associated with up to 50% reduction of morbidity rates and up to 2.5 days reduction of postoperative hospital stay. However, widespread adoption of ERAS pathways is still yet to come, mainly because of the lack of proper information and communication. Purpose of this paper is to support the diffusion of ERAS pathways through a critical review of the existing evidence by members of the two national societies dealing with ERAS pathways in Italy, the PeriOperative Italian Society (POIS) and the Associazione Italiana Chirurghi Ospedalieri (ACOI), showing the results of a consensus development conference held at Matera, Italy, during the national ACOI Congress on June 10, 2019.

Prevention of hernia incision in laparoscopic left colon resection.

AIM: Aim of this study was to assess the rate of incisional hernia in laparoscopic left colectomy comparing two different sites of mini-laparotomy: midline and oblique left iliac fossa. METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed data from 748 patients who underwent laparoscopic left colectomy, in which we performed a midline 6-7 cm incision of the umbilical pubic tract (438 patients - group A), and an oblique left iliac fossa incision (262 patients - group B). Usually a medial to lateral meso-colon dissection technique with vascular closure was performed as a first step. Electro-thermal bipolar energy was routinely used. The variables compared were operative time, hernia in site of mini-laparotomy, conversion, intraoperative bleeding, 30-day complications, wound infection, length of stay. RESULTS: From early 2004 to April 2012, 748 patients underwent laparoscopic left colectomy, receiving a midline incision for specimen extraction in 438 cases, group A, and off midline in 262, group B. The mean operative time was 135 (90-245) min for group A and 110.5 (40-195) min for group B, and the mean hospital stay was 8 (5-28) days and 6 (4-30) days for group A and B respectively. Forty-eight patients underwent conversion in open surgery and were removed from the study (33 from group A and 15 from group B). Forty-five incisional hernia occurred in group A (10.2%) vs. 3 in group B (1.1%). We shifted to left iliac fossa incision since June 2010. CONCLUSION: This study summarizes our experience in the effort to reduce incisional hernia in laparoscopic left colectomy. There was a significant difference in rate of hernia comparing midline and oblique left iliac fossa incision. We postulate anatomy of abdominal wall, dynamics and the higher rate of infection of umbilicus to be the key.

Treatment of rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: review of the literature.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique that was introduced by Buess in the early 1980s. The TEM procedure employs a dedicated rectoscope with a 3D binocular optic and a set of endoscopic surgical instruments. Since the beginning its advantages have been evident: magnification of the operative field, better access to proximal lesions with lower margin positivity and fragmentation over traditional transanal excision techniques. A non-systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed database to identify all original articles on rectal cancer treated by TEM. Only series including at least ten cases of adenocarcinoma with two years' mean minimum follow-up and published in English were selected. Nowadays more than two decades of scientific data support the use of TEM in the treatment of selected patients with non-advanced rectal cancer. This paper describes the indications and the surgical technique of TEM in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy approaches: a 15-year experience in the search for a tailored procedure.

AIM: This study reports single-institution experience with anterior, flank lateral and submesocolic approaches in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). METHODS: The study population was 267 patients who underwent LA from 1994 to 2008 at our institution. The choice of surgical route (anterior, anterior submesocolic or flank lateral) was based on patient characteristics (body-mass index, previous abdominal surgery) and lesion features (size, side, secreting mass, pheochromocytoma, suspected malignancy). The submesocolic approach, as described in 2005, was used for left-sided lesions ≤7-8 cm and in non-obese patients; the flank lateral approach was used in obese or previously operated patients. Of a total of 267 patients, 116 underwent right LA by the anterior and 4 by the flank lateral approach; 88 underwent left LA by the anterior, 37 by the submesocolic, and 22 by the flank lateral approach. RESULTS: The mean operating time was: 80.1 min (range, 65-125) for right anterior and 93 min (range, 96-145) for right flank lateral LA; 108 min (range, 80-305) for left anterior, 56.2 min (range, 38-105) for submesocolic, and 80.5 min (range, 54-125) for flank lateral LA. Major intraoperative complications requiring conversion to open surgery occurred in 7 patients: bleeding (5); splenic colonic flexure tear (1); and hypertension with severe arrhythmia in pheochromocytoma removal (1). There were no significant statistically differences in length of hospital stay or analgesic medications after anterior, flank lateral or submesocolic LA; the mean operating time was significantly shorter with use of the anterior and submesocolic approaches. CONCLUSION: In the authors' experience, tailoring the LA approach according to patient and lesion characteristics is both safe and effective. In selected cases, the operating time is shorter by the submesocolic appraoch. .

A flexible concept of fast track surgery for laparoscopic colorectal resections.

AIM: Laparoscopy per se improves the patient outcome allowing low pain, reduction of pulmonary dysfunction or less fatigue, better mood and psychological status on the operated on patient. In this study a series of laparoscopic colorectal resections underwent fast track in a "flexible" way. METHODS: From March 2006 to March 2009, 75 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for cancer have been prospectively evaluated. There were 46 males and 29 females with 61.4 years mean age (26-87). The cohort was divided in three group, 25 patient each, on the basis of the fast track treatment used. In the series A fast track on the whole, in the B fast track partial and in the C fast track postoperatively only. RESULTS: Mean operating time was 81, 118, 142/76, 110, 151/83, 126, 145 minutes for right colectomy, left colectomy and rectal resection respectively in group A, B and C. The postoperative pain rating was less in the group A compared to B and C, with no differences concerning mobilization, flatus, resumption of solid feeding and mean postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Fast track management in laparoscopic colectomy is safe and effective, but it seems not essential in reducing the total hospital stay.

Is laparoscopic fiberoptic choledochoscopy for common bile duct stones a fine option or a mandatory step?

BACKGROUND: Because choledochoscopy often is a challenging maneuver, it would be advantageous to define the real utility of its use. This study aimed to compare blind exploration of the common bile duct (CBD) with choledochoscopy-assisted CBD stone removal in terms of patient outcome and complication rate. METHODS: Two groups of patients were prospectively evaluated in a 4-year period. The study participants were 36 men and 27 women randomized to group A (n = 32) for a blind basket procedure or group B (n = 31) for a choledochoscopy-assisted procedure as the first step of laparoscopic CBD stone removal. Patients with preoperatively suspected CBD stones (n = 51) and those with unsuspected stones (n = 12) were included. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of anagraphics, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, or previous surgery. All the procedures were performed by surgeons skilled in this surgical field. Choledochoscopy, when used, was always performed with the instrument connected to a camera monitor that had a wide vision, whether in a single-monitor, in a picture-in-picture manner, or with the use of an additional monitor. RESULTS: From March 2004 to April 2008, 63 patients undergoing CBD exploration for stone removal were enrolled in the study. Five of these patients had undergone previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). The mean operative time was 107 min for group A and 122 min for group B. The mean hospital stay was 3 days for group A and 3.6 days for group B. Clearance of CBD stones was achieved laparoscopically in 62 cases. One patient required open combined transduodenal papilloplasty and transcholedochotomy. In seven cases, blind basket exploration was unable to remove the stones according to the cholangiogram, so choledochoscopy was required. Six patients underwent a transversal coledocothomy for stone removal. A Kehr T-tube was placed in four of these patients. In four group A cases, the papilla was inadvertently passed during the procedure. In six group A cases, including the four aforementioned cases, a high level of amylases was found on postoperative day 1. At this writing, no late complications or stone recurrences have been observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic basket blind technique and choledochoscopy are safe and effective for CBD stone removal. However, the latter seems to be better in terms of a higher stone removal rate and fewer minor complications despite its longer operation time. In the authors' opinion, it may be preferable to reserve ERCP for very high-risk patients, taking into account that in addition to the related complications, it results in an approximate 10% rate of recurrent or persistent stones.

Long-term results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism.

BACKGROUND: The management of primary aldosteronism is currently achieved by both medical and surgical treatment. Laparoscopy has in recent years unquestionably become the gold standard in adrenal surgery for benign lesions. This study aims to evaluate our clinical results among patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for primary aldosteronism. METHODS: From January 1994 to January 2006, amid LA series, 59 primary aldosteronism patients were treated in our institution. Patients were 33 males and 26 females with mean age 49.3 yr (19-78). The mean body mass index was 25.9 kg/m2 (20.5-33.3). The mean size of lesion was 2.9 cm (1-5.5). Clinical symptoms were as follows: hypertension and symptomatic/asymptomatic hypokalemia (54), hypokalemia (5). RESULTS: Thirty-five left and 24 right LA were performed. On the left side, 22 procedures were carried out by anterior approach, 9 by anterior submesocolic route, and 4 by means of flank approach. All right procedures were completed by the anterior supine approach. The mean operative time was 103.5 min for left and 92.8 min for right adrenalectomy. There was one major complication, a colonic post-operative fistula, regarding a left adrenalectomy case. The mean post-operative hospital stay was 3 days (1-9). The cure rate of hypertension and hypokalemia was similar to the current literature results. CONCLUSIONS: LA is a safe and effective option in the treatment of primary aldosteronism. Appropriate selection of patients, larger adrenal masses and duration of symptoms are determining factors in the success rate of hypertension management.

Electrothermal bipolar energy-based device in laparoscopic right colectomy: our experience.

AIM: Aim of the present study was to evaluate effectiveness of bipolar electrothermal energy in laparoscopic right colectomy, both for vascular pedicle ligature and dissecting manoeuvres. METHODS: Eighty-nine consecutive unselected patients underwent laparoscopic right colectomy between 2003 and 2006. All procedures were performed or supervised by the same surgical team (two staff of surgeons). Forty-four laparoscopic right colectomy were carried out with ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS), (group 1) and forty-five by means of electrothermal bipolar atlas (EBA), (group 2). Intraoperative bleeding and postoperative blood loss, operating time, complication and hospital stay have been investigated within two groups. RESULTS: No mortality and no major intraoperative were reported in both series. A conversion to open surgery occurred in one case in both groups. A duodenal perforation occurred in UCS group as major postoperative complication. Comparing 1 and 2 series statistically significant differences were found concerning mean operating time (122.7 vs 98.4) and blood loss (220 vs 115 mL), with a P value <0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Both UCS and EBA devices were safe and effective in performing laparoscopic right colectomy. However, EBA did allow a statistically significant shorter operative time and bleeding/blood loss, tracing back its effectiveness in vessel sealing and dissection.

The learning curve in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the procedure of choice for surgical management of most adrenal tumors. LA learning curve (LC) varies among surgeons and may be influenced by factors depending on surgeon, patient, and lesion peculiarities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the LC by multi-dimensional analysis. METHODS: Between August 1994 and August 2005, 241 LA were performed in our department. Data were prospectively collected. The pre-operative variables evaluated were patient-related (age, gender, body mass index, co-morbidities) and disease-related (histology, size, and side of lesion). Level of experience of surgical team and surgical approach (anterior, flank, submesocolic routes) were evaluated as well. Flank approached and bilateral procedures were excluded, while submesocolic LA, were collected separately. Operating time (OpT), conversion rate (CR), intra-operative and post-operative complications were evaluated. Patient, surgeon, and procedure-related factors involved in LC were investigated by a multi-factorial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Body mass index, side, size, histology, technology improvement, and experience of surgical team, evaluated through the progressive series of surgical procedures, were independent predictors of CR and OpT. The CR for right adrenalectomy was 3% (3 cases) compared to 4.2% for left side (6 cases). The submesocolic approach significantly influenced OpT, but not CR. Mean OpT for right and left LA was 83 and 109 min, respectively. Based on surgical experience increase, the OpT and CR flattened their curves, roughly at 30 and 40 procedures for right and left LA, respectively. Post-operative complications did not change considerably throughout the series. Readmission rate within 30 days was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Manifold factors may affect LC and outcome in LA. Their knowledge may support teaching activities as well as reducing conversion and complication rates.

Flank approach versus anterior sub-mesocolic access in left laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is commonly recognized as the gold standard in adrenal surgery. The most used surgical access is at present the so-called flank approach. The aim of this study was to compare the flank approach and the anterior sub-mesocolic access carrying out left laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). METHODS: From January 2003 to January 2006 50 eligible left LAs were randomized to the flank (n = 25, group A) or sub-mesocolic transperitoneal approach (n = 25, group B). The two groups were similar concerning patient and lesion features. Comparing the two approaches, the main parameters analyzed, adjusted for tumor size and histology, were operating time (OpT), complication rate, and hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no converted procedures. Mean overall OpT was 76.4 min (54-96 min) versus 65.6 min (45-95 min) in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.001), while the OpT required to tie the adrenal vein was 42.8 min (26-55 min) and 24.5 min (16-41 min) (p = 0.000). Oral feeding resumed within 12-24 h in both groups. Mean hospital stay was 3 and 2.4 days in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.04). Mean tumor size was similar in group A and B: 3.6 cm (1.5-6.5 cm) and 3.8 cm (2-6 cm), respectively. Definitive histology in groups A and B were: Cushing adenoma (6 and 4), Conn adenoma (5 and 6), pheochromocytoma (4 and 9), and incidentaloma (8 and 5, respectively). A myelolipoma and an adrenogenital adenoma were observed in group A and one carcinoma was observed in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-mesocolic approach provides a statistically significant shorter OpT and hospital stay. Identification and early closure of the adrenal vein by means of a really minimal dissection and no-touch gland technique resulted in the main benefits of this approach.

Adrenal incidentaloma: surgical update.

Nowadays, the role of surgery in the treatment of adrenal incidentalomas (AI), considering their biologic behavior, is still debated. Surgery is mandatory in cases of hyperfunctioning adrenal masses, in the presence of suspect radiological malignancy, in cases of discordant computed tomography (CT) and scintigraphy findings and when the maximum diameter is 4 cm or more. On the other hand, studies have suggested relative inaccuracy of conventional CT in evaluating the size. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the treatment of AI by reviewing our experience. Over the period from 1995 to 2005 we laparoscopically managed 78 AI by anterior transperitoneal approach. Two LA (2.6%) were converted to open surgery. Neither intra- nor post-operative major complications were observed. The mean size of lesions was 5.5 cm (range 3-9). Twenty-one large adrenal lesions (exceeding 6 cm) were removed (27%). Definitive histology resulted as follows: adrenocortical adenoma (63), pheochromocytoma (5), nodular hyperplasia (4), myelolipoma (3), cysts (2), and adrenocortical carcinoma (1, with a size of 3 cm). The patients were followed-up by hormonal and radiological evaluation every 12 months (6 for malignancy); their follow-up (median 60.4 months, range 6-123) was uneventful. Also larger AI were treated safely. Laparoscopy has been safe and effective in the treatment of AI in our experience, according to specific literature.

Hepatic resections by means of electrothermal bipolar vessel device (EBVS) LigaSure V: early experience.

BACKGROUND: Many techniques and devices are available for performing liver resection, such as clamp crushing, Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA), Hydrojet and dissecting sealer, ultrasonic shears, and, more recently, electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (EBVS). In this prospective trial we sought to evaluate the impact of EBVS on hepatic resections. METHODS: From March 2004 to December 2005, 24 patients from our consecutive liver resection series were enrolled in the present study. There were 17 males and 7 females with a mean age of 59.6 years (range = 41-80) who had colonic cancer metastases (18), hepatocarcinoma (3), angioma (2), and intrahepatic lithisasis (1). Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo liver resection via EBVS LigaSure V (12 patients, group A) or ultrasonic shears harmonic scalpel (HS) (12 patients, group B). Hepatic procedures did not differ significantly between the two groups and were as follows: right hepatectomy (2), left hepatectomy (1), bisegmentectomy (14), and segmentectomy (7). RESULTS: There was no mortality in either group. The mean operative time was 136.7 min (range = 90-210) in group A and 187.9 min (range = 130-360) in group B. The Pringle maneuver was done in five patients in group A [mean time = 11.4 min (range = 6-12)] and in four patients in group B [mean time = 16 min (range = 9-26)]. The mean blood loss, total bile salts, and hemoglobin concentration from drained fluid on the second postoperative day were 205.8 vs. 506.7 ml, 0.6 vs. 1.1 mmol/L, and 1.0 vs. 2.1 g/L (p < 0.05) for groups A and B, respectively. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.1 vs. 7.8 days. In group B a patient who underwent right hepatectomy for colon cancer metastases had transient hepatic failure. No patients received blood transfusions in group A, while two or more blood units were administered in two cases in group B. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study EBVS proved to be safe and effective for liver resection. By means of this device, statistically significant benefits concerning blood loss, total bile salts, and hemoglobin postoperative leakage were found.

Laparoscopic radiofrequency renal ablation in patients with simultaneous visceral tumors: long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To report our experience with in situ laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of renal tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 2000 to May 2002, two men, 81 and 71 years old, and one woman, 75 years old, were referred to our department for right renal clear-cell carcinoma <3.5-cm diameter. The 71- year-old patient had only one kidney. Because of the tumor location, the percutaneous route was not considered the approach of choice. Moreover, a simultaneous large right adrenal incidentaloma (myelolipoma) and a right colon cancer were known to be present in the second and third patient, respectively. The aforementioned findings suggested the laparoscopic route as a preferable technique to treat both the renal and the other morbidities. RESULTS: Under laparoscopic ultrasonography control of tine placement, a 20-minute thermoablation cycle at 100 degrees C mean temperature was performed. Including right colectomy and right adrenalectomy, the operative time was 120, 200, and 275 minutes, with postoperative hospital stays of 3, 4, and 6 days for the three patients, respectively. Abdominal CT scans after 1 and 4 weeks and then every 6 months confirmed complete treatment of the lesion at 44 months' average follow-up (range 36-56 months). CONCLUSION: When percutaneous access is not feasible or the patient should undergo another laparoscopic procedure simultaneously, laparoscopic RFA of renal tumors is feasible and effective, as shown by long-term follow-up.

Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection for cure of colorectal cancer is controversial. More investigations on long-term results are required. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcome with a minimum follow-up of 5 years between laparoscopic or open approach for the treatment of colo-rectal cancer. METHODS: The treatment modality (laparoscopic or open) was related to the patients (pts) choice. The following parameters between the two groups (laparoscopic and open) were assessed: wound recurrences rate, local recurrences rate, incidence of distant metastases and survival probability analysis. RESULTS: We report the long term outcome of 149 pts with colon cancer of which 85 treated by Laparoscopic Surgery (LS) and 64 by Open Surgery (OS) and of 86 patients with rectal cancer of which 52 treated by LS and 34 by OS. In the pts with colonic cancer, mean follow-up was 82.8 months. No Statistically Significant Difference (SSD) was observed in the local recurrences rate (3.5% after LS and 6.2% after OS) and in the incidence of distant metastases (10.5% after LS and 10.9% after OS). Cumulative survival probability in LS was 0.882 as compared to 0.859 after OS. In the pts with rectal cancer, mean follow-up was 78.5 months. No SSD was observed in the local recurrences rate (19.2% after LS and 17.6% after OS) and in the incidence of distant metastases (15.3% after LS and 20.5% after OS). Cumulative survival probability in LS was 0.711 as compared to 0.617 after OS. We report an interesting data about the time of recurrences between LS and OS: the recurrences were delayed after LS, both after colonic (22.6 months vs 6.5) and rectal (25.7 months vs 13.0) resections, respectively. CONCLUSION: We suppose that laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colo-rectal cancer is quite safe. However, further investigation is needed.

Sub-mesocolic access in laparoscopic left adrenalectomy.

BACKGROUND: This article reports an alternative laparoscopic access to left adrenal gland. METHODS: From January 1994 to August 2004, 209 laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed in our Department. Indications were Conn adenoma (55 cases), incidentaloma (64), Cushing adenoma (45), pheochromocytoma (32), adreno-genital syndrome (two), mielolipoma (two), and metastatic mass(nine). Of 209, in 12 cases the left adrenalectomy was performed through a submesocolic access (seven pheochromocytoma, two incidentaloma, two Cushing adenoma, one Conn adenoma,). The identification and closure of the adrenal vein with minimal gland manipulation resulted the main benefit of this approach. Moreover, the adrenalectomy was performed with minimal anatomical dissection. RESULTS: No mortality or major complications occurred. During the operation, the blood pressure and cardiac rhythm were significantly more stable, in the group of patients who underwent a left adrenalectomy by the submesocolic approach compared to the anterior or flank lateral transperitoneal group. CONCLUSIONS: Left adrenal lesions, as selected cases of pheochromocytoma, can be safely treated by laparoscopic submesocolic access.

Laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: The rectosigmoid colon is affected by deep pelvic endometriosis in 3-37% of cases. In the past, treatment of the affected gastrointestinal tract generally required conversion to conventional surgery. We describe our experience with complete laparoscopic management of deep pelvic endometriosis with bowel involvement. METHODS: From March 1995 to March 2003, 29 consecutive patients with endometriosis requiring laparoscopic intervention were evaluated. In seven patients (24%) colorectal involvement was identified prior to the operation. A low anterior resection was performed in four patients (57%) and a sigmoid resection in three (43%). In all cases, colonoscopy showed a normal mucosa. In all cases, treatment consisted of resection of the bowel involved together with the excision of all other implants. Data analysis included age, previous abdominal operations, previous history of endometriosis, operative time, conversion rate, complications, length of stay, and pain relief. RESULTS: There were seven patients with colorectal involvement whose median age was 32.8 years (range, 28-40), with a history of previous abdominal operation in two (28%). Preoperative symptoms were as follow: dysmenorrea in four patients (57%), dyspareunia in four (57%), pelvic pain in seven (100%), rectal bleeding in one (14%), and tenesmus in five (71%). Mean operative time was 190 min (range, 165-230). Length of stay was 8.3 days (range, 7-11). There were no anastomotic leak and no major postoperative complication. One patient had temporary urinary retention. At a median follow-up of 38.7 months (range, 1-84), complete relief of pelvic symptoms was achieved in five patients (71%), and there was improvement in one patient. In one patient complaining of persistent pain, a new colonic implant was diagnosed two years after the surgery requiring reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that provided that the surgeon is highly skilled in laparoscopy, laparoscopic resection of deep pelvic endometriosis with rectosigmoid involvement is feasible and effective in nearly all patients.

Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.

AIM: In the last decade, laparoscopic procedures are applied to the treatment of almost all colonic diseases, including both benign and malignant lesions. Focusing our attention to the laparoscopic operative technique, we compare the perioperative results and the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic hemicolectomy with those after open conventional hemicolectomy. METHODS: This prospective non randomized study is based on a series of 469 consecutive patients (73.6% with malignant lesions) operated on by the same surgical team following the same type of surgical technique, for laparoscopic and open approach, to perform right (RH) and left (LH) hemicolectomy, respectively, excluding segmental resections, emergency operations as well as transverse colon, splenic flexure and recurrent carcinomas. The treatment modality was selected by the patients after reading the informed consent form. Conversion rate to open surgery (for the laparoscopic group) and causes were assessed. Statistical significance (p) for operative time, resumption of gastrointestinal functions, length of stay, complications, perioperative mortality, as well as length of specimen, number of lymph-nodes harvest, incidence of local recurrences and distant metastases, and survival probability analysis in malignant cases, was assessed between the 2 groups (laparoscopic and open). RESULTS: From March 1992 to February 2003, 166 patients underwent RH and 303 LH. In the RH group, 108 patients underwent laparoscopic approach and 58 underwent open surgery (26 vs 13 for benign lesions and 82 vs 45 for adenocarcinomas, respectively). LH was performed by laparoscopy in 202 patients and by laparotomy in 101 (55 vs 30 for benign lesions and 147 vs 71 for adenocarcinomas, respectively). There were no conversions to open surgery in laparoscopic RH, while 10 patients (4.9%) in the laparoscopic LH group required conversion: 3 of 34 performed for diverticular disease and 7 of 147 performed for malignancy. Mean operative time for laparoscopic surgery was longer than for open surgery (182 vs 140 min for RH and 222 vs 190 min for LH, respectively), but with increasing experience this decreased significantly. Mean hospital stay in patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures was significantly shorter both in RH and LH groups (9.2 vs 13.2 days and 9.9 vs 13.2 days, respectively). Similar major complication rates were observed between the 2 laparoscopic and open groups (1.8% vs 1.7% for RH and 4.1% vs 4.9% for LH, respectively). Follow-up time ranged between 12 and 109 months (mean, 57.3 months) in RH groups and between 12 and 111 months (mean, 57.5 months) in LH groups. The follow-up dropout was of only 3 patients after RH (in the laparoscopic group) and 5 after LH (3 in the laparoscopic group and 2 in the open group). The local recurrence rate was lower after laparoscopic surgery in both arms (7% vs 8.8% for RH and 3.3% vs 7% for LH, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant. Two port site recurrences were observed in the laparoscopic groups, 1 after a Dukes D palliative RH and 1 after a Dukes C LH converted to open surgery (1.7% and 0.9%, respectively). Metachronous metastases rates were similar between the laparoscopic and open groups (20.9% vs 17.6% for RH and 4.4% vs 5.3% for LH, respectively). Cumulative survival probability (CSP) at 72 months after laparoscopic RH was 0.791 as compared to 0.765 after open surgery (p=0.326) and 0.956 after laparoscopic LH as compared to 0.877 after open surgery (p=0.115). CSP for Dukes stage A, B and C in the laparoscopic RH group was 0.875, 0.846, and 0.727 as compared to 0.9 (p=0.815), 0.889 (p=0.87), and 0.6 (p=0.183) after open surgery, respectively. CSP for Dukes stage A, B and C in the laparoscopic LH group was 0.1, 0.966, and 0.885 as compared to 0.1 (p=0.936), 0.944 (p=0.466), and 0.7 (p=0.072) after open surgery, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that laparoscopic hemicolectomy for both benign and malignant lesions can be performed safely. Oncological outcomes were comparable with those of open surgery.

Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.

BACKGROUND: Controversy continues to surround laparoscopic rectal resection for malignancy. A longer follow-up period is required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of the procedure and its impact on survival. Furthermore, no data from ongoing randomized controlled trials are yet available. The aims of this study were to compare long-term outcomes for unselected patients undergoing either laparoscopic or open rectal resection for cancer. METHODS: A series of 124 unselected consecutive patients with rectal cancer, who underwent surgery by the same surgical team, have been included in this study. Patients with T1N0 tumors underwent local excision, and emergency cases were excluded from the study. Written consent was submitted by each patient, and inclusion in either group (laparoscopic or open) was left to the patient's choice. The laparoscopic approach was chosen by 81 patients, and 43 patients chose open surgery. All the patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy (5,040 cGy), performed in selected cases with chemotherapy (for patients younger than 70 years). The following parameters were compared between the two groups: length of the surgical specimen, clearance of the margins of the specimen, number of lymph nodes identified, local recurrence rate, incidence of distant metastases, and survival probability analysis. The mean follow-up period for both groups was 43.8 months (range, l-9 years). RESULTS: We performed 60 laparoscopic and 27 open anterior resections, as well as 21 laparoscopic and 16 open abdomino perineal resections, respectively. No mortality occurred in either group. The mean length of the resected specimens was 24.3 cm in the laparoscopic group and 23.8 cm in the open group ( p = 0.47). The mean tumor-free margin was 3.0 cm in the laparoscopic group and 2.8 cm in the open group ( p = 0.57), and the mean number of lymph nodes identified was 10.3 in the laparoscopic group and 9.8 in the open group ( p = 0.63). Of the 124 patients, 86 (52 laparoscopic and 34 open) were included in out study. We excluded patients who underwent a palliative resection (6 laparoscopic and 6 open patients) or conversion to open surgery ( n = 10) and patients who had undergone surgery in the past year ( n = 16). One laparoscopic patient was lost to follow-up evaluation, whereas three laparoscopic patients and one open patient died of causes not related to cancer. No wound recurrence was observed. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic resection was 20.8%, as compared with 16.6% after open resection ( p = 0.687). Distant metastases occurred in 18.2% of the patients in the laparoscopic group, as compared with 21.2% in the open group ( p = 0.528). Cumulative survival probability was 0.709 after laparoscopic resection after LR and 0.606 after open resection ( p = 0.162), whereas for Dukes' stages A, B, and C in the laparoscopic group versus the open group, it was 0.875 vs 0.889 ( p = 0.392), 0.722 vs 0.584 ( p = 0.199), and 0.500 vs 0.417 ( p = 0.320), respectively. At this writing 20 laparoscopic patients (62.5%) and 20 open patients (60.6%) are disease free ( p = 0.623). CONCLUSIONS: Oncologic surgical principles were respected. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer was comparable with that after conventional resection. We should wait to draw conclusive scientific statements until the completion of ongoing international randomized controlled trials.

Results of laparoscopic vs open resections for colon cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer is still a controversial procedure, the major cause of concern being the lack of long-term results. The aims of this study was to compare long-term outcome in unselected patients undergoing either laparoscopic (LH) or open hemicolectomy (OH) for colonic cancer. METHODS: From March 1992 to August 1997, 197 elective patients were included in this prospective nonrandomized study. The patients were operated on by the same surgical team following the same type of surgical technique for both right and left hemicolectomy, excluding segmental resections; the only difference was the type of access, which was either laparoscopic or open. Each patient gave a written consent, and the allocation to each group (laparoscopic or open) was done on the basis of the patient's choice. The long-term outcomes of the two groups were compared. Follow-up for both groups ranged from 36 to 96 months (mean, 48.9). RESULTS: In all, 149 (74 LH, 75 OH) of 197 patients were studied, excluding palliative resections, conversions to open surgery, perioperative deaths, and deaths not related to cancer. Only two patients in the laparoscopic group were lost to follow-up. The local recurrence after LH was 1.3% vs 2.7% after OH (p = 0.105). Metachronous metastases rates were similar for the two groups (10.8% for LH and 10.7% for OH). Cumulative survival probability (CSP) in the LH group vs the OH group was 0.892 vs 0.867 (p = 0.513), respectively. CSP for Duke's stage B and C in the LH group vs the OH group was 0.910 vs 0.895 (p = 0.506) and 0.800 vs 0.734 (p = 0.544) respectively. Sixty-four LH patients (86.5%) and 65 OH patients (86.7%) are disease-free. CONCLUSION: In our series of patients, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of long-term survival rate.