Patterns of metformin use and glycated haemoglobin trends among patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in Alberta, Canada.

AIM: Canadian guidelines recommend metformin as first-line therapy for incident uncomplicated type 2 diabetes and the vast majority of patients are treated accordingly. However, only 54% 65% remain on treatment after 1 year, with the highest discontinuation rates within the first 3 months. The purpose of this study was: (a) to identify individual and clinical factors associated with metformin discontinuation among patients with newly diagnosed uncomplicated type 2 diabetes in Alberta, Canada, and (b) describe glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) trajectories in the first 12 months after initiation of pharmacotherapy, stratified by metformin usage pattern. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative datasets from 2012 to 2017 to define a cohort of individuals with uncomplicated incident type 2 diabetes. Using logistic regression, we determined individual and clinical characteristics associated with metformin discontinuation. We categorized individuals based on patterns of metformin use and then used mean HbA1c measurements over a 12-month follow-up period to determine glycaemic trajectories for each pattern. RESULTS: Characteristics associated with metformin discontinuation were younger age, lower baseline HbA1c and having fewer comorbidities. Sex, income and location (urban/rural) were not significantly associated with metformin discontinuation. Individuals who continued metformin with higher adherence and individuals who discontinued metformin entirely had lowest HbA1c values at 12 months from treatment initiation. Those who changed therapy or had additional therapies added had higher HbA1c values at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Identifying characteristics associated with discontinuation of metformin and individuals' medication usage patterns provide an opportunity for targeted interventions to support patients' glycaemic management.

Patterns and Patients' Characteristics Associated With Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to describe patterns and patient-level factors associated with use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) among adults with diabetes being treated in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: Using linked administrative data sets from 2014 to 2019, we defined a retrospective cohort of adults with prevalent or incident type 2 diabetes with indications for SGLT2i use and who did not have advanced kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) or previous amputation. We describe medication dispensation patterns of SGLT2is over time in the overall cohort and among the subgroup with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine patients' characteristics associated with SGLT2i use. RESULTS: Of the 341,827 patients with diabetes (mean age, 60.7 years; 45.6% female), 107,244 (31.3%) had CVD. The proportion of patients with an SGLT2i prescription increased in a linear fashion to a maximum of 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7% to 10.9%) of the eligible cohort by the end of the observation period (March 2019). The proportion of filled prescriptions was similar for patients with CVD (10.4%; 95% CI, 10.1% to 10.6%) and for those without CVD (10.9%; 95% CI, 10.8% to 11.0%). Patients' characteristics associated with lower odds of filling an SGLT2i prescription included female sex, older age and lower income. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SGLT2is is increasing among patients with diabetes but remains low even in those with CVD. Policy and practice changes to increase prescribing, especially in older adults, may help to reduce morbidity and mortality related to cardiovascular and renal complications.

Accounting for concurrent antihyperglycemic medication changes in dietary and physical activity interventions: A focused literature review.

AIMS: To summarize methods used to account for antihyperglycemic medication changes in randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of dietary and physical activity interventions on glycemia among adults with diabetes. METHODS: Using studies included in two recently published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials examining the glycemic effects of dietary and physical activity interventions, we evaluated how each study accounted for antihyperglycemic medication changes. Data were analyzed using summary statistics, stratified by the type of intervention studied, and each was assigned a score from 0 to 6 reflecting the strength of medication controls employed. RESULTS: We evaluated 22 physical activity focused and 27 dietary focused articles. Our scoring system yielded a mean concurrent medication adjustment score of 3.9/6 for the physical activity studies and a score of 1.7/6 (p < 0.001) for the dietary studies. CONCLUSIONS: We found that randomized controlled trials included in recent systematic reviews of physical activity and dietary interventions did not robustly account or control for changes in antihyperglycemic medications, with physical activity interventions doing so more robustly than dietary interventions. This is a threat to the validity of study findings, as observed glycemic changes may in fact be attributable to imbalances in concurrent medication adjustments between groups.

First-line pharmacotherapy for incident type 2 diabetes: Prescription patterns, adherence and associated costs.

AIMS: To use real-world prescription data from Alberta, Canada to: (a) describe the prescribing patterns for initial pharmacotherapy for those with newly diagnosed uncomplicated type 2 diabetes; (b) describe medication-taking behaviours (adherence and persistence) in the first year after initiating pharmacotherapy; and (c) explore healthcare system costs associated with prescribing patterns. METHODS: We employed a retrospective cohort design using linked administrative datasets from 2012 to 2017 to define a cohort of those with uncomplicated incident diabetes. We summarized the initial prescription patterns, adherence and costs (healthcare and pharmaceutical) over the first year after initiation of pharmacotherapy. Using multivariable regression, we determined the association of these outcomes with various sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The majority of individuals for whom metformin was indicated as first-line therapy received a prescription for metformin monotherapy (89%). Older individuals, those with higher baseline A1C and those with no comorbidities, were most likely to be started on non-metformin agents. Adherence with the initially prescribed regimen was suboptimal overall, with nearly half (48%) being non-adherent over the first year. One-third of those who started metformin discontinued it in the first 3 months. Those started on non-metformin agents had roughly twice the healthcare costs, and five to seven times higher medication costs, compared to those started on metformin, in the first year after starting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: With the addition of new classes of medications, healthcare providers who look after those with type 2 diabetes have more pharmaceutical options than ever. Most individuals continue to be prescribed metformin monotherapy. However, adherence is suboptimal, and drops off considerably within the first 3 months.