RESUMEN
This study aims to rank, and cluster countries in terms of some essential livestock indicators, and evaluate the subject with specific attention to the conditions existing in Türkiye. The study material covers 142 countries whose 2020 data were fully reported by the World Food and Agriculture Organization, the World Trade Organization, and the World Bank. It was determined that the most appropriate number of clusters would be 4 and significant differences were found between these clusters in terms of medium and high effect size for all indicators (P < 0.01). The cluster of 31 countries, according to the Ward algorithm, and the cluster of 37 countries according to the K-Means algorithm, both including Türkiye, were found to have higher averages than the other clusters in terms of related indicators (P < 0.01). The common elements in both clusters were determined: Türkiye, USA, Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Ethiopia, Morocco, France, India, the Netherlands, England, Spain, Italy, Canada, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Colombia, Pakistan, Peru, Poland, and Russia. Taking into account the geographical proximity and economic relations, Türkiye should examine the livestock models followed by these countries and evaluate the possible areas of cooperation that can be developed and competition that could be faced by these countries.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biosecurity plays a crucial role in preventing contagious diseases and in increasing farm productivity. OBJECTIVE: To determine technical and economic biosecurity scores of farms, and to examine the associations between biosecurity practices (BP) and producers' socioeconomic characteristics. METHODS: The study was conducted on a total of 50 small-scale dairy farms that were randomly selected in Hatay, Turkey. A checklist consisting of 19 biosecurity practices was addressed to the farms. The technical and economic scoring systems were developed by the authors according to presence and cost of the each of the biosecurity practices. RESULTS: The mean of the technical and economic scores were found to be 9.30 and 17.04, respectively. 'Treatment of sick animals' (98%), 'vaccination against the most common contagious diseases' (90%), and 'barn lime' (86%) were found to be the most commonly used applications. 'Testing for the most common contagious diseases before buying' (10%) was used at the lowest rate. Significant differences were found among the groups regarding education level (<.05), income class (<.05), and herd size (<.01). Biosecurity scores were significantly positively correlated with herd size (<.05) and producers' education level (<.01). There were statistically significant associations between the producers' socioeconomic characteristics and some of the biosecurity practices. CONCLUSION: Training programs should be arranged to change the attitudes and perception of small-scale producers concerning poor biosecurity practices. In order to encourage producers to increase biosecurity scores, regulations regarding financial support and penalties could be quite useful at both the regional and national levels.
