Minocycline prevents chronic restraint stress-induced vulnerability to developing cocaine self-administration and associated glutamatergic mechanisms: a potential role of microglia.

Stressful experience-induced cocaine-related behaviors are associated with a significant impairment of glutamatergic mechanisms in the Nucleus Accumbens core (NAcore). The hallmarks of disrupted glutamate homeostasis following restraint stress are the enduring imbalance of glutamate efflux after a cocaine stimulus and increased basal concentrations of extracellular glutamate attributed to GLT-1 downregulation in the NAcore. Glutamate transmission is tightly linked to microglia functioning. However, the role of microglia in the biological basis of stress-induced addictive behaviors is still unknown. By using minocycline, a potent inhibitor of microglia activation with anti-inflammatory properties, we determined whether microglia could aid chronic restraint stress (CRS)-induced glutamate homeostasis disruption in the NAcore, underpinning stress-induced cocaine self-administration. In this study, adult male rats were restrained for 2 h/day for seven days (day 1-7). From day 16 until completing the experimental protocol, animals received a vehicle or minocycline treatment (30 mg/Kg/12h i.p.). On day 21, animals were assigned to microscopic, biochemical, neurochemical or behavioral studies. We confirm that the CRS-induced facilitation of cocaine self-administration is associated with enduring GLT-1 downregulation, an increase of basal extracellular glutamate and postsynaptic structural plasticity in the NAcore. These alterations were strongly related to the CRS-induced reactive microglia and increased TNF-α mRNA and protein expression, since by administering minocycline, the impaired glutamate homeostasis and the facilitation of cocaine self-administration were prevented. Our findings are the first to demonstrate that minocycline suppresses the CRS-induced facilitation of cocaine self-administration and glutamate homeostasis disruption in the NAcore. A role of microglia is proposed for the development of glutamatergic mechanisms underpinning stress-induced vulnerability to cocaine addiction.

Brain ethanol-metabolizing enzymes are differentially expressed in lead-exposed animals after voluntary ethanol consumption: Pharmacological approaches.

Developmentally-lead (Pb)-exposed rats showed an enhanced vulnerability to the stimulating and motivational effects of ethanol (EtOH). This is accompanied by differential activity of the brain EtOH-metabolizing enzymes catalase (CAT) and mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2). Based on the theory that brain acetaldehyde accumulation is associated with the reinforcing properties of EtOH, this study sought to determine brain CAT and ALDH2 expression in limbic areas of control and Pb-exposed animals after voluntary EtOH intake. Thirty-five-day-old rats perinatally exposed to 220 ppm Pb were offered with water or increasing EtOH solutions (2-10% v/v) during 28 days until postnatal day (PND) 63. Once intake was stable, the animals were administered: 1) saline (SAL; test days 21-24 or 21-28, as corresponds), or 2) a CAT inhibitor: 3-amine 1, 2, 4-triazole (AT; 250 mg/kg intraperitoneally [i.p.], 5 h before the last eight EtOH intake sessions -test days 21-24 and 25-28), or 3) a CAT booster: 3-nitropropionic acid (3NPA; 20 mg/kg subcutaneously [s.c.], 45 min before the last four EtOH intake sessions -test days 25-28). Two additional groups were centrally-administered cyanamide (CY, an ALDH2 inhibitor, 0.3 mg i.c.v. immediately before the last four EtOH sessions, test days 25-28) or its corresponding vehicle (VEH). Lead exposure increased EtOH intake, an effect potentiated in both groups by 3NPA or CY pretreatments and reduced by AT, albeit selectivity in the Pb group. Catalase abundance in limbic areas parallels these observations in the Pb group, showing higher CAT expression in all areas after EtOH consumption respect to the controls, an effect prevented by AT administration. In contrast, ALDH2 expression was reduced in the Pb animals after EtOH intake, with CY potentiating this effect in all brain areas under study. Based on these results and on previous evidences, we suggest that Pb exposure promotes acetaldehyde accumulation in limbic regions, providing some insights into the mechanism of action that underlies the vulnerability to the excessive EtOH consumption reported in these animals.

Silencing brain catalase expression reduces ethanol intake in developmentally-lead-exposed rats.

Lead (Pb) is a developmental neurotoxicant. We have demonstrated that perinatally Pb-exposed rats consume more ethanol than their control counterparts, a response that seems to be mediated by catalase (CAT) and centrally-formed acetaldehyde, ethanol's first metabolite with attributed reinforcing effects in the brain. The present study sought to disrupt ethanol intake (2-10% ethanol v/v) in rats exposed to 220 ppm Pb or filtered water during gestation and lactation. Thus, to block brain CAT expression, a lentiviral vector coding for a shRNA against CAT (LV-antiCAT vector) was microinfused in the posterior ventral tegmental area (pVTA) either at the onset or towards the end of a chronic voluntary ethanol consumption test. At the end of the study, rats were euthanized and pVTA dissected to measure CAT expression by Western blot. The LV-antiCAT vector administration not only reversed, but also prevented the emergence of the elevated ethanol intake reported in the perinatally Pb-exposed animals, changes that were supported by a significant reduction in CAT expression in the pVTA. These results provide further evidence of the crucial role of this enzyme in the reinforcing properties of ethanol and in the impact of the perinatal Pb programming to challenging events later in life.

Developmental lead exposure induces opposite effects on ethanol intake and locomotion in response to central vs. systemic cyanamide administration.

Lead (Pb) is a developmental neurotoxicant that elicits differential responses to drugs of abuse. Particularly, ethanol consumption has been demonstrated to be increased as a consequence of environmental Pb exposure, with catalase (CAT) and brain acetaldehyde (ACD, the first metabolite of ethanol) playing a role. The present study sought to interfere with ethanol metabolism by inhibiting ALDH2 (mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase) activity in both liver and brain from control and Pb-exposed rats as a strategy to accumulate ACD, a substance that plays a major role in the drug's reinforcing and/or aversive effects. To evaluate the impact on a 2-h chronic voluntary ethanol intake test, developmentally Pb-exposed and control rats were administered with cyanamide (CY, an ALDH inhibitor) either systemically or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) on the last 4 sessions of the experiment. Furthermore, on the last session and after locomotor activity was assessed, all animals were sacrificed to obtain brain and liver samples for ALDH2 and CAT activity determination. Systemic CY administration reduced the elevated ethanol intake already reported in the Pb-exposed animals (but not in the controls) accompanied by liver (but not brain) ALDH2 inactivation. On the other hand, a 0.3 mg i.c.v. CY administration enhanced both ethanol intake and locomotor activity accompanied by brain ALDH2 inactivation in control animals, while an increase in ethanol consumption was also observed in the Pb-exposed group, although in the absence of brain ALDH2 blockade. No changes were observed in CAT activity as a consequence of CY administration. These results support the participation of liver and brain ACD in ethanol intake and locomotor activity, responses that are modulated by developmental Pb exposure.

Involvement of the brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the neuroadaptive responses induced by amphetamine in a two-injection protocol.

A single or repeated exposure to psychostimulants induces long-lasting neuroadaptative changes. Different neurotransmitter systems are involved in these responses including the neuropeptide angiotensin II. Our study tested the hypothesis that the neuroadaptative changes induced by amphetamine produce alterations in brain RAS components that are involved in the expression of the locomotor sensitization to the psychostimulant drug. Wistar male rats, pretreated with amphetamine were used 7 or 21 days later to study AT1 receptors by immunohistochemistry and western blot and also angiotensinogen mRNA and protein in caudate putamen and nucleus accumbens. A second group of animals was used to explore the possible role of Ang II AT1 receptors in the expression of behavioral sensitization. In these animals treated in the same way, bearing intra-cerebral cannula, the locomotor activity was tested 21 days later, after an amphetamine challenge injection and the animals received an AT1 blocker, losartan, or saline 5min before the amphetamine challenge. An increase of AT1 receptor density induced by amphetamine was found in both studied areas and a decrease in angiotensinogen mRNA and protein only in CPu at 21 days after treatment; meanwhile, no changes were established in NAcc. Finally, the increased locomotor activity induced by amphetamine challenge was blunted by losartan administration in CPu. No differences were detected in the behavioral sensitization when the AT1 blocker was injected in NAcc. Our results support the hypothesis of a key role of brain RAS in the neuroadaptative changes induced by amphetamine.

El estres oxidativo como mecanismo de accion del plomo. Implicancias terapeuticas / Oxidative stress as a mechanism of action of lead. Therapeutic implications

El plomo (Pb) es un metal no esencial altamente toxico que afecta a diversos organos y tejidos. Si bien aun no ha sido descripto un mecanismo unico mediante el cual este metal ejerce sus efectos toxicos, un gran numero de estudios han puesto en evidencia el rol fundamental del estres oxidativo en la intoxicacion por Pb. A este respecto, ha sido informado que en la intoxicaci¨®n por Pb el estres oxidativo puede ocurrir a diferentes niveles: por generacion de acido ¦Ã-aminolevulinico (¦Ã-ALA), por la capacidad per se que posee el Pb para inducir peroxidacion lipidica en presencia de ion ferroso (Fe2+), o por deplecion de glutati¨®n (GSH) y enzimas antioxidantes. Sobre la base de estos antecedentes, el objetivo de esta revision es presentar evidencias recientes sobre la implicancia del estres oxidativo en los efectos adversos ocasionados por Pb, destacar la posibilidad de utilizacion de biomarcadores de estres oxidativo como un metodo complementario al diagnostico temprano de exposicion y revelar la importancia de los compuestos antioxidantes como nuevas herramientas en la prevencion y tratamiento de la intoxicacion por este metal.

Lead (Pb) is a highly toxic non-essential metal that affects different organs and tissues. Although at the present a unique mechanism by which this metal exerts its toxic effects has not been described, a large number of studies have highlighted the fundamental role of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of Pb poisoning. In this regard, it has been reported that Pb-induced oxidative stress can occur at different levels: by the generation of ¦Ã-aminolevulinic acid (¦Ã-ALA), through its ability to induce lipid peroxidation in the presence of ferrous ion (Fe2+), or via glutathione (GSH) or antioxidant enzyme depletion. On the basis of these antecedents, the aim of this review is to present recent evidence regarding the implication of oxidative stress in the adverse effects caused by Pb, to emphasize the possibility to use oxidative stress biomarkers as a complementary method for early detection of Pb exposure, and to reveal the importance of antioxidant compounds as novel tools in the prevention and treatment of Pb exposure.

Decrease of lymphoproliferative response by amphetamine is mediated by dopamine from the nucleus accumbens: influence on splenic met-enkephalin levels.

Despite the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic pathway being one of the main substrates underlying stimulating and reinforcing effects induced by psychostimulant drugs, there is little information regarding its role in their effects at the immune level. We have previously demonstrated that acute exposure to amphetamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) induced an inhibitory effect on the splenic T-cell proliferative response, along with an increase in the methionine(met)-enkephalin content at limbic and immune levels, 4 days after drug administration. In this study, we investigated if a possible dopamine mechanism underlies these amphetamine-induced effects by administering D1 and D2 dopaminergic antagonists or a dopaminergic terminal neurotoxin before the drug. Pre-treatment with either SCH-23390 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) or raclopride (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), a D1 or D2 dopaminergic receptor antagonist, respectively, abrogated the effects of amphetamine on the lymphoproliferative response and on met-enkephalin levels of the spleen. The amphetamine-induced increase in limbic met-enkephalin content was suppressed by SCH-23390 but not by raclopride pre-treatment. Finally, an intra-accumbens 6-hydroxy-dopamine injection administered 2 weeks previously prevented amphetamine-induced effects on the lymphoproliferative response and on met-enkephalin levels in the prefrontal cortex and spleen. These findings strongly suggest that D1 and D2 dopaminergic receptors are involved in amphetamine-induced effects at immune level as regards the lymphoproliferative response and the changes in spleen met-enkephalin content, whereas limbic met-enkephalin levels were modulated only by the D1 dopaminergic receptors. In addition, this study showed that a mesolimbic component modulated amphetamine-induced effects on the immune response, as previously shown at a behavioral level.

Sensitization to amphetamine occurs simultaneously at immune level and in met-enkephalin of the nucleus accumbens and spleen: an involved NMDA glutamatergic mechanism.

Administration of psychostimulants can elicit a sensitized response to the stimulating and reinforcing properties of the drugs, although there is scarce information regarding their effects at immune level. We previously demonstrated that an acute exposure to amphetamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) induced an inhibitory effect on the splenic T-cell proliferative response, along with an increase in met-enkephalin at limbic and immune levels, 4 days following drug administration. In this study, we evaluated the amphetamine-induced effects at weeks one and three after the same single dose treatment (5 mg/kg, i.p.) on the lymphoproliferative response and on the met-enkephalin in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), prefrontal cortex (PfC), spleen and thymus. It was demonstrated that these effects disappeared completely after three weeks, although re-exposure to an amphetamine challenge induced the expression of sensitization to the effects of amphetamine on the lymphoproliferative response and on the met-enkephalin from NAc, spleen and thymus, but not in the PfC. Pre-treatment with MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) glutamatergic receptor antagonist, blocked the effects of a single amphetamine exposure on the lymphoproliferative response and on met-enkephalin in the NAc and spleen. Furthermore, the NMDA receptor antagonist administered prior to amphetamine challenge also blocked the expression of sensitization in both parameters evaluated. These findings show a long-lasting amphetamine-induced sensitization phenomenon at the immune level in a parallel way to that occurring in the limbic and immune enkephalineric system. A glutamate mechanism is implied in the long-term amphetamine-induced effects at immune level and in the met-enkephalin from NAc and spleen.

A dopamine mechanism is implied in the acquisition and expression of amphetamine and stress-induced effects observed in the lymphocyte subpopulations.

Drugs of abuse and stress are associated with changes in circulating cell populations and reductions in cell-mediated immune responses. The main goal of this study was to determine the influence of repeated and acute d-amphetamine treatments on the foot-shock stress-induced effects on the peripheral lymphocyte subpopulations, and the involvement of a dopamine mechanism in the development and expression of this phenomenon. Wistar rats received an acute (5 mg/kg/day i.p.) or a repeated (2 mg/kg/day i.p. during 9 days) amphetamine treatment, and were exposed to a foot-shock stress (1 mA, 3 s) 4 days after the last amphetamine injection. Another group was administered with haloperidol (1 mg/kg/day i.p.) 15 min previous to each daily amphetamine injection or previous to the foot-shock stress session. Then, blood cells stained with monoclonal antibodies against CD3-FITC, CD8-PE and CD4-Cy-Chrome, and against CD161a-FITC, CD3-PE, and CD45RA-Cy-Crhome, were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry. The exposure to a foot-shock stress induced a decrease in the absolute number of peripheral lymphocytes, as well as in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and B-cells in acute and repeatedly amphetamine-treated rats, whereas the NK-cell population remained unchanged. Haloperidol administration previous to each drug administration or the foot-shock stress session reversed these effects. This study provides strong evidence that dopamine can play a more general role in the influence of amphetamine on the stress-induced effects on the lymphocyte subsets.

Influence of acute or repeated restraint stress on morphine-induced locomotion: involvement of dopamine, opioid and glutamate receptors.

The development of restraint stress-induced sensitization to the locomotor stimulating effect of morphine (2 mg/kg i.p.) was investigated. In experiment 1, both a single restraint session (2 h) and a repeated restraint stress (2 h per day for 7 days), similarly enhanced the effects of morphine on motor activity. In experiment 2, we observed that this sensitization was prevented by administration of both D(1) and D(2) dopaminergic antagonist [SCH-23390 (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) and (+/-)-sulpiride (60 mg/kg i.p.)] 10 min prior to the stress session. In experiment 3, we showed that an opioid antagonist pretreatment [naltrexone (1 mg/kg i.p.) 10 min prior to stress session, suppressed the stress-induced sensitization after morphine administration. In experiment 4, pretreatment with a non-competitive antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type of glutamate receptors [(+)-MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg i.p.)], 30 min prior to the acute restraint session, prevented the development of sensitization to morphine. All these results suggest that: (1) sensitization to morphine on stimulating locomotor effect does not depend on the length of exposure to stress (acute vs. repeated); (2) stimulation of both D(1) and D(2) dopaminergic receptors is necessary for the development of restraint stress-induced sensitization to morphine; (3) an opioid system is also involved in this sensitization process; and (4) the stimulation of glutamatergic NMDA receptors is involved in this acute restraint-induced effect.

Motivational effects mu- and kappa-opioid agonists following acute and chronic restraint stress: involvement of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors.

The influence of both acute and chronic restraint stress on the rewarding properties of morphine (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg i.p.) and the aversive effects of naloxone (0.5 mg/kg i.p. x3 or 1.0 mg/kg i.p.) or bremazocine (0.4 mg/kg i.p.) was investigated. An acute (2 h) but not chronic restraint (2 h daily for 7 days) enhanced the morphine place preference, and elicited a place aversion with a subthreshold dose of bremazocine. This enhancing effect on the reinforcing properties induced by the drugs was prevented by either R(+)-SCH-23390 hydrochloride (R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H3-benzazepine, 30 microg/kg i.p.) or (+/-)-sulpiride (60 mg/kg i.p.), 10-20 min prior to the stress session. Naltrexone pretreatment (1 mg/kg i.p.) abolished the stress effect on morphine place preference but not that on bremazocine aversion. Instead, nor-BNI (30 microg/3 microl i.c.v.) abolished the stress's effects on bremazocine aversion, but did not modify those on morphine preference. These results show that: (1) acute stress enhanced the morphine and bremazocine conditioned reinforcing effects meanwhile chronic stress did not modify them; (2) the stimulation of D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors is necessary for the development of restraint stress-induced sensitization to the conditioned reinforcing effects of drugs; and (3) the stimulation mu/delta- and kappa-opioid receptors seems to be differentially involved.