Incidence and risk factors of tuberculosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a multi-center prospective cohort study.

Objectives: Both burdens of tuberculosis (TB) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in China are ranked as top three in the world. SLE patients are at high risk for TB, but so far, there are no guidelines for TB prevention and management targeting this population in China. This study aims to investigate the incidence of active tuberculosis (ATB) and to explore the risk factors for developing ATB in SLE patients, and to provide evidence for TB prevention and management for SLE patients in China. Methods: A multi-center prospective cohort study was conducted. SLE patients were enrolled from clinics and wards of 13 tertiary hospitals in Eastern, Middle, and Western China from September 2014 to March 2016. Baseline demographic features, TB infection status, clinical information, and laboratory data were collected. ATB development was examined during follow-up visits. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to plot survival curves, and Log-rank test was used to evaluate differences. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to explore the risk factors for ATB development. Results: With a median follow-up time of 58 months [interquartile range (IQR): 55-62], 16 out of 1361 SLE patients developed ATB. The 1-year incidence of ATB was 368 [95% confidence interval (CI): 46-691] per 100,000. Over a 5-year period, the cumulative incidence of ATB was 1141 [95% CI: 564-1718] per 100,000, and the incidence density was 245 per 100,000 person-years. Cox regression models were constructed with maximum daily dose of glucocorticoids (GCs) as a continuous variable and a categorical variable, respectively. In model 1, maximum daily dose of GCs (pills per day) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.30, p=0.010] and TB infection (aHR=8.52, 95%CI: 3.17-22.92, p<0.001) were independent risk factors for ATB development. In model 2, maximum daily dose of GCs≥30 mg/d (aHR =4.81, 95%CI: 1.09-22.21, P=0.038) and TB infection (aHR=8.55, 95%CI: 3.18-23.00, p<0.001] were independent risk factors for ATB development. Conclusions: SLE patients had a higher incidence of ATB compared to the general population. The risk of developing ATB was even higher with increased daily dose of GCs or in a status of TB infection, in which case TB preventive treatment should be considered.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in febrile patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing active tuberculosis (ATB) in febrile patients, to explore influencing factors of positive results and to verify the potential value of QFT-Plus in the identification of ATB and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). METHODS: A total of 240 febrile patients with ATB (n = 80) and non-ATB (n = 160) were recruited to assess the accuracy of QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of positive results. RESULTS: The proportion of indeterminate results (ITRS) in QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB were 3.3% and 0%, respectively. The consistency between the results of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was substantial. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB was 0.792 and 0.849 (p = 0.070), respectively. The sensitivity of differentiating ATB from non-ATB was 92.2% in QFT-Plus versus 95.0% in T-SPOT.TB. The influencing factors of T-SPOT.TB positive result were male (odds ratio (OR) = 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-4.26, p = 0.006), evidence of previous TB (OR 11.36, 95% CI 4.62-27.94, p < 0.001), while male (OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.73-5.84, p < 0.001), evidence of previous TB (OR = 7.58, 95% CI 3.60-15.98, p <0.001), and use of immunosuppressant (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.260.94, p = 0.030) were influencing factors for QFT-Plus positive result. There was no significant difference in QFT-Plus in differentiating ATB from LTBI in febrile patients. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB in febrile patients. QFT-Plus is prone to ITRS. The influencing factors including males, evidence of the previous TB, and use of immunosuppressant should be considered when interpreting positive results.