Clinical utility of liquid biopsy and integrative genomic profiling in early-stage and oligometastatic cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy and Integrative Genomic Profiling (IGP) are yet to be implemented into routine Radiation Oncology. Here we assess the utility of germline, tumour and circulating cell-free DNA-based genomic analyses for the clinical management of early-stage and oligometastatic cancer patients treated by precision radiotherapy. METHODS: We performed germline, tissue- and liquid biopsy NGS panels on 50 early-stage/oligometastatic cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. We also monitored ctDNA variants in serial liquid biopsies collected during radiotherapy and follow-up and evaluated the clinical utility of such comprehensive approach. RESULTS: The integration of different genomic studies revealed that only 1/3 of the liquid biopsy variants are of tumour origin. Altogether, 55 tumour variants (affecting 3/4 of the patients) were considered potentially actionable (for treatment and prognosis), whereas potential follow-up biomarkers were identified in all cases. Germline cancer-predisposing variants were present in three patients, which would have not been eligible for hereditary cancer testing according to clinical guidelines. The presence of detectable ctDNA variants before radiotherapy was associated with progression-free survival both in oligometastatic patients and in those with early-stage. CONCLUSIONS: IGP provides both valuable and actionable information for personalised decision-making in Radiation Oncology.

Clinical Impact of Genetic Diagnosis of Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults.

HYPOTHESIS: Adult genetic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) may be underestimated. BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of genetic hearing loss is challenging, given its extreme genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, particularly in adulthood. This study evaluated the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the etiological diagnosis of adult-onset SNHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults (>16 yr old) with SNHL were recruited at the Otolaryngology Department at Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (Spain). Environmental factors, acoustic trauma, endolymphatic hydrops, and age-related hearing loss were excluding criteria. An NGS gene panel was used, including 196 genes (OTOgenics v3) or 229 genes (OTOgenics v4) related to syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the study (average age at the onset of SNHL, 41 yr). Fifteen pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants considered to be causative were found in 15 patients (23% diagnostic yield) in TECTA (4), KCNQ4 (3), GJB2 (2), ACTG1 (1), COL2A1 (1), COCH (1), COCH/COL2A1 (1), STRC (1), and ABHD12 (1). Three patients had syndromic associations (20% of patients with genetic diagnosis) that had not been previously diagnosed (two Stickler type I and one polyneuropathy, hearing loss, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa, cataract syndrome). Seven variants of unknown significance were found in COL11A1 (1), GSMDE (2), DNTM1 (1), SOX10 (1), EYA4 (1), and TECTA (1). CONCLUSION: NGS gene panels can provide diagnostic yields greater than 20% for adult SNHL, with a significant proportion of variant of unknown significance that could potentially contribute to increasing diagnostic output. Identifying a genetic cause enables genetic counseling, provides prognostic information and can reveal unrecognized syndromes contributing to an accurate management of their associated manifestations.

Comprehensive genomic diagnosis of inherited retinal and optical nerve disorders reveals hidden syndromes and personalized therapeutic options.

PURPOSE: In the era of precision medicine, genomic characterization of blind patients is critical. Here, we evaluate the effects of comprehensive genetic analysis on the etiologic diagnosis of potentially hereditary vision loss and its impact on clinical management. METHODS: We studied 100 non-syndromic and syndromic Spanish patients with a clinical diagnosis of blindness caused by alterations on the retina, choroid, vitreous and/or optic nerve. We used a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (OFTALMOgenics™), developed and validated within this study, including up to 362 genes previously associated with these conditions. RESULTS: We identified the genetic cause of blindness in 45% of patients (45/100). A total of 28.9% of genetically diagnosed cases (13/45) were syndromic and, of those, in 30.8% (4/13) extraophthalmic features had been overlooked and/or not related to visual impairment before genetic testing, including cases with Mainzer-Saldino, Bardet-Biedl, mucolipidosis and MLCRD syndromes. In two additional cases-syndromic blindness had been proposed before, but not specifically diagnosed, and one patient with Heimler syndrome had been misdiagnosed as an Usher case before testing. 33.3% of the genetically diagnosed patients (15/45) had causative variants in genes targeted by clinical trials exploring the curative potential of gene therapy approaches. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive genomic testing provided clinically relevant insights in a large proportion of blind patients, identifying potential therapeutic opportunities or previously undiagnosed syndromes in 42.2% of the genetically diagnosed cases (19/45).

Clinical utility of next-generation sequencing in the aetiological diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss in a Childhood Hearing Loss Unit. / Utilidad clínica de la secuenciación de nueva generación en el diagnóstico etiológico de la hipoacusia neurosensorial en una Unidad de Hipoacusia Infantil.

INTRODUCTION: Sensorineural hearing loss (SNL) is the most prevalent sensory deficit in our environment. Next generation genomic sequencing (NGS) enables an aetiological diagnosis in a high percentage of patients. Our pilot study shows the results of the systematic application of NGS in a Childhood Hearing Loss Unit, as well as its implications for the clinical management of patients and their families. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We included 27 patients diagnosed with SNL between 2014 and 2017, in which an environmental cause was ruled out. The genetic test consisted of a panel of genes analyzed by NGS (OTOgenicsTM panel). This panel has been designed to include genes associated with sensorineural or mixed hearing loss, early onset or late, syndromic and non-syndromic, regardless of their inheritance pattern. RESULTS: A genetic diagnosis was obtained in 56% (15/27) of the patients (62% in the case of bilateral SNL). Of the patients, 5/27 (19%) presented pathogenic variants in the GJB2 gene and the rest pathogenic and / or probably pathogenic variants in other genes associated with isolated SNL (PR2X2, TECTA and STRC), with syndromic SNL (CHD7, GATA3, COL4A5, MITF and SOX10) or with syndromic and non-syndromic SNL (BSND, ACTG1 and CDH23). DISCUSSION: The aetiological diagnosis of SNL is a challenge in clinical practice. Our series demonstrates that it is possible to implement genetic diagnosis in the care routine and that this information has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Comprehensive genomic diagnosis of non-syndromic and syndromic hereditary hearing loss in Spanish patients.

BACKGROUND: Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the most common sensory impairment. Comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become the standard for the etiological diagnosis of early-onset SNHL. However, accurate selection of target genomic regions (gene panel/exome/genome), analytical performance and variant interpretation remain relevant difficulties for its clinical implementation. METHODS: We developed a novel NGS panel with 199 genes associated with non-syndromic and/or syndromic SNHL. We evaluated the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the panel on 1624 known single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels on a mixture of genomic DNA from 10 previously characterized lymphoblastoid cell lines, and analyzed 50 Spanish patients with presumed hereditary SNHL not caused by GJB2/GJB6, OTOF nor MT-RNR1 mutations. RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity of the test to detect SNVs and indels on the DNA mixture from the cell lines was > 99.5%, with a specificity > 99.9%. The diagnostic yield on the SNHL patients was 42% (21/50): 47.6% (10/21) with autosomal recessive inheritance pattern (BSND, CDH23, MYO15A, STRC [n = 2], USH2A [n = 3], RDX, SLC26A4); 38.1% (8/21) autosomal dominant (ACTG1 [n = 3; 2 de novo], CHD7, GATA3 [de novo], MITF, P2RX2, SOX10), and 14.3% (3/21) X-linked (COL4A5 [de novo], POU3F4, PRPS1). 46.9% of causative variants (15/32) were not in the databases. 28.6% of genetically diagnosed cases (6/21) had previously undetected syndromes (Barakat, Usher type 2A [n = 3] and Waardenburg [n = 2]). 19% of genetic diagnoses (4/21) were attributable to large deletions/duplications (STRC deletion [n = 2]; partial CDH23 duplication; RDX exon 2 deletion). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of precision medicine, obtaining an etiologic diagnosis of SNHL is imperative. Here, we contribute to show that, with the right methodology, NGS can be transferred to the clinical practice, boosting the yield of SNHL genetic diagnosis to 50-60% (including GJB2/GJB6 alterations), improving diagnostic/prognostic accuracy, refining genetic and reproductive counseling and revealing clinically relevant undiagnosed syndromes.