Decreased severity of COVID-19 in vaccinated pregnant individuals during predominance of different SARS-CoV-2 variants.

PROBLEM: Since the start of the pandemic, Pregnant individuals have been disproportionately affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Vaccination has been shown to be protective against severe disease. However, data on effectiveness of vaccine in reducing disease severity are limited in pregnant individuals who later developed COVID-19. METHOD OF STUDY: This is a single academic center retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 from December 2020 through January 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups based on vaccination status. The primary outcome of our study was progression to severe or critical disease. A secondary analysis was performed based on the timeframes of predominance of different variants of SARS-CoV-2, to determine whether the effect of vaccination was different during these epochs. RESULTS: Our cohort included 472 patients among which 125 (26.5%) were vaccinated and 347 were unvaccinated. None of the patients in the vaccinated group who later developed COVID-19 progressed to severe or critical disease compared to 7.2% in the unvaccinated one (p < .01). Similarly, after adjusting for medical comorbidities, obesity, receipt of monoclonal antibodies, and trimester at diagnosis, vaccinated individuals who later developed COVID-19 were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (1.6% vs. 14.7%, aOR .14, 95% CI .22-.47) compared with unvaccinated ones. CONCLUSION: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant individuals who later develop a breakthrough infection, is associated with decreased progression to severe or critical COVID-19, and need for hospital and ICU admissions. Vaccination is specifically effective during the predominance of the more severe Delta variant.

Using principal component analysis to examine associations of early pregnancy inflammatory biomarker profiles and adverse birth outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammation as a risk factor for preterm birth is well-established. The primary objective of this analysis was to examine whether individual cytokines versus a composite indicator of mid-pregnancy inflammation are significantly associated with risk for adverse birth outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-site prospective study was conducted in a socio-demographically diverse cohort of 610 pregnant participants. At a study visit between 12 and 20 6/7 weeks' gestation, low-grade inflammation was measured via log-transformed serum concentrations of the biomarkers IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-13, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and CRP. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify underlying dimensions of inflammatory activity from the seven biomarkers measured. Gestational age and birth weight at delivery were obtained from medical chart review. The associations between inflammatory profiles and birth outcomes were assessed via linear and logistic regression models. Results were compared with those from individual inflammatory biomarkers, and model fit was assessed using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS: Principal component analysis analysis yielded a two-factor solution, with the first factor (IF1) composed of IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, IFN-É£, and TNF-α, and the second factor (IF2) containing IL-6 and CRP. When adjusted for race, education, BMI, smoking status, gestational age at time of blood draw, and study site, a one standard deviation (SD) increase in IF1 remained significantly associated with a decrease in standardized gestational age (ß = -.13, 95% CI: -.21, -.05) and an increase in odds of preterm delivery (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.88) (Table 3). A one SD increase in IF2 was similarly associated with a decrease in standardized gestational age at delivery (ß = -.13, 95% CI: -.23, -.04) and an increase in odds of preterm delivery (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.05). Neither IF1 nor IF2 was associated with measures of fetal growth. AIC identified that IL-6 was a slightly better fit for length of gestation compared to either composite measure, though all performed similarly. CONCLUSION: Independent of known sociodemographic risk factors, an elevated mid-pregnancy inflammatory profile was associated with a nearly 50% increase in odds of preterm delivery. The composite performed similarly to IL-6. These results suggest that maternal low-grade inflammation is a risk factor for preterm delivery, and that mid-pregnancy inflammatory biomarkers may be useful in predicting risk for preterm delivery.

Lifetime Psychosocial Stress Exposure Associated with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) complicate 5 to 10% of all pregnancies and are a major cause of pregnancy-related morbidity. Exposure to psychosocial stress has been associated with systemic inflammation and adverse birth outcomes in pregnant women. Thus, it is probable that psychosocial stress and inflammation play a role in the development of HDP. The primary objective of this analysis was to determine if a woman's lifetime psychosocial stress exposure was associated with an increased risk of HDP. Additionally, we examined whether serum inflammation was an underlying biological mediator for this relationship. STUDY DESIGN: A multisite prospective study was conducted in a sociodemographically diverse cohort of 647 pregnant women. At a study visit between 12 and 206/7 weeks' gestation, maternal psychosocial stress was assessed with six validated assessments and inflammation was measured via log-transformed serum concentrations of interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-10, IL-13, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α. A composite stress score was calculated for each participant from the six stress assessments. The diagnosis of HDP was abstracted from the medical record and was defined as the presence of gestational hypertension after 20 weeks of pregnancy and/or preeclampsia. The association between composite stress and HDP was determined using binary logistic regression. Inflammation, using the six inflammatory biomarkers, was tested as a potential mediator between stress and HDP. RESULTS: Participants with higher composite stress scores were more likely to develop HDP (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-2.12). When adjusted for known risk modifiers, including maternal age, race/ethnicity, parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index, diabetes, chronic hypertension, and smoking during pregnancy, the risk remained unchanged (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03-2.20). No mediation effect by inflammation was observed. CONCLUSION: Independent of known risk factors, women exposed to greater composite stress burden across the life course are at increased risk of developing HDP. KEY POINTS: · This study was conducted to determine if women with high levels of psychosocial stress have differences in risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP).. · Independent of known risk factors, women with increased lifetime psychosocial burden are at higher risk for HDP.. · A model that captures multiple domains of life stress may better predict HDP than a unimodal stress assessment..