Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 127
Filtrar
2.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(1 Pt A): 102034, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37582457

RESUMEN

Cardiac biomarkers like troponin have become essential for detecting myocardial ischemia, a hallmark of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS), in the emergency department (ED). However, inappropriate and excessive biomarker testing can lead to false positive results, patient anxiety, and unnecessary treatment. Our study aimed to develop an appropriateness criterion for troponin testing and examine the long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of patients tested with troponin in the ED. We retrospectively evaluated 407 patients who underwent troponin testing at a tertiary-care northeastern US hospital. The majority (n = 252, 62%) of troponin testing was appropriate, with the remainder deemed inappropriate. Baseline characteristics were equally distributed between the 2 groups. Of the appropriately ordered troponins, 34% were positive compared to 28% of the inappropriately ordered troponins (range 0.04-0.10 ng/mL). Patients were followed over 540 days. MACE occurred in 21% and 10% of patients in the appropriate and inappropriate groups, respectively. Unlike the inappropriate group (3.5%), 96% of the events in the appropriate group occurred within the first 200 days. Patients in the appropriate group were at an increased adjusted risk of MACE (HR 2.55, 95% CI (1.59-4.08), P < 0.001) on long-term follow-up. In addition, MACE was comparable between patients with positive and negative troponins in the inappropriate group (HR 1.46, 95% CI (0.28-7.71), P = 0.65). Our study supports judicious troponin testing and the need for robust appropriateness criteria for ordering troponin in the ED to avoid overdiagnosis and inappropriate testing.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Humanos , Troponina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico
3.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 18(1): 255, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37658440

RESUMEN

Current myocardial infarction treatments focus on improving hemodynamics rather than addressing the problem of lost myocardium impairing left ventricular function. Epicardial infarct repair with a bioactive patch placed on the ischemic area is an emerging approach to promote endogenous myocardial repair. We report the use of a second-generation CorMatrix-extracellular matrix (ECM) patch as an adjunct to surgical revascularization in treating a young patient with diffuse, multivessel coronary artery disease unamenable to PCI and a large anterior myocardial infarction. The progressive myocardial scar shrinkage and increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from 10 to 51% are generally not observed with surgical revascularization therapy alone, suggesting this new patch has adjunctive potential to current revascularization therapy.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Matriz Extracelular
4.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 53(12): e14071, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37539630

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding optimal antiplatelet/antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective study including TAVR patients from 2012 to 2020, ischemic and bleeding outcomes were compared between antiplatelet (dual antiplatelet [DAPT] vs. single antiplatelet [SAPT]) and oral anticoagulation (OAC) groups using incidence rate, Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Total 492 patients (mean age 79.7 ± 7.7 years, 53.7% males, 83.5% Caucasian) were included. There was higher incidence of 1-year death or ischemia with DAPT vs. SAPT (23.6 vs. 14.8 per 100 patient-years [PY], incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-2.68, p = .05), especially in those without coronary artery disease (23.9 vs. 10.7 per 100 PY, IRR 2.24, 95% CI 1.10-4.47, p = .017). There was significantly higher major bleeding in those on OAC vs. no OAC (15 vs. 8 per 100 PY, IRR 1.87, 95% CI 1.10-3.11, p = .016), especially late (>1-year) bleeding (10.2 vs. 3.6 per 100 PY, IRR 2.81, 95% CI 1.33-5.92, p = .004). In multivariate analysis, DAPT was an independent predictor of death or ischemia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.96, p = .041). OAC was an independent predictor of major bleeding (aHR 2.32, 95% CI 1.31-4.13, p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: There is signal to harm with routine use of DAPT post-TAVR. There is higher incidence of late bleeding post-TAVR with OAC, suggesting potential role for alternate antithrombotic strategies.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Isquemia/etiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo
9.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 162(2): e183-e353, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972115
10.
Circulation ; 143(5): e35-e71, 2021 02 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33332149

RESUMEN

AIM: This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. Structure: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , American Heart Association , Cardiología/organización & administración , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/terapia , Estados Unidos
13.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 77(4): 450-500, 2021 02 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33342587

RESUMEN

AIM: This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.

16.
18.
JACC CardioOncol ; 2(3): 491-502, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396256

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related cardiotoxicity (iRC) is uncommon but can be fatal. There have been few reports of iRC from a rural cancer population and few data for iRC and inflammatory biomarkers. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ICI-treated lung cancer patients based in a rural setting and to assess the utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the diagnosis of iRC. METHODS: Patients with lung cancer treated with ICIs at Vidant Medical Center/East Carolina University (VMC/ECU) between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. MACE included myocarditis, non-ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), and pericardial disorders. Medical history, laboratory values, pre-ICI electrocardiography (ECG), and echocardiography results were compared in patients with and without MACE. RESULTS: Among 196 ICI-treated patients, 23 patients (11%) developed MACE at a median of 46 days from the first ICI infusion (interquartile range [IQR]: 17 to 83 days). Patients who developed MACE experienced myocarditis (n = 9), NSTEMI (n = 3), SVT (n = 7), and pericardial disorders (n = 4). Ejection fraction was not significantly different at the time of MACE compared to that at baseline (p = 0.495). Compared to baseline values, NLR (10.9 ± 8.3 vs. 20.7 ± 4.2, respectively; p = 0.032) and CRP (42.1 ± 10.1 mg/l vs. 109.9 ± 15.6 mg/l, respectively; p = 0.010) were significantly elevated at the time of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: NLR and CRP were significantly elevated at the time of MACE compared to baseline values in ICI-treated patients. Larger datasets are needed to validate these findings and identify predictors of MACE that can be used in the diagnosis and management of ICI-related iRC.

20.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 13(2 Pt 1): 357-369, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30878438

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the prevalence of reduced contractility and uncompensated wall stress in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and their impact on survival. BACKGROUND: LVEF in AS is determined not only by contractility but also by loading conditions. METHODS: Patients with first diagnosis (time 0) of severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA]≤1 cm2) with prior echo study (-3±1 years) were identified. Contractility was evaluated by plotting midwall fractional shortening (mFS) against circumferential end-systolic wall stress (cESS), stratified by LVEF of 60% at time 0. The temporal changes (from -3 years to time 0) and prognostic value of LVEF, contractility, and wall stress were assessed. RESULTS: Of 445 patients, 290 (65%) had LVEF ≥60% (median: 66% [interquartile range {IQR}: 63% to 69%]) and 155 patients (35%) had LVEF <60% (median: 47% [IQR: 34% to 55%]). Median AVA was 1.27 cm2 (IQR: 1.13 to 1.43 cm2) at -3 years and 0.90 cm2 (IQR: 0.83 to 0.96 cm2) at time 0. Decreased contractility was already present at -3 years (49 [17%] vs. 59 [38%]; LVEF ≥60% vs. <60%; p < 0.001) and became more prevalent at time 0 (69 [24%] vs. 106 [68%]; p < 0.001). Overall, wall stress was well controlled in both groups at -3 years (1 [0%] vs. 12 [8%]; p < 0.001) but deteriorated over time in patients with LVEF <60% (time 0: 0 [0%] vs. 26 [17%]; p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 3.4 years, LVEF <60%, decreased contractility and high wall stress were associated with worse survival (p < 0.01 for all). Decreased contractility remained incremental to LVEF in patients with LVEF ≥60% (p < 0.01), but less so when LVEF was <60% (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS, LVEF <60% is associated with a poor prognosis, being linked with decreased contractility and/or high wall stress. Decreased contractility is also present in a subset of patients with LVEF ≥60% and provides incremental prognostic value. These abnormalities already exist before AVA reaches 1.0 cm2.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Contracción Miocárdica , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estrés Mecánico , Factores de Tiempo , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...