Achievement of target LDL-cholesterol level in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The JET-LDL registry.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), current guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level < 1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL). METHODS: The JET-LDL is a multicenter, observational, prospective registry created to investigate levels of LDL-C in consecutive patients with ACS undergoing PCI at 35 Italian hospitals, and to report their lipid lowering therapies (LLT). Follow-up was planned at 1 and 3 months. LDL-C reduction >50% from baseline or level < 55 mg/dL at 1-month was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 1095 patients were included: median age was 67 (58-75); 33.7% were already on LLT. Baseline LDL-C levels was 105 (76.5-137) mg/dL. At hospital discharge all patients were on LLT: 98.1% received statins (as mono or combination therapy), ezetimibe and PCSK9i were used in 60.1% and 8.5% of cases, respectively. Primary endpoint was achieved in 62% (95% CI 58-65) of cases. At 1-month LDL-C levels dropped to 53 (38-70) mg/dL (p < 0.001 vs baseline) and it was <55 mg/dL in 53% (95% CI 49-57) of patients; however, PCSK9i were added to 7 further cases. At 3-months 58% (95% CI 55-62) of patients achieved the target level, but PCSK9i was added to only 11 new patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world registry of ACS patients undergoing PCI, recommend LDL-C levels were obtained in 62% of patients, but PCSK9i prescription was limited to 10% of cases. As LLT pattern appeared mainly improved at hospital discharge, an early and strong treatment should be considered.

Dual antiplatelet therapy prolongation in high-risk patients with prior myocardial infarction: insights from the post-PCI registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients surviving a myocardial infarction (MI) are at a heightened risk for recurrent ischemic events that can be reduced with the long-term addition of a second antithrombotic drug to aspirin. However, data about real prescription of this therapy are lacking and sometimes controversial. METHODS: We aimed to describe the incidence and the determinants of a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prolongation beyond 12 months in a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with prior MI undergoing PCI and features of high ischemic risk intended as age more than 65 years, second MI, type 2 diabetes mellitus, multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We analysed patients enrolled in the prospective 'Post-PCI' registry that included patients treated with PCI for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or acute coronary syndromes. At 12 months' follow-up, we collected data about DAPT prolongation in patients with prior MI and at least one of the previous features of high risk who did not experience ischemic and bleeding events during the follow-up. RESULTS: Among 1113 patients included in the registry, 778 (72%) presented the inclusion criteria for the present study: 434 (66%) were more than 65 years old, 245 (37%) had a second MI, 189 (29%) diabetes mellitus, 480 (73%) MVCAD and 216 (33%) CKD. Despite a DAPT being prescribed for 1 year in 86% of the patients, it was prolonged for over 12 months in 105 (16%) of them. At multivariable analysis, only second MI and MVCAD were independent predictors of DAPT prolongation in a model including age more than 65 years, diabetes mellitus, CKD and PCI on left main/left anterior descending coronary artery. We found no significant difference in DAPT prolongation according to a DAPT-score value at least 2 or based on the physician who actually performed the follow-up (clinical cardiologist, interventional cardiologist or other). CONCLUSION: In patients with prior MI and features of high ischemic risk undergoing PCI, the rate of DAPT prolongation beyond 12 months was low; recurrent MI and MVCAD appeared as its main determinants.

Management of diabetic patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes: a prospective multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) present an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. An Italian Consensus Document indicated 'three specific must' to obtain in this subgroup of patients: optimal oral antiplatelet therapy, early invasive approach and a tailored strategy of revascularization for unstable angina/non-ST-elevation-myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI); furthermore, glycemia at admission should be managed with dedicated protocols. AIM: To investigate if previous recommendations are followed, the present multicenter prospective observational registry was carried out in Lombardia during a 9-week period between March and May 2015. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 559 consecutive ACS patients (mean age 68.7 ±â€Š11.3 years, 35% ≥75 years, 50% STEMI), with 'known DM' (56%) or 'hyperglycemia', this last defined as blood glucose value ≥ 126 mg/dl at admission, were included in the registry at 29 hospitals with an on-site 24/7 catheterization laboratory. Patients with known diabetes mellitus received clopidogrel in 51% of the cases, whereas most patients with hyperglycemia (72%) received a new P2Y12 inhibitor: according to clinical presentation in case STEMI prasugrel/ticagrelor were more prescribed than clopidogrel (70 vs. 30%, P < 0.001); on the contrary, no significant difference was found in case of UA/NSTEMI (48 vs. 52%, P = 0.57).Overall, 96% of the patients underwent coronary angiography and 85% received a myocardial revascularization (with percutaneous coronary intervention in 92% of cases) that was however performed in fewer patients with known diabetes mellitus compared with hyperglycemia (79 vs. 90%, P = 0.001).Among UA/NSTEMI, 85% of patients received an initial invasive approach, less than 72 h in 80% of the cases (51% <24 h); no difference was reported comparing known diabetes mellitus to hyperglycemia. Despite similar SYNTAX score, patients with known diabetes mellitus had a higher rate of Heart Team discussion (29 vs. 12%, P = 0.03) and received a surgical revascularization in numerically more cases.Most investigators (85%) followed a local protocol for glycemia management at admission, but insulin was used in fewer than half of the cases; diabetes consulting was performed in 25% of the patients and mainly in case of known diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Based on data of the present real world prospective registry, patients with ACS and known diabetes mellitus are treated with an early invasive approach in case of UA/NSTEMI and with a tailored revascularization strategy, but with clopidogrel in more cases; glycemia management is taken into account at admission.