Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38038819

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Inconclusive and limited results have been reported on the clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotyping in stroke/TIA patients of non-East Asian ancestries. We herein performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to quantitatively estimate the association of CYP2C19 loss-of function (LOF) status with efficacy and safety of clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy in non-East Asian patients affected by stroke or TIA. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed up to July 2023 using PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases. The clinical outcomes investigated were stroke, composite vascular events and bleeding. Pooled estimates were calculated as risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI using the Mantel- Haenszel random-effects model. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADEpro tool. RESULTS: A total number of 1673 stroke/TIA patients from 8 non-East Asian studies, published between 2014 and 2022, were included in the systematic review. Clopidogrel-treated carriers of CYP2C19 LOF alleles were found at increased risk of stroke compared to non-carriers (RR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.04-2.71, P = 0.03). However, no significant association was observed with the risk of composite vascular events (RR: 1.15, 95%CI: 0.58-2.28, P = 0.69) or bleeding (RR: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.38-1.86, P = 0.67). Similarly, European ancestry patients carrying CYP2C19 LOF alleles displayed a higher risk of stroke (RR: 2.69 (1.11-6.51, P = 0.03), but not of composite vascular events or bleeding. CONCLUSION: The present updated meta-analysis provides moderate quality evidence of association between CYP2C19 LOF alleles and an increased risk of stroke in non-East Asian patients with stroke/TIA after receiving clopidogrel therapy. Further large pharmacogenetic studies are still warranted to corroborate these findings.

2.
J Gene Med ; 25(3): e3467, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36479790

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In order to clarify the role of the maternal apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), we herein performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to reevaluate the evidence on this association. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Knowledge and the Cochrane library up to September 2022. Methodological study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the credibility of significant pooled odds ratios (ORs) was estimated by the false positive report probability and the Bayesian false discovery probability. RESULTS: Twelve studies published from 2009 to 2022 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the overall analysis, the ε4 allele was found to confer an increased risk of RPL compared to the ε3 allele (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.00-2.55, p = 0.049) and women carrying the ApoE ε4 allele displayed a higher risk of RPL compared with those carrying the ε2 and ε3 alleles (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.06-2.87, p = 0.028). Subgroup analysis based on subjects' ethnicity revealed that these associations were restricted to the Asian population (ε4 allele vs. ε3 allele, OR 5.93, 95% CI 1.79-19.61, p = 0.004; ε4 allele carriers vs. carriers of ε2 and ε3 alleles, OR 8.42, 95% CI 1.47-48.12, p = 0.017). None of the associations detected were found to be noteworthy under false positive report probability or Bayesian false discovery probability at a prior probability of 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis highlights an association between maternal ApoE genotype and RPL risk in Asians, but not in Caucasians. Further case-control studies are warranted in women of Asian ancestry to exclude the possibility of false-positive findings.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Habitual , Apolipoproteínas E , Femenino , Humanos , Apolipoproteínas E/genética , Teorema de Bayes , Genotipo , Heterocigoto
3.
Rev Med Virol ; 32(5): e2336, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35218279

RESUMEN

The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of N95, surgical/medical and non-medical facemasks as personal protective equipment against respiratory virus infection. The study incorporated 35 published and unpublished randomized controlled trials and observational studies investigating specific mask effectiveness against influenza virus, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar and medRxiv databases for studies published up to 5 February 2021 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020214729). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of respiratory viral infection. The quality of evidence was estimated using the GRADE approach. High compliance to mask-wearing conferred a significantly better protection (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.82) than low compliance. N95 or equivalent masks were the most effective in providing protection against coronavirus infections (OR, 0.30; CI, 0.20-0.44) consistently across subgroup analyses of causative viruses and clinical settings. Evidence supporting the use of medical or surgical masks against influenza or coronavirus infections (SARS, MERS and COVID-19) was weak. Our study confirmed that the use of facemasks provides protection against respiratory viral infections in general; however, the effectiveness may vary according to the type of facemask used. Our findings encourage the use of N95 respirators or their equivalents (e.g., P2) for best personal protection in healthcare settings until more evidence on surgical and medical masks is accrued. This study highlights a substantial lack of evidence on the comparative effectiveness of mask types in community settings.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Máscaras , Metaanálisis en Red , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Eur J Neurol ; 29(4): 1209-1217, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Erenumab (ERE) is the first anticalcitonin gene-related peptide receptor monoclonal antibody approved for migraine prevention. A proportion of patients do not adequately respond to ERE. METHODS: Prospective multicenter study involving 110 migraine patients starting ERE 70 mg monthly. Baseline socio-demographics and migraine characteristics, including mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), migraine-related burden (MIDAS [Migraine Disability Assessment scale] and Headache Impact Test-6), and use of abortive medications, during 3 months before and after ERE start were collected. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to determine polymorphic variants of calcitonin receptor-like receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein-1 genes. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors for 50% responder patients (50-RESP) and 75% responder patients (75-RESP). RESULTS: At month 3, MMDs decreased from 17.2 to 9.2 (p < 0.0001), 59/110 (53.6%) patients were 50-RESP, and 30/110 (27.3%) were 75-RESP. Age at migraine onset (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (95% CI)]: 1.062 [1.008-1.120], p = 0.024), number of failed preventive medications (0.753 [0.600-0.946], p = 0.015), and MIDAS score (1.011 [1.002-1.020], p = 0.017) were associated with 75-RESP. Among the genetic variants investigated, RAMP1 rs7590387 was found associated with a lower probability of being 75-RESP (per G allele OR [95% CI]: 0.53 [0.29-0.99], p = 0.048]), but this association did not survive adjustment for confounding clinical variables (per G allele, 0.55 [0.28-1.10], p = 0.09]). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-word study, treatment with ERE significantly reduced MMDs. The number of failed preventive medications, migraine burden, and age at migraine onset predicted response to ERE. Larger studies are required to confirm a possible role of RAMP1 rs7590387 as genetic predictor of ERE efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Trastornos Migrañosos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/genética , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
Clin Transl Sci ; 15(2): 501-513, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34719115

RESUMEN

On October 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved remdesivir as the first drug for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), increasing remdesivir prescriptions worldwide. However, potential cardiovascular (CV) toxicities associated with remdesivir remain unknown. We aimed to characterize the CV adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with remdesivir using VigiBase, an individual case safety report database of the World Health Organization (WHO). Disproportionality analyses of CV-ADRs associated with remdesivir were performed using reported odds ratios and information components. We conducted in vitro experiments using cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cell cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) to confirm cardiotoxicity of remdesivir. To distinguish drug-induced CV-ADRs from COVID-19 effects, we restricted analyses to patients with COVID-19 and found that, after adjusting for multiple confounders, cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-3.29), bradycardia (aOR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.24-3.53), and hypotension (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.03-2.73) were associated with remdesivir. In vitro data demonstrated that remdesivir reduced the cell viability of hPSC-CMs in time- and dose-dependent manners. Physicians should be aware of potential CV consequences following remdesivir use and implement adequate CV monitoring to maintain a tolerable safety margin.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Farmacovigilancia , SARS-CoV-2 , Adenosina Monofosfato/efectos adversos , Alanina/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Miocitos Cardíacos/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Organización Mundial de la Salud
6.
J Pers Med ; 11(10)2021 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34683108

RESUMEN

Normal tissue radiosensitivity is thought to be influenced by an individual's genetic background. However, the specific genetic variants underlying the risk of late skin reactions following radiotherapy for breast cancer remain elusive. To unravel the genetic basis for radiation-induced late skin toxicity, we carried out targeted next-generation sequencing of germline DNA samples from 48 breast cancer patients with extreme late skin toxicity phenotypes, consisting of 24 cases with grade 2-3 subcutaneous fibrosis and/or grade 2-3 telangiectasia (LENT-SOMA scales) and 24 controls with grade 0 fibrosis and grade 0 telangiectasia. In this exploratory study, a total of five single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) located in three genes (TP53, ERCC2, and LIG1) reached nominal levels of statistical significance (p < 0.05). In the replication study, which consisted of an additional 45 cases and 192 controls, none of the SNVs identified by targeted NGS achieved nominal replication. Nevertheless, TP53 rs1042522 (G > C, Pro72Arg) in the replication cohort had an effect (OR per C allele: 1.52, 95%CI: 0.82-2.83, p = 0.186) in the same direction as in the exploratory cohort (OR per C allele: 4.70, 95%CI: 1.51-14.6, p = 0.007) and was found be nominally associated to the risk of radiation-induced late skin toxicity in the overall combined cohort (OR per C allele: 1.79, 95%CI: 1.06-3.02, p = 0.028). These results raise the possibility of an association between TP53 rs1042522 and risk of radiation-induced late skin toxicity in breast cancer patients; however, large replication studies are warranted for conclusive evidence.

7.
Headache ; 61(7): 1060-1076, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34309832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A plethora of studies have attempted to identify genetic determinants of disease susceptibility and treatment response of patients with cluster headache (CH), but results are often conflicting, and no comprehensive overview with a quantitative summary of the evidence in this field is available. METHODS: A systematic search of relevant publications was performed without any language restrictions on PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, and OpenGrey, up to December 2020. A standardized data extraction form was used to collect relevant data from each included study. Meta-analyses were conducted for gene polymorphisms investigated in at least two studies and the Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP) test was applied to the pooled odds ratios (ORs) to assess the credibility of the observed associations. RESULTS: Among the 27 articles identified by the systematic review, 17 studies evaluating 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were included in the quantitative data analysis. The pooled results showed no significant association with CH risk of 10 SNPs, including five SNPs of HCRTR2 (rs2653349, rs2653342, rs3122156, rs10498801, and rs3800539), two SNPs of ADH4 (rs1800759 and rs1126671), CLOCK rs1801260, and two SNPs (rs1006417 and ADCYAP1R1 rs12668955) previously identified by a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Conversely, the pooled results revealed the association of the HCRTR2 rs9357855 A allele with a higher risk of CH (A vs. G, OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.72, p = 0.026), and of GNB3 rs5443 with a higher response rate of patients with CH to triptan drugs (CT+TT vs. CC, OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.04-3.72, p = 0.038). However, assuming a prior probability of 0.001, the respective BFDP values being higher than 0.8 (BFDPrs9357855  = 0.998; BFDPrs5443  = 0.998) revealed lack of noteworthy results. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed GWASs and large replication studies are still needed to identify reliable genetic variants of disease susceptibility and treatment response of patients with CH.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple
8.
Int J Biol Sci ; 17(8): 2112-2123, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34131410

RESUMEN

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract that mainly affects young people. IBD is associated with various gastrointestinal symptoms, and thus, affects the quality of life of patients. Currently, the pathogenesis of IBD is poorly understood. Although intestinal bacteria and host immune response are thought to be major factors in its pathogenesis, a sufficient explanation of their role in its pathophysiologic mechanism has not been presented. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), which are small RNA molecules that regulate gene expression, have gained attention as they are known to participate in the molecular interactions of IBD. Recent studies have confirmed the important role of miRNAs in targeting certain molecules in signaling pathways that regulate the homeostasis of the intestinal barrier, inflammatory reactions, and autophagy of the intestinal epithelium. Several studies have identified the specific miRNAs associated with IBD from colon tissues or serum samples of IBD patients and have attempted to use them as useful diagnostic biomarkers. Furthermore, some studies have attempted to treat IBD through intracolonic administration of specific miRNAs in the form of nanoparticle. This review summarizes the latest findings on the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of IBD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , MicroARNs , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/genética , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/genética , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/metabolismo , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , MicroARNs/genética , MicroARNs/uso terapéutico , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/genética
9.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 51(3): 513-522, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33866147

RESUMEN

The incidence of autoimmune diseases is increasing worldwide, thus stimulating studies on their etiopathogenesis, derived from a complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors. Genetic association studies have shown the PTPN22 gene as a shared genetic risk factor with implications in multiple autoimmune disorders. By encoding a protein tyrosine phosphatase expressed by the majority of cells belonging to the innate and adaptive immune systems, the PTPN22 gene may have a fundamental role in the development of immune dysfunction. PTPN22 polymorphisms are associated with rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus, and many other autoimmune conditions. In this review, we discuss the progress in our understanding of how PTPN22 impacts autoimmunity in both humans and animal models. In addition, we highlight the pathogenic significance of the PTPN22 gene, with particular emphasis on its role in T and B cells, and its function in innate immune cells, such as monocytes, dendritic and natural killer cells. We focus particularly on the complexity of PTPN22 interplay with biological processes of the immune system. Findings highlight the importance of studying the function of disease-associated PTPN22 variants in different cell types and open new avenues of investigation with the potential to drive further insights into mechanisms of PTPN22. These new insights will reveal important clues to the molecular mechanisms of prevalent autoimmune diseases and propose new potential therapeutic targets.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Animales , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/genética , Autoinmunidad , Linfocitos B , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Proteína Tirosina Fosfatasa no Receptora Tipo 22/genética
10.
J Med Chem ; 64(8): 4410-4429, 2021 04 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33847110

RESUMEN

The World Health Organization assigns international nonproprietary names (INN), also known as common names, to compounds upon request from drug developers. Structures of INNs are publicly available and represent a source, albeit underused, to understand trends in drug research and development. Here, we explain how a common drug name is composed and analyze chemical entities from 2000 to 2021. In the analysis, we describe some changes that intertwine chemical structure, newer therapeutic targets (e.g., kinases), including a significant increase in the use of fluorine and of heterocycles, and some other evolutionary modifications, such as the progressive increase in molecular weight. Alongside these, small signs of change can be spotted, such as the rise in spirocyclic scaffolds and small rings and the emergence of unconventional structural moieties that might forecast the future to come.


Asunto(s)
Química Farmacéutica/tendencias , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/química , Terminología como Asunto , Flúor/química , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/química , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/metabolismo
11.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 86(5): 577-588, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33005979

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of trastuzumab biosimilars in comparison to the reference drug through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Open Grey and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Dichotomous data for efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled to obtain the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed with the Mantel-Haenszel method using Revman 5.3 software. RESULTS: Eight phase III RCTs including a total of 3913 patients with HER2 + breast cancer were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results for the comparison of trastuzumab biosimilars to the reference drug showed no differences of objective response rate (ORR) (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98-1.12, P = 0.20) or overall survival (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.09, P = 0.17) in the intention-to-treat population, as well as no difference of ORR (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.10, P = 0.30) in the per-protocol population. Similarly, no significant difference was detected in any type of adverse event reported in at least three RCTs, including any serious treatment-emergent adverse effects (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76-1.25, P = 0.83), heart failure (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.69-3.14, P = 0.32), neutropenia (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96-1.15, P = 0.26), and infusion-related reaction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.89-1.36, P = 0.38). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides compelling evidence of clinical comparability between trastuzumab biosimilars and the originator product in terms of both efficacy and safety for the treatment of HER2 + breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Neutropenia/epidemiología , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Reacción en el Punto de Inyección , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trastuzumab/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Brain Sci ; 10(10)2020 Sep 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33007889

RESUMEN

This study aimed to verify noteworthy findings between genetic risk factors and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by employing the false positive report probability (FPRP) and the Bayesian false-discovery probability (BFDP). PubMed and the Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) catalog were searched from inception to 1 August, 2019. We included meta-analyses on genetic factors of ASD of any study design. Overall, twenty-seven meta-analyses articles from literature searches, and four manually added articles from the GWAS catalog were re-analyzed. This showed that five of 31 comparisons for meta-analyses of observational studies, 40 out of 203 comparisons for the GWAS meta-analyses, and 18 out of 20 comparisons for the GWAS catalog, respectively, had noteworthy estimations under both Bayesian approaches. In this study, we found noteworthy genetic comparisons highly related to an increased risk of ASD. Multiple genetic comparisons were shown to be associated with ASD risk; however, genuine associations should be carefully verified and understood.

13.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(19)2020 Sep 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33008138

RESUMEN

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a relatively new condition described as an allergic-mediated disease of the esophagus. Clinically, it is characterized by dysphagia, food impaction, and reflux-like symptoms. Multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted to identify genetic loci associated with EoE. The integration of numerous studies investigating the genetic polymorphisms in EoE and the Mendelian diseases associated with EoE are discussed to provide insights into the genetic risk of EoE, notably focusing on CCL26 and CAPN14. We focus on the genetic loci investigated thus far, and their classification according to whether the function near the loci is known. The pathophysiology of EoE is described by separately presenting the known function of each cell and molecule, with the major contributors being eosinophils, Th2 cells, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1, and interleukin (IL)-13. This review aims to provide detailed descriptions of the genetics and the comprehensive pathophysiology of EoE.


Asunto(s)
Calpaína/genética , Quimiocina CCL26/genética , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Citocinas/genética , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/patología , Esófago/patología , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad/genética , Interleucina-13/genética , Células Th2/metabolismo , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta1/genética
14.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 39(1): 227, 2020 Oct 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33115526

RESUMEN

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease, whose main molecular trait is the MAPK pathway activation due to KRAS mutation, which is present in 90% of cases.The genetic landscape of KRAS wild type PDAC can be divided into three categories. The first is represented by tumors with an activated MAPK pathway due to BRAF mutation that occur in up to 4% of cases. The second includes tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) due to defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR), which occurs in about 2% of cases, also featuring a high tumor mutational burden. The third category is represented by tumors with kinase fusion genes, which marks about 4% of cases. While therapeutic molecular targeting of KRAS is an unresolved challenge, KRAS-wild type PDACs have potential options for tailored treatments, including BRAF antagonists and MAPK inhibitors for the first group, immunotherapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents for the MSI/dMMR group, and kinase inhibitors for the third group.This calls for a complementation of the histological diagnosis of PDAC with a routine determination of KRAS followed by a comprehensive molecular profiling of KRAS-negative cases.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Mutación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Patología Molecular , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
15.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(16)2020 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32784808

RESUMEN

Sarcopenia refers to a decrease in skeletal muscle mass and function. Because sarcopenia affects mortality, and causes significant disability, the clinical importance of sarcopenia is emerging. At first, sarcopenia was recognized as an age-related disease but, recently, it has been reported to be prevalent also in younger patients with autoimmune diseases. Specifically, the association of sarcopenia and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis has been studied in detail. Although the pathogenesis of sarcopenia in autoimmune diseases has not been elucidated, chronic inflammation is believed to contribute to sarcopenia, and moreover the pathogenesis seems to be different depending on the respective underlying disease. The definition of sarcopenia differs among studies, which limits direct comparisons. Therefore, in this review, we cover various definitions of sarcopenia used in previous studies and highlight the prevalence of sarcopenia in diverse autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, systemic sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and autoimmune diabetes. In addition, we cover the pathogenesis and treatment of sarcopenia in autoimmune and rheumatic diseases. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of sarcopenia in various autoimmune diseases and highlights the need for a consistent definition of sarcopenia.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico , Sarcopenia/epidemiología
16.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 12850, 2020 07 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732985

RESUMEN

Contrasting results exist on the association between CTLA-4 rs231775 and acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. We herein conducted an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to clarify this relationship and to establish whether the current evidence is sufficient to draw firm conclusions. In addition, noteworthiness of significant pooled odds ratios (ORs) was estimated by false positive report probability (FPRP). A comprehensive search was performed through PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library and Open Grey up to October 2019. Fifteen independent cohorts, including a total of 5,401 kidney transplant recipients, were identified through the systematic review. Overall, no association was detected with the allelic (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88-1.30, P = 0.49), dominant (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73-1.22, P = 0.66) or the recessive (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.97-1.43, P = 0.096) model of CTLA-4 rs231775. In each genetic model, the cumulative Z-curve in TSA crossed the futility boundary and entered the futility area. In addition, none of the significant genetic comparisons detected in the subsequent and sensitivity analyses or in previously reported meta-analyses were found to be noteworthy by FPRP. In conclusion, this study provides strong evidence that CTLA-4 rs231775 is not a clinically-relevant genetic risk determinant of acute rejection after renal transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Antígeno CTLA-4/genética , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Trasplante de Riñón , Resultados Negativos , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Riesgo
17.
J Clin Med ; 9(8)2020 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32726951

RESUMEN

(1) Background: The use of corticosteroids in critical coronavirus infections, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), or Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has been controversial. However, a meta-analysis on the efficacy of steroids in treating these coronavirus infections is lacking. (2) Purpose: We assessed a methodological criticism on the quality of previous published meta-analyses and the risk of misleading conclusions with important therapeutic consequences. We also examined the evidence of the efficacy of corticosteroids in reducing mortality in SARS, MERS and COVID-19. (3) Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were used to identify studies published until 25 April 2020, that reported associations between steroid use and mortality in treating SARS/MERS/COVID-19. Two investigators screened and extracted data independently. Searches were restricted to studies on humans, and articles that did not report the exact number of patients in each group or data on mortality were excluded. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) under the fixed- and random-effect model. (4) Results: Eight articles (4051 patients) were eligible for inclusion. Among these selected studies, 3416 patients were diagnosed with SARS, 360 patients with MERS, and 275 with COVID-19; 60.3% patients were administered steroids. The meta-analyses including all studies showed no differences overall in terms of mortality (OR 1.152, 95% CI 0.631-2.101 in the random effects model, p = 0.645). However, this conclusion might be biased, because, in some studies, the patients in the steroid group had more severe symptoms than those in the control group. In contrast, when the meta-analysis was performed restricting only to studies that used appropriate adjustment (e.g., time, disease severity), there was a significant difference between the two groups (HR 0.378, 95% CI 0.221-0.646 in the random effects model, p < 0.0001). Although there was no difference in mortality when steroids were used in severe cases, there was a difference among the group with more underlying diseases (OR 3.133, 95% CI 1.670-5.877, p < 0.001). (5) Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis providing the most accurate evidence on the effect of steroids in coronavirus infections. If not contraindicated, and in the absence of side effects, the use of steroids should be considered in coronavirus infection including COVID-19.

18.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 34(3): 100548, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32498977

RESUMEN

In the present study we systematically re-analyzed results from meta-analyses and genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to assess the credibility of genetic associations with acute rejection risk in renal transplantation. A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane library, and Open Grey up to July 2019. Methodological quality of systematic meta-analyses was assessed by the AMSTAR tool. Credibility of genetic associations was assessed by employing the Venice criteria and two Bayesian statistical approaches, the false positive report probability (FPRP) and the Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP). Sixteen systematic meta-analyses, with a moderate-high quality score (median AMSTAR score: 9, range: 6-11) and 1 GWAS fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, our systematic re-analysis has identified 9 polymorphic variants in 8 genes (ACE, CD28, CTLA-4, CYP3A5, IFNG, TNF-α, PTPRO and CCDC67) as potential risk factors for acute renal graft rejection. At the pre-specified prior probability of 0.001, the 2 SNPs identified by the GWAS (rs7976329 and rs10765602) showed no evidence of noteworthiness under FPRP or BFDP, indicating the possibility of false-positive associations. After applying the Venice criteria in combination with FPRP and BFDP to results from systematic meta-analyses, TT/AT vs AA of IFNG +874 T/A reached moderate epidemiological credibility, while weak evidence of association was found for all the other genetic comparisons. Well-designed GWASs and large replication studies with updated meta-analyses are still needed to identify reliable genetic predictors of acute renal graft rejection.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Trasplante de Riñón , Enfermedad Aguda , Antígenos CD28/genética , Antígeno CTLA-4/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Humanos , Peptidil-Dipeptidasa A/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Riesgo
19.
J Med Chem ; 63(18): 10170-10187, 2020 09 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32352778

RESUMEN

Since 1977, the World Health Organization publishes a list of essential medicines, i.e., those that satisfy the priority health care needs of the population and are selected with regard to disease prevalence and public health relevance, evidence of clinical efficacy, and safety, as well as comparative costs and cost-effectiveness. The Essential Medicines List (EML) is an invaluable tool for all countries to select those medicines that have an excellent risk/benefit ratio and that are reputed to be of pivotal importance to health. In the present perspective, we describe the chemical composition and the main features of the small molecules that are included in the EML, spanning from their origin, to their stereochemistry and measure of drug-likeness. Most and foremost, we wish to disseminate the importance of the EML, which can be both a helpful teaching tool in an ever-expanding world of medicines and an inspiration for those involved in pharmaceutical R&D.


Asunto(s)
Química Farmacéutica , Medicamentos Esenciales/química , Administración Oral , Medicamentos Esenciales/administración & dosificación , Formularios Farmacéuticos como Asunto , Humanos , Inyecciones , Estructura Molecular , Estereoisomerismo , Organización Mundial de la Salud
20.
PLoS One ; 14(11): e0225685, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31756226

RESUMEN

The relationship between the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) rs1801516 gene polymorphism and risk of radiation-induced late skin side effects remains a highly debated issue. In the present study, we assessed the role of ATM rs1801516 as risk factor for radiation-induced fibrosis and telangiectasia, using the LENT-SOMA scoring scale in 285 breast cancer patients who received radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery. A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was then conducted to assess reliability of the accumulated evidence in breast cancer patients. In our cohort study, no association was found between ATM rs1801516 and grade ≥ 2 telangiectasia (GA+AA vs GG, HRadjusted: 0.699; 95%CI: 0.273-1.792, P = 0.459) or grade ≥ 2 fibrosis (GA+AA vs GG, HRadjusted: 1.175; 95%CI: 0.641-2.154, P = 0.604). Twelve independent cohorts of breast cancer patients were identified through the systematic review, of which 11 and 9 cohorts focused respectively on the association with radiation-induced fibrosis and radiation-induced telangiectasia. Pooled analyses of 10 (n = 2928 patients) and 12 (n = 2783) cohorts revealed, respectively, no association of ATM rs1801516 with radiation-induced telangiectasia (OR: 1.14; 95%CI: 0.88-1.48, P = 0.316) and a significant correlation with radiation-induced fibrosis (OR: 1.23; 95%CI: 1.00-1.51, P = 0.049), which however did not remain significant after TSA adjustment (TSA-adjusted 95%CI: 0.85-1.78). These results do not support an impact of ATM rs1801516 on late skin reactions of radiotherapy for breast cancer, nevertheless further large studies are still required for conclusive evidences.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de la Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutada/genética , Rayos gamma/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Femenino , Rayos gamma/uso terapéutico , Genotipo , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Telangiectasia/diagnóstico , Telangiectasia/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...