Hypersensitivity transfusion reactions to fresh frozen plasma: a retrospective analysis of the French hemovigilance network.

Few data are currently available on hypersensitivity transfusion reactions (HTRs) after exposure to fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Between 2000 and 2018, three different FFP production strategies have been used in France, leading to the concomitant use of different types of FFP. The objective of this study was to describe the rate of FFP-related HTRs and to assess the relative risk of each type of FFP. HTR following FFP transfusion between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively extracted from the national hemovigilance database of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). Temporal evolution of the incidence of reactions was modeled using logistic regression. During the study period, the overall rate of FFP-related HTRs was 52.0 (95% CI 50.2-53.9) reactions per 100,000 units of FFP issued. The rate of FFP-related HTRs progressively increased over the study period, from 28.7 (95% CI 22.8-36.0) in 2000 to 88.9 (78.8-100.3) reactions per 100,000 units of FFP issued in 2018 (OR 1.08 [1.07 - 1.09], P < .001), whereas the rate of other types of adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) decreased. Between 2000 and 2014, its period of use, Solvent-Detergent-treated Apheresis FFP (SD-APH) was associated with the lowest risk of HTR. Our results indicate that although the rate of HTRs to FFP is low in France, the risk of having such a reaction has steadily increased between 2000 and 2018. A declarative bias is unlikely as the rate of other type of FFP-related ATRs decreased over the same period. The risk of HTRs to FFP is suggested to differ according to the processing of the FFP with a lower risk for SD-APH.

Hypersensitivity transfusion reactions to platelet concentrate: a retrospective analysis of the French hemovigilance network.

BACKGROUND: Among labile blood products, platelet concentrates (PCs) are the leading cause of hypersensitivity transfusion reactions (HTRs). These reactions often lead to interruption of PC transfusion and can result in a prolonged transfusion process leading to significant morbidity and use of premedication and close monitoring for patients with a history of allergic transfusion reactions. The French hemovigilance database is one of the largest standardized databases providing information on HTRs following administration of labile blood products. In this study, we analyzed this database to assess the relative risk of HTR for each type of PC. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: HTRs following PC transfusion were retrospectively extracted from the e-Fit Hemovigilance database of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). Frequencies were calculated using the number of specific PCs transfused. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2014, the overall estimated incidence of HTRs following PC administration was calculated at 232 HTRs per 100,000 PCs transfused. The rate of HTRs was significantly higher with apheresis PC (337/100,000) than with buffy-coat PC (94/100,000). Platelets in additive solutions (PAS) were associated with a significantly lower frequency of HTRs when compared with PCs in native plasma. Amotosalen/UVA- PCs (APCs and BCPCs) which are always in PAS in France, exhibited the lowest frequency of HTRs when compared with their corresponding PCs in native plasma or in PAS (p < 10-7 in all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the type of PC and its processing may have an impact on the risk of HTR.

Analysis of Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury and Possible Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury Reported to the French Hemovigilance Network From 2007 to 2013.

Using the French Hemovigilance Network database from 2007 to 2013, we provide information on demographics, incidence, and risk factors of reported transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and possible TRALI, analyze TRALI mitigation efforts for fresh frozen plasma and platelet concentrates, and consider the impact of platelet additive solutions on TRALI incidence. We applied the Toronto consensus conference definitions for TRALI and possible TRALI. Two TRALI subgroups were considered: "antibody positive" when a donor has human leukocyte antigen (class I or II) and/or human neutrophil antigen antibodies and the recipient has cognate antigen, and "antibody negative" when immunological investigation is negative or not done. The analysis targeted 378 cases, divided into antibody-positive TRALI (n=75), antibody-negative TRALI (n=100), and possible TRALI (n=203). TRALI patients were younger and received more blood components than the general population of transfused patients. Moreover, we identified the following clinical conditions where patients seemed to be at higher risk to develop TRALI: postpartum hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, liver transplantation, allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation, polytrauma, and thrombotic microangiopathy. Policy measures intended to reduce antibody-positive TRALI were found effective for apheresis platelet concentrates and fresh frozen plasma but not for whole blood-derived platelet concentrates. The use of platelet additive solutions was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of TRALI following transfusion of buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates but not following transfusion of apheresis platelets. Our data reinforce the concept that possible TRALI and TRALI, as defined in the Canadian consensus conference, share many characteristics. No specific policy measures are currently directed at mitigation of possible TRALI despite its impact on transfusion safety. Despite TRALI mitigation measures, the overall incidence of TRALI cases reported to the French Hemovigilance system was not significantly reduced. Therefore, additional research is needed to reduce, if not eradicate, all TRALI categories.