Simple acute postero-lateral elbow dislocation: A historical perspective.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to summarize (1) the historical knowledge of the posterolateral elbow dislocation (PLED) pattern and the biomechanical, radiographic, and clinical data that engendered its evolution; and (2) to help clinicians better understand the management of PLED. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Ovid, Scopus and Cochrane Library, and the Medical Subject Headings vocabulary. Results are discussed as a chronologic review of the relevant literature between 1920-2022. RESULTS: In 1966 Osborn and Cotterill were the first to describe posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) causing the PLED. Several theories on PLED were then published by others surgeons as our understanding of elbow biomechanics continued to improve. Multiple treatment protocols have been designed based on the aforementioned theories. Conservative and surgical treatment for PLED provides excellent functional outcomes. However, high rates of persistent pain stiffness and instability have been reported long-term, and no single approach to treatment has been widely accepted. CONCLUSION: Despite a growing body of biomechanical evidence, there is no consensus surgical indication for the treatment of PLED. Both conservative and surgical management result in satisfactory functional outcomes after PLED. However, elevated rates of residual pain, and instability have also been described and may limit heavy labor and sports participation. The next challenge for elbow surgeons will be to identify those patients who would benefit from surgical stabilization following PLED.

Primary repair of acute versus chronic ruptures of the distal biceps tendon. Comparison of functional results in a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: In the event of a rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii, most authors recommend early reinsertion to recover optimal elbow function. However, these ruptures are not always diagnosed or promptly referred to surgeons, thus creating a delay in treatment. Studies reporting functional results in cases of chronic repair (greater than 21 days) of the distal biceps brachii tendon show an increased rate of complications. HYPOTHESIS: Primary repairs of chronic ruptures (treatment delayed for more than 21 days) and acute ruptures of the distal biceps give the same functional results and the same rate of complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study between January 2017 and December 2021 comparing chronic primary repair of the distal biceps at the elbow (experimental group, comprising 75 patients) and acute (control group, comprising 135 patients) by endobutton. We analyzed the time between trauma and surgery, and assessed short- and long-term functional recovery by measuring residual pain (VAS), a collection of the following functional scores: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), as well as a measure of strength (as a percentage of the healthy side). We evaluated the rate of complications and radiographically analyzed the rate of heterotopic ossification. RESULTS: The mean time between trauma and surgery was 73±66 days (experimental group) versus 11.2±5 days (control group). In the short-term (4.79±2.09 months), there was no significant difference in the MEPS, Q-DASH and PREE functional scores between the two groups (p=0.354, p=0.412 and p=0.958, respectively). In the long-term (28.9±17.9 months), the functional evolution remained similar. The recovery of strength in flexion and supination was 89.19±13.43% and 77.48±16.68%, respectively, and similar in the two cohorts (p=0.476 and p=0.395). There was no difference in the rate of complications; however, the rate of heterotopic ossification was higher in the control group (p=0.006). DISCUSSION: The functional results and the recovery of strength did not change according to the time until surgery. Although the overall complication rate was similar, repairs of the biceps in less than 21 days led to more heterotopic ossification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective case-control study.

Chronic elbow instability in adults: The why, when and how of ligament reconstruction.

Chronic elbow instability in adults mainly consists of valgus instability and posterolateral instability. They most often occur because of ligament damage following elbow dislocation but can also occur due to repeated microtrauma. The aim of ligament stabilization surgery is always the same: recreate the anatomy and function of the original ligament. Extensive knowledge of the elbow's anatomical structures and biomechanics is crucial to understanding why the elbow is unstable and how to treat it. In this review, we will explain how elbow instability develops, what types of grafts are available and which reconstruction techniques can be used for posterolateral or valgus instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

How much acromial bone should be removed to decrease the critical shoulder angle? A 3D CT acromioplasty planning study.

BACKGROUND: A high critical shoulder angle (CSA) is associated with rotator cuff tear (RCT) and retear rate after repair. CSA reduced to less than 33° by acromioplasty is correlated with better clinical results and healing. But up to 24% of patients retain a CSA above 35° after acromioplasty. The objective of the study was to evaluate the use of 3D when planning acromioplasty and measure acromial bone removal volume dimensions. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans from 45 patients with RCT and CSA ≥ 38° were retrospectively included. A 33° CSA cutting plane was positioned. Acromion was divided into 5 mm slices and acromial bone resection measured on each slice. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility measurements were rated strong or very strong. Patients' mean preoperative CSA was 40° (38°, 49° ± 2.3°). Measurements of acromial resection were: anteroposterior length: 32.7 mm (20, 50 ± 7.4); inferior width: 7.6 mm (4.2, 19 ± 2.9); superior width: 4.1 mm (0, 16 ± 3.0); height: 6.1 mm (1.7, 6.7 ± 1.6); and cutting angle: 74° (46, 91 ± 8.0). Maximum width of acromial resection was located 10.6 mm (5, 17.5 ± 0.6) from the acromion's anterior edge and decreased gradually moving posteriorly. Preoperative CSA was linearly correlated with width (P < 0.0001, R = 84%) and length (P = 0.0001, R = 28%) of acromioplasty; the higher the CSA, the greater the width and length. CONCLUSIONS: 3D CT reconstructions are valid for planning a CSA decreasing acromioplasty. To reduce CSA to 33°, acromioplasty must be performed anterolaterally and resection is at least 2 cm long anteroposteriorly. For higher CSAs, acromioplasty may require lateral resection over 1 cm in width and up to 5 cm in length. To decrease the CSA efficiently, acromioplasty must be adapted to patient anatomy and 3D planning could be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis: Early results with a new technique combining ultrasonographic percutaneous tenotomy with platelet-rich plasma injection.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis [LE] remains difficult, with suboptimal results. This prospective study aimed to determine whether percutaneous epicondylar tenotomy combined with PRP injection under ultrasonography control would optimize the surgery results, with an early gain on pain and strength and a rapid return to professional activities at 3 months. The secondary objective was to determine whether clinical or biological risk factors (e.g., composition of the PRP) affected the outcomes. METHODS: A total number of 261 Patients with recalcitrant LE underwent percutaneous epicondylar tenotomy under ultrasonography control, coupled with PRP injection. All patients were clinically assessed using VAS pain scale, the functional scores: QuickDASH [Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand], Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation [PRTEE] and MEPS [Mayo Elbow Performance Score]; Elbow Self-Assessment Score [ESAS]; grip strength; and return to work. RESULTS: At 3-month follow-up, the VAS score decreased by 3.4 points (SD 2.2; p<0.0001), the QuickDASH decreased by 32.9 points (SD 18.9, range 56.1-23.1; p<0.0001), the PRTEE decreased by 14.8 points (SD 19.1, 49.8-26.4; p=0.017), and the MEPS increased by 19.4 points (SD 13.1, 67.4-86.9; p<0.0001); grip strength increased to 8.3kg (SD 10.7; p<0.0001) and increased by 26% (SD 0.60, 0.7-0.96; p<0.0001) as compared with the opposite side. The ESAS showed 78.3% improvement. CONCLUSION: Treatment of recalcitrant LE by percutaneous tenotomy combined with PRP injection under ultrasonography control provides rapid recovery in terms of pain and strength, with a high level of satisfaction and a high rate of early return to work. STUDY DESIGN: Case series.

Management of lateral epicondylitis.

Lateral epicondylitis is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain. Although also known as tennis elbow, lateral epicondylitis often develops as a work-related condition and therefore constitutes a major public health issue. This article reviews the pathophysiological factors involved in lateral epicondylitis, as well as the tools available for establishing the diagnosis and ruling out other causes of lateral elbow pain. Finally, the non-operative and surgical treatment options are discussed in detail.

Prospective comparative analysis of arthroscopic debridement for primary and post-traumatic elbow osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: The main aim of the present study was to compare the preoperative profiles and the efficacy of arthroscopic debridement for elbow osteoarthritis between patients with primary versus post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The study hypothesis was that the two groups would show no difference on either criterion. METHOD: In the framework of a symposium of the French Arthroscopy Society (SFA), a prospective comparative multicenter study included 87 patients with 6 months' follow-up of arthroscopic debridement for elbow osteoarthritis: 53 primary (G1) and 34 secondary (G2). Pre- and post-operative clinical assessment in both groups compared Andrews-Carson specific functional score for elbow osteoarthritis (main endpoint), and the QuickDash (QD), Patient-Related Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) functional scores, pain on VAS, range of motion (RoM) and strength. RESULTS: Arthroscopic debridement significantly improved all functional scores at 6 months, notably including the specific Andrews-Carson score, which showed gain in both groups: 68.5±28.7 (range, -5 to 110) in G1 and 62.6±25.4 (18 to 110) in G2 (P=0.35). Pain decreased significantly in both groups, by 5.1±2.6 points (range, 10 to 1) in G1 and 4.4±2.7 points (range, 8.5 to 1) in G2 (P=0.28). RoM in flexion-extension improved comparably in both groups, by 42.9±22.1 (-15 to 105) in G1 and 49.3±24.5 (10 to 90) in G2 (P=0.22). Strength in flexion improved comparably, by 7.6±4.7kg (-2 to 17.5) in G1 and 6.1±4.8kg (-1 to 13) in G2 (P=0.23). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The study hypothesis was confirmed: there were no differences according to primary versus secondary osteoarthritis in preoperative profile or results. Elbow osteoarthritis entails mechanical impingement. Arthroscopic debridement gave good results independently of primary or post-traumatic etiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prospective comparative observational multicenter cohort study.

Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the elbow: Results and analysis of predictive factors.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis is the second most frequent cause of elbow stiffness, after trauma sequelae. Surgical treatment mainly consists of debridement. The main aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow on Andrews-Carson score. Secondary objectives comprised assessment of the impact of associated procedures and of epidemiological factors on functional results. METHOD: A prospective multicenter study involving 8 centers, in a symposium held by the French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA), included patients treated by arthroscopy for primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the elbow between January 2017 and March 2018, with a minimum 6 months' follow-up. Clinical assessment was based on change in Andrews-Carson functional score (AC), specific to osteoarthritis of the elbow, and on other functional scores: QuickDash (QD), Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Self-Evaluation Elbow (SEE). Progression in pain on visual analog scale (VAS) and range of motion (RoM) was also assessed. Initial imaging work-up comprised standard X-ray and CT arthrography; paraclinical follow-up was based on X-ray. The impact of the following procedures associated to arthroscopic debridement was analyzed: radial head resection, ulnar nerve release, humeral fenestration, lateral ramp release, and medial collateral ligament posterior bundle release. The functional impact of epidemiological factors (age, handedness, manual occupation, smoking, body-mass index, and work accident/occupational disease status) and radiographic factors (foreign bodies, joint impingement, osteophytes, and fossa filling) was also assessed. RESULTS: The series comprised 87 patients: 75 male (86.2%); mean age, 49 years (range, 18-73 years). Arthroscopic debridement significantly improved all functional scores at a minimum 6 months, and notably the specific AC score: 113.6±25.4 (40-180) versus 178.7±20.2 (110-200) (P<0.0001). Pain diminished significantly: 6.4±2.1 (0-10) versus 1.7±1.8 (0-8) (P<0.0001). RoM increased significantly: flexion/extension, 93.44±20.5° (5-130°) versus 124.2±13.8° (90-160°) (P<0.0001); pronation/supination, 147.6±25.6° (60-180°) versus 162.5±20.6° (100-180°) (P<0.0001). Strength (kg) increased in flexion (8.8±4.0 (4 to 20) versus 15.3±5.1 (3 to 32) (P<0.0008) and in grip [33.1±12.3 (10 to 58) versus 42.1±14.0 (2 to 68) (P<0.0001)]. Epidemiologically, males showed better recovery than females for both pain and strength. There was a significant positive impact of manual work on functional recovery, pain and also strength. There was a significant negative impact of work-accident/occupational disease on pain and strength. Regarding associated procedures, lateral ramp debridement improved AC score, with a gain of 75.4±25.3 points (-5 to 110) vs. 49.6±23.5 (10 to 100) (P<0.0001), and pain on VAS, with a fall of -5.6±2.1 points (-10 to -1) vs. -3.6±3.0 (-8.5 to 1) (P=0.0013). Ulnar nerve release, radial head resection and humeral fenestration had no positive impact. Preoperative foreign body was a factor for good prognosis. Cartilage wear, especially in the humeroulnar compartment, was associated with poorer functional results. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow significantly improved clinical results at 6 months, with significant improvements in functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion. Gender, type of work and work-accident/occupational disease status influenced clinical results. Lateral ramp release is an often overlooked technical factor improving functional results. Radiologically, the best candidates are those presenting with a foreign body and no humeroulnar impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Prospective observational multicenter cohort study.

Can preoperative imaging predict the outcomes after arthroscopic release for elbow arthritis?

INTRODUCTION: The primary symptoms of elbow osteoarthritis are the progressive development of stiffness along with pain at the end range of motion due to osteophyte impingement. Surgical treatment involves resecting these "bone stops". In the literature, these osteophytic lesions are more common than cartilage lesions, which suggests they may occur beforehand. The aim of our study was to confirm osteophytes are more common than cartilage lesions, and also to establish a link between these lesions and the functional outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter (8 hospitals) study conducted in the context of a symposium of the Francophone Arthroscopy Society (SFA). Eighty-seven patients with elbow osteoarthritis treated by arthroscopic release were included. The clinical outcomes (range of motion in flexion, extension and pronation-supination; strength; pain at rest and during activity; satisfaction; Andrews and Carson score; QuickDASH, Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Self-Evaluation Elbow (SEE) were determined before the procedure and at the 6-month follow-up visit. A standard radiographic assessment was done before the surgery and at the last follow-up visit. A CT arthrogram was done before the procedure. The presence of joint narrowing, osteophytes, filling of fossa along with secondary osteochondroma was evaluated in terms of their location, severity, size and/or number. The presence of radial head subluxation was recorded. The Bröberg & Morrey and Rettig & Hastings classification systems were applied. All the postoperative clinical data along with their change (difference between preoperative and postoperative values) were compared to the imaging findings. RESULTS: Osteophytes were found in 95% of our patients. They were located at the olecranon in 85% of cases and at the coronoid process in 81%. Filled fossae found in 94% of cases. The olecranon, coronoid and radial fossa were filled in 83%, 80% and 60% of elbows, respectively. On the initial X-rays, joint narrowing was found in 68% of elbows. CT arthrogram identified narrowing in 70% of cases. Narrowing was present in the humeroradial joint in 60% of cases and in the humeroulnar joint in 23% of cases. The presence of joint narrowing on CT arthrogram was a negative prognostic factor for pain during activity (p<0.05) along with the Quick DASH (p<0.01) and PREE (p<0.05). Involvement of the humeroradial joint impacted pain at rest (p<0.01). Narrowing of the humeroulnar joint was associated with worse outcomes in terms of pain at rest (p<0.05) and during activity (p<0.05), QuickDASH (p<0.005), MEPS (p<0.05), PREE (p<0.05) and the SEE (p<0.05). The presence of loose bodies before the procedure was associated with better outcomes in terms of pain at rest (p<0.05), QuickDASH (p<0.001), MEPS (p<0.001), Andrews & Carson score (p<0.05) and PREE (p<0.005). The osteoarthritis stage in the Bröberg & Morrey or the Rettig & Hastings classification systems did not impact the various clinical parameters or functional outcome scores. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In the imaging work-up, signs of impingement (osteophytes and filling of fossa) are more common than signs of joint narrowing. The presence of humeroulnar and/or humeroradial impingement when there are no cartilage lesions visible may correspond to a pre-arthritic stage. The outcomes of arthroscopic release are better in elbows with isolated impingement than in those with cartilage lesions, especially at the humeroulnar joint. Excision of secondary osteochondromas is also an excellent surgical indication. Current classification systems cannot be used to determine the prognosis before arthroscopic release of elbow osteoarthritis cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Prospective multicenter observational cohort study.

Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis.

Elbow osteoarthritis chiefly affects heavy manual labourers and athletes and may be primary or post-traumatic. Arthroscopic debridement for primary elbow osteoarthritis reliably produces pain relief, motion range gains, and good functional outcomes. Total elbow arthroplasty, in contrast, is considered a salvage option in this patient population, as activities must be restricted to protect the implant. Here, we describe the operative technique used for arthroscopic elbow release in 87 patients with symptomatic elbow osteoarthritis included prospectively at 6 centres in a study that was conducted for a French Arthroscopy Society symposium and whose findings are reported elsewhere. The technique involves exploration of the anterior and posterior compartments with resection of motion-limiting osteophytes; clearing of the fossae; foreign body extraction; and treatment of the posterior and anterior capsule and of the lateral inclines. The indications of ulnar nerve release, radial head excision, release of the posterior band of the medial collateral ligament (MCL), and/or fenestration as described by Outerbridge-Kashiwagi are discussed. After 6 months, 93.5% of patients were satisfied with the procedure. No serious neurological complications were recorded. Wound healing was impaired in 4 patients, of whom 3 responded to local care; the remaining patient required open debridement for surgical-site infection. Complex regional pain syndrome developed in 3 patients. Ulnar nerve transposition was required secondarily in 1 patient and another patient had persistent dysesthesia after ulnar nerve release. This minimally invasive technique provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate.

Does the critical shoulder angle decrease after anterior acromioplasty?

INTRODUCTION: No clinical studies to date have analyzed the critical shoulder angle (CSA) following anterior acromioplasty. Our study's main objective was to measure the change in the CSA after acromioplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety patients were included in this retrospective series. The CSA and the type of acromion were evaluated before and after surgery. RESULTS: The average CSA for patients before surgery was 35.9° (± 3.7, 26.2, 44.2) and 33° after the acromioplasty (± 3.5, 24.8, 41.4). The decrease was significant and 2.9° on average (± 2.2, - 2.2, 11.9, p = 0.000). Preoperatively, 58% of patients had a CSA ≥ 35° (n = 52) and 24% postoperatively (n = 22, p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized anterior acromioplasty allows for a significant decrease in the CSA without lateral resection of the acromion. This study confirms the tight link between the CSA and the anterior acromion as well as the interest of this angle to quantify acromioplasty whether anterior or lateral. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case Series, Retrospective design.