Advanced Prescription of Emergency Contraceptive Pills Among Adolescents and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To examine healthcare providers' adherence to professional recommendations for advanced prescription of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 432 visits by 282 unique nonpregnant women 14 to 25 years of age seen at an obstetrics and gynecology teaching clinic to determine the percentage of visits during which advanced prescriptions of ECPs were provided when indicated. A logistic regression model, which accounted for nonindependent observations through generalized estimating equations, was used to identify factors associated with the provision of ECP advanced prescriptions. RESULTS: Approximately one-fifth of eligible visits (19.9%) and eligible patients (19.1%) had documentation of an ECP advanced prescription when indicated. Healthcare providers in this clinical setting were more likely to prescribe ECPs to adolescents and women whose primary contraceptive methods were associated with higher failure rates in typical use, such as condoms. Compared with women aged 20 to 25 years, the adjusted odds ratio of receiving an advanced prescription for ECPs was 5.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.85-12.41) for adolescents. Compared with users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.25 (95% CI 1.62-11.15) for condom users, and 3.90 (95% CI 1.54-9.86) for users of other short-term hormonal contraceptives. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clear professional recommendations for ECP advanced prescriptions for all women at risk for unintended pregnancy, a substantial gap exists between this standard of care and routine clinical service provision in an obstetrics and gynecology teaching clinic.

Promotion of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents and Young Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants are recommended as first-line contraceptives by health care professional societies. However, uptake among US women lags substantially behind other developed countries. Little information is available on the extent to which clinicians document discussion about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in this patient population. We sought to determine the frequency with which clinicians document LARC discussion with eligible women aged 14 to 25 years in a training clinic and evaluate factors associated with LARC discussion and uptake. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all visits of nonpregnant women aged 14 to 25 years seen at an obstetrics and gynecology resident physician clinic during a calendar year. A logistic regression model was used to assess demographic factors associated with LARC education and uptake. RESULTS: Among 450 visits by eligible patients, LARC discussion was documented during 47.8% (215/450) of visits. Among visits with documentation of LARC counseling, 45.6% (98/215) had documentation of a LARC placement plan. Among patients who decided to initiate LARC, 40.8% (40/98) had a device placed at the same visit. LARC placement was documented during 8.9% (40/450) of visits. Clinicians documented LARC counseling for women aged 14 to 19 years more frequently than for women aged 20 to 25 years. Compared with women who did not use any method of contraception, clinicians documented LARC counseling less frequently for women who used short-term hormonal contraception. DISCUSSION: Clinicians in a training clinic did not document LARC counseling for more than half of eligible patients. Every clinical visit is an opportunity to assess risk of unintended pregnancy and ensure that contraceptive needs are addressed.

Physician Adherence to Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Guidelines in an OB/GYN Teaching Clinic in Hawai'i.

Rates of chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (GC) have risen for the first time in the United States since 2006. Certain population groups are disproportionately affected by these sexually transmitted infections (STIs) as well as HIV. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and professional societies have published screening guidelines for these STIs for women under the age of 25. We aimed to quantify physician adherence to GC/CT and HIV screening guidelines and to determine demographic factors associated with GC/CT and HIV screening recommendations among women 14-25 years old in Honolulu, Hawai'i. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all visits to an OB/GYN teaching clinic in 2014 to determine rates of STI screening recommendations and evaluate differences in screening recommendations by demographic factors such as patient age, race, insurance type, visit type, and visit number during the study period. Electronic medical records of 726 visits by 446 patients were reviewed. Among visits by patients with indications for screening, 71.0% and 21.6% received screening recommendations for GC/CT and HIV, respectively. Age group, race, and visit type were significantly associated with receiving screening recommendations. A lack of appropriate documentation regarding the assessment of risk factors for GC/CT and HIV screening was observed. Emphasis should be placed on more thorough ascertainment and documentation of patients' risk factors for STI acquisition to determine screening needs at each clinical visit based on professional guidelines, as substantial public health benefits may be gained through the identification and prompt treatment of GC/CT and HIV infections.