Do Urine Cytology and FISH Analysis Have a Role in the Follow-Up Protocol of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a stringent follow-up regimen that includes interval cystoureteronephscopy, CT urography, and selective urine cytology sampling for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing endoscopic treatment and management. There are no recommendations regarding FISH analysis. Our purpose was to assess the efficacy of cytology and FISH as part of the follow-up protocol and its significance to clinical decision-making in this scenario. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who managed endoscopically for UTUC at our institute between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical data, histology, cytology, and FISH results were collected. FISH analysis was considered malignant according to Paris criteria. RESULTS: During the study period, 62 patients underwent 561 ureteroscopies as part of the treatment and follow-up regimen of low-grade UTUC. Urine from the affected upper tract was sampled for cytology in 377 procedures, and FISH analyses were performed in 273. In 75.4% of FISH analyses, the result was different from the cytology results: FISH found malignant aberrations in 15.5% of cases where cytology was benign. Furthermore, FISH classified all the cells defined as atypical via cytology as either benign or malignant. In only one case (0.17%), the urinary cytology report changed the follow-up regimen. CONCLUSION: Cytology may be omitted from the follow-up protocol of low-grade UTUC. In the handful of cases cytology does assist the diagnosis of UTUC, there is an additional benefit to performing FISH analysis, particularly when cellular atypia is reported in the cytology results.

Unveiling the Challenges in Tandem Ureteral Stent Management for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction: Failure Rate, Risk Factors, and Durability of Their Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) is a sequela of advanced malignant disease that requires renal drainage, with tandem ureteral stents (TUSs) being a viable option. This study aimed to evaluate the TUS failure rate, associated risk factors, and the feasibility of replacing failed TUSs with a new pair of stents. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of MUO patients treated with TUS insertion from 2014 to 2022 was conducted. TUS failure was defined as urosepsis, recurrent urinary tract infections, acute kidney failure, or new hydronephrosis on imaging. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified the independent predictors of TUS failure. RESULTS: A total of 240 procedures were performed on 186 patients, with TUS drainage failing in 67 patients (36%). The median time to failure was 7 months. Multivariate analysis revealed female gender (OR = 3.46, p = 0.002), pelvic mass (OR = 1.75, p = 0.001), and distal ureteral obstruction (OR = 2.27, p = 0.04) as significant risk factors for TUS failure. Of the failure group, 42 patients (22.6%) underwent TUS replacement for a new pair. Yet, 24 (57.2%) experienced a second failure, with a median time of 4.5 months. The risk factors for TUS second failure included a stricture longer than 30 mm (OR = 11.8, p = 0.04), replacement with TUSs of the same diameter (OR = 43, p = 0.003), and initial TUS failure within 6 months (OR = 19.2, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: TUS insertion for the treatment of MUO is feasible and has good outcomes with a relatively low failure rate. Primary pelvic mass and distal ureteral obstruction pose higher risks for TUS failure. Replacing failed TUSs with a new pair has a success rate of 42.8%. Consideration should be given to placing larger diameter stents when replacing failed TUS.

Strategies of Endoscopic Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma among Endourologists: A Global Survey.

Up-to-date guidelines on the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are continuously published. We aim to assess the variability of diagnosis and treatment strategies in the endoscopic management of UTUC and adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. A 15-question survey was designed to query practitioners on approaches to clinical practice and knowledge about endoscopic treatment indications and techniques. It was emailed to all members of the Endourologic Society through the society's office, and to all Israeli non-member endourologists. Eighty-eight urologists participated in the survey. Adherence to guidelines on indications for endoscopic management was only 51%. Most of the survey respondents (87.5%) use holmium laser for tumor ablation, and ~50% use forceps for biopsy while the other half use baskets. Only 50% stated that they would use Jelmyto® for specific indications. Most (80%) indicated that they repeat the ureteroscopy 3 months after the first one, and 52.3% continue with follow-up ureteroscopy every 3 months during the first year after diagnosis. There is vast variability among endourologists in the technical aspects of UTUC, the indications for endoscopic management, and adherence to the available guidelines for managing UTUC.

Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Adults-A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Laparoscopic (LP) and robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) are minimally invasive techniques for correcting uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of all adults who underwent RAP (n = 41) to those who underwent LP (n = 24) for UPJO at our institution between 2003−2022. Methods: Age, sex, body mass index, surgical side, past abdominal/endoscopic surgeries, pre- and postoperative renal scans, pre- and postoperative serum creatinine levels, operative time (OT), presence of crossing vessels, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, time to JJ stent removal, follow-up length, and postoperative hydronephrosis were analyzed. Results: The groups were demographically comparable. The mean total and skin-to-skin OTs (minutes) were significantly longer in the RAP group than in the LP group (242.4 ± 55 vs. 161.4 ± 40 p < 0.001; 163.7 ± 41.8 vs. 124.3 ± 30.3 p = 0.006, respectively). Hospital stay (days) was shorter in the RAP group (3.3 ± 2.1 vs. 7.3 ± 2.5 p < 0.001). Postoperative complication rates were identical for both groups. The LP group had a significantly longer follow-up period (85.2 ± 73 vs. 19 ± 14 months p < 0.001). The success rates for the LP and RAP groups were 87.5% and 90.6% (p = 0.708). Conclusions: RAP achieves equivalent results to LP, in adult patients. A longer OT may be expected with the robotic system since it can handle more complicated cases.

Predictors of Unfavorable Pathology in Patients with Incidental (pT1a-T1b) Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Incidental prostate cancer (IPCa) is encountered in 10% of surgical procedures for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Identification of patients with underlying detrimental prostate cancer is paramount for tailored treatment decision-making, but guideline recommendations for this setting are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To highlight clinical and histological characteristics related to BPO surgery that may predict IPCa with unfavorable pathology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We included men with IPCa who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in the short term after IPCa diagnosis. Two cohorts were built according to final pathology for the RP specimen: unfavorable pathology (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade group [GG] ≥3 and/or ≥pT3a and/or pN1) versus favorable pathology. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We performed multivariate regression analysis for the endpoint, which was unfavorable pathology for the RP specimen. Using the model estimates for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), ISUP GG, age, and prostate volume, we established a model for estimating the risk of unfavorable histopathology. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 112 patients were included in the final assessment. On multivariate analysis, PSA (odds ratio [OR] 1.083, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003-1.170; p = 0.042), ISUP GG for the specimen from BPO surgery (OR 3.090; 95% CI 1.129-8.457; p = 0.028), and age (OR 1.121, 95% CI 1.026-1.225; p = 0.012) were independent predictors for unfavorable histopathology. On receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.751. A novel calculator was developed to predict adverse pathology for men with IPCa. The study is limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: For men with IPCa, PSA before surgery for BPO, ISUP GG, and age are independent predictors of unfavorable disease. Our results might improve preoperative risk assessment for patient counseling. PATIENT SUMMARY: We developed a novel calculator to estimate the risk of underlying detrimental disease in men diagnosed with prostate cancer at surgery for benign prostatic obstruction.

[CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ROBOT-ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY (RAPN)].

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard treatment for renal tumors less than 7 cm. OBJECTIVES: To describe surgical techniques and trends of treating renal tumors less than 7 cm at our department and present the clinical outcomes of our experience with Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: Out of an established prospective RAPN database, we retrieved demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological parameters. Operation length was defined as the time between the first surgical incision and the last suture (skin to skin). Warm ischemia time (WIT) was defined as the time between the renal artery clamping and clamp releasing. Data is presented as mean (range, standard deviation) or numeric value (%). RESULTS: Overall, 250 RAPN cases were recorded between the years 2013-2020. Mean tumor size was 32 mm. Mean operation length was 153 minutes. Mean warm ischemia time was 17.5 minutes. Intra-operative complication rates, including converting the surgery to an open approach or to radical nephrectomy, was low. Mean estimated blood loss was 359 cc. An increase in the utilization of the robotic approach has been recorded throughout the years, with a concurrent decrease in the open and laparoscopic approaches. CONCLUSIONS: RAPN is associated with lower complication rates and superior perioperative outcomes, therefore considered a good alternative to the open and laparoscopic approaches. Thus, RAPN is the gold standard treatment for renal tumors less than 7 cm at our institute.