RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive therapies as azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) are widely prescribed as first-line treatment to prevent relapses in NMOSD. However, the rate of response to these traditional therapies is unknown in Argentina. We aimed to describe and compare treatment failure rates in NMOSD patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in NMOSD patients included in RelevarEM (a nationwide, longitudinal, observational, non-mandatory registry of MS and NMOSD in Argentina). NMOSD patients were defined based on validate diagnostic criteria. Only NMOSD patients who received AZA or MMF for at least 6 months or RTX for at least 1 month were included. Patients who were receiving AZA, MMF, or RTX and then switched to another 1 of these 3 therapies were included if the above-mentioned criteria for each drug were fulfilled. Data on patient demographics, clinical, neuroradiological findings, and treatments administered were collected. Treatment failure was defined as any new attack/relapse that occurred despite immunosuppressive treatment. RESULTS: We included 139 NMOSD patients who were receiving AZA (n = 105), MMF (n = 5) or RTX (n = 29) with a mean follow-up time of 41.3 ± 11.4 months and median of EDSS at treatment initiation of 3. We observed a reduction in the annualized relapse rate from pre-treatment to post-treatment of 51.1 %, 48.4 %, and 79.1 % respectively with a Hazard Risk relative to RTX (95 % CI) of 1.67 (1.34-3.54, p = 0.01) for AZA and 2.01 (1.86-4.43, p = 0.008) for MMF. AZA, MMF and RTX failure was observed in 45/105 (42.8 %), 2/5 (40 %) and 3/29 (10.3 %) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment failure rates were higher for AZA and MMF than RTX in Argentinean NMOSD patients in a real-world setting. High-efficacy treatment increases the opportunity to prevent attacks of NMOSD.
Asunto(s)
Azatioprina , Inmunosupresores , Ácido Micofenólico , Neuromielitis Óptica , Sistema de Registros , Rituximab , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Humanos , Neuromielitis Óptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Argentina , Adulto , Masculino , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Estudios LongitudinalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate patient profiles, effectiveness and safety of cladribine (CLAD) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Argentina. METHODS: This was a substudy included in RelevarEM (MS and neuromyelitis optica registry in Argentina, NCT03375177). Patients with MS who received CLAD tablets and were followed up for at least 24 months were included. Clinical evaluations every 3 months collect information about: a) clinical relapses; b) progression of physical disability, evaluated through Expanded Disability Status Scale, and c) new lesions found in the magnetic resonance imaging. Lymphopenia was evaluated during the follow-up and defined as grade 1: absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) 800-999/µL; grade 2: ALC 500-799/µL; grade 3: ALC 200-499/µL and grade 4: ALC <200/µL. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were included from 19 centers from Argentina. The mean annualized relapse rate during the 12-month pre-CLAD initiation was 1.19 ± 0.56 versus 0.22 ± 0.18 at month 12 and 0.19 ± 0.15 at month 24 ( P < 0.001). A total of 142 (59.2%) fulfilled the criteria of disease activity during the 12 months before treatment initiation, whereas 27 (11.3%) fulfilled it at month 12 and 38 (15.8%) at month 24, P < 0.001. Regarding no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), 202 (84.2%) patients achieved NEDA status at month 12 and 185 (77%) at month 24. The most frequent incidence density of lymphopenia for course 2 observed was also for grade 1, 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.5-7.1). The overall incidence density of lymphopenia grade 4 was 0.1 (95% CI = 0.06-0.19). CONCLUSION: This information will help when choosing the best treatment option for Argentinean patients.
Asunto(s)
Cladribina , Inmunosupresores , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Argentina/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Cladribina/uso terapéutico , Cladribina/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Linfopenia/inducido químicamente , Linfopenia/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in older patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) is limited due to their exclusion from clinical trials. Our purpose is to evaluate the choice of DMTs in pwMS older than 50 years old in a real-world setting. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of pwMS from the Argentine MS and NMOSD Registry. We included patients under 35 and above 50 years old prescribed DMTs. Disease activity was categorized as highly active (HA) or not highly active (NHA), and DMTs were classified as low efficacy therapies (LET) or high efficacy therapies (HET). RESULTS: 1460 patients (65% females) were enrolled. The HA group comprised 241 patients, 198 young (82.2%) and 43 older (17.8%). The NHA group included 1219 patients, 893 young (73%) and 326 older (27%). In the NHA group, older patients received LET more frequently than younger patients (66% versus 44%; p < 0.01). In the HA group, older patients received LET in 61% of cases, whereas younger patients received HET in 71% (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study shows the preference of LET in older patients regardless of disease activity. However it does not demonstrate a difference in disability in older patients based on low vs high efficacy DMTs used, probably due to the design of the study. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to address this issue.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Argentina/epidemiología , Anciano , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary-progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is characterized by gradual neurological deterioration without relapses. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of gender and age at disease onset on disease progression and disability accumulation in patients with this disease phenotype. METHODS: Secondary data from the RelevarEM registry, a longitudinal database in Argentina, were analyzed. The cohort comprised patients with PPMS who met inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis with multilevel Bayesian robust regression modeling was conducted to assess the associations between gender, age at onset, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score trajectories. RESULTS: We identified 125 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PPMS encompassing a total of 464 observations. We found no significant differences in EDSS scores after 10 years of disease progression between genders (-0.08; credible interval (CI): -0.60, 0.42). A 20-year difference in age at onset did not show significant differences in EDSS score after 10 years of disease progression (0.281; CI: -0.251, 0.814). Finally, we also did not find any clinically relevant difference between gender EDSS score with a difference of 20 years in age at onset (-0.021; CI: -0.371, 0.319). CONCLUSION: Biological plausibility of gender and age effects does not correlate with clinical impact measured by EDSS score.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/diagnóstico , Edad de Inicio , Teorema de Bayes , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Progresión de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
We aimed to evaluate the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in people with MS (PwMS) on high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HET) included in the national MS registry in Argentina (RelevarEM). METHODS: Non-interventional, retrospective cohort study that collected information directly from RelevarEM. Adult PwMS who had been treated for at least 6 months with a HET (ocrelizumab, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, cladribine) who had received at least two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines available in Argentina were included. Full course of vaccination was considered after the second dose of the corresponding vaccines. Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported for the whole cohort by Kaplan-Meier survival curves (which is expressed in percentage) as well as incidence density (which is expressed per 10.000 patients/day with 95% CI). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight PwMS were included. Most frequent first and second dose received was AstraZeneca vaccine, followed by Sputnik vaccine. Most frequent HETs used in included patients were cladribine in 79 (34.8%). We found an incidence density of breakthrough COVID-19 infection of 3.5 × 10.000 patients/day (95% CI 2.3-6.7) after vaccination in Argentina. We described the incidence rate after vaccination for every HET used, it being significantly higher for ocrelizumab compared with other HETs (p = 0.005). Only five patients presented a relapse during the follow-up period with no differences regarding the pre-vaccination period. CONCLUSIONS: We found an incidence density of breakthrough COVID-19 infection of 3.5 × 10.000 patients/day (95% CI 2.3-6.7) after vaccination in Argentina.
Asunto(s)
Infección Irruptiva , COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Adulto , Humanos , Argentina/epidemiología , Cladribina , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Resumen Introducción: Existe poca información local sobre el riesgo de infección grave por COVID-19 en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple (EM) que reciben tratamiento modificador de la enfermedad (DMT). El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la enfermedad por COVID-19 (gravedad y letalidad) en pacientes con EM que reciben DMT. Métodos: El estudio se realizó sobre una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes con EM. Se incluyeron 111 con EM y diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19 tratados con DMT, seguidos hasta la resolución del COVID-19. Resultados: Un total de seis (5.4%; IC 95%: 2-11.4%) desarrollaron COVID-19 grave definido como requerimiento de internación en terapia intensiva o muerte, y tres fallecieron (tasa de letalidad cruda del 2.7%; IC 95%: 1.1-4.3%). La tasa de letalidad ajustada por edad fue del 1.5% (IC 95%: 0.6-2.4%). El factor que se asoció independientemente con COVID-19 grave fue la edad (OR 1.1; IC 1.0-1.3; p < 0.05) con una tendencia en la Escala del Estado de Incapacidad Ampliada (EDSS) ≥ 6(OR 6.2; IC 0.6-56.4; p = 0.10). Conclusión: La letalidad por COVID-19 en pacientes con EM es baja y la gravedad se asoció significativamente con la edad y mostró una tendencia con EDSS ≥ 6.
Abstract Introduction: There is limited local information on the risk of severe COVID-19 infection in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are receiving disease-modifying treatments (DMT). The aim of the study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 disease (severity and lethality) in MS patients receiving DMT. Methods: The study was performed on a prospective cohort with EM. We included 111 patients with MS and a confirmed di agnosis of COVID-19 treated with DMT and followed up until the resolution of COVID-19. Results: A total of six patients (5.4%; 95% CI: 2-11.4%) developed severe COVID-19 defined as requiring hospitalization in intensive care unit or death and three died (crude case fatality rate of 2.7%; 95% CI: 1.1-4.3%). The age-adjusted case fatality rate was 1.5% (95% CI: 0.6-2.4%). The factor that was independently associated with severe COVID-19 was age (OR 1.1; CI 1.0-1.3; p < 0.05) with a trend in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ≥ 6 (OR 6.2; CI 0.6-56.4; p = 0.10). Conclusion: The lethality due to COVID-19 in MS patients is low, and severity was significantly associated with age and showed a trend with EDSS ≥ 6.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is limited local information on the risk of severe COVID-19 infection in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are receiving disease-modifying treatments (DMT). The aim of the study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 disease (severity and lethality) in MS patients receiving DMT. METHODS: The study was performed on a prospective cohort with EM. We included 111 patients with MS and a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 treated with DMT and followed up until the resolution of COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of six patients (5.4%; 95% CI: 2-11.4%) developed severe COVID-19 defined as requiring hospitalization in intensive care unit or death and three died (crude case fatality rate of 2.7%; 95% CI: 1.1-4.3%). The age-adjusted case fatality rate was 1.5% (95% CI: 0.6-2.4%). The factor that was independently associated with severe COVID-19 was age (OR 1.1; CI 1.0-1.3; p < 0.05) with a trend in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) = 6 (OR 6.2; CI 0.6-56.4; p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: The lethality due to COVID-19 in MS patients is low, and severity was significantly associated with age and showed a trend with EDSS = 6.
Introducción: Existe poca información local sobre el riesgo de infección grave por COVID-19 en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple (EM) que reciben tratamiento modificador de la enfermedad (DMT). El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la enfermedad por COVID-19 (gravedad y letalidad) en pacientes con EM que reciben DMT. Métodos: El estudio se realizó sobre una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes con EM. Se incluyeron 111 con EM y diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19 tratados con DMT, seguidos hasta la resolución del COVID-19. Resultados: Un total de seis (5.4%; IC 95%: 2-11.4%) desarrollaron COVID-19 grave definido como requerimiento de internación en terapia intensiva o muerte, y tres fallecieron (tasa de letalidad cruda del 2.7%; IC 95%: 1.1-4.3%). La tasa de letalidad ajustada por edad fue del 1.5% (IC 95%: 0.6-2.4%). El factor que se asoció independientemente con COVID-19 grave fue la edad (OR 1.1; IC 1.0-1.3; p < 0.05) con una tendencia en la Escala del Estado de Incapacidad Ampliada (EDSS) = 6(OR 6.2; IC 0.6-56.4; p = 0.10). Conclusión: La letalidad por COVID-19 en pacientes con EM es baja y la gravedad se asoció significativamente con la edad y mostró una tendencia con EDSS = 6.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Argentina/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The objective was to evaluate time to reach an EDSS of 4, 6, and 7 in NMOSD and MOGAD patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT 03,375,177). METHODS: NMOSD patients diagnosed according to 2015 criteria and with MOGAD were identified. Patients with at least 3 years of follow-up and periodic clinical evaluations with EDSS outcomes were included. AQP4-antibody and MOG-antibody status was recorded, and patients were stratified as seropositive and seronegative for AQP4-antibody. EDSS of 4, 6, and 7 were defined as dependent variables. Log rank test was used to identify differences between groups. RESULTS: Registry data was provided for a total of 137 patients. Of these, seventy-five presented AQP4-ab-positive NMOSD, 45 AQP4-ab-negative NMOSD, and 11 MOGAD. AQP4-ab status was determined by cell-based assay (CBA) in 72% of NMOSD patients. MOG-ab status was tested by CBA in all cases. Mean time to EDSS of 4 was 53.6 ± 24.5 vs. 63.1 ± 32.2 vs. 44.7 ± 32 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD, respectively (p = 0.76). Mean time to EDSS of 6 was 79.2 ± 44.3 vs. 75.7 ± 48.6 vs. 54.7 ± 50 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD (p = 0.23), while mean time to EDSS of 7 was 86.8 ± 54 vs. 80.4 ± 51 vs. 58.5 ± 47 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD (p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: No differences were observed between NMOSD (seropositive and seronegative) and MOGAD in survival curves.
Asunto(s)
Neuromielitis Óptica , Humanos , Neuromielitis Óptica/epidemiología , Acuaporina 4 , Argentina/epidemiología , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito , Autoanticuerpos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine has quickly increased during of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given that unmet needs and barriers to multiple sclerosis (MS) care have been reported, telemedicine has become an interesting option to the care of these patients. The objective of these consensus recommendations was to elaborate a guideline for the management of people with MS using telemedicine in order to contribute to an effective and high-quality healthcare. METHODS: A panel of Argentinean neurologist's experts in neuroimmunological diseases and dedicated to the diagnosis, management,and care of MS patients gathered virtually during 2021 and 2022 to conduct a consensus recommendation on the use of telemedicine in clinical practice in adult people with MS. To reach consensus, the methodology of "formal consensus RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method" was used. RESULTS: Recommendations were established based on relevant published evidence and expert opinion focusing on definitions, general characteristics and ethical standards, diagnosis of MS, follow-up (evaluation of disability and relapses of MS), identification and treatment of relapses, and finally disease-modifying treatments using telemedicine. CONCLUSION: The recommendations of this consensus would provide a useful guide for the proper use of telemedicine for the assessment, follow-up, management, and treatment of people with MS. We suggest the use of these guidelines to all the Argentine neurologists committed to the care of people with MS.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Telemedicina , Humanos , Adulto , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Consenso , Pandemias , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
The objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence of COVID-19 after complete vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177). METHODS: cohort study conducted between May 2021 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the appearance of infection during the follow-up time (at least three months after complete vaccination (second dose)). Data was collected through the contact between the treating physician and the patient. Specific information was requested (date, symptoms, need for hospitalization, ventilatory assistance, treatment, and evolution). The contact was made every 30 days during the period of 3 months after the full dose vaccination. A positive COVID-19 case was defined according to the definition established by the Ministry of Health in Argentina. Cumulative incidence was reported by Kaplan Meier survival curves as well as incidence density. RESULTS: A total of 576 PwMS were included, mean age 45.2 ± 13 years, 432 (75%) RRMS, 403 (70%) were female. The mean and median time of follow-up after the second dose was 91 ± 17 and 94 ± 21 days respectively. Most frequent first and second dose received was Astra-Zeneca vaccine, followed by Sputnik V vaccine. During follow-up a total of twenty COVID-19 cases were observed for a total exposure time of 39,557 days. The overall cumulative incidence for the observed period was 3.4% (SE 0.4%) with an overall incidence density of 5 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.7-12). We observed more cases in woman than men with an incidence density of 6 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.9-9) vs. 3 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.2-6) respectively, but not significantly different (IRR 1.7 95% CI 0.56-7.37 p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: we found an incidence density of breakthrough COVID-19 infection of 5 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.7-12) after vaccination in Argentina.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is scarce information regarding the decision-making process (DMP) in people with MS (PwMS) from Latin America. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the DMP in Argentinean PwMS and to assess its relationship with patient preferences, and clinical-demographic characteristics. METHODS: PwMS from the patient organization Esclerosis Múltiple Argentina (n = 1275) were invited to participate in a self-administered web-based survey. Participants were asked to provide clinical-demographic information and to complete a questionnaire on their perceptions about the information provided by their physician, the Control Preference Scale, and the Satisfaction with the Decisions and Care Questionnaire, and were inquired on their preferred sources of information about MS. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 379 PwMS. Most were females (67%); mean age: 40.3 (SD = 11.1) years; mean disease duration: 7.9 (SD = 7.2) years. Patients' decisional control preferred role was active in 47%, shared in 27%, and passive in 26%. A moderate concordance (weighted kappa 0.55) was observed between patients' preferences and self-reported DMP. Seventy-two percent participated in the DMP according to their preferences (concordance rates: active 66%, shared 87%, passive 51%). Most (83%) declared receiving information from their neurologists, matching their preferences (94%). CONCLUSIONS: Argentinian PwMS have distinctive preferences regarding information management and decision making.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Participación del Paciente , Prioridad del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In multiple sclerosis demographics there is a well-known female prevalence and male patients have been less specifically evaluated in clinical studies, though some clinical differences have been reported between sexes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess clinical and demographic differences between male and female patients included in the national Argentine MS Registry-RelevarEM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was observational, retrospective, and was based on the data of 3099 MS patients included as of 04 April 2021. The statistical analysis plan included bivariate analyses with the crude data and also after adjustment for the MS phenotype, further categorized as progressive-onset MS or relapsing-onset MS. In the adjusted analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio was compared to the crude odds ratio, to account for the phenotype as a confounder. RESULTS: The data from 1,074 (34.7%) men and 2,025 (65.3%) women with MS diagnosis were analysed. Males presented primary progressive disease two times more often than women (11% and 5%, respectively). In the crude analyses by sex, the presence of exclusively infratentorial lesions in the magnetic resonance imaging studies was more frequent in males than in females, but after adjustment by MS onset phenotype, such difference was only present in males with relapsing-onset MS (p = 0.00006). Similarly, worse Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were confirmed only in men with relapsing-onset disease after phenotype adjustment (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: We did not find any statistically significant clinical or demographic difference between sexes when the progressive MS phenotype was specifically considered. However, the differences we found between the clinical phenotypes are in line with the literature and highlight the importance of stratifying the analyses by sex and phenotype when designing MS studies.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Esclerosis Múltiple , Demografía , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/epidemiología , Fenotipo , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the number of reports of multiple sclerosis (MS) rebound activity (RA), which is usually defined as a severe disease reactivation after natalizumab or fingolimod withdrawal that exceeds pre-treatment baseline inflammatory activity. The frequency and risk factors that could predict RA remain unknown. Fingolimod is currently the most frequently prescribed disease modifying therapy for MS in Argentina, so that there is a need to determine possible predictors of RA. OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for developing RA after fingolimod cessation; to describe RA characteristics, management and evolution. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of patients with MS who had discontinued fingolimod and were followed up to nine months after discontinuation. Demographic, clinical and paraclinical data was extracted, including age, gender, MS phenotype, reason for discontinuation, number of relapses during the year prior to suspension, time treated with fingolimod, EDSS before, during and after rebound, MRI findings. RESULTS: 26 cases of RA were matched 1:1 with patients without RA. The median time elapsed to RA was 50 days. 68% showed worsening of the EDSS in the evaluation at 3 months of RA. When compared with the control group, no difference was found in terms of age, gender, phenotype, EDSS at the moment of suspension, reason for discontinuation, number of relapses in the previous year, and time on therapy. CONCLUSION: In this case-controlled study, no risk factors could be identified to predict RA after fingolimod cessation. Further controlled, prospective, better powered studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Esclerosis Múltiple , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Clorhidrato de Fingolimod/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Natalizumab , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
MAGNIMS-CMSC-NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis have been recently published, and they have been fundamental for improving patient care. Implementation of these and previous MAGNIMS recommendations have not been established in many countries. Addressing the local limitations behind these difficulties is needed. A panel of 14 MS neurologists from 16 different reference centres from Chile, Argentina, Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, Panamá, Perú and Brazil met to discuss the current situation regarding the use of MRI in MS including a) Access and availability, b) Standardized acquisition protocols and reports, and c) Multicentric research potential.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Argentina , Brasil , Humanos , América Latina , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , México , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Background PPMS (primary progressive multiple sclerosis) patients represent less than 10% of MS patients in Argentina, men and women were similarly affected and most of them had a severe functional impairment. More rapid progression has been reported in males, but this is not the case in all datasets. The main objective of our study was to determine the time to EDSS (Expanded disability Status Scale) 4, 6 and 7 in PPMS patients. We also compared the times to reach these EDSS in men and women and aimed to identify factors associated with the disability progression. Method This cohort of patients with diagnosis of PPMS (n = 253) was selected from follow-up recorded in the RelevarEM registry database. Result The median times to EDSS 4, 6 and 7 were 24 (IQR 12-48), 72 (IQR 36-96) and 96 (IQR 60-120) months, respectively. Comparison of the survival curves to EDSS 4, 6 and 7 according to gender did not show significant differences (p = 0.33, p = 0.55 and p = 0.59). There is no evidence of an association between the clinical adjustment variables (sex, age >40 years at diagnosis, EDSS > 3 at onset and multifocal MS symptoms at disease onset) and the time of arrival at the EDSS 4, 6 and 7. Conclusion Severe disability was observed six years after the onset of symptoms. No association was found between the studied factors and the time to arrival to severe disability.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva , Esclerosis Múltiple , Adulto , Argentina , Estudios de Cohortes , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to analyze the accumulative risk of MRI and OB factors for evolution from RIS to MS in subjects included in the Argentinean MS registry (NCT03375177). METHODS: RIS subjects were identified according to RIS diagnosis criteria. Subjects were longitudinally followed with clinical and MRI at intervals of 6 months. Time from RIS identification to the first clinical event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. Multivariable Cox regression models were created to assess the independent predictive value of demographic characteristics, as well as clinical, OB and MRI data on time to the first clinical event. The single and increased risk factor of evolution of RIS was quantified. RESULTS: A total of 88 RIS subjects, mean follow-up time 42 ± 4 months were included. 39 (44.3%) and 23 (26.1%) had a new MRI lesion or a clinical event, respectively, during the follow-up. OB (HR 5.9, 95% CI 1.29-10.1, p = 0.004), infratentorial lesions (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.09-7.5) and spinal cord lesions (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.4-8.2, p = 0.01) at RIS identification were independent predictors associated with a subsequent clinical event. The accumulative risk showed that when two of the three factors (OB, infratentorial or spinal cord lesions) were present the HR was 10.4, 95% CI 4.4-22, p < 0.001, and when three factors were present, it was HR 15.6, 95% CI 5.7-28, p < 0.001 for a relapse. CONCLUSION: The presence of three factors significantly increased the risk of clinical event; high-risk subjects should probably be managed by a different approach than those used for individuals without high-risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Desmielinizantes , Esclerosis Múltiple , Argentina/epidemiología , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/diagnóstico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To date, there are no data available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin American patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: Characterize safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin American (LATAM) patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). METHODS: A cross-sectional study between February 1, 2021, and April 30, 2021. Individuals with MS from LATAM countries were invited to participate in a self-administered web-based survey, through MS patient organizations from the region. RESULTS: 393 vaccinated pwMS from 10 different Latin American countries were included. The vaccines administered were: inactivated virus vaccines (IVV) in 38.2% of patients, adenovirus vector vaccines (AdV) in 48.8% and mRNA vaccines 13%. All patients received at least one dose of any of the COVID-19 vaccines and 123 (31.3%) declared receiving a second dose. Mean (SD) age 41.5 (11.8) years, 82.4% female, MS disease duration: 8.4 (8.2) years. No serious adverse events were reported with any of the COVID-19 vaccines after either the first or second dose. A lower frequency of adverse events was found with IVV (22%) in comparison with AdV (46.4%) and mRNA (35.3%) (p < 0.01). Five participants reported having an MS relapse after IVV first dose. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines applied in LATAM proved safe for MS patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Currently, there are several reasons to promote worldwide the concept of multiple sclerosis care units (MSCU) for a better management of affected patients. Ideally, the MSCU should have some human and technical resources that distinguish and improve the care of affected patients; however, local, and regional aspects should be considered when recommending how these units should operate. The objective of these consensus recommendations was to review how MSCU should work in Latin America to improve long-term outcomes in MS patients. METHODS: A panel of neurology experts from Latin America dedicated to the diagnosis and care of MS patients gathered virtually during 2019 and 2020 to carry out a consensus recommendation about objectives and functioning implementation of MSCU in Latin America. To achieve consensus, the methodology of "formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method" was used. RESULTS: Recommendations focused on the objectives, human and technical resources, and the general functioning that MSCU should have in Latin America. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations of these consensus guidelines attempt to optimize the health care and management of MS patients by setting how MSCU should work in our region.