Strength of clinical indication and therapeutic impact of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD) has revolutionized the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the identification of ideal candidates remains challenging. We aimed to describe the long-term impact of the ICD for primary prevention in patients with HCM based on stringent (high SCD risk) vs lenient indications (need for pacing/personal choice). METHODS: Data from two Italian HCM Cardiomyopathy Units were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients >1 follow-up visits were divided into two groups according to ICD candidacy:stringent (high SCD risk) and lenient (need for pacing, patients' choice, physician advice despite lack of high SCD risk). Major cardiac events (composite of appropriate shock/intervention and SCD) was the primary endpoint. A safety endpoint was defined as a composite of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications. RESULTS: Of 2009 patients, 252(12.5%) received an ICD, including 27(1.3%) in secondary prevention and 225(11.2%) in primary prevention (age at implantation 49 ± 16 years; men 65.3%). Among those in primary prevention, 167(74.2%) had stringent, while 58(25.8%) had lenient indications. At 5 ± 4 years, only stringent ICD patients experienced major cardiac events (2.84%/year, 5-year cumulative incidence: 8.1%, 95%CI [3.5-14.1%]). ICD-related complications were similar across stringent and lenient subgroups. However, patients implanted >60 years had a significantly higher risk of adverse events. CONCLUSION: One third of ICD recipients with HCM in primary prevention received a lenient implantation and had no appropriate intervention. ICD implantation due to systematic upgrade in patients requiring pacing and increased risk perception may offer little advantage and increase complication rates.

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and defibrillation testing: A propensity-matched pilot study.

BACKGROUND: To date, only a few comparisons between subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) patients undergoing and those not undergoing defibrillation testing (DT) at implantation (DT+ vs DT-) have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes of 2 propensity-matched cohorts of DT+ and DT- patients. METHODS: Among consecutive S-ICD patients implanted across 17 centers from January 2015 to October 2020, DT- patients were 1:1 propensity-matched for baseline characteristics with DT+ patients. The primary outcome was a composite of ineffective shocks and cardiovascular mortality. Appropriate and inappropriate shock rates were deemed secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1290 patients, a total of 566 propensity-matched patients (283 DT+; 283 DT-) served as study population. Over median follow-up of 25.3 months, no significant differences in primary outcome event rates were found (10 DT+ vs 14 DT-; P = .404) as well as for ineffective shocks (5 DT- vs 3 DT+; P = .725). At multivariable Cox regression analysis, DT performance was associated with a reduction of neither the primary combined outcome nor ineffective shocks at follow-up. A high PRAETORIAN score was positively associated with both the primary outcome (hazard ratio 3.976; confidence interval 1.339-11.802; P = .013) and ineffective shocks alone at follow-up (hazard ratio 19.030; confidence interval 4.752-76.203; P = .003). CONCLUSION: In 2 cohorts of strictly propensity-matched patients, DT performance was not associated with significant differences in cardiovascular mortality and ineffective shocks. The PRAETORIAN score is capable of correctly identifying a large percentage of patients at risk for ineffective shock conversion in both cohorts.

Prevalence, causes and predictors of cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous studies assessing the natural history of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), there is lack of data regarding the burden of hospitalization. Aim of this study was to describe prevalence, causes and predictors of cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with HCM. METHODS: We retrospectively included 253 patients with HCM undergoing first evaluation at our center. Enrolment criteria included cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) at baseline and > 1-year follow-up. All hospital admissions were recorded during follow-up and adjudicated as acute vs elective and cardiovascular (CV) vs non-cardiovascular (non-CV). RESULTS: During 6.4 ± 4.0 years there were 187 hospitalizations in 92 patients (36%, at a rate of 5.7%/year). Most were CV-related (158/187,84.5%; 4.8%/year) while non-CV admissions were 29/187 (15.5%, 0.88%/year). There was a slight predominance of elective (n = 96, 58%, 2.8%/year) vs acute (n = 62, 41.8%, 2.0%/year) CV hospitalizations. Independent predictors of CV hospitalization were baseline symptoms (NYHA class II vs I: HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.24-3.43, NYHA III-IV vs I: HR 3.05; 95% CI 1.40-6.65, p = .004), indexed left atrial (LA) volume (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.04, p < .001), and lower indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume iRVEDV) at cardiac magnetic resonance (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In little over 6 years, CV hospitalization was required in over one-in-three of our HCM patients, often unplanned and due to acute disease-related complications. Symptomatic status, larger LA volume and reduced iRVEDV at baseline were independently associated with CV admissions. Strategies aimed at preventing hospitalizations are an important target to reduce the burden of disease in HCM patients.

Appropriate and inappropriate shocks in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: An international multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) are attractive for preventing sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as they mitigate risks of transvenous leads in young patients. However, S-ICDs may be associated with increased inappropriate shock (IAS) in HCM patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of appropriate shock and IAS in a contemporary HCM S-ICD cohort. METHODS: We collected electrocardiographic and clinical data from HCM patients who underwent S-ICD implantation at 4 centers. Etiologies of all S-ICD shocks were adjudicated. We used Firth penalized logistic regression to derive adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for predictors of IAS. RESULTS: Eighty-eight HCM patients received S-ICDs (81 for primary and 7 for secondary prevention) with a mean follow-up of 2.7 years. Five patients (5.7%) had 9 IAS episodes (3.8 IAS per 100 patient-years) most often because of sinus tachycardia and/or T-wave oversensing. Independent predictors of IAS were higher 12-lead electrocardiographic R-wave amplitude (aOR 2.55 per 1 mV; 95% confidence interval 1.15-6.38) and abnormal T-wave inversions (aOR 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.97). There were 2 appropriate shocks in 7 secondary prevention patients and none in 81 primary prevention patients, despite 96% meeting Enhanced American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association criteria and the mean European HCM Risk-SCD score predicting 5.7% 5-year risk. No patients had sudden death or untreated sustained ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter HCM S-ICD study, IAS were rare and appropriate shocks confined to secondary prevention patients. The R-wave amplitude increased IAS risk, whereas T-wave inversions were protective. HCM primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator guidelines overestimated the risk of appropriate shocks in our cohort.

[Ventricular storm in a young man with primary hypokinetic dilated cardiomyopathy: why thinking of sarcoidosis?] / Storm ventricolare in un giovane con cardiomiopatia ipocinetico-dilatativa primitiva: perché pensare alla sarcoidosi.

The diagnostic approach to patients with cardiac sarcoidosis is challenging, as the disease may occur as a subclinical entity or have heterogeneous clinical manifestations ranging from ventricular arrhythmias to advanced cardiac failure. Therefore, while clinical suspicion remains key, imaging techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and myocardial scintigraphy play an important confirmatory role. Final diagnosis requires histological proof on cardiac or extracardiac biopsy. A multidisciplinary context is essential for appropriate diagnosis, staging and management. We present the case of a young man with dilated cardiomyopathy in whom, following the onset of malignant and recurrent ventricular arrhythmias, a final diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis was reached based on a host of invasive and non-invasive diagnostic techniques, allowing tailored treatment.

Cryoablation of typical AVNRT: Younger age and administration of bonus ablation favor long-term success.

BACKGROUND: Cryoablation (CA) is an emerging tool for the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Determinants of long-term success still need clarification. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess which patients' and procedural features affect the long-term efficacy of CA for typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive patients undergoing CA for typical AVNRT were divided into 3 groups of age: group A, ≤20 years, n = 20 (23.5%); group B, 21-50 years, n = 30 (35.3%); group C, ≥51 years, n = 35 (41.2%). CA was performed for 5 minutes at -75°C in all; 4-minute bonus CA was delivered if not contraindicated (ie, transient PR interval lengthening during the first application and narrow triangle of Koch). The efficacy end point was the absence of recurrences at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: CA was acutely successful in all 85 patients (100%). Bonus ablation was performed in 69 (81.2%). No permanent complications were observed. At follow-up, AVNRT recurrences occurred in 9 patients (10.6%): group A, 0 (0%); group B, 2 (6.7%), group C, 7 (20%). Incidence of recurrences was significantly different between age groups (P = .047) and between patients receiving (7.2%) and not receiving (25.0%) bonus CA (P = .038). In multivariable analysis, age groups (odds ratio [OR] 5.917; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.372-25.518; P = .017) and bonus CA (OR 0.115; 95% CI 0.018-0.724; P = .021) were the only independent predictors of recurrences. Furthermore, age as a continuous variable remained statistically associated with recurrences (OR 1.046; 95% CI 1.002-1.091; P = .038). CONCLUSION: CA is effective and safe for typical AVNRT ablation. Younger age and bonus CA administration are independent predictors of success at 12 months. Incidence of recurrences is low in patients younger than 21 years.

Effects of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation on endothelial and blood clotting activation.

Cryoablation (CA) emerged as an alternative procedure to radiofrequency (RF). The aim of this study was to compare haemostatic system alterations in patients undergoing RF or CA for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation. von Willebrand factor (vWF), spontaneous whole blood platelet aggregation, prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), and clot lysis time (CLT) were determined in 48 patients (27 CA; 21 RF; 19M/29F, mean age 49.6 ± 17.6 years). Blood samples were obtained before the procedure (T0), immediately after (T1), and 24 h later (T2). At T1 both procedures were associated with a significant increase in levels of the endothelial activation marker vWF. At T2 vWF levels were lower in CA than in RF group. No changes in whole blood platelet aggregation before and after ablation procedures were observed. At T1 both groups determined an increase in blood clotting activation markers, F1 + 2, TAT, and DD. At T2 F1 + 2, TAT and DD levels were similar to baseline values. The comparison between RF and CA showed no significant differences in F1 + 2 and TAT levels, whereas at T1 DD levels were higher in CA group than in RF group. Both procedures induced a significant decrease in CLT, whereas no changes in PAI-1 levels were found. There were no significant differences in CLT and PAI-1 levels. The fibrinolytic efficiency analysis showed that at T1 DD/TAT and DD/F1 + 2 ratios were lower in RF group and remained lower in RF than in CA group at T2. CA procedure may be associated with a lower degree of endothelial damage and with a higher fibrinolytic capacity respect to RF.