Assessment of liver graft quality during hypothermic oxygenated perfusion: the first international validation study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: While it is currently assumed that liver assessment is only possible during normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), there is uncertainty regarding a reliable and quick prediction of graft injury during ex situ hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE). We therefore intended to test, in an international liver transplant cohort, recently described mitochondrial injury biomarkers measured during HOPE before liver transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Perfusate samples of human livers from 10 centers in 7 countries with HOPE-experience were analyzed for released mitochondrial compounds, i.e. flavin mononucleotide (FMN), NADH, purine derivates and inflammatory markers. Perfusate FMN was correlated with graft loss due to primary non-function or symptomatic non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS), and kidney failure, as well as liver injury after transplantation. Livers deemed unsuitable for transplantation served as negative control. RESULTS: We collected 473 perfusate samples of human DCD (n=315) and DBD livers (n=158). Fluorometric assessment of FMN in perfusate was validated by mass spectrometry (R=0.7011,p<0.0001). Graft loss due to primary non-function or cholangiopathy was predicted by perfusate FMN values (c-statistic mass spectrometry 0.8418 (95%CI 0.7466-0.9370,p<0.0001), c-statistic fluorometry 0.7733 (95%CI 0.7006-0.8461,p<0.0001). Perfusate FMN values were also significantly correlated with symptomatic NAS and kidney failure, and superior in prediction of graft loss when compared to conventional scores derived from donor and recipient parameters, such as the donor risk index and the balance of risk score. Mitochondrial FMN values in liver tissues of non-utilized livers were low, and inversely correlated to high perfusate FMN values and purine metabolite release. CONCLUSIONS: This first international study validates the predictive value of the mitochondrial co-factor FMN, released from complex I during HOPE, and may therefore contribute to a better risk stratification of injured livers before implantation. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Analysis of 473 perfusates, collected from 10 international centers during hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE), revealed that mitochondria derived flavin mononucleotide (FMN) values in perfusate is predictive for graft loss, cholangiopathy, and kidney failure after liver transplantation. This result is of high clinical relevance, as recognition of graft quality is urgently needed to improve the safe utilization of marginal livers. Ex-situ machine perfusion approaches, such as HOPE, are therefore likely to increase the number of useable liver grafts.

Mitochondrial injury during normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) in a rodent model of DCD liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and hypothermic-oxygenated-perfusion (HOPE), were both shown to improve outcomes after liver transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD). Comparative clinical and mechanistical studies are however lacking. METHODS: A rodent model of NRP and HOPE, both in the donor, was developed. Following asystolic donor warm ischemia time (DWIT), the abdominal compartment was perfused either with a donor-blood-based-perfusate at 37 °C (NRP) or with oxygenated Belzer-MPS at 10 °C (donor-HOPE) for 2 h. Livers were then procured and underwent 5 h static cold storage (CS), followed by transplantation. Un-perfused and HOPE-treated DCD-livers (after CS) and healthy livers (DBD) with direct implantation after NRP served as controls. Endpoints included the entire spectrum of ischemia-reperfusion-injury. FINDINGS: Healthy control livers (DBD) showed minimal signs of inflammation during 2 h NRP and achieved 100% posttransplant recipient survival. In contrast, DCD livers with 30 and 60 min DWIT suffered from greater mitochondrial injury and inflammation as measured by increased perfusate Lactate, FMN- and HMGB-1-levels with subsequent Toll-like-receptor activation during NRP. In contrast, donor-HOPE (instead of NRP) led to significantly less mitochondrial-complex-I-injury and inflammation. Results after donor-HOPE were comparable to ex-situ HOPE after CS. Most DCD-liver recipients survived when treated with one HOPE-technique (86%), compared to only 40% after NRP (p = 0.0053). Following a reduction of DWIT (15 min), DCD liver recipients achieved comparable survivals with NRP (80%). INTERPRETATION: High-risk DCD livers benefit more from HOPE-treatment, either immediately in the donor or after cold storage. Comparative prospective clinical studies are required to translate the results. FUNDING: Funding was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no: 32003B-140776/1, 3200B-153012/1, 320030-189055/1, and 31IC30-166909) and supported by University Careggi (grant no 32003B-140776/1) and the OTT (grant No.: DRGT641/2019, cod.prog. 19CT03) and the Max Planck Society. Work in the A.G. laboratory was partially supported by the NIH R01NS112381 and R21NS125466 grants.

Machine Perfusion for Extended Criteria Donor Livers: What Challenges Remain?

Based on the renaissance of dynamic preservation techniques, extended criteria donor (ECD) livers reclaimed a valuable eligibility in the transplantable organ pool. Being more vulnerable to ischemia, ECD livers carry an increased risk of early allograft dysfunction, primary non-function and biliary complications and, hence, unveiled the limitations of static cold storage (SCS). There is growing evidence that dynamic preservation techniques-dissimilar to SCS-mitigate reperfusion injury by reconditioning organs prior transplantation and therefore represent a useful platform to assess viability. Yet, a debate is ongoing about the advantages and disadvantages of different perfusion strategies and their best possible applications for specific categories of marginal livers, including organs from donors after circulatory death (DCD) and brain death (DBD) with extended criteria, split livers and steatotic grafts. This review critically discusses the current clinical spectrum of livers from ECD donors together with the various challenges and posttransplant outcomes in the context of standard cold storage preservation. Based on this, the potential role of machine perfusion techniques is highlighted next. Finally, future perspectives focusing on how to achieve higher utilization rates of the available donor pool are highlighted.

Mitochondria and ischemia reperfusion injury.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes the role of mitochondria in ischemia-reperfusion-injury (IRI). RECENT FINDINGS: Mitochondria are the power-house of our cells and play a key role for the success of organ transplantation. With their respiratory chain, mitochondria are the main energy producers, to fuel metabolic processes, control cellular signalling and provide electrochemical integrity. The mitochondrial metabolism is however severely disturbed when ischemia occurs. Cellular energy depletes rapidly and various metabolites, including Succinate accumulate. At reperfusion, reactive oxygen species are immediately released from complex-I and initiate the IRI-cascade of inflammation. Prior to the development of novel therapies, the underlying mechanisms should be explored to target the best possible mitochondrial compound. A clinically relevant treatment should recharge energy and reduce Succinate accumulation before organ implantation. While many interventions focus instead on a specific molecule, which may inhibit downstream IRI-inflammation, mitochondrial protection can be directly achieved through hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) before transplantation. SUMMARY: Mitochondria are attractive targets for novel molecules to limit IRI-associated inflammation. Although dynamic preservation techniques could serve as delivery tool for new therapeutic interventions, their own inherent mechanism should not only be studied, but considered as key treatment to reduce mitochondrial injury, as seen with the HOPE-approach.

Liver perfusion strategies: what is best and do ischemia times still matter?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes recent developments in the field of liver perfusion techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: Dynamic preservation techniques are increasingly tested due to the urgent need to improve the overall poor donor utilization. With their exposure to warm ischemia, livers from donors after circulatory death (DCD) transmit additional risk for severe complications after transplantation. Although the superiority of dynamic approaches compared to static-cold-storage is widely accepted, the number of good quality studies remains limited. Most risk factors, particularly donor warm ischemia, and accepted thresholds are inconsistently reported, leading to difficulties to assess the impact of new preservation technologies. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) leads to good outcomes after DCD liver transplantation, with however short ischemia times. While randomized controlled trials (RCT) with NRP are lacking, results from the first RCTs with ex-situ perfusion were reported. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion was shown to protect DCD liver recipients from ischemic cholangiopathy. In contrast, endischemic normothermic perfusion seems to not impact on the development of biliary complications, although this evidence is only available from retrospective studies. SUMMARY: Dynamic perfusion strategies impact posttransplant outcomes and are increasingly commissioned in various countries along with more evidence from RCTs. Transparent reporting of risk and utilization with uniform definitions is required to compare the role of different preservation strategies in DCD livers with prolonged ischemia times.

A multicentre outcome analysis to define global benchmarks for donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The concept of benchmarking is established in the field of transplant surgery; however, benchmark values for donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation are not available. Thus, we aimed to identify the best possible outcomes in DCD liver transplantation and to propose outcome reference values. METHODS: Based on 2,219 controlled DCD liver transplantations, collected from 17 centres in North America and Europe, we identified 1,012 low-risk, primary, adult liver transplantations with a laboratory MELD score of ≤20 points, receiving a DCD liver with a total donor warm ischemia time of ≤30 minutes and asystolic donor warm ischemia time of ≤15 minutes. Clinically relevant outcomes were selected and complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo-Grading and the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Corresponding benchmark cut-offs were based on median values of each centre, where the 75th-percentile was considered. RESULTS: Benchmark cases represented between 19.7% and 75% of DCD transplantations in participating centres. The 1-year retransplant and mortality rates were 4.5% and 8.4% in the benchmark group, respectively. Within the first year of follow-up, 51.1% of recipients developed at least 1 major complication (≥Clavien-Dindo-Grade III). Benchmark cut-offs were ≤3 days and ≤16 days for ICU and hospital stay, ≤66% for severe recipient complications (≥Grade III), ≤16.8% for ischemic cholangiopathy, and ≤38.9 CCI points 1 year after transplant. Comparisons with higher risk groups showed more complications and impaired graft survival outside the benchmark cut-offs. Organ perfusion techniques reduced the complications to values below benchmark cut-offs, despite higher graft risk. CONCLUSIONS: Despite excellent 1-year survival, morbidity in benchmark cases remains high. Benchmark cut-offs targeting morbidity parameters offer a valid tool to assess the protective value of new preservation technologies in higher risk groups and to provide a valid comparator cohort for future clinical trials. LAY SUMMARY: The best possible outcomes after liver transplantation of grafts donated after circulatory death (DCD) were defined using the concept of benchmarking. These were based on 2,219 liver transplantations following controlled DCD donation in 17 centres worldwide. Donor and recipient combinations with higher risk had significantly worse outcomes. However, the use of novel organ perfusion technology helped high-risk patients achieve similar outcomes as the benchmark cohort.