Neuroendocrine carcinoma of vagina with prolonged survival.

We report the case of a woman in her 70s with a stage IVA small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina. The patient started chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Pelvic MRI after completion of treatment did not show residual disease. Three years and 8 months after definitive treatment, the patient remains on regular follow-up without evidence of disease.

Lymph node yield in the pathological staging of resected nonmetastatic colon cancer: The more the better?

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend regional lymphadenectomy with a lymph node yield (LNY) of at least 12 lymph nodes (LN) for adequate colon cancer (CC) staging. LNY ≥22LN may improve survival, especially in right-sided CC [Lee et al., Surg Oncol, 27(3), 2018]. This multicentric retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of LNY and tumor laterality on CC staging and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage I-III CC that underwent surgery from 2012 to 2018 were grouped according to LNY: <22 and ≥ 22. Primary outcomes were LN positivity (N+ rate) and disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) was the secondary outcome. Exploratory analyses were performed for laterality and stage. RESULTS: We included 795 patients (417 < 22LN, 378 ≥ 22LN); 53% had left-sided CC and 29%/37%/38% had stage I/II/III tumors. There was no association between LNY ≥22LN and N+ rate after adjustment for grade, T stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion; a trend for a higher N+ rate in left-sided CC was identified (interaction p = 0.033). With a median follow-up of 63.6 months for DFS and 73.2 months for OS, 254 patients (31.9%) relapsed and 207 (26.0%) died. In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, ASA score, laparoscopic approach, T/N stage, mucinous histology, LVI and adjuvant chemotherapy, LNY ≥22LN was significantly associated with both DFS (HR 0.75, p = 0.031) and OS (HR 0.71, p = 0.025). Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a more significant benefit for right-sided CC. CONCLUSION: LNY ≥22LN was associated with longer DFS and OS in patients with operable CC, especially for right-sided CC.

Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Solid Tumors Undergoing Intravenous Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially life-threatening complication of systemic chemotherapy (CT) that often requires hospital admission. Delay in diagnosis and treatment are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the factors that influence FN episodes outcomes in the emergency room (ER). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all FN episodes (with a collected blood culture [BC]) that occurred between 2012 and 2016 at our institution. FN was defined as a temperature ≥38°C and an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1,000/µL, expected to decrease to <500/µL in the following week. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, there were 173 FN episodes in 153/1,947 patients treated with intravenous CT. Most of these episodes (n = 121, 70%) were diagnosed in the ER, 29 in the outpatient clinic, and 23 as inpatients. In the ER, the median time was 36 min from hospital nurse triage to medical observation, and 52 min from medical observation to complete blood count specimen collection. There was a positive BC in 33 FN episodes, 72% with Gram-negative bacteria. A total of 160 FN episodes led to hospital admission and 13 were treated as outpatients. Mortality associated with the FN episode was 15% and an ANC <100/µL was predictive of increased mortality. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that FN is a serious and common complication of IV CT which must be diagnosed and treated promptly. Profound neutropenia was the only predictive factor of mortality.

ONKOTEV Score as a Predictive Tool for Thromboembolic Events in Pancreatic Cancer-A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in patients with cancer and causes considerable morbidity and mortality. The risk of VTE is higher in patients with pancreatic cancer and is often associated with treatment delays or interruptions. Recently, the ONKOTEV score was proposed as a VTE risk predictor model for patients with cancer, but its validation is still ongoing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to determine the incidence of VTE and to evaluate the ONKOTEV score as a VTE predictive tool in a population of patients with pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Between February 2012 and May 2017, 165 patients were included in the study. The median age was 73 years, 45.5% of patients were female, and 55.8% had stage IV disease. Fifty-one patients had a VTE (30.9%); 23.5% had pulmonary embolism, 25.5% had deep venous thrombosis, and 51.0% had visceral VTE (VsT). At a median follow-up time of 6.3 months, cumulative incidence of VTE was less than 10% for ONKOTEV scores 0 or 1 and approximately 40% and 70% for scores 2 and ≥3, respectively. CONCLUSION: The high VTE incidence observed in this study is consistent with prior reports. Patients at high risk for VTE with no increase in hemorrhagic risk should be considered for primary thromboprophylaxis. The ONKOTEV score may stratify VTE risk in patients with pancreatic cancer, with ONKOTEV score ≥2 being associated with a higher VTE occurrence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of patients with pancreatic cancer and causes considerable morbidity, treatment delays or interruptions, and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis is not used routinely in ambulatory patients. Tools to stratify the risk of VTE are important to help select patients who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Recently, the ONKOTEV score was proposed as a VTE risk predictor model for patients with cancer, but its validation is still ongoing. In this patient series, ONKOTEV score ≥2 was associated with high VTE occurrence and may stratify VTE risk in patients with pancreatic cancer, suggesting that ONKOTEV can be considered to select patients with pancreatic cancer for primary thromboprophylaxis.

Loss of HER2 and disease prognosis after neoadjuvant treatment of HER2+ breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: HER2 overexpression/amplification occurs in 15-20% breast cancers (BC) and is associated with worse prognosis. The addition of anti-HER2 treatment to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Changes in HER2 status after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) have been reported and may affect prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of NAT in patients with HER2+ BC and its influence on HER2 status and associated prognostic impact. METHODS: Retrospective chart review and pathologic evaluation of all consecutive patients with HER2+ BC (defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ confirmed by SISH) submitted to NAT between 2010-2015 in three Portuguese Hospitals. RESULTS: One hundred eight female patients were included; 40 with stage II, 68 with stage III. Hormone receptors were positive in 70. pCR (ypT0/isN0) was achieved in 48 patients (44%). With a median follow-up of 52 months, there were 5 disease free survival (DFS) events among pCR patients and 19 among non-pCR (P = 0.02). Of the 60 patients with residual disease at surgery, 52 remained HER2+ and 8 (13%) lost HER2 overexpression/amplification. 5y-DFS and 5y-OS was 70% and 84%, respectively, for patients whose residual tumors remained HER2+, and 21% and 50% for patients whose residual tumors became HER2 negative (P = 0.02 and < 0.001). DISCUSSION: We confirmed the negative prognostic impact of NAT-induced HER2 loss on residual tumor leading to worse DFS and OS. Despite the retrospective design and small sample size, these results suggest that it is important to retest HER2 after NAT, to better refine patient outcome.

Acute reversible toxic encephalopathy during capecitabine and oxaliplatin treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Capecitabine is a fluoropyrimidine commonly used in the treatment of colorectal cancer which may cause central nervous system toxicity, namely cerebellar dysfunction. CASE REPORT: We describe a 77-year-old man undergoing adjuvant treatment of colon cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin who presented with acute cerebellar ataxia and encephalopathy that progressed to coma. Diagnosis of toxic encephalopathy was made after the exclusion of alternative causes of neurological dysfunction and complete resolution of clinical findings with permanent discontinuation of chemotherapy. DISCUSSION: When patients with cancer develop symptoms and signs of central nervous dysfunction, metabolic and infectious causes plus tumor involvement of central nervous system must be sought. However, chemotherapy may also cause toxicity to the central nervous system. Capecitabine is no exception, although cerebellar dysfunction is rarely reported. CONCLUSION: Although rare, capecitabine-induced encephalopathy may be severe and physicians should be aware of this possible side effect.

Prognostic Factors after Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases, resulting in 5-year survival rates of 36 -€“ 58. Although many studies have been performed to determine prognostic factors for tumor recurrence and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases, there are few prognostic scoring systems stratifying patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases into risk group models. OBJECTIVES: To identify, evaluate and compare the existing prognostic scores for survival after surgery for resection of colorectal liver metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic search in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase from 1990 to 2013 using the terms '€˜hepatic resection', '€˜colorectal cancer'€™, 'liver metastasis', '€˜hepatectomy', '€˜prognostic'€™, and '€˜score'€˜. Only studies proposing a prognostic model or risk stratification based on clinical and/or pathological variables were included. RESULTS: From 1996 to June 2013, 19 scoring systems were identified, including one nomogram. Thirty prognostic factors were identified although none of the factors was common to all prognostic models. The 4 factors most often included were: number of liver metastases, regional lymph node metastization of primary tumor, preoperative CEA level and maximum size of metastases. The median study sample size was 305 patients (81-1 568 patients) and median follow-up was 33 months (16-54 months). All studies were retrospective and used the Cox proportional hazards model for multi-variable analysis. CONCLUSION: Several factors have been constantly reported as having prognostic value after liver resection of colorectal livermetastases, although there is no consensus on the ideal scoring system.

Introdução: A ressecção de metástases hepáticas é o único tratamento potencialmente curativo em doentes com metástases hepáticas de cancro colo-rectal, resultando numa sobrevida global de 36-58%. Até à data foram publicados múltiplos trabalhos sobre factores de prognóstico após hepatectomia em doentes com metástases hepáticas de cancro colo-rectal. No entanto, poucos apresentaram modelos de prognóstico que permitam estratificar os doentes em grupos de risco, relacionando-os com sobrevida após metastasectomia hepática.Objectivos: Identificar, avaliar e comparar os diferentes scores de prognóstico após recessão de metástases hepáticas de cancro colo-rectal.Material e Métodos: Pesquisa na PubMed, Cochrane e Embase, de artigos publicados entre 1990 e 2013, usando os termos ‘recessão hepática’, ‘cancro colo-rectal’, ‘metástases hepáticas’, ‘hepatectomia’, ‘prognóstico’ e ‘modelo’. Apenas os artigos que apresentaram modelos de prognóstico com base em variáveis clínico-patológicas foram incluídos.Resultados: De 1996 a Junho de 2013, 19 modelos de prognóstico foram identificados, incluindo um nomograma. Foram identificados 30 diferentes factores prognósticos, embora nenhum factor fosse comum a todos os modelos prognósticos. Os factores mais frequentemente incluídos foram: número de metástases hepáticas, envolvimento ganglionar regional do tumor primário, nível sérico de CEA pré-operatório e tamanho máximo das metástases. A amostra mediana foi de 305 doentes (81-1 568 doentes) e o seguimento mediano foi de 33 meses (16-54 meses). Todos os estudos foram retrospectivos e utilizaram o modelo proporcional de Cox para análise multivariada.Conclusão: Vários factores têm sido constantemente reportados como tendo valor prognostico após ressecção de metástases hepáticas de cancro colorectal, no entanto, não existe consenso sobre o modelo ideal de prognóstico.