Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Cell ; 41(12): 2136-2153.e13, 2023 12 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995682

RESUMEN

CCS1477 (inobrodib) is a potent, selective EP300/CBP bromodomain inhibitor which induces cell-cycle arrest and differentiation in hematologic malignancy model systems. In myeloid leukemia cells, it promotes rapid eviction of EP300/CBP from an enhancer subset marked by strong MYB occupancy and high H3K27 acetylation, with downregulation of the subordinate oncogenic network and redistribution to sites close to differentiation genes. In myeloma cells, CCS1477 induces eviction of EP300/CBP from FGFR3, the target of the common (4; 14) translocation, with redistribution away from IRF4-occupied sites to TCF3/E2A-occupied sites. In a subset of patients with relapsed or refractory disease, CCS1477 monotherapy induces differentiation responses in AML and objective responses in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma. In vivo preclinical combination studies reveal synergistic responses to treatment with standard-of-care agents. Thus, CCS1477 exhibits encouraging preclinical and early-phase clinical activity by disrupting recruitment of EP300/CBP to enhancer networks occupied by critical transcription factors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Proteínas Nucleares , Humanos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Factores de Transcripción , Dominios Proteicos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/genética , Proteína p300 Asociada a E1A
5.
Br J Haematol ; 170(3): 336-48, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25891006

RESUMEN

There is a significant unmet need in effective therapy for relapsed myeloma patients once they become refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. While data from the front line setting suggest bendamustine is superior to melphalan, there is no information defining optimal bendamustine dose in multiply-treated patients. We report a multi-centre randomized two-stage phase 2 trial simultaneously assessing deliverability and activity of two doses of bendamustine (60 mg/m2 vs. 100 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, thalidomide (100 mg) days 1-21 and low dose dexamethasone (20 mg) days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-d cycle. Ninety-four relapsing patients were treated on trial, with a median three prior treatment lines. A pre-planned interim deliverability and activity assessment led to closure of the 100 mg/m2 arm due to excess cytopenias, and led to amendment of entry criteria for cytopenias. Non-haematological toxicities including thromboembolism and neurotoxicity were infrequent. In the 60 mg/m2 arm, treatment was deliverable in 61.1% subjects and the partial response rate was 46.3% in the study eligible population, with 7.5 months progression-free survival. This study demonstrates bendamustine at 60 mg/m2 twice per month with thalidomide and dexamethasone is deliverable for repeated cycles in heavily pre-treated myeloma patients and has substantial clinical activity.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Mostaza Nitrogenada/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Mostaza Nitrogenada/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos
6.
Patient ; 8(2): 207-16, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25736164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder driven by dysregulated interleukin-6 production. MCD has a poor prognosis, and treatment is generally noncurative and aimed at symptom relief. Siltuximab is a novel, monoclonal interleukin-6 antibody recently shown to be effective in a registration clinical trial. MCD symptoms, such as fatigue, pain, and weakness, are most appropriately quantified using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. We assessed the effect of siltuximab on patient perception of symptoms, functional status, and wellbeing using PRO instruments. METHODS: We analyzed results of a randomized, double-blind trial comparing siltuximab 11 mg/kg every 3 weeks with placebo to treat MCD. Subjects (N = 79) completed the recently developed MCD-Symptom Scale (MCD-SS), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale, and the Short Form (SF)-36 at predetermined time points throughout the treatment period. Scores were compared at baseline and over time between the treatment arms and PRO instruments. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean number of symptoms reported was 9.2 (standard deviation 3.76) out of 16 total, as measured by the MCD-SS. Fatigue was a key symptom across all PRO instruments. Siltuximab-treated subjects reported early improvements in symptoms compared with subjects in the placebo arm on both the MCD-SS and FACIT-Fatigue scale. Statistically significant improvements in five SF-36 domains were observed in siltuximab-treated patients, namely role physical, role emotional, vitality, bodily pain, and mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MCD commonly report impairments in functioning, wellbeing, and fatigue at baseline. Siltuximab-treated patients reported significant improvements in these outcomes after treatment.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Castleman/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado de Salud , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad de Castleman/complicaciones , Método Doble Ciego , Emociones , Fatiga/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología
7.
Lancet Oncol ; 15(9): 966-74, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25042199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multicentric Castleman's disease is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder driven by dysregulated production of interleukin 6. No randomised trials have been done to establish the best treatment for the disease. We assessed the safety and efficacy of siltuximab-a chimeric monoclonal antibody against interleukin 6-in HIV-negative patients with multicentric Castleman's disease. METHODS: We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at 38 hospitals in 19 countries worldwide. We enrolled HIV-negative and human herpesvirus-8-seronegative patients with symptomatic multicentric Castleman's disease. Treatment allocation was randomised with a computer-generated list, with block size six, and stratification by baseline corticosteroid use. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to siltuximab (11 mg/kg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) or placebo; all patients also received best supportive care. Patients continued treatment until treatment failure. The primary endpoint was durable tumour and symptomatic response for at least 18 weeks for the intention-to-treat population. Enrolment has been completed. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01024036. FINDINGS: We screened 140 patients, 79 of whom were randomly assigned to siltuximab (n=53) or placebo (n=26). Durable tumour and symptomatic responses occurred in 18 (34%) of 53 patients in the siltuximab group and none of 26 in the placebo group (difference 34·0%, 95% CI 11·1-54·8, p=0·0012). The incidence of grade 3 or more adverse events (25 [47%] vs 14 [54%]) and serious adverse events (12 [23%] vs five [19%]) was similar in each group despite longer median treatment duration with siltuximab than with placebo (375 days [range 1-1031] vs 152 days [23-666]). The most common grade 3 or higher were fatigue (five vs one), night sweats (four vs one), and anaemia (one vs three). Three (6%) of 53 patients had serious adverse events judged reasonably related to siltuximab (lower respiratory tract infection, anaphylactic reaction, sepsis). INTERPRETATION: Siltuximab plus best supportive care was superior to best supportive care alone for patients with symptomatic multicentric Castleman's disease and well tolerated with prolonged exposure. Siltuximab is an important new treatment option for this disease. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Castleman/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Castleman/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Castleman/mortalidad , Intervalos de Confianza , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Cooperación Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Lancet Oncol ; 12(5): 431-40, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21507715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravenous injection is the standard administration route of bortezomib; however, subcutaneous administration is an important alternative. We compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib at the approved 1·3 mg/m(2) dose and twice per week schedule in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. METHODS: This randomised, phase 3 study was undertaken at 53 centres in ten countries in Europe, Asia, and South America. Patients aged 18 years and older with relapsed multiple myeloma after one to three previous lines of therapy were randomly assigned to receive up to eight 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1·3 mg/m(2), on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, by subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion. Randomisation was by an interactive voice response system based on a computer-generated randomisation schedule, stratified by number of previous lines and disease stage. Patients and treating physicians were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib in terms of overall response rate (ORR) after four cycles in all patients with a diagnosis of measurable, secretory multiple myeloma who received one or more dose of drug (response-evaluable population). Non-inferiority was defined as retaining 60% of the intravenous treatment effect. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00722566, and is ongoing for long-term follow-up. FINDINGS: 222 patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous (n=148) or intravenous (n=74) bortezomib. The response-evaluable population consisted of 145 patients in the subcutaneous group and 73 in the intravenous group. Patients received a median of eight cycles (range one to ten) in both groups. ORR after four cycles was 42% in both groups (61 patients in subcutaneous group and 31 in intravenous group; ORR difference -0·4%, 95% CI -14·3 to 13·5), showing non-inferiority (p=0·002). After a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 7·9-16·8) in the subcutaneous group and 12·0 months (8·1-15·6) in the intravenous group, there were no significant differences in time to progression (median 10·4 months, 95% CI 8·5-11·7, vs 9·4 months, 7·6-10·6; p=0·387) and 1-year overall survival (72·6%, 95% CI 63·1-80·0, vs 76·7%, 64·1-85·4; p=0·504) with subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 84 (57%) patients in the subcutaneous group versus 52 (70%) in the intravenous group; the most common were thrombocytopenia (19 [13%] vs 14 [19%]), neutropenia (26 [18%] vs 13 [18%]), and anaemia (18 [12%] vs six [8%]). Peripheral neuropathy of any grade (56 [38%] vs 39 [53%]; p=0·044), grade 2 or worse (35 [24%] vs 30 [41%]; p=0·012), and grade 3 or worse (nine [6%] vs 12 [16%]; p=0·026) was significantly less common with subcutaneous than with intravenous administration. Subcutaneous administration was locally well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: Subcutaneous bortezomib offers non-inferior efficacy to standard intravenous administration, with an improved safety profile. FUNDING: Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, and Millennium Pharmaceuticals.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Borónicos/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asia , Células Sanguíneas/efectos de los fármacos , Bortezomib , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/etnología , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de Proteasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteasas/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , América del Sur , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Psychooncology ; 20(1): 88-97, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20187072

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this project was to identify the nature and range of needs, as well as levels of quality of life (QOL), of both patients living with myeloma and their partners. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was used, recruiting patients and their partners from 4 hospitals in the United Kingdom at a mean time post-diagnosis of 5 years. Patients completed a scale exploring their Supportive Care Needs, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the EORTC QOL scale with its Myeloma module. The partners completed the partners' version of the Supportive Care Needs scale and HADS. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients and 93 of their partners participated. One-quarter of the patients and one-third of the partners reported unmet supportive care needs. About 27.4% of patients reported signs of anxiety and 25.2% reported signs of depression. Almost half the partners (48.8%) reported signs of anxiety and 13.6% signs of depression. Anxious/depressed patients had more than double unmet needs than non-anxious/depressed patients (P<0.05). QOL was moderate, with key areas of impairment being physical, emotional, social and cognitive functioning, and patients complained of several symptoms, including tiredness (40.7%), pain (35.9%), insomnia (32.3%), peripheral neuropathies (28.3%) and memory problems (22.3%). About 40.8% were worried about their health in the future. CONCLUSION: Long-term supportive care services should provide support to both patients and their partners in relation to their unmet needs, screening them for psychological disorders, referring them appropriately and timely, and optimising symptom management in order to improve the patients' QOL.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Mieloma Múltiple/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Apoyo Social , Esposos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/fisiopatología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Análisis de Regresión , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
11.
Support Care Cancer ; 19(1): 101-11, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19998045

RESUMEN

GOALS OF WORK: The purpose of this study was to explore the experience of living with myeloma after completion of treatments in patients and their informal caregivers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Qualitative interviews were carried out with 20 patients living with myeloma and 16 of their informal caregivers (mostly spouses), asking them through semi-structured interviews to talk about the effects of myeloma on their lives, issues and concerns, their supportive care needs and how they were coping in everyday life. MAIN RESULTS: Key findings indicate the significant impact myeloma has on patients' and caregivers' emotional, role, social and work-related areas of life. While patients seemed less engaged with their illness, their informal caregivers were providing practical and emotional support to patients almost exclusively, often by neglecting their own needs. This increased engagement with the informal caring often led to experiences of a heightened illness burden and difficulties with coping. Both patients and caregivers had significant fears and uncertainty about the future, with myeloma being described as a 'time bomb'. Both patients and caregivers were concealing stressful situations related to the illness from each other in an effort to protect them, although this resulted in isolation. CONCLUSIONS: While health professionals' attention has been concentrated in helping patients to get through treatments, it is imperative that psychosocial rehabilitation is offered also to those who survive many years after diagnosis and are off treatments. Caregivers are particularly vulnerable to the high demands of caring for myeloma patients, and a more concerted action by health professionals should be directed to them.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Mieloma Múltiple/psicología , Apoyo Social , Adaptación Psicológica , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida
12.
Br J Haematol ; 139(1): 70-80, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17854309

RESUMEN

The introduction of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has enabled the role of allogeneic transplantation to be re-evaluated in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). While T-cell depletion reduces graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), it potentially abrogates graft-versus-tumour activity and increases infective complications. We compared the results in 67 sibling donor transplantations following RIC in multiply relapsed patients from two national phase II studies conditioned with fludarabine/melphalan. One used cyclosporine/alemtuzumab (MF-A, n = 31), the other used cyclosporine/methotrexate (MF, n = 36) as GvHD prophylaxis. There was a small excess of chemorefractory cases in the MF cohort (P = NS). MF-A resulted in significantly lower incidences of non-relapse mortality, acute and chronic GvHD, but no significant excess of relapse/progression. Post donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) disease responses occurred in 8/14 (57%) and 6/11 (55%) patients in the MF-A and MF groups, respectively. Current progression-free survival (CPFS) was superior with MF-A (univariate analysis), with durable responses to DLI contributing to the favourable outcome (43% vs. 25%, P = 0.0356). Disease status at transplantation significantly influenced overall survival (P = 0.0038) and CPFS (P = 0.0014), retaining significance in multivariate analyses, which demonstrated a trend towards improved CPFS with T-cell depletion (P = 0.0939). These data suggest that alemtuzumab significantly reduced GvHD without resulting in a deleterious impact on survival outcomes following RIC in HL, and that durable responses to DLI may be more common following the inclusion of alemtuzumab in the conditioning protocol.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Depleción Linfocítica , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Adulto , Alemtuzumab , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/inmunología , Humanos , Transfusión de Linfocitos , Masculino , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Agonistas Mieloablativos/uso terapéutico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vidarabina/uso terapéutico
13.
J Exp Med ; 203(1): 27-33, 2006 Jan 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16390938

RESUMEN

Langerhans cells (LC) and other antigen-presenting cells are believed to be critical in initiating graft versus host responses that influence the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, their fate in humans is poorly understood. We have sought to define the effect of conditioning regimes and graft versus host disease (GVHD) on the survival of recipient LC and reconstitution of donor cells after transplant. Confocal microscopy of epidermal sheets shows that full intensity transplant (FIT) depletes LC more rapidly than reduced intensity transplant (RIT) at day 0, although the nadir is similar in both at 14-21 d. Recovery occurs rapidly within 40 d in the absence of acute GVHD, but is delayed beyond 100 d when GVHD is active. LC chimerism was determined in sex-mismatched transplants using a two-step Giemsa/fluorescence in situ hybridization assay on isolated cells. Acquisition of donor chimerism at 40 d is more rapid after FIT (97%) than RIT (36.5%), irrespective of blood myeloid engraftment. At 100 d, all transplants achieve at least 90% LC donor chimerism and over half achieve 100%. Complete donor chimerism is associated with prior acute cutaneous GVHD, suggesting a role for allogeneic T cells in promoting LC engraftment.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Células de Langerhans , Adulto , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimera por Trasplante , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante
14.
Br J Haematol ; 122(5): 778-87, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12930389

RESUMEN

The interleukin-1 (IL-1) family of cytokines is widely involved in inflammatory processes and diseases with an inflammatory component. Polymorphisms of the IL-1alpha, IL-1beta and IL-1Ra genes have been implicated in a number of autoimmune or inflammatory conditions, with polymorphism of the IL-1Ra gene showing association with severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We compared the clinical outcomes (GVHD and survival) of 115 patients after human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling allogeneic BMT with their genotype for two polymorphisms present in the IL-1alpha gene, which have been implicated in immune-related pathology. Possession of allele 2 of the IL-1alpha-889 polymorphism and allele 2 of the IL-1alpha variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the donor genotype was associated with the occurrence of chronic, but not acute GVHD. A local normal population was also genotyped for these polymorphisms, and subsequent analysis identified conserved haplotypes in this gene region. Haplotypes containing allele 2 at both IL-1alpha-889 and IL-1alpha VNTR loci were extremely uncommon, suggesting that both risk alleles would be inherited independently. Both loci could therefore function as independent disease association markers. The polymorphisms of the IL-1alpha gene could be used to predict chronic GVHD in HLA-matched sibling transplants alongside clinical risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/inmunología , Interleucina-1/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Adulto , Enfermedades de la Médula Ósea/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Haplotipos , Humanos , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/terapia , Masculino , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Donantes de Tejidos , Inmunología del Trasplante , Trasplante Homólogo
15.
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) ; 50(6): 371-8, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12546063

RESUMEN

This review summarizes recent results investigating the role of certain cytokine gene polymorphisms, including those of TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. It discusses their role in predicting outcome and the development of a genetic risk index for graft versus host disease (GvHD) in HLA-matched sibling transplants. By the comparative use of an in vitro human skin explant model, initial results suggest that certain cytokine gene polymorphisms may be associated with more severe disease.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Citocinas/genética , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Humanos , Polimorfismo Genético , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...