Peer support for smoking cessation: a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Peer-support programs are a useful social support strategy for populations trying to quit smoking who are willing to maintain smoking abstinence. This study is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of peer support for smoking cessation. METHODS: This protocol will be conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions 6.2. We will conduct a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ovidEmbase, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ovidMEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Open Grey, as well as the Trials Register of Promoting Health Interventions in EPPI-Centre, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and reference lists of included papers. The review will include randomized controlled trials of peer support interventions aimed to stop smoking in any population. Two reviewers will independently screen and select relevant studies. Version 2 of the Cochrane tool that assesses risk of bias in randomized trials will be used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The primary outcomes will be defined as the tobacco abstinence rate and adverse events. If a quantitative synthesis is not appropriate, a synthesis without meta-analysis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: This review will provide the best available evidence regarding the effects of peer support interventions to quit smoking. The results from this study will help to inform healthcare providers on the optimal peer support intervention modalities such as intensity, delivery methods, type of support provider, and duration of the intervention. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020196288.

e-Health Interventions for Community-Dwelling Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.

Background: Because type 2 diabetes mellitus is a critical health problem with increasing incidence, prevalence, and complications worldwide, e-health has been widely utilized for management in type 2 diabetes. Introduction: This scoping review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on e-health interventions aimed to examine service platforms, program types, outcomes, current status of research activities, research gaps, and the effectiveness of type 2 diabetes self-care management among community-dwelling adults. Materials and Methods: Arksey and O'Malley's method was adopted for this review. The Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE databases were searched from inception until April 2018. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and charted studies using a piloted charting form. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus, and results were collated, summarized, and thematically analyzed. Results: The final studies (N = 81) related to e-health interventions included systematic reviews/meta-analyses on clinical effectiveness (n = 64), usability (n = 14), and behavioral outcomes (n = 47). The commonest e-health intervention subtypes for type 2 diabetes care were patient monitoring (53/163, 32.5%), treatment adherence (50/163, 30.7%), and diabetes-related advice/education (34/163, 20.9%). Mobile devices were most often used to provide e-health services (57/142, 40.1%), followed by the internet (41/142, 28.9%). The e-health strategy that was effective in controlling blood glucose in type 2 diabetes patients was a multimodal intervention comprising treatment advice or education, treatment adherence or reminder methods, and patient monitoring. Treatment adherence or reminder methods and/or patient monitoring showed behavioral effects, but the usability of e-health interventions was controversial. Conclusions: We suggest that e-health intervention should be complex intervention including treatment advice/education, patient monitoring, and treatment adherence or reminder methods.

Current status of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in Korea: role and benefits.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was aimed to investigate the current clinical status of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) in Korea based on a National Health Insurance (NHI) database between 2011 and 2014. METHODS: The claims data of ESD for EGC in Korean NHI were reviewed using material codes of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service between November 2011 and December 2014. The current clinical status was analyzed in terms of treatment pattern, in-hospital length of stay (LOS), total medical costs, and en bloc resection rate according to the hospital type. RESULTS: A total of 23,828 cases of ESD for EGC were evaluated. ESD was performed in 67.4% of cases in tertiary care hospitals, 31.8% in general hospitals, and 0.8% in hospitals, respectively. The median LOS was 5 days, and total median medical costs was approximately 1,300 US dollars. En bloc resection rate was 99%; 8.5% of cases underwent additional treatment within 90 days ESD, and 5.5% in 91 to 365 days after ESD. The clinical status was not significantly different according to the year and hospital type. CONCLUSION: A majority of ESD for EGC were performed in tertiary care hospitals in Korea. The clinical status showed excellent clinical outcomes and did not differ by the year and between the types of hospitals in Korea.