Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
RMD Open ; 10(1)2024 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38508678

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite better therapies and strategies, many people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have persistent pain, often from abnormal pain processing, now termed nociplastic pain. However, RA patients with fibromyalgia (FM), a central nociplastic pain syndrome, also have power doppler ultrasound (PDUS+) joint inflammation. To understand the complex causes of pain, we performed clinical examination and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) plus comprehensive PDUS evaluation not previously combined. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of sequential RA patients with at least moderate DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate disease activity, we assessed 66/68 joints for swelling and tenderness, respectively, FM American College of Rheumatology 2010 diagnostic criteria, completed PROMs for function, quality of life and mood, alongside PDUS examination of 44 joints. Statistical analysis included logistic regression modelling and regularised (lasso) logistic regression methods. RESULTS: From 158 patients, 72 (46%) patients met FM criteria, with significantly worse tender joint counts and PROMs, but no differences in PDUS compared with the non-FM group. Categorising patients by PDUS+ joint presence and/or FM criteria, we identified four distinct groups: 43 (27.2%) patients with -FM-PD, 43 (27.2%) with -FM+PD, 42 (26.6%) with +FM-PD and 30 (19%) with +FM+PD. Both FM+ groups had worse PROMs for fatigue, mood and pain, compared with the FM- groups. We were unable to develop algorithms to identify different groups. CONCLUSION: The unexpected group -FM-PD group may have peripheral nociplastic pain, not commonly recognised in rheumatology. Only 46% of patients demonstrated PDUS+ inflammation. However clinical examination and PROMs did not reliably differentiate groups, emphasising PDUS remains an important tool.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Fibromialgia , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Fibromialgia/complicaciones , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Inflamación
3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 17(1): 404, 2016 Sep 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27659057

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical measures of disease activity may not reliably discriminate between patients with active inflammatory disease and those with concomitant fibromyalgia (FM). Recent work has shown RA patients with a 28 tender joint count (TJC) minus swollen joint count (SJC) of 7 or more (joint count criteria) are more likely to meet classification criteria for FM. This study aimed to determine whether RA patients meeting clinical criteria for FM had lower levels of joint inflammation as determined by ultrasound (US). METHODS: RA patients with DAS28 > 2.6 were recruited. Patients underwent clinical assessment including ultrasound examination of the hands and wrists with quantification of grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) synovitis. Patients completed questionnaires to assess pain, fatigue, disability and psychological comorbidity. RESULTS: Patients meeting either of the FM criteria had higher scores for disease activity, depression, disability and fatigue. Those meeting both the joint count and classification FM criteria had significantly lower levels of GS and PD inflammation on US. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients with concomitant FM, as determined by widespread soft tissue tenderness but fewer clinically inflamed joints, have higher disease activity scores but may have lower levels of synovial inflammation on US. This has implications for the identification and management of these patients who may not respond to conventional therapy and hence be more suitable for alternative approaches to treatment.

4.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 55(11): 1993-2000, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27498355

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP) is a human endoplasmic reticulum-resident stress protein. In pre-clinical studies it has anti-inflammatory properties due to the induction of regulatory cells. This randomized placebo-controlled, dose ascending double blind phase I/IIA trial of BiP in patients with active RA, who had failed accepted therapies, had the primary objective of safety. Potential efficacy was measured by DAS28-ESR and changes in biomarkers. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with active RA who had failed one or more DMARDs were sequentially assigned to three groups each of eight patients randomly allocated to receive placebo (two patients) or BiP (six patients), 1, 5 or 15 mg. Patients received a single i.v. infusion over 1 h and were observed as inpatients overnight. A 12-week follow-up for clinical, rheumatological and laboratory assessments for safety, efficacy (DAS28-ESR) and biomarker analysis was performed. RESULTS: No infusion reactions or serious adverse drug reactions were noted. Adverse events were evenly distributed between placebo and BiP groups with no BiP-related toxicities. Haematological, renal and metabolic parameters showed no drug-related toxicities. Remission was only achieved by patients in the 5 and 15 mg groups, and not patients who received placebo or 1 mg BiP. Good DAS28-ESR responses were achieved in all treatment groups. The BiP responding patients showed significantly lower serum concentrations of CRP, 2 weeks post-infusion compared with pre-infusion levels, and of VEGF and IL-8 from the placebo group. CONCLUSION: BiP (⩽15 mg) is safe in patients with active RA. Some patients had clinical and biological improvements in RA activity. BiP merits further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry, http://isrctn.com, ISRCTN22288225 and EudraCT, https://eudract.ema.europa.eu, 2011-005831-19.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfocinas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Interleucina-8/metabolismo , Linfocinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Adulto Joven
6.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 27(2): 180-4, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25962818

RESUMEN

This review will focus on the recent information and strategies now informing best use of TNF inhibitor therapy in RA. These issues include the role of TNFi therapy in early RA management, anti-drug antibodies in TNFi therapy, updates on safety and optimal dosage regimens in long term management.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/farmacología , Humanos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA