Translocation (11;14) is a common cytogenetic abnormality in clonal plasma cells in monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease.

Monoclonal Immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD) is characterised by deposits of intact monoclonal light chains in the kidney leading to renal dysfunction. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the underlying plasma cell cytogenetic abnormalities in MIDD. CyclinD1 (11;14) translocation was identified in 12/27 (45%) patients. Among the patients without translocation, del13q and hyperdiploidy were the most common abnormalities. Patients in the non-t (11;14) group had a higher baseline light-chain ratio, higher proteinuria and lower eGFR as compared to patients with t (11;14). Haematological VGPR or higher was seen in 58% of t (11;14), and 30% without t (11;14), possibly related to higher use of Daratumumab-based therapy in the t (11;14) group. With a median follow-up of 750 days, 30% (8/24) progressed to end stage renal disease (ESRD). eGFR <20 mL/min (HR 25, 95% CI 2.09-298, p = 0.01) and 24 urine protein >3 g/24 h (HR 9, 95% CI 1.27-63.90, p = 0.02) at diagnosis were significantly associated with progression to ESRD. Renal survival was better in t (11;14) as compared to the non-t (11;14) group (HR 0.11, p = 0.06). Translocation (11;14) is a common abnormality in MIDD and affects the presentation and outcomes. Identification of this abnormality should lead to exploration of BCL2 inhibitors in this disease.

Quadruplet regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Quadruplet regimens (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with proteosome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory (IMID) drugs) are increasingly being investigated in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The objective of our study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to measure the efficacy and toxicity of quadruplet regimens utilized in NDMM. Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, and meeting libraries from inception to January 24, 2024, in addition to ASCO conference abstracts 2024 were searched using terms reflecting MM and component of the quadruplet regimen. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared backbone regimens consisting of a PI and IMID versus the same regimen plus an anti-CD38 mAb in NDMM. We identified seven RCTs including 3716 patients. Compared to triplets, quadruplets increase the overall response rate (ORR, relative risk [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), and progression free survival (PFS, hazard ratio [HR]] 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.66). Quadruplets increase the rates of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5 (RR 1.39, 95% 1.23-1.58) and at 10-6 (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.36-1.94). Quadruplets improve overall survival (OS, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.79). There was a slight increase in the rates of grade 3-4 infections (RR 1.22 [95% CI 1.07-1.39]) noted with quadruplets compared to triplets. Overall, in this meta-analysis quadruplets were associated with improved efficacy including ORR, MRD negativity, PFS and OS with a slight increase in infection rates. Quadruplet regimens represent a new standard of care particularly in transplant eligible NDMM.

Evaluating early intervention in smoldering myeloma clinical trials: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), an asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM), carries a variable risk of progression to MM. There is little consensus on the efficacy or optimal timing of treatment in SMM. We systematically reviewed the landscape of all clinical trials in SMM. We compared the efficacy of treatment regimens studied in SMM to results from these regimens when used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), to determine whether the data suggest deeper responses in SMM versus NDMM. METHODS: All prospective interventional clinical trials for SMM, including published studies, meeting abstracts, and unpublished trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov up to April 1, 2023, were identified. Trial-related variables were captured, including treatment strategy and efficacy results. Relevant clinical endpoints were defined as overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS: Among 45 SMM trials identified, 38 (84.4%) assessed active myeloma drugs, while 7 (15.6%) studied bone-modifying agents alone. Of 18 randomized trials in SMM, only one (5.6%) had a primary endpoint of OS; the most common primary endpoint was progression-free survival (n = 7, 38.9%). Among 32 SMM trials with available results, 9 (28.1%) met their prespecified primary endpoint, of which 5 were single-arm studies. Six treatment regimens were tested in both SMM and NDMM; 5 regimens yielded a lower rate of very good partial response rate or better (≥VGPR) in SMM compared to the corresponding NDMM trial (32% vs 63%, 43% vs 53%, 40% vs 63%, 86% vs 89%, 92% vs 95%, and 94% vs 87%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this systematic review of all prospective interventional clinical trials in SMM, we found significant variability in trial design, including randomization status, primary endpoints, and types of intervention used. Despite the statistical limitations, comparison of treatment regimens revealed no compelling evidence that the treatment is more effective when introduced early in SMM compared to NDMM.

Multiple myeloma clinical trials exclude patients with the highest-risk disease: a systematic review of trial exclusion criteria.

Patients with certain subsets of multiple myeloma continue to have poor outcomes and are in need of novel treatment approaches. Strict eligibility criteria for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limit access to clinical trials and limit the external validity of trial results for these patients. We systematically reviewed RCTs in newly diagnosed myeloma from 2006 to 2023 to ascertain the prevalence of 12 key exclusion criteria and trends over time. 80 RCTs were included. Exclusion criteria included: age in 43 (51%) trials; projected life expectancy in 20 (24%); performance status in 74 (87%); non-secretory and/or oligosecretory disease in 47 (55%), hepatic function in 64 (79%), renal function in 63 (74%), hematological thresholds in 50 (59%), prior malignancy in 68 (80%), and neuropathy in 50 (59%). For 53 trials which had detailed exclusion criteria available, plasma cell leukemia was excluded in 21 (40%), extramedullary disease in 5 (9%) and CNS disease in 13 (25%). The percentage of studies invoking each of these exclusion criteria did not significantly improve over time on univariate regression analysis, and exclusion criteria relating to neuropathy have worsened. The restrictive eligibility criteria of most myeloma RCTs perpetuate a cycle where limited data exists to treat challenging myeloma subtypes.

Immune prognostic score predicts the risk of infection and survival outcomes in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies.

The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and CAR-HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) score identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients at high risk for immune-mediated toxicity and early mortality with cellular immunotherapy. However, their association with outcomes in patients receiving T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (bsAb) is unclear. This multi-centre retrospective study examines the association of baseline GPS and CAR-HT scores with outcomes in 126 MM patients treated with bsAb. Overall, 19% were identified as GPS high risk but did not experience increased toxicity or mortality. Conversely, high-risk CAR-HT patients had a higher incidence of infections and inferior survival, suggesting a need for aggressive infection mitigation strategies.

Prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities by FISH in AL amyloidosis with daratumumab-based frontline therapy.

We performed an international retrospective cohort study to investigate the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities by FISH in 283 patients with AL amyloidosis treated with frontline daratumumab-bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (Dara-VCD) or Dara-VD. The cytogenetic subgroups of interest were t(11;14), gain/amp(1q) [hereafter, +1q], hyperdiploidy, deletion(13q), del(17p), and myeloma high-risk (HR) translocations (t[4;14], t[14;16], or t[14;20]). The endpoints of interest were rate of hematologic complete response (heme CR), very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), and hematologic event-free survival (Heme EFS). The incidence of abnormalities was following: t(11;14)-53.4%; deletion (13q)-28.9%; +1q-22.3%; hyperdiploidy-19.4%; HR translocations-6.6%; and deletion(17p)-4.5%. The heme-CR rate by cytogenetic subgroups were: t(11;14) vs no t(11;14)-45.2% vs 41.8% (p=0.597); del(13q) vs no del(13q)-46.8% vs 42.8% (p=0.594); +1q vs no +1q-30.2% vs 47.9% (p=0.022); hyperdiploidy vs no hyperdiploidy-39.5% vs 44.9% (p=0.541); HR translocations vs none: 45.5% vs 43.1% (p=0.877); and del(17p) vs no del(17p)-50.0% vs 42.9% respectively (p=0.658). Similarly, +1q was the only subgroup with a significantly lower ≥VGPR rate (64.2% vs 79.0%; p=0.033). At a median follow-up of 19.8 months, the median heme-EFS was 49.6 months (95% CI, 24.7-not reached [NR]), and the 2-year OS was 80.98% (95% CI, 75.6-85.4). The presence of+1q was significantly associated with worse heme-EFS on multivariate analysis (HR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.14-3.71; p=0.017). Notably, there was no adverse prognostic impact of t(11;14) on heme EFS or OS. In conclusion, +1q is associated with worse outcome in the daratumumab-era. Clinical trials testing novel immunotherapies frontline should be enriched in +1q to further improve outcomes in this subgroup.

Safety and Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors for Amyloid Light-Chain Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have demonstrated benefit in patients with heart failure, but minimal data exist concerning the use of these medications in amyloid light-chain cardiomyopathy (AL-CM). We performed a retrospective study to assess the safety and efficacy of SGLT2is in AL-CM. METHODS: We queried our institutional registry and identified 27 patients with AL-CM who received SGLT2is. The safety analysis included all 27 patients and assessed SGLT2i-associated adverse events, hospitalizations and deaths. To decrease confounding, the efficacy analysis included only a subset of patients with stable disease (on stable anti-plasma cell therapy for ≥ 2 months prior to baseline and had achieved at least a hematologic Very Good Partial Response) and compared disease-marker changes in these patients (n = 17) with those of a contemporaneous untreated control cohort from our registry (n = 21). RESULTS: The mean age of the overall population was 68.6 (standard deviation 9.4) years. Of the patients, 7 (14.6%) had diabetes, and 19 (39.6%) had chronic kidney disease. In the safety analysis, the median follow-up time was 10.9 (interquartile range 7.2) months. Two (7.4%) patients discontinued SGLT2is due to hypovolemia and genital irritation, and 6 (22.2%) additional patients temporarily held SGLT2is due to an adverse event that is commonly related to volume depletion. There were 13 hospitalizations, all considered unrelated to SGLT2i use, and no deaths occurred. In the efficacy analysis, SGLT2i-treated patients had more severe disease at baseline than controls, demonstrating significantly higher median troponin-T and loop diuretic dosage (P < 0.05). Compared with controls, SGLT2i treatment was associated with significantly greater reductions in loop diuretic dosage (P < 0.001) and NTproBNP levels (P = 0.033) across 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up timepoints. SGLT2i treatment was also associated with a significantly greater reduction in mean arterial pressure at 12 months (P = 0.031) but not at other timepoints. No significant differences were observed in changes in weight, eGFR, troponin-T, proteinuria, or albumin levels. CONCLUSIONS: In this small-scale retrospective study, we demonstrate that SGLT2is are well tolerated by most patients with AL-CM, but volume depletion symptoms may limit continuous use. SGLT2is may aid management of congestion in AL-CM, as evidenced by reduced diuretic dosage and NTproBNP levels without adverse renal effects. Larger long-term studies are needed to build on our findings.

Outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in patients with t(11;14) light chain amyloidosis after failure of daratumumab-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab's incorporation in the upfront treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis has led to daratumumab (dara) refractoriness early in disease course. Patients who experience relapse or have suboptimal response to dara-based-therapy, have limited options. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in t(11;14) positive AL patients who previously failed dara. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with AL were included in this bi-institutional retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Dara failure was due to inadequate response in 20 (65%) patients, haematologic relapse in 7 (22%), and both haematologic plus organ relapse in 4 (13%). Overall haematologic response rate to venetoclax-based therapy was 97%, with ≥ VGPR being 91%. Of the 19 evaluable patients with cardiac involvement, 14 (74%) achieved organ response. Of the 13 evaluable patients with renal involvement, 6 (46%) achieved organ response. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12- and 24-month TTNT rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. At data-cut-off, four patients had died, all from AL-related organ complications. The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 89% and 85%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26% of patients, with 6% due to infections. CONCLUSION: These findings are encouraging for the use of venetoclax as salvage therapy post-dara failure.

Thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma: a case-based review with practical guidelines.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant challenge in the context of multiple myeloma, with an incidence of up to 10% in newly diagnosed patients and varying frequency in the relapsed/refractory setting. Accurate VTE risk assessment and personalized thromboprophylaxis strategies are important parts of supportive care in myeloma. There are three validated risk assessment models for prediction of VTE risk in newly diagnosed myeloma-SAVED, IMPEDE-VTE, and PRISM. In this review, we delve into the practical applications of VTE risk prediction models in the context of current therapies. By emphasizing the necessity of a tailored approach, we underscore the importance of considering patient-specific, disease-specific, and treatment-specific risk factors in each clinical scenario, and using that data to complement the output from risk assessment models. We also provide a summary of currently available data on VTE thromboprophylaxis in myeloma, and highlight specific situations where direct oral anticoagulants should be strongly considered. Our objective is to fill the critical gaps in VTE prophylaxis and management through the analysis of specific patient cases and provide a practical overview for clinicians.

Dietary interventions in cancer: a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Prior systematic reviews addressing the impact of diet on cancer outcomes have focused on specific dietary interventions. In this systematic review, we assessed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating dietary interventions for cancer patients, examining the range of interventions, endpoints, patient populations, and results. METHODS: This systematic review identified all RCTs conducted before January 2023 testing dietary interventions in patients with cancer. Assessed outcomes included quality of life, functional outcomes, clinical cancer measurements (eg, progression-free survival, response rates), overall survival, and translational endpoints (eg, inflammatory markers). RESULTS: In total, 252 RCTs were identified involving 31 067 patients. The median sample size was 71 (interquartile range 41 to 118), and 80 (32%) studies had a sample size greater than 100. Most trials (n = 184, 73%) were conducted in the adjuvant setting. Weight or body composition and translational endpoints were the most common primary endpoints (n = 64, 25%; n = 52, 21%, respectively). Direct cancer measurements and overall survival were primary endpoints in 20 (8%) and 7 (3%) studies, respectively. Eight trials with a primary endpoint of cancer measurement (40%) met their endpoint. Large trials in colon (n = 1429), breast (n = 3088), and prostate cancer (n = 478) each showed no effect of dietary interventions on endpoints measuring cancer. CONCLUSION: Most RCTs of dietary interventions in cancer are small and measure nonclinical endpoints. Although only a small number of large RCTs have been conducted to date, these trials have not shown an improvement in cancer outcomes. Currently, there is limited evidence to support dietary interventions as a therapeutic tool in cancer care.

Teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: multi-institutional real-world study.

The objective of our study was to report real-world data on the safety and efficacy of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of teclistamab up until August 2023. One hundred and ten patients were included, of whom, 86% had triple-class refractory disease, 76% penta-refractory disease, and 35% had prior exposure to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting therapies. The overall response rate (ORR) in our cohort was 62%, with a ≥ very good partial remission (VGPR) rate of 51%. The ORR in patients with and without prior BCMA-targeted therapies was 54% vs 67%, respectively (p = 0.23). At a median follow-up of 3.5 months (range, 0.39-10.92), the estimated 3 month and 6 month progression free survival (PFS) was 57% (95% CI, 48%, 68%) and 52% (95% CI, 42%, 64%) respectively. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was 56% and 11% respectively, with grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS noted in 3.5% and 4.6% of patients respectively. 78 unique infections were diagnosed in 44 patients, with the incidence of all-grade and grade ≥3 infections being 40% vs 26% respectively. Primary prophylaxis with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was associated with a significantly lower infection risk on multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.17, 0.64; p = 0.001).