Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 58(2): 156-161, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534509

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether video-based patient decision aids (VBPDAs) for cataract surgery consultation can enhance a patient's decision-making process while upholding safety regulations during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. DESIGN: Single-centre consecutive case study. PARTICIPANTS: 147 patients, with an average age of 70 years, who came in for a cataract surgery consult were enrolled in this study. METHODS: All patients watched part 1 of the VBPDA outlining the process of cataract surgery and the decisions involved. Patients then underwent cataract surgery consultation with an ophthalmologist. Afterward, if the patient was indicated for surgery, part 2 of the VBPDA was played. At the end of the visit, all patients completed a survey assessing the effects of COVID-19 safety precautions on their appointment. In addition, patients who had gone forward with surgery complete the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). RESULTS: For patients proceeding with cataract surgery, the median DCS score was 9.38 (range, 0-54.69, min-max) on a scale from 0 to 100 (low-high decisional conflict). A DCS score <25 indicates low decisional conflict (n = 76, 68.47%) and a score >25 indicates feeling unsure (n = 35, 31.53%). The DCS also can be separated into various subscales: the informed subscale (median = 8.33; min-max = 0-66.67), values subscale (16.67, 0-58.33), support subscale (8.33, 0-50.00), uncertainty subscale (8.33, 0-83.33), and effective decision subscale (0, 0-37.50). CONCLUSION: Our study found VBPDAs to be an effective tool to enhance the patient decision-making process for cataract surgery during the COVID-19 era.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Derivación y Consulta , Catarata/complicaciones , Catarata/epidemiología , Toma de Decisiones
2.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; 30(7-8): 1564-1567, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33979245

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report a case of Purtscher-like retinopathy secondary to acute pancreatitis caused by medication-induced calcium-alkali syndrome in a pregnant woman. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 39-year-old 23-week pregnant patient complained of visual disturbances during admission for acute pancreatitis precipitated by calcium-alkali syndrome. History revealed the acute ingestion of over 2,400 mg of elemental calcium from over the counter medication in the background of longstanding use. Visual acuity was counting fingers at 1 foot bilaterally. Posterior segment exam revealed Purtscher-flecken in the posterior pole with scattered dot hemorrhages. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed inner retinal thickening and increased hyper-reflectivity. OCT angiography demonstrated loss of flow primarily in the superficial capillary plexuses. The patient was diagnosed with Purtscher-like retinopathy and observed. Two months follow up revealed resolution of the funduscopic findings and visual acuity improved minimally to 20/200 in the right eye and counting fingers in the left eye. CONCLUSION: Common over the counter medication can potentiate a calcium-alkali syndrome capable of causing a Purtscher-like retinopathy.


Asunto(s)
Calcio , Pancreatitis , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Álcalis , Enfermedad Aguda , Pancreatitis/inducido químicamente , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico
3.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 53(5): 491-496, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30340717

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize emergency optometrist referrals triaged at a tertiary ophthalmology care centre by physical examination findings and provisional diagnosis accuracy. DESIGN: Prospective case review. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients referred to a tertiary eye care clinic for an after-hours ocular consult. METHODS: Variables extracted from the patient charts included date of referral, age, sex, eye(s) under examination, referral visual acuity (VA), referral intraocular pressure (IOP), the referring optometrist's provisional diagnosis, VA at the time of the ophthalmologist consultation, IOP at the time of the ophthalmologist consultation, number of days between referral and ophthalmic consultation, and the ophthalmologist's diagnosis. Optometrist VA measures were correlated against ophthalmologist measures for left eye, right eye, diseased eye, and nondiseased eye. The independent t test was used to compare IOP measures between clinicians, and the absolute frequency of agreement between localization of eye pathology was reported. RESULTS: After categorizing disease by anatomic location, absolute agreement between optometrist provisional diagnosis and ophthalmologist diagnosis was 60.0%. Strong correlations were found between optometrist and ophthalmologist VA measurements. IOP measurements were reported less frequently by optometrists. In cases in which referral IOP was documented, no significant difference was observed between clinician measures. CONCLUSIONS: VA and IOP measurements by optometrists are reliable, although IOP measurements were included less frequently in optometrist referrals. Optometrist referrals correctly localized eye pathology in 60.0% of cases. Two cases of retinal tear and 2 cases of retinal detachment, for which a precise reason for referral is ideal, were referred for other reasons.


Asunto(s)
Glaucoma/diagnóstico , Oftalmología/métodos , Optometría/métodos , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Triaje/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Agudeza Visual
4.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 53(2): 110-116, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29631820

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient satisfaction with emergency ophthalmology care and determine the effect provision of anticipated appointment wait time has on scores. DESIGN: Single-centre, randomized control trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients triaged at the Hamilton Regional Eye Institute (HREI) from November 2015 to July 2016. METHODS: Fifty patients triaged for next-day appointments at the HREI were randomly assigned to receive standard-of-care preappointment information or standard-of-care information in addition to an estimated appointment wait time. Patient satisfaction with care was assessed postvisit using the modified Judgements of Hospital Quality Questionnaire (JHQQ). In determining how informing patients of typical wait times influenced satisfaction, the Mann-Whitney U test was performed. As secondary study outcomes, we sought to determine patient satisfaction with the intervention material using the Fisher exact test and the effect that wait time, age, sex, education, mobility, and number of health care providers seen had on satisfaction scores using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The median JHQQ response was "very good" (4/5) and between "very good" and "excellent" (4.5/5) in the intervention and control arms, respectively. There was no difference in patient satisfaction between the cohorts (Mann-Whitney U = 297.00, p = 0.964). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that wait times influenced patient satisfaction (OR = 0.919, 95% CI 0.864-0.978, p = 0.008). Of the intervention arm patients, 92.0% (N = 23) found the preappointment information useful, whereas only 12.5% (N = 3) of the control cohort patients noted the same (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Provision of anticipated wait time information to patients in an emergency on-call ophthalmology clinic did not influence satisfaction with care as captured by the JHQQ.


Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Oftalmopatías/terapia , Oftalmología/organización & administración , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/métodos , Listas de Espera , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
5.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 38(11): 1911-7, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22980724

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of multiple trabecular micro-bypass stents combined with cataract surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and cataract. SETTING: Private practice, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Eyes with OAG had implantation of 2 or 3 micro-bypass stents with concurrent cataract surgery and follow-up through 1 year. Efficacy measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) and topical ocular hypotensive medication use. Safety assessment included complications and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). RESULTS: The study comprised 53 eyes (47 patients); 28 had implantation of 2 stents and 25 had implantation of 3 stents. The overall mean 1-year postoperative IOP was 14.3 mm Hg, which was significantly lower than preoperative IOP overall and in each group (P<.001). The target IOP was achieved in a significantly higher proportion of eyes at 1 year versus preoperatively (77% versus 43%; P<.001). Overall, 83% of eyes had a decrease in topical ocular hypotensive medication at 1 year from preoperatively, with a 74% decrease in the mean number of medications (from 2.7 to 0.7) at 1 year (P<.001). The 3-stent group was on significantly fewer medications than the 2-stent group at 1 year (0.4 versus 1.0; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Using multiple micro-bypass stents with concurrent cataract surgery led to a mean postoperative IOP of less than 15 mm Hg and allowed patients to achieve target pressure control with significantly fewer medications through 1 year. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Ahmed is a consultant to Glaukos Corp. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.


Asunto(s)
Catarata/complicaciones , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/cirugía , Iridectomía , Facoemulsificación , Stents , Trabeculectomía , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/complicaciones , Humanos , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Tonometría Ocular , Agudeza Visual/fisiología
6.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 47(2): 113-7, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22560414

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare three different techniques of obtaining informed patient consent and the relative acceptance rates for resident involvement in cataract surgery. The techniques differed with regards to physician-patient interaction, and how resident involvement was presented. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care ophthalmology department with a recently established residency training program. PARTICIPANTS: 356 patients undergoing informed consent procedure for cataract surgery. METHODS: Charts of all patients undergoing cataract surgery by 3 cataract surgeons from October 2009 to March 2010 were reviewed. Patient demographics, the documentation of a specific request for resident participation, and the patient response were recorded. Response rates were analyzed between the three different techniques/surgeons. RESULTS: Consent to resident participation was found to range from 21% to 86%. Higher acceptance rates were associated with direct personal conversation between surgeon and patient. CONCLUSION: High acceptance rates for resident involvement in cataract surgery can be achieved with full disclosure of resident involvement to patients.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Internado y Residencia , Oftalmología/educación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...