RESUMEN
Background: There is an increased trend of e-cigarette but the toxic effects of e-cigarette metabolites are not widely studied especially in liver disease. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of recent e-cigarette use in a nationally representative sample of US adults and adolescents and its association amongst respondents with liver disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2015 to 2018. The self-reported NHANES questionnaire was used to assess liver disease (MCQ160L, MCQ170L and MCQ 510 (a-e)), e-cigarette use (SMQ900) and traditional smoking status (SMQ020 or SMQ040). We conducted univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression models to predict the association of e-cigarette use, traditional smoking and dual smoking amongst the population with liver disease. Results: Out of total 178,300 respondents, 7,756 (4.35%) were e-cigarette users, 48,625 (27.27%) traditional smoking, 23,444 (13.15%) dual smoking and 98,475 (55.23%) non-smokers. Females had a higher frequency of e-cigarette use (49.3%) compared to dual (43%) and traditional smoking (40.8%) (P < 0.0001). Respondents with a past history of any liver disease have lower frequency of e-cigarette use compared to dual and traditional smoking, respectively (2.4% vs. 6.4% vs. 7.2%; P < 0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression models, we found that e-cigarette users (odds ratio (OR): 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 - 1.06; P < 0.0001) and dual smoking (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.50 - 1.51; P < 0.0001) were associated with higher odds of having history of liver disease compared to non-smokers. Conclusion: Our study found that despite the low frequency of e-cigarette use in respondents with liver disease, there was higher odds of e-cigarette use amongst patients with liver disease. This warrants the need for more future prospective studies to evaluate the long-term effects and precise mechanisms of e-cigarette toxicants on the liver.
RESUMEN
Introduction Approximately 5-10% of strokes occur in adults of less than 45 years of age. The rising prevalence of stroke risk factors may increase stroke rates in young adults (YA). We aimed to compare risk factors and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) among YA. Methods Adult hospitalizations for AIS and concurrent risk factors were found in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Weighted analysis using chi-square and multivariable survey logistic regression was performed to evaluate AIS-related outcomes and risk factors among YA (18-45 years) and older patients. Results A total of 4,224,924 AIS hospitalizations were identified from 2003 to 2014, out of which 198,378 (4.7%) were YA. Prevalence trend of YA with AIS showed incremental pattern over time (2003: 4.36% to 2014: 4.7%; pTrend<0.0001). In regression analysis, the risk factors associated with AIS in YA were obesity (adjusted odds ratio {aOR}: 2.26; p<0.0001), drug abuse (aOR: 2.56; p<0.0001), history of smoking (aOR: 1.20; p<0.0001), infective endocarditis (aOR: 2.08; p<0.0001), cardiomyopathy (aOR: 2.11; p<0.0001), rheumatic fever (aOR: 4.27; p=0.0014), atrial septal disease (aOR: 2.46; p<0.0001), ventricular septal disease (aOR: 4.99; p<0.0001), HIV infection (aOR: 4.36; p<0.0001), brain tumors (aOR: 7.89; p<0.0001), epilepsy (aOR: 1.43; p<0.0001), end stage renal disease (aOR: 2.19; p<0.0001), systemic lupus erythematous (aOR: 3.76; p<0.0001), polymyositis (aOR: 2.72; p=0.0105), ankylosis spondylosis (aOR: 2.42; p=0.0082), hypercoagulable state (aOR: 4.03; p<0.0001), polyarteritis nodosa (aOR: 5.65; p=0.0004), and fibromuscular dysplasia (aOR: 2.83; p<0.0001). Conclusion There is an increasing trend in AIS prevalence over time among YA. Both traditional and non-traditional risk factors suggest that greater awareness is needed, with prevention strategies for AIS among young adults.
