RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical training traditionally took place at academic centres, but changed to incorporate community and rural hospitals. As little data exist comparing resident case volumes between these locations, the objective of this study was to determine variations in these volumes for routine general surgery procedures. METHODS: We analyzed senior resident case logs from 2009 to 2019 from a general surgery residency program. We classified training centres as academic, community, and rural. Cases included appendectomy, cholecystectomy, hernia repair, bowel resection, adhesiolysis, and stoma formation or reversal. We matched procedures to blocks based on date of case and compared groups using a Poisson mixed-methods model and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 85 residents and 28 532 cases. Postgraduate year (PGY) 3 residents at academic sites performed 10.9 (95% CI 10.1-11.6) cases per block, which was fewer than 14.7 (95% CI 13.6-15.9) at community and 15.3 (95% CI 14.2-16.5) at rural sites. Fourth-year residents (PGY4) showed a greater difference, with academic residents performing 8.7 (95% CI 8.0-9.3) cases per block compared with 23.7 (95% CI 22.1-25.4) in the community and 25.6 (95% CI 23.6-27.9) at rural sites. This difference continued in PGY5, with academic residents performing 8.3 (95% CI 7.3-9.3) cases per block, compared with 18.9 (95% CI 16.8-21.0) in the community and 14.5 (95% CI 7.0-21.9) at rural sites. CONCLUSION: Senior residents performed fewer routine cases at academic sites than in community and rural centres. Programs can use these data to optimize scheduling for struggling residents who require exposure to routine cases, and help residents complete the requirements of a Competence by Design curriculum.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/educación , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Comunitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate New South Wales (NSW) psychiatrists' and psychiatry trainees' knowledge and attitudes towards eating disorders (EDs). METHOD: A total of 1781 psychiatrists and trainees in NSW were invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire assessing ED confidence, knowledge and attitudes. RESULTS: A total of 51 doctors responded to the survey, with 38 completing all items. Significant knowledge gaps were revealed. Respondents expressed a desire for more ED training. CONCLUSION: Enhanced ED training in psychiatry education and incorporating the lived experience voice to improve attitudes appear necessary.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Psiquiatría , Humanos , Psiquiatría/educación , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/terapia , Nueva Gales del Sur , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , PsiquiatrasRESUMEN
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to treat several neuropsychiatric disorders including depression, where it is effective in approximately one half of patients for whom pharmacological approaches have failed. Treatment response is related to stimulation parameters such as the stimulation frequency, pattern, intensity, location, total number of pulses and sessions applied, and target brain network engagement. One critical but underexplored component of the stimulation procedure is the orientation or yaw angle of the commonly used figure-of-eight TMS coil, which is known to impact neuronal response to TMS. However, coil orientation has remained largely unchanged since TMS was first used to treat depression and continues to be based on motor cortex anatomy, which may not be optimal for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex treatment site. In this targeted narrative review, we evaluate experimental, clinical, and computational evidence indicating that optimizing coil orientation may improve TMS treatment outcomes. The properties of the electric field induced by TMS, the changes to this field caused by the differing conductivities of head tissues, and the interaction between coil orientation and the underlying cortical anatomy are summarized. We describe evidence that the magnitude and site of cortical activation, surrogate markers of TMS dosing and brain network targeting considered central in clinical response to TMS, are influenced by coil orientation. We suggest that coil orientation should be considered when applying therapeutic TMS and propose several approaches to optimizing this potentially important treatment parameter.