Use of a 3D-printed body surface percutaneous puncture guide plate in vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been used widely to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). However, it has many disadvantages, such as excessive radiation exposure, long operation times, and high cement leakage rates. This study was conducted to explore the clinical effects and safety of the use of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed body-surface guide plate to aid PVP for the treatment of OVCFs. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted with patients with OVCFs presenting between October 2020 and June 2021. Fifty patients underwent traditional PVP (group T) and 47 patients underwent PVP aided by 3D-printed body-surface guide plates (3D group). The following clinical and adverse events were compared between groups: the puncture positioning, puncture, fluoroscopy exposure and total operation times; changes in vertebral height and the Cobb angle after surgery relative to baseline; preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index scores; and perioperative complications (bone cement leakage, neurological impairment, vertebral infection, and cardiopulmonary complications. RESULTS: The puncture, adjustment, fluoroscopy, and total operation times were shorter in the 3D group than in group T. Visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index scores improved significantly after surgery, with significant differences between groups (both p < 0.05). At the last follow-up examination, the vertebral midline height and Cobb angle did not differ between groups. The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the 3D group than in group T (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of 3D-printed body-surface guide plates can simplify and optimize PVP, shortening the operative time, improving the success rate, reducing surgical complications, and overall improving the safety of PVP.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Evaluation of the Efficacy of Manipulation and Cervical Traction in the Treatment of Radical Cervical Spondylosis.

Background: With the accelerated pace of life in modern society, changes in work style, and the popularity of computers, the prevalence of cervical spondylosis (CSR) is increasing, and the age of onset is advancing. Once suffering from this disease, it is often difficult to cure and recurring, with complex clinical symptoms, causing a serious impact on human health. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of manipulation and cervical traction in the treatment of radical cervical spondylosis. Methods: The PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched for literature. The literature related to this study was included according to selective criteria and inhibitory elimination criteria, and valuable information was selected for statistical analysis, resulting in a total of 11 randomized controlled trials with 994 subjects. Results: The short-term efficacy of manual treatment for CSR was superior to that of cervical traction alone (P < 0.05); subgroup analysis showed that the short-term efficacy of pulling or rotational manipulation was superior to that of cervical traction (P < 0.05). The mean difference between symptoms and manipulation VAS scores was higher before and after treatment when compared with cervical traction for CSR (P < 0.05); the subgroup analysis showed that VAS scores, upper extremity anesthesia scores, and survivorship scores were lower for pulling or rotating manipulation than for cervical traction (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The advantages of manual therapy in terms of short-term efficacy, VAS pain scores, neck pain, upper extremity anesthesia, and survivorship improvement provide a theoretical basis for its clinical impact.

Sleep pattern in relation to recurrent osteoporotic fracture in the elderly.

Background: Previous studies assessed the relationship between individual sleep behavior and fracture risk, rather than taking into account the joint complexity of the sleep behaviors. We aimed to explore the association between sleep pattern and risk of imminent recurrent osteoporotic fracture in older hospitalized patients due to an index osteoporotic fracture, where sleep pattern was evaluated as a combination incorporating five common sleep behaviors (i.e., insomnia, snoring, nocturnal sleep duration, daytime napping, and midnight waking up). Methods: We used data from a prospective cohort study for analyses. Patients who aged not < 55 years and were admitted to the hospital due to an index osteoporotic fracture were recruited. Sleep pattern was grouped as healthy, intermediate, and poor pattern, based on the categorization of overall sleep scores. We used Cox proportional hazard models to explore sleep pattern in relation to imminent recurrent fracture. Results: We included a total of 185 elderly hospitalized patients for analyses with mean (± standard deviation) age = 71.5 ± 10.3 years and 87.0% female. During a mean follow-up of 14.7 months, there were 10 (5.4%) recurrent osteoporotic fractures observed. A significantly higher overall sleep score was found in patients with recurrent fractures when compared with those without fractures (3.20 vs. 2.36, p = 0.038). Both intermediate (p = 0.76) and poor sleep patterns (p = 0.093) were non-significantly associated with an elevated risk of fracture when compared with a healthy pattern. Per-one-increase in the overall sleep score was significantly related to an increased risk of fracture: hazard ratio = 1.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.00--2.55) from the multivariable model. Conclusion: Per-one-increase in the overall sleep score was found to be significantly associated with a 60% higher risk of imminent recurrent osteoporotic fracture in the elderly, and intermediate and poor sleep patterns were non-significantly related to an increased risk of recurrent fracture. More high-quality evidence is required to further evaluate the relationship between the sleep pattern and the risk of recurrent osteoporotic fracture in the elderly.

Relationship between sleep pattern and bone mineral density in patients with osteoporotic fracture.

Background: Evidence investigating sleep pattern in relation to bone health in elderly participants with osteoporosis remains sparse. We aimed to assess the relationship between sleep pattern incorporating five sleep characteristics (snoring, midnight waking up, insomnia, sleep duration, and daytime napping) and bone mineral density (BMD) in elderly participants with osteoporotic fracture. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to include eligible elderly patients from the Department of Orthopedics who were admitted to hospital due to an osteoporotic fracture. Sleep pattern was constructed based on total sleep scores and categorized into healthy, intermediate, and poor pattern groups. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess sleep pattern in relation to risk of low BMD. Results: A total of 169 elderly patients with osteoporotic fracture were included in this study (mean age: 71.91 years; 87.57% females). There were 36 (21.30%), 107 (63.31%), and 26 (15.38%) patients with healthy, intermediate, and poor sleep pattern, respectively. Compared with healthy sleep pattern, no significant relationship between intermediate sleep pattern and BMD was detected [odds ratio (OR) = 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74, 3.97, p = 0.21), while poor pattern was significantly associated with decreased BMD (OR = 3.50, 95% CI: 1.10, 11.14, p = 0.034). Conclusion: The majority of elderly patients with osteoporotic fracture had unhealthy sleep pattern; poor sleep pattern was significantly related to reduced BMD when compared with healthy pattern. Further high-quality evidence is needed to assess and validate the relationship between sleep pattern and risk of low BMD in the elderly.

Association between bone turnover markers and the risk of imminent recurrent osteoporotic fracture.

The association between bone turnover markers (BTMs) and the risk of imminent recurrent osteoporotic fracture (ROF) in the elderly remains unclear. The present study thus aimed to explore BTMs in relation to imminent ROF in the elderly with an index OF. For this purpose, data from a prospective cohort study were used for analysis. Elderly patients hospitalized due to an index OF were included and followed-up. The BTMs included bone resorption marker (C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen) and the bone formation markers, procollagen type I N propeptide, osteocalcin (OC) and total alkaline phosphatase. The outcome was the time to the first ROF following their index fracture. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between BTMs and ROF. Model discrimination was calculated to explore whether the BTMs had potential to improve fracture risk prediction. There were 169 eligible patients included in the analysis (median age, 72 years; 87.6% females). During a median follow-up period of 10.5 months, there were seven ROFs (4.1%) observed. Serum OC levels were found to be significantly associated with the risk of ROF [hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.018-0.90; P=0.039] for per-SD increase in OC from multivariable analysis. After incorporating OC into the model, a C-index of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.70-0.96; P<0.001) was observed, which outperformed the model with bone mineral density alone (improvement for C-index, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.028-0.55). On the whole, the present study demonstrates a significant association between serum OC and the decreased risk of imminent ROF in the elderly with index fractures. However, further high-quality evidence is required to further clarify and validate the BTMs in relation to the imminent risk of ROFs among the elderly.

Outcome of one-stage percutaneous endoscopic debridement and lavage combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the therapeutic effect of one-stage percutaneous endoscopic debridement and lavage (PEDL) combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in the treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. METHODS: From March 2017 to October 2019, 51 patients diagnosed with pyogenic spondylodiscitis underwent PPSF followed by PEDL in our department. Biopsy specimens were examined for microorganisms and evaluated histopathologically. Clinical outcomes were assessed by physical examination, routine serological testing, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and imaging studies. RESULTS: Of the enrolled patients, the operation time ranged from 90 min to 114 min every level with an average of 102 min, and the average drainage time ranged from 6 days to 10 days with an average of 7.4 days. All patients who complained of lower back pain symptoms were more relieved than before surgery. Causative pathogens were identified in 20 of 51 biopsy specimens; Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent. However, there were eight patients with postoperative complications. The mean follow-up was 25.0 ± 3.8 (range: 20-32) months. Inflammatory markers showed that infection was controlled. The VAS and ODI improved significantly. At the last follow-up, magnetic resonance imaging showed that the infected lesions had disappeared. CONCLUSION: PEDL supplementing PPSF may be useful for patients with single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis, as it is minimally invasive, especially for patients who cannot undergo conventional open surgery due to poor health or advanced age.

Relationship Between Obesity and Risk of Major Osteoporotic Fracture in Postmenopausal Women: Taking Frailty Into Consideration.

The role of obesity in fracture risk remains uncertain and inconclusive in postmenopausal women. Our study aimed to assess the relationship between obesity and risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF; ie, a clinical fracture of upper arm or shoulder, hip, spine, or wrist) in postmenopausal women, after taking frailty into consideration. We used the data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) 5-year Hamilton cohort for this study. Frailty was measured by a frailty index (FI) of deficit accumulation at baseline. We incorporated an interaction term (obesity × FI) in the Cox proportional hazards regression model. We included 3985 women (mean age 69.4 years) for analyses, among which 29% were obese (n = 1118). There were 200 (5.02%) MOF events documented during follow-up: 48 (4.29%) in obese women and 152 (5.65%) in the nonobese group. Significant relationships between obesity, frailty, and MOF risk were found: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.78) for those with an FI of zero regarding MOF risk among obese women, and HR = 1.34 (95% CI 1.11-1.62) per SD increase in the FI among nonobese women. The interaction term was also significant: HR = 1.16 (95% CI 1.02-1.34) per SD increase in the FI among obese women. Increased HRs were found with higher FIs regarding the relationship between obesity and MOF risk, indicating increasing frailty attenuated the protective effect of obesity. For example, although the HR for obesity and MOF risk among those who were not frail (FI = 0) was 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.78), among those who were very frail (FI = 0.70), the HR was 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.98). To conclude, after taking frailty into consideration, obesity was significantly associated with decreased risk of MOF in postmenopausal women among those who were not frail; however, increasing frailty attenuated this protective effect of obesity. Evaluating frailty status may aid in understanding of the complex relationship between obesity and fracture risk. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Frailty and risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Data from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative.

The evidence assessing the relationship between frailty and risk of adverse health outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains limited and sparse in the literature. Data from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI), a clinical registry of patients with RA, were used to explore the relationship between frailty and fracture risk in patients with RA. Patients were referred to OBRI by their participating rheumatologist, and contacted by OBRI trained interviewers. Primary outcome was time to first incident osteoporotic fractures during follow-up that led to a hospitalization or emergency room visit. Frailty was measured by a Rockwood-type frailty index (FI) of deficit accumulation that consisted of 32 health-related deficits. To quantify the relationship between frailty and risk of fracture, we used Cox proportional hazards models with hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported. We included 2923 patients (mean age 57.7 standard deviation [SD]: 12.7; 78% female,) for analyses. During a mean follow-up of 3.7 years, there were 125 (4.3%) incident fractures reported. The FI was significantly higher in patients with a fracture compared to controls (0.24 vs. 0.20, p = 0.02). The FI was found to be significantly related to increased risk of fracture in the fully-adjusted models, with a HR of 1.04 (95% CI: 1.02-1.06, p < 0.001) and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.32-1.89, p < 0.001) for per-0.01 and per-SD increase in the FI respectively. In summary, our study demonstrates that higher frailty status is significantly related to increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with RA. Quantifying the frailty status as a research tool may aid in fracture risk assessment, management and decision-making in RA.