RESUMEN
Background: This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of weight difference between implanted prosthesis and removed bone in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) on hip awareness and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: A total of 48 patients (56 hips) who underwent primary THA were prospectively enrolled. Implanted prosthesis and removed bone were weighed intraoperatively. Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) scores were obtained before and at 1 and 3 months after surgery. Patients were divided into groups A, B, and C according to the percentile of the weight difference. Results: The mean weight difference of the implanted prosthesis and removed bone was 117.97 ± 47.35â g. A negative correlation was found among the weight differences of the three groups and 1- and 3-month postoperative FJS (correlation coefficients, -0.331 and -0.734, respectively). A positive correlation was found among the weight difference of the three groups and 3-month postoperative WOMAC (correlation coefficient, 0.403). A significant difference in 3-month postoperative FJS and WOMAC scores was found among the three groups. The mean 3-month postoperative FJS (79.00) of group C was significantly lower than that of group A (93.32) (P < 0.05). The mean WOMAC score (15.83) of group A was significantly lower than that of group C (23.67) (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The implanted prosthesis is larger than the removed bone in cementless THA. The weight difference is negatively correlated with hip function. The weight difference should be minimized to achieve optimal hip joint awareness.
RESUMEN
Objectives: Numerous studies have established the role of inflammation in osteoarthritis (OA) progression, yet limited research explores the association between systemic inflammatory indicators and pre-diagnosis OA risk. This study aimed to investigate the association between peripheral inflammatory indicators and the risk of OA using data from the UK Biobank. Methods: The study analyzed data from 417,507 participants in the UK Biobank, including neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count, platelet count, and C-reactive protein meter. Additionally, derived ratios such as NLR(neutrophils-lymphocytes ratio), PLR(Platelets-lymphocytes ratio), SII(systemic immune-inflammation index), and LMR (lymphocytes-monocytes ratio) were examined. Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic spline models were used to assess both linear and nonlinear associations. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 12.7 years, a total of 49,509 OA events were identified. The findings revealed that CRP (HR:1.06, 95%CI:1.05-1.07), NLR (HR:1.02, 95%CI:1.01-1.03), PLR (HR:1.02, 95%CI:1.01-1.03), and SII (HR:1.03, 95%CI:1.01-1.04) were associated with an increased risk of OA, while LMR (HR:0.97, 95%CI:0.96-0.99) showed a significant negative correlation with OA risk. Subgroup analyses further emphasized that these associations were significant across most of the population. Although neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets showed a nominal association with the risk of OA, the results were unreliable, especially for specific joint OA. Conclusion: The study provides evidence of a significant association between elevated peripheral inflammatory indicators and OA risk. These findings underscore the importance of low-grade chronic inflammation in OA development. The potential clinical utility of these indicators as early predictors of OA is suggested, warranting further exploration.
