Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 19(1): 188, 2019 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31729975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic factors and establish a nomogram to predict the long-term survival of gastric cancer patients. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 421 gastric cancer patients, who were treated with radical D2 lymphadenectomy by the same surgical team between January 2009 and March 2017, were collected. The analysis of long-term survival was performed using Cox regression analysis. Based on the multivariate analysis results, a prognostic nomogram was formulated to predict the 5-year survival rate probability. RESULTS: In the present study, the total overall 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 58.7 and 45.8%, respectively. The results of the univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor staging, tumor location, Borrmann type, the number of lymph nodes dissected, the number of lymph node metastases, positive lymph nodes ratio, lymphocyte count, serum albumin, CEA, CA153, CA199, BMI, tumor size, nerve invasion, and vascular invasion were prognostic factors for gastric cancer (all, P < 0.05). However, merely tumor staging, tumor location, positive lymph node ratio, CA199, BMI, tumor size, nerve invasion, and vascular invasion were independent risk factors, based on the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis (all, P < 0.05). The nomogram based on eight independent prognostic factors revealed a well-degree of differentiation with a concordance index of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79, P < 0.001), which was better than the AJCC-7 staging system (concordance index = 0.68). CONCLUSION: The present study established a nomogram based on eight independent prognostic factors to predict long-term survival in gastric cancer patients. The nomogram would be beneficial for more accurately predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer, and provide important basis for making individualized treatment plans following surgery.


Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígenos de Carbohidratos Asociados a Tumores/análisis , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Joven
2.
World J Gastrointest Oncol ; 11(6): 499-508, 2019 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radical D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer as a standard procedure has gained global consensus. Mounting studies have shown that the number of lymph nodes dissection directly affects the prognosis and recurrence of gastric cancer. Our previous study showed that there was no obvious lymph node around the abnormal hepatic artery derived from the superior mesenteric artery. AIM: To investigate the relationship between celiac artery variation and the number of lymph nodes dissection in gastric cancer surgery. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 421 patients treated with radical D2 lymphadenectomy were analyzed retrospectively. The difference of the number of lymph nodes dissection between the celiac artery variation group and the normal vessels group and the relationship with prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: Celiac artery variation was found in 110 patients, with a variation rate of 26.13%. Celiac artery variation, tumor staging, and Borrmann typing were factors that affected lymph node clearance in gastric cancer, and the number of lymph nodes dissection in patients with celiac artery variation was significantly less than that of non-variant groups (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in survival time between the two groups (P > 0.05). Univariate and multiple Cox regression analysis showed that celiac artery variation was not a prognostic factor for gastric cancer (P > 0.05). Tumor staging, intraoperative bleeding, and positive lymph node ratio were prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The number of lymph nodes dissection in patients with celiac artery variation was reduced, but there was no obvious effect on prognosis. Therefore, lymph nodes around the abnormal hepatic artery may not need to be dissected in radical D2 lymphadenectomy.

3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 21(22): 6944-51, 2015 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26078572

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate celiac artery variations in gastric cancer patients and the impact on gastric cancer surgery, and also to discuss the value of the ultrasonic knife in reducing the risk caused by celiac artery variations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate the difference in average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, average postoperative drainage within 3 d, and postoperative hospital stay between the group with vascular variations and no vascular variations, and between the ultrasonic harmonic scalpel and conventional electric scalpel surgery group. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight cases presented with normal celiac artery, and 80 presented with celiac artery variation (33.61%). The average operation time, blood loss, average drainage within 3 d after surgery in the celiac artery variation group were significantly more than in the no celiac artery variation group (215.7 ± 32.7 min vs 204.2 ± 31.3 min, 220.0 ± 56.7 mL vs 163.1 ± 52.3 mL, 193.6 ± 41.4 mL vs 175.3 ± 34.1 mL, respectively, P < 0.05). In celiac artery variation patients, the average operation time, blood loss, average drainage within 3 d after surgery in the ultrasonic harmonic scalpel group were significantly lower than in the conventional electric scalpel surgery group (209.5 ± 34.9 min vs 226.9 ± 29.4 min, 207.5 ± 57.1 mL vs 235.6 ± 52.9 mL, 184.4 ± 38.2 mL vs 205.0 ± 42.9 mL, respectively, P < 0.05), and the number of lymph node dissections was significantly higher than in the conventional surgery group (25.5 ± 9.2 vs 19.9 ± 7.8, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Celiac artery variation increases the difficulty and risk of radical gastrectomy. Preoperative imaging evaluation and the application of ultrasonic harmonic scalpel are conducive to radical gastrectomy.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ultrasónicos/métodos , Malformaciones Vasculares/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Arteria Celíaca/anomalías , Arteria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Drenaje , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/instrumentación , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ultrasónicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ultrasónicos/instrumentación , Malformaciones Vasculares/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...