The association between obstructive sleep apnea and osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder with well-known metabolic consequences. The relationship between OSA and bone health, especially osteoporosis, remains poorly understood. Given that both OSA and osteoporosis are highly prevalent chronic conditions with significant public health implications, this study aims to investigate the association of OSA with bone health and osteoporosis. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to November 22, 2022. Fifteen studies comprising 158,273 individuals were included. The presence of OSA correlated negatively with bone mineral density on meta-analysis (pooled correlation = -0.30; 95 % CI, -0.42 to -0.17; N = 8). Individuals with OSA had poorer bone mineral density scores (mean difference = -0.58, 95 % CI, -1.15 to -0.01; N = 8), and significantly higher risk of developing osteoporosis (adjusted odds ratio = 2.18; 95 % CI, 1.14 to 4.16; N = 4). Notably, both body mass index (BMI) and age were not significant effect modulators in the correlation of OSA and bone density. These findings suggest that OSA is associated with diminished bone health, and it is severity-dependent. Further studies are required to determine if treatment of OSA may have the potential to mitigate these risks.

Mandibular Advancement vs CPAP for Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension guidelines recommend diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with hypertension. The mandibular advancement device (MAD) is an oral appliance therapy for patients who decline or cannot tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). OBJECTIVES: We compared the relative effectiveness of MAD vs CPAP in reducing 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP). METHODS: In an investigator-initiated, randomized, noninferiority trial (prespecified margin 1.5 mm Hg), 321 participants aged ≥40 years with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk were recruited at 3 public hospitals for polysomnography. Of these, 220 participants with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥15 events per hour) were randomized to either MAD or CPAP (1:1). The primary outcome was the difference between the 24-hour mean arterial BP at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, the 24-hour mean arterial BP decreased by 2.5 mm Hg (P = 0.003) at 6 months in the MAD group, whereas no change was observed in the CPAP group (P = 0.374). The between-group difference was -1.6 mm Hg (95% CI: -3.51 to 0.24, noninferiority P < 0.001). The MAD group demonstrated a larger between-group reduction in all secondary ambulatory BP parameters compared with the CPAP group, with the most pronounced effects observed in the asleep BP parameters. Both the MAD and CPAP improved daytime sleepiness, with the between-group difference similar (P = 0.384). There were no between-group differences in cardiovascular biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: MAD is noninferior to CPAP for reducing 24-hour mean arterial BP in participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk. (Cardiosleep Research Program on Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Blood Pressure Control and Maladaptive Myocardial Remodeling-Non-inferiority Trial [CRESCENT]; NCT04119999).

Posterior Palatal Expansion via Subnasal Endoscopy (2PENN) for Maxillary Deficiency: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) addresses transverse maxillary deficiency, a known contributor to nasal obstruction. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, preliminary outcomes, and safety of posterior palatal expansion via subnasal endoscopy (2PENN), a modified SARPE procedure, aimed at achieving anterior and posterior maxillary expansion. METHODS: This prospective case series included consecutive adult patients with findings of transverse maxillary deficiency that underwent the 2PENN procedure from 4/2021 to 4/2022. Patients completed pre- and post-operative clinical evaluations, Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) questionnaires, and computed tomography (CT), with measures including expansion at the level of the posterior nasal spine (PNS), first maxillary inter-molar distance (IMD), and anterior nasal spine (ANS). RESULTS: The cohort (N = 20) was middle-aged (39 ± 11 years), predominantly male (80%), and overweight (BMI 28 ± 4 kg/m2 ). The majority (85%) of patients had sleep breathing issues, of which 10 (59%) had polysomnography-confirmed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Full anterior-posterior separation of the mid-palatal suture line was evident on all post-operative CT scans, with mean expansion at the PNS of 3.6 ± 1.3 mm, IMD of 6.1 ± 1.6 mm and ANS of 7.0 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001). Following surgery, mean NOSE scores improved from 57 ± 23 to 14 ± 13 (p < 0.001). One patient required maxillary antrostomy for post-operative sinusitis. CONCLUSION: 2PENN is an effective and safe technique for achieving both anterior and posterior maxillary expansion in patients with transverse maxillary deficiency. Further study is warranted to better understand the effect of 2PENN in patients with OSA, particularly as it relates to improving pharyngeal patency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1970-1977, 2024.

Mandibular advancement device versus CPAP in lowering 24-hour blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and hypertension: the CRESCENT trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Although treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces blood pressure (BP), adherence to CPAP is often suboptimal. A mandibular advancement device (MAD) is a guideline-endorsed alternative therapy for OSA. Still, there is limited evidence on the relative efficacy between MAD and CPAP on BP reduction. We evaluate whether treatment of moderate-to-severe OSA using MAD can improve BP and other health-related outcomes compared with CPAP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted. We will recruit 220 Asians with a history of hypertension and high cardiovascular risk for an overnight polysomnography screening. Those with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥15 events/hour) will be randomised to treatment with either MAD or CPAP in a 1:1 ratio. Stratified by age (60 vs <60 years old), body mass index (25 vs <25 kg/m2) and apnoea-hypopnoea index (30 vs <30 events/hour), an adaptive randomisation scheme with permuted blocks constructed in real-time is implemented to restrict imbalance. The overall study duration is 12 months. The primary endpoint is the 24-hour mean arterial BP difference between baseline and 6-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints include other measures of ambulatory BP monitoring, arrhythmia based on a 4-day electrocardiographic monitoring, biomarker and proteomic analysis, cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived myocardial fibrosis and remodelling and quality-of-life questionnaires. Recruitment began in October 2019 and ended in December 2022. Comparison between MAD and CPAP will be performed using covariance (ANCOVA) analysis of the changes in 24-hour mean arterial BP while adjusting for the baseline 24-hour mean arterial BP. We will compare the 95% CIs around the treatment difference point estimate with the prespecified non-inferiority margin (1.5 mm Hg). If the upper limit of the 95% CI is <1.5 mm Hg and crosses 0, non-inferiority of the MAD relative to CPAP will be established. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Domain Specific Review Board-C, National Healthcare Group under approved the study protocol (NHG DSRB Ref: 2019/00359, approved on 28 August 2019). Study findings will be disseminated to various local, national, and international audiences through abstract presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04119999.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). METHODS: Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS: The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. CONCLUSION: This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Enhanced drug-induced sleep endoscopy: Distinguishing central from obstructive apnea.

This case report describes a patient originally diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who was later found to have central sleep apnea (CSA) during drug-induced sleep endoscopy, which was subsequently confirmed on an in-laboratory sleep study. The revised diagnosis resulted in a change in recommended therapy from hypoglossal nerve stimulation to phrenic nerve stimulation. This case report is a reminder that the sleep surgeon must be cognizant of the possibility of CSA being misclassified as OSA especially as home sleep studies become increasingly routine, and discusses ways to more easily distinguish between CSA and OSA. Laryngoscope, 133:706-708, 2023.