Monocytosis Is a Biomarker of Severity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Analysis of a 6-Year Prospective Natural History Registry.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with alterations of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Monocytes respond to inflammation and infection, yet the relationship between monocytosis and IBD severity is not fully understood. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of monocytosis in IBD and the association between monocytosis and disease severity and IBD-related health care utilization. METHODS: We used a multiyear, prospectively collected natural history registry to compare patients with IBD with monocytosis to those without monocytosis, among all patients and by disease type. RESULTS: A total of 1290 patients with IBD (64.1% with Crohn disease; 35.9% with ulcerative colitis) were included (mean age 46.4 years; 52.6% female). Monocytosis was found in 399 (30.9%) of patients with IBD (29.3% with Crohn disease; 33.9% with ulcerative colitis). Monocytosis was significantly associated with abnormal C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anemia, worse quality of life, active disease, and increased exposure to biologics (all P < 0.001). Compared with patients without monocytosis, patients with monocytosis had a 3-fold increase in annual financial health care charges (median: $127,013 vs. $32,925, P < 0.001) and an increased likelihood of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.5; P < 0.001), IBD-related surgery (AOR, 1.9; P = 0.002), and emergency department (ED) use (AOR, 2.8; P < 0.001). Patients with monocytosis had a shorter time to surgery, hospitalization, and ED visit after stratifying by disease activity (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD with monocytosis, regardless of disease type, are at increased risk for worse clinical outcomes, hospitalization, surgery, and ED use. Peripheral monocytosis may represent a routinely available biomarker of a distinct subgroup with severe disease.

Monocytosis and a Low Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio Are Effective Biomarkers of Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity.

BACKGROUND: Current biomarkers in ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited by their performance, cost, and limited availability in daily practice. This study examined alterations in the leukocyte profiles as biomarkers of UC activity, including the effects of age, gender, and medications. METHODS: Case-control study that included 110 UC subjects, 75 subjects with Clostridium difficile infection, and 75 non-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subjects, randomly selected from a single-institution IBD database. Mean values of neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), monocytes (M) and their ratios were compared between groups. Receiver operator curve analyses assessed the performance of each biomarker in discriminating disease states. Subgroup analyses examined leukocytes profiles with endoscopic activity. RESULTS: Elevated monocyte counts and decreased L/M values significantly differed between subjects with active UC and UC in remission and performed better than the other leukocyte profiles. A monocyte count of 483 and L/M ratio of 3.1 were 60% sensitive and had a specificity of 61% and 53%, respectively for active UC. Monocyte count >860 and L/M value <1.6 had a 75% positive predictive value for UC activity. Those markers also correlated with endoscopically active disease. L/M and N/L values performed best at differentiating active UC from non-IBD controls, whereas N/L and N values performed best at differentiating from C. difficile controls. CONCLUSIONS: Monocytosis and a low L/M ratio might be effective, readily available, and low-cost biomarkers to identify disease activity in UC patients. N/L values were more effective in distinguishing active UC patients from patients without IBD and those with C. difficile infection.

A late presentation of a fatal disease: juvenile hemochromatosis.

Juvenile hemochromatosis is a rare and severe form of hereditary hemochromatosis. We report the case of a 39-year-old female who presented with heart failure and cirrhosis from previously unrecognized juvenile hemochromatosis. This is the latest presentation described in the literature. An important clue to the diagnosis was a history of amenorrhea since the age of 20 that had never been investigated. The patient died of intractable heart failure two months after the initial presentation. Juvenile hemochromatosis should be suspected in a young patient with endocrine or cardiac manifestations. Early diagnosis is crucial since phlebotomy can improve the prognosis and delay or prevent progression to heart failure and cirrhosis.

Hereditary hemochromatosis: missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis?

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemochromatosis is a disorder that can cause iron overload and organ damage. Hereditary hemochromatosis is characterized by mutations in the HFE gene. HFE C282Y homozygotes and compound heterozygotes (C282Y/H63D) are at risk of developing manifestations of hemochromatosis. Abnormal iron study results also occur in many liver and hematologic diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis. METHODS: Pertinent clinical and laboratory data, including HFE genotype, were tabulated from the electronic medical records of patients with the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision code 275, "disorders of iron metabolism," who were seen at a tertiary referral center between January 2002 and May 2012. RESULTS: HFE genotyping was obtained in only 373 of 601 patients (62%); 200 were C282Y homozygotes or compound heterozygotes. Of the 173 patients with nonhereditary hemochromatosis genotypes, 53% were misdiagnosed with hereditary hemochromatosis and 38% underwent phlebotomy. In two thirds of these cases, the misdiagnosis was made by a nonspecialist. In the remaining 228 patients who were not genotyped, 80 were diagnosed with hereditary hemochromatosis and 64 were phlebotomized. Of patients misdiagnosed with hemochromatosis, 68% had known liver disease and 5% had a hematologic cause of abnormal iron study results. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal iron study results in patients with nonhereditary hemochromatosis genotypes commonly lead to a misdiagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis and inappropriate treatment with phlebotomy. This error often is seen in the setting of elevated iron study results secondary to chronic liver diseases. Furthermore, hereditary hemochromatosis is commonly diagnosed and treated without HFE genotyping. We suggest that phlebotomy centers require a documented HFE genotype before initiating phlebotomy.