Acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Among Patients Receiving Dialysis: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Importance: Integrating routine SARS-CoV-2 testing in dialysis facilities may benefit patients receiving dialysis by mitigating risks of serious illness and reducing transmission. Patient acceptance of nonmandatory testing is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the acceptance of 2 SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies among patients in hemodialysis facilities nationwide. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cluster (dialysis facility-level) randomized trial investigated the acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 testing among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis at facilities located in 22 states. Intervention: Anterior nares real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction tests offered once every 2 weeks (static testing facilities) vs offered once a week, once every 2 weeks, or once a month depending on county COVID-19 infection prevalence (dynamic testing facilities). Facilities were randomized by county, and tests were offered for 3 months between February 4 and July 24, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was test acceptance. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who accepted at least 1 test. Results: In total, 62 hemodialysis facilities were randomized and 57 participated. Among 2389 participating patients, the median age was 64 (IQR, 54-74) years, 1341 (56%) were male, 138 (6%) were categorized as American Indian, 60 (3%) Asian, 885 (37%) Black, 75 (3%) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 338 (14%) Hispanic, and 876 (37%) White; and 1603 (67%) had diabetes. A median of 6 (IQR, 6-6) tests were offered per patient in the static arm and 4 (3-6) tests in the dynamic arm. Test acceptance was low: 8% of offered tests were accepted in each of the test arms. Among 503 patients who accepted at least 1 test, the median percentage of offered tests that were accepted was 16% (IQR, 17%-42%) using the static testing strategy and 50% (IQR, 33%-75%) using the dynamic testing strategy (P < .001). Older patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.16] per 5-year age increment), patients with (vs without) diabetes (OR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.16]), and women compared with men (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.98-1.73]) were more likely to accept multiple tests. Patients designated in the electronic health record as Hispanic were more likely than patients designated as White (OR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.15-2.76]) to accept at least 1 test, whereas patients living in zip codes electing Republican representatives to Congress were less likely than patients living in zip codes electing Democratic representatives (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.17-0.69]) to accept multiple tests. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized trial evaluating 2 SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies in dialysis facilities, test acceptance was low, and a dynamic testing strategy anchored to COVID-19 infection prevalence did not outperform a static testing strategy of every 2 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05225298.

Hexasodium fytate for the treatment of calciphylaxis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label extension.

Background: In the CALCIPHYX trial, we investigated hexasodium fytate, an inhibitor of vascular calcification, for the treatment of calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis), a rare condition characterised by painful, non-healing skin lesions. Methods: In this international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with an ulcerated calciphylaxis lesion and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score ≥50/100 were randomised 1:1 to hexasodium fytate 7 mg/kg or placebo intravenously during maintenance haemodialysis. Primary efficacy outcomes were an 8-item modification of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT-CUA) and Pain VAS in the intention-to-treat population. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04195906. Findings: Overall, 34/37 patients randomised to hexasodium fytate and 26/34 patients randomised to placebo completed the 12-week randomised treatment period. At Week 12, both groups (hexasodium fytate versus placebo) showed similar improvements in BWAT-CUA (mean [standard deviation (SD)], -5.3 [5.2] versus -6.0 [6.2]; least squares mean difference, 0.3 [96% confidence interval (CI): -2.5, 3.0]; p = 0.88) and Pain VAS (mean [SD], -19.5 [26.9] versus -32.2 [38.5]; least squares mean difference, 11.5 [96% CI: -4.8, 27.8]; p = 0.15). One patient randomised to placebo briefly received hexasodium fytate in error. Serious adverse events through Week 12 included: calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation (2/38 [5%] versus 11/33 [33%]) and death (1/38 [3%] versus 5/33 [15%]). During the subsequent 12 weeks of open-label hexasodium fytate and 4 weeks of follow-up, there were no additional calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation. Over the course of the entire trial, deaths were 2/38 [5%] for the hexasodium fytate group and 7/33 [21%] for the placebo group. Interpretation: In patients with calciphylaxis, BWAT-CUA and Pain VAS improved similarly in hexasodium fytate- and placebo-treated patients; over the course of the entire trial, there were fewer deaths and calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation in the hexasodium fytate group. Funding: Funded by Sanifit, a CSL Vifor company.

Prevalence of Mendelian Kidney Disease Among Patients With High-Risk APOL1 Genotypes Undergoing Commercial Genetic Testing in the United States.

Introduction: Among individuals with high-risk APOL1 genotypes, the lifetime risk of developing kidney failure is ∼15%, indicating that other genetic variants or nongenetic modifiers likely contribute substantially to an individual patient's risk of progressive kidney disease. Here, we estimate the prevalence and distribution of Mendelian kidney diseases among patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes undergoing commercial genetic testing in the United States. Methods: We analyzed clinical exome sequencing data from 15,181 individuals undergoing commercial genetic testing for Mendelian kidney disease in the United States from 2020 to 2021. We identified patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes by the presence of G1/G1, G1/G2, or G2/G2 alleles. Patients carrying single risk APOL1 alleles were identified as G1/G0, G2/G0; the remainder of patients were G0/G0. We estimated the prevalence and distribution of Mendelian kidney disease stratified by APOL1 genotype and genetically predicted ancestry. Results: Of 15,181 patients, 3119 had genetic testing results consistent with a molecular diagnosis of Mendelian kidney disease (20.5%). Of 15,181 patients, 1035 (6.8%) had high-risk APOL1 genotypes. Among patients with recent genomic African ancestry, the prevalence of Mendelian kidney diseases was lower in those with high-risk APOL1 genotypes (9.6%; n = 91/944) compared with single risk APOL1 allele carriers (13.6%; n = 198/1453) and those with G0/G0 APOL1 genotypes (16.6%; n = 213/1281). Among patients with Mendelian kidney disease and recent genomic African ancestry, we observed differences in the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in PKD1 (19.8% in high-risk vs. 30.2% in low-risk genotypes), and COL4A4 (24.2% in high-risk vs. 10.5% in low-risk genotypes). Conclusion: In this selected population of patients undergoing clinical genetic testing, we found evidence of Mendelian kidney disease in ∼10% patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes.

Prospective Study on Kidney Dysfunction Markers and Risk for Mortality among South Asians.

Introduction: Associations between markers of impaired kidney function and adverse outcomes among South Asians is understudied and could differ from existing data derived mostly from North American or European cohorts. Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of 9797 participants from the ongoing cardiometabolic risk reduction study in South Asia, India. We examined the associations between baseline spot urine albumin-to-creatinine (UACR) ratio and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) estimating equations with all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for baseline age, sex, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, tobacco, history of cardiovascular disease, and cholesterol. Additionally, we calculated population attributable fraction (PAF) for both markers. Results: Over a median 7-year follow-up, with 66,909 person-years, 791 deaths occurred. At baseline, the weighted prevalence of UACR ≥ 30 mg/g and eGFRCKD-EPI 2009 <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was 6.6% and 1.6%, respectively. The risk for mortality was increased with higher UACR (10-30 hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6 [1.2-2.1]), 30-300 HR: 2.4 [1.8-3.1]), and ≥300 (HR: 6.0 [3.8-9.4] relative to UACR <10 mg/g). Risk for mortality was also higher with lower eGFRCKD-EPI 2009 (44-30; HR: 4.5 [2.5-8.3] and <30 HR: 7.0 [3.7-13.0], relative to 90-104 ml/min per 1.73 m2). PAF for mortality because of UACR ≥30 mg/g and eGFRCKD-EPI 2009 <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were 24.4% and 13.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Single-time point assessment of UACR ≥30 mg/g or eGFRCKD-EPI 2009 <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 portends higher mortality risk among urban South Asians. Because albuminuria is common and associated with accelerated decline in GFR, screening and targeted efforts to reduce albuminuria are warranted.

Hyperkalemia and risk of chronic kidney disease progression: A propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is a known complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, it is not known whether hyperkalemia directly contributes to CKD progression and the risk of death. Clarifying the extent to which hyperkalemia is associated with CKD progression and mortality can inform clinical practice and guide future research. The objective of this study was to quantify the risks of CKD progression and mortality associated with hyperkalemia in patients with stages 3b/4 CKD. METHODS: This was a real-world, exact and propensity score-matched, observational cohort study using data (January 2016-December 2021) from Optum's deidentified Market Clarity Data, a large US integrated insurance claims/electronic medical record database. The study included matched adult patients with stages 3b/4 CKD with and without hyperkalemia, not regularly treated with an intestinal potassium (K+) binder. Measured outcomes were CKD progression and all-cause mortality. CKD progression was defined as diagnosis of CKD stage 4 (if stage 3b at index), CKD stage 5 or kidney failure, or receipt of dialysis or kidney transplantation. RESULTS: After matching, there were 6,619 patients in each of the hyperkalemia and non-hyperkalemia cohorts, with a mean (standard deviation) follow-up time of 2.12 (1.42) years. Use of any renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) during baseline was common (75.9%) and most patients had CKD stage 3b (71.2%). Patients with hyperkalemia had a 1.60-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50, 1.71) higher risk of CKD progression and a 1.09-fold (1.02, 1.16) higher risk of all-cause mortality relative to patients without hyperkalemia. Relative risks of CKD progression associated with hyperkalemia were similar within the subset of patients receiving RAASi and across CKD stages, and when alternative definitions of CKD progression were used. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD stages 3b/4 and hyperkalemia experienced significantly higher risks of CKD progression and all-cause mortality than propensity score-matched patients without hyperkalemia.

Practical Considerations and Implementation of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease: Who, When, and How? A Position Statement by Nephrologists.

INTRODUCTION: There remains an unmet need to reduce kidney and cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This report is therefore intended to provide real-world clinical guidance to primary care providers on sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor use in patients with CKD, focusing on practical considerations. Initially developed as glucose-lowering drugs, SGLT2 inhibitors preserve kidney function and reduce risks of cardiovascular events and mortality. Clinical benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, yet utilization in practice remains relatively low, likely due to the complexity of labeled indications (past and present) and misconceptions about SGLT2 inhibitors as a class. METHODS: A panel of 8 US-based nephrologists convened in August 2022 to develop consensus guidance for the primary care community surrounding risk assessment as well as initiation and implementation of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD. Here, we provide an adapted version of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) heatmap and a treatment-decision algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate SGLT2 inhibitors as co-first-line therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, where RAAS inhibitor dose titration need not be completed before initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor. In fact, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may facilitate up-titration or maintenance of optimal RAAS inhibitor dosing. We describe potential strategies to aid implementation of an SGLT2 inhibitor in clinical practice, including improving education and awareness among care providers and patients and dispelling misconceptions about the safety of SGLT2 inhibitors. In summary, we support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors with RAAS inhibitors as co-first-line therapy in most patients with CKD.

Effects of Dapagliflozin in Patients with Membranous Nephropathy.

Introduction: Despite the provision of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitors and immunosuppressive therapies, membranous nephropathy often progresses to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The objective of this prespecified analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in patients with membranous nephropathy enrolled in the DAPA-CKD trial. Methods: Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25-75 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 200-5,000 mg/g were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo, along with standard-of-care and followed for median 2.4 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of ≥50% sustained decline in eGFR, ESKD, or kidney or cardiovascular death. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included eGFR slope and UACR. Results: Among DAPA-CKD participants with membranous nephropathy, 19 were randomized to dapagliflozin and 24 to placebo. The mean (SD) age was 59.9 ± 12.1 years, the mean eGFR was 45.7 ± 12.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the median UACR was 1,694.5 (25%, 75% range 891-2,582.5) mg/g. Two of 19 (11%) patients randomized to dapagliflozin and five of 24 (21%) randomized to placebo experienced the primary composite endpoint. Total and chronic mean eGFR slopes for dapagliflozin and placebo were -3.87 and -4.29 and -2.66 and -4.22 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively; corresponding between-group mean differences were 0.42 and 1.57 mL/min/1.73 m2/year. Dapagliflozin reduced geometric mean (SEM) UACR relative to placebo (-29.3% ± 1.2% vs. -3.6% ± 1.1%; between-group mean difference [95% CI] -26.7 [-50.4, 8.3]). Four (21%) patients randomized to dapagliflozin and seven (29%) randomized to placebo experienced a serious adverse event. Conclusion: In membranous nephropathy, the effects of dapagliflozin on kidney disease progression and albuminuria were generally favorable; there was insufficient power to justify formal inference testing.

Plasmapheresis in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis with Active Kidney Involvement in the United States (2016-2020): A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Plasmapheresis is currently recommended when antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) presents with severe kidney and/or lung involvement. This cross-sectional study aimed at describing characteristics of hospitalized patients diagnosed with AAV with severe kidney involvement undergoing plasmapheresis in the US. METHODS: We defined the study population as adults hospitalized for active kidney involvement with a new diagnosis of AAV (by subtype or unspecified). We established the cohort from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample by ICD-10-CM codes. In this cross-sectional study, we described demographic and clinical characteristics, associated inpatient procedures, lengths of stay, hospital costs, and disposition at discharge comparing patients treated and not treated with plasmapheresis. RESULTS: We identified a total of 975 cases of hospitalized AAV with acute kidney involvement in the US treated by plasmapheresis over the 5-year period. Demographic characteristics of patients who received plasmapheresis were similar to those in patients who did not (n=5670). There were no regional differences in the proportion of patients who received plasmapheresis; however, plasmapheresis was deployed more frequently among patients admitted to urban teaching hospitals relative to rural and non-teaching hospitals. Cases treated with plasmapheresis were more likely to have had acute kidney injury (AKI) (96% vs. 90%, p=0.0007), AKI requiring dialysis (52% vs 16%, p<0.001), hypoxia (40% vs. 16%, p<0.0001), and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (13% vs. 3%, p=0.0003). CONCLUSION: During 2016-2020, plasmapheresis was deployed in approximately 20% of patients being admitted for AAV and acute kidney involvement in the US. As standards of care and practice evolve, the role of plasmapheresis in the management of AAV with acute kidney involvement will require further study.