Variation in Urology Care After Urinary Stone Surgery Among Veterans at High-risk for Recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of urology follow-up and implementation of stone prevention measures after stone surgery and to assess variation in care delivery within a large, integrated healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used nationwide data from the United States Veterans Health Administration to identify patients who had stone surgery between 2016 and 2018 and who were at higher risk for recurrence. Our cohort included 13,444 Veterans across 90 facilities. We examined the proportion of patients who had a post-operative urology visit or who received a prevention measure (24-hour urine test, serum parathyroid hormone measurement, or prescription of a stone-related medication) within 6 months of stone surgery. We calculated the median odds ratio to quantify facility-level variation in urology care after stone surgery, adjusting for patient- and facility-level characteristics. RESULTS: Within 6 months of stone surgery, 94.2% Veterans had a urology visit, yet only 8.8% completed 24-hour urine testing, 8.4% had a parathyroid hormone measurement, and 31.0% were prescribed a stone-related medication. Implementation of prevention measures varied widely across facilities with the median odds ratio ranging between 1.18 for medication prescriptions and 1.77 for 24-hour urine testing. CONCLUSION: While most patients have a urology visit after stone surgery, stone prevention measures were implemented infrequently and inconsistently for patients at higher risk for recurrence, indicating an opportunity for quality improvement.

Baseline, Early Changes, and Residual Albuminuria: Post-hoc Analysis of a Clinical Trial of Dapagliflozin in Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Albuminuria is a strong indicator of kidney and cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We assessed risk associations between albuminuria at baseline and four months after randomization in a placebo-controlled trial of dapagliflozin and kidney endpoints in patients with CKD and albuminuria, with and without type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of the DAPA-CKD trial, 4304 adult patients with CKD were randomized to dapagliflozin 10mg or placebo as adjunct to maximally tolerated renin-angiotensin-system (RAAS) inhibitors. The primary endpoint was a composite of sustained ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, kidney failure, or death from kidney or cardiovascular cause. The kidney composite endpoint was similar but excluded cardiovascular death. We assessed associations among baseline albuminuria, early change in albuminuria, (baseline to Month 4), and residual albuminuria (Month 4) with the primary composite and kidney composite endpoints using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, dapagliflozin reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR; baseline to Month 4) by 36% (95% CI: 30.2%, 42.5%) and 21% (95% CI: 12, 30%) in participants with and without type 2 diabetes, respectively (p-interaction: 0.02). A reduction in UACR from baseline to Month 4 was associated with a lower risk for the primary and kidney composite endpoints with a similar risk gradient for participants with and without type 2 diabetes (p-interaction: 0.10 and 0.19, respectively). Residual albuminuria was associated with a similar risk for the primary and kidney composite endpoints in each treatment arm (p-interaction: 0.19 and 0.18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin reduced albuminuria, and the magnitude of albuminuria reduction showed similar proportional reductions in risks for the primary and kidney composite endpoints in participants with and without type 2 diabetes. Patients with residual albuminuria at Month 4 - whether randomized to dapagliflozin or placebo - experienced relatively high rates of CKD progression kidney endpoints, suggesting that therapies added to RAAS inhibitors and dapagliflozin may be required to sustain kidney and cardiovascular health. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dapagliflozin on Renal Outcomes and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD), NCT03036150.

Acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Among Patients Receiving Dialysis: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Importance: Integrating routine SARS-CoV-2 testing in dialysis facilities may benefit patients receiving dialysis by mitigating risks of serious illness and reducing transmission. Patient acceptance of nonmandatory testing is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the acceptance of 2 SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies among patients in hemodialysis facilities nationwide. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cluster (dialysis facility-level) randomized trial investigated the acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 testing among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis at facilities located in 22 states. Intervention: Anterior nares real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction tests offered once every 2 weeks (static testing facilities) vs offered once a week, once every 2 weeks, or once a month depending on county COVID-19 infection prevalence (dynamic testing facilities). Facilities were randomized by county, and tests were offered for 3 months between February 4 and July 24, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was test acceptance. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who accepted at least 1 test. Results: In total, 62 hemodialysis facilities were randomized and 57 participated. Among 2389 participating patients, the median age was 64 (IQR, 54-74) years, 1341 (56%) were male, 138 (6%) were categorized as American Indian, 60 (3%) Asian, 885 (37%) Black, 75 (3%) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 338 (14%) Hispanic, and 876 (37%) White; and 1603 (67%) had diabetes. A median of 6 (IQR, 6-6) tests were offered per patient in the static arm and 4 (3-6) tests in the dynamic arm. Test acceptance was low: 8% of offered tests were accepted in each of the test arms. Among 503 patients who accepted at least 1 test, the median percentage of offered tests that were accepted was 16% (IQR, 17%-42%) using the static testing strategy and 50% (IQR, 33%-75%) using the dynamic testing strategy (P < .001). Older patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.16] per 5-year age increment), patients with (vs without) diabetes (OR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.16]), and women compared with men (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.98-1.73]) were more likely to accept multiple tests. Patients designated in the electronic health record as Hispanic were more likely than patients designated as White (OR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.15-2.76]) to accept at least 1 test, whereas patients living in zip codes electing Republican representatives to Congress were less likely than patients living in zip codes electing Democratic representatives (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.17-0.69]) to accept multiple tests. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized trial evaluating 2 SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies in dialysis facilities, test acceptance was low, and a dynamic testing strategy anchored to COVID-19 infection prevalence did not outperform a static testing strategy of every 2 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05225298.

Hexasodium fytate for the treatment of calciphylaxis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label extension.

Background: In the CALCIPHYX trial, we investigated hexasodium fytate, an inhibitor of vascular calcification, for the treatment of calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis), a rare condition characterised by painful, non-healing skin lesions. Methods: In this international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with an ulcerated calciphylaxis lesion and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score ≥50/100 were randomised 1:1 to hexasodium fytate 7 mg/kg or placebo intravenously during maintenance haemodialysis. Primary efficacy outcomes were an 8-item modification of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT-CUA) and Pain VAS in the intention-to-treat population. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04195906. Findings: Overall, 34/37 patients randomised to hexasodium fytate and 26/34 patients randomised to placebo completed the 12-week randomised treatment period. At Week 12, both groups (hexasodium fytate versus placebo) showed similar improvements in BWAT-CUA (mean [standard deviation (SD)], -5.3 [5.2] versus -6.0 [6.2]; least squares mean difference, 0.3 [96% confidence interval (CI): -2.5, 3.0]; p = 0.88) and Pain VAS (mean [SD], -19.5 [26.9] versus -32.2 [38.5]; least squares mean difference, 11.5 [96% CI: -4.8, 27.8]; p = 0.15). One patient randomised to placebo briefly received hexasodium fytate in error. Serious adverse events through Week 12 included: calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation (2/38 [5%] versus 11/33 [33%]) and death (1/38 [3%] versus 5/33 [15%]). During the subsequent 12 weeks of open-label hexasodium fytate and 4 weeks of follow-up, there were no additional calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation. Over the course of the entire trial, deaths were 2/38 [5%] for the hexasodium fytate group and 7/33 [21%] for the placebo group. Interpretation: In patients with calciphylaxis, BWAT-CUA and Pain VAS improved similarly in hexasodium fytate- and placebo-treated patients; over the course of the entire trial, there were fewer deaths and calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation in the hexasodium fytate group. Funding: Funded by Sanifit, a CSL Vifor company.

Prevalence of Mendelian Kidney Disease Among Patients With High-Risk APOL1 Genotypes Undergoing Commercial Genetic Testing in the United States.

Introduction: Among individuals with high-risk APOL1 genotypes, the lifetime risk of developing kidney failure is ∼15%, indicating that other genetic variants or nongenetic modifiers likely contribute substantially to an individual patient's risk of progressive kidney disease. Here, we estimate the prevalence and distribution of Mendelian kidney diseases among patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes undergoing commercial genetic testing in the United States. Methods: We analyzed clinical exome sequencing data from 15,181 individuals undergoing commercial genetic testing for Mendelian kidney disease in the United States from 2020 to 2021. We identified patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes by the presence of G1/G1, G1/G2, or G2/G2 alleles. Patients carrying single risk APOL1 alleles were identified as G1/G0, G2/G0; the remainder of patients were G0/G0. We estimated the prevalence and distribution of Mendelian kidney disease stratified by APOL1 genotype and genetically predicted ancestry. Results: Of 15,181 patients, 3119 had genetic testing results consistent with a molecular diagnosis of Mendelian kidney disease (20.5%). Of 15,181 patients, 1035 (6.8%) had high-risk APOL1 genotypes. Among patients with recent genomic African ancestry, the prevalence of Mendelian kidney diseases was lower in those with high-risk APOL1 genotypes (9.6%; n = 91/944) compared with single risk APOL1 allele carriers (13.6%; n = 198/1453) and those with G0/G0 APOL1 genotypes (16.6%; n = 213/1281). Among patients with Mendelian kidney disease and recent genomic African ancestry, we observed differences in the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in PKD1 (19.8% in high-risk vs. 30.2% in low-risk genotypes), and COL4A4 (24.2% in high-risk vs. 10.5% in low-risk genotypes). Conclusion: In this selected population of patients undergoing clinical genetic testing, we found evidence of Mendelian kidney disease in ∼10% patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes.

Prospective Study on Kidney Dysfunction Markers and Risk for Mortality among South Asians.

Introduction: Associations between markers of impaired kidney function and adverse outcomes among South Asians is understudied and could differ from existing data derived mostly from North American or European cohorts. Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of 9797 participants from the ongoing cardiometabolic risk reduction study in South Asia, India. We examined the associations between baseline spot urine albumin-to-creatinine (UACR) ratio and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) estimating equations with all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for baseline age, sex, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, tobacco, history of cardiovascular disease, and cholesterol. Additionally, we calculated population attributable fraction (PAF) for both markers. Results: Over a median 7-year follow-up, with 66,909 person-years, 791 deaths occurred. At baseline, the weighted prevalence of UACR ≥ 30 mg/g and eGFRCKD-EPI 2009 <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was 6.6% and 1.6%, respectively. The risk for mortality was increased with higher UACR (10-30 hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6 [1.2-2.1]), 30-300 HR: 2.4 [1.8-3.1]), and ≥300 (HR: 6.0 [3.8-9.4] relative to UACR <10 mg/g). Risk for mortality was also higher with lower eGFRCKD-EPI 2009 (44-30; HR: 4.5 [2.5-8.3] and <30 HR: 7.0 [3.7-13.0], relative to 90-104 ml/min per 1.73 m2). PAF for mortality because of UACR ≥30 mg/g and eGFRCKD-EPI 2009 <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were 24.4% and 13.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Single-time point assessment of UACR ≥30 mg/g or eGFRCKD-EPI 2009 <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 portends higher mortality risk among urban South Asians. Because albuminuria is common and associated with accelerated decline in GFR, screening and targeted efforts to reduce albuminuria are warranted.

Practical Considerations and Implementation of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease: Who, When, and How? A Position Statement by Nephrologists.

INTRODUCTION: There remains an unmet need to reduce kidney and cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This report is therefore intended to provide real-world clinical guidance to primary care providers on sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor use in patients with CKD, focusing on practical considerations. Initially developed as glucose-lowering drugs, SGLT2 inhibitors preserve kidney function and reduce risks of cardiovascular events and mortality. Clinical benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, yet utilization in practice remains relatively low, likely due to the complexity of labeled indications (past and present) and misconceptions about SGLT2 inhibitors as a class. METHODS: A panel of 8 US-based nephrologists convened in August 2022 to develop consensus guidance for the primary care community surrounding risk assessment as well as initiation and implementation of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD. Here, we provide an adapted version of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) heatmap and a treatment-decision algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate SGLT2 inhibitors as co-first-line therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, where RAAS inhibitor dose titration need not be completed before initiation of an SGLT2 inhibitor. In fact, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may facilitate up-titration or maintenance of optimal RAAS inhibitor dosing. We describe potential strategies to aid implementation of an SGLT2 inhibitor in clinical practice, including improving education and awareness among care providers and patients and dispelling misconceptions about the safety of SGLT2 inhibitors. In summary, we support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors with RAAS inhibitors as co-first-line therapy in most patients with CKD.

Effects of Dapagliflozin in Patients with Membranous Nephropathy.

Introduction: Despite the provision of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitors and immunosuppressive therapies, membranous nephropathy often progresses to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The objective of this prespecified analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in patients with membranous nephropathy enrolled in the DAPA-CKD trial. Methods: Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25-75 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 200-5,000 mg/g were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo, along with standard-of-care and followed for median 2.4 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of ≥50% sustained decline in eGFR, ESKD, or kidney or cardiovascular death. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included eGFR slope and UACR. Results: Among DAPA-CKD participants with membranous nephropathy, 19 were randomized to dapagliflozin and 24 to placebo. The mean (SD) age was 59.9 ± 12.1 years, the mean eGFR was 45.7 ± 12.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the median UACR was 1,694.5 (25%, 75% range 891-2,582.5) mg/g. Two of 19 (11%) patients randomized to dapagliflozin and five of 24 (21%) randomized to placebo experienced the primary composite endpoint. Total and chronic mean eGFR slopes for dapagliflozin and placebo were -3.87 and -4.29 and -2.66 and -4.22 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively; corresponding between-group mean differences were 0.42 and 1.57 mL/min/1.73 m2/year. Dapagliflozin reduced geometric mean (SEM) UACR relative to placebo (-29.3% ± 1.2% vs. -3.6% ± 1.1%; between-group mean difference [95% CI] -26.7 [-50.4, 8.3]). Four (21%) patients randomized to dapagliflozin and seven (29%) randomized to placebo experienced a serious adverse event. Conclusion: In membranous nephropathy, the effects of dapagliflozin on kidney disease progression and albuminuria were generally favorable; there was insufficient power to justify formal inference testing.

Hyperkalemia and risk of chronic kidney disease progression: A propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is a known complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, it is not known whether hyperkalemia directly contributes to CKD progression and the risk of death. Clarifying the extent to which hyperkalemia is associated with CKD progression and mortality can inform clinical practice and guide future research. The objective of this study was to quantify the risks of CKD progression and mortality associated with hyperkalemia in patients with stages 3b/4 CKD. METHODS: This was a real-world, exact and propensity score-matched, observational cohort study using data (January 2016-December 2021) from Optum's deidentified Market Clarity Data, a large US integrated insurance claims/electronic medical record database. The study included matched adult patients with stages 3b/4 CKD with and without hyperkalemia, not regularly treated with an intestinal potassium (K+) binder. Measured outcomes were CKD progression and all-cause mortality. CKD progression was defined as diagnosis of CKD stage 4 (if stage 3b at index), CKD stage 5 or kidney failure, or receipt of dialysis or kidney transplantation. RESULTS: After matching, there were 6,619 patients in each of the hyperkalemia and non-hyperkalemia cohorts, with a mean (standard deviation) follow-up time of 2.12 (1.42) years. Use of any renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) during baseline was common (75.9%) and most patients had CKD stage 3b (71.2%). Patients with hyperkalemia had a 1.60-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50, 1.71) higher risk of CKD progression and a 1.09-fold (1.02, 1.16) higher risk of all-cause mortality relative to patients without hyperkalemia. Relative risks of CKD progression associated with hyperkalemia were similar within the subset of patients receiving RAASi and across CKD stages, and when alternative definitions of CKD progression were used. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD stages 3b/4 and hyperkalemia experienced significantly higher risks of CKD progression and all-cause mortality than propensity score-matched patients without hyperkalemia.

Selonsertib in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Phase 2b Randomized Active Run-In Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Selonsertib is an apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 inhibitor that reduces inflammation, fibrosis, and apoptosis. The MOSAIC study evaluated whether selonsertib attenuated kidney function decline in patients with diabetic kidney disease. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2b study in adults with type 2 diabetes and eGFR 20 to <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with UACR 150 to 5000 mg/g on maximum tolerated dose of ACE inhibitor or ARB. To account for an acute selonsertib-related decrease in eGFRcr, patients entered a 4-week selonsertib run-in period to establish treatment-specific baseline eGFRcr. Patients were randomized 1:1 to selonsertib 18 mg or matching placebo once daily. We followed all participants up until the last randomized participant completed 48 weeks follow-up. The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in eGFRcr slopes from treatment-specific baselines to week 84, evaluated at a prespecified two-sided P = 0.30. We also evaluated kidney clinical events (eGFRcr ≥40% decline from pre-run-in baseline, kidney failure, or death due to kidney disease) and adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 310 patients were randomized (selonsertib n=154, placebo n=156; 68% male, mean age 65 years, mean baseline eGFRcr 35 ml/min/1.73 m2). Mean difference between selonsertib and placebo eGFRcr slopes at week 84 was 1.20 ml/min/1.73 m2/year (95% CI, -0.41 to 2.81; P = 0.14). Kidney clinical events occurred in 17% (26/154) of patients randomized to selonsertib and 12% (19/156) of those randomized to placebo (difference 4.7%; 95% CI, -6.3% to 15.9%). The most common investigator-reported adverse event was acute kidney injury (selonsertib 11.0/100 and placebo 5.9/100 patient-years). CONCLUSIONS: Selonsertib attenuated the decline in eGFRcr over up to 84 weeks; however, it resulted in a numerically higher number of patients reaching a kidney clinical event and a numerically higher rate of investigator-reported acute kidney injury.

Projecting the clinical burden of chronic kidney disease at the patient level (Inside CKD): a microsimulation modelling study.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global concern that presents significant challenges for disease management. Several factors drive CKD prevalence, including primary risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension, and an ageing population. Inside CKD is an international initiative that aims to raise awareness of the substantial burden incurred by CKD. Methods: Using a peer-reviewed microsimulation method, the clinical burden of CKD was estimated from 2022 to 2027. Demographic data from the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific/Middle East were used to generate virtual populations and to project the prevalence of CKD, kidney replacement therapy, associated cardiovascular complications, comorbid conditions, and all-cause mortality in the CKD population over the modelled time frame. Findings: Across the 31 participating countries/regions, the total prevalence of CKD was projected to rise to 436.6 million cases by 2027 (an increase of 5.8% from 2022), with most cases (∼80%) undiagnosed. Inside CKD projected a mean of 8859 cases of heart failure, 10,244 of myocardial infarction, and 7797 of stroke per 100,000 patients with CKD by 2027. Interpretation: The clinical impact of CKD is substantial and likely to increase; the high prevalence of undiagnosed cases and associated complications may benefit from the implementation of health policy interventions that promote screening, earlier diagnosis, and interventions to improve outcomes. Funding: AstraZeneca.

Tenapanor improves long-term control of high phosphate concentrations in the blood in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a plain language summary of the NORMALIZE study.

What is this summary about?This is a summary of an article that was published in the medical journal Kidney360 describing results from the NORMALIZE study. The NORMALIZE study looked at how well tenapanor tablets reduced higher-than-normal levels of phosphate in the blood of persons with kidney disease who are on maintenance dialysis. These persons are unable to keep their blood phosphate levels in a normal range, and high levels of phosphate can contribute to several serious health consequences.Tenapanor is approved as an add-on treatment for high levels of phosphate in the blood of adults with chronic kidney disease who are on maintenance dialysis and whose disease does not respond adequately to treatment with phosphate binders or who are not able to take phosphate binders. In earlier clinical studies, tenapanor was studied alone or studied together with phosphate binders. In a 1-year clinical study called PHREEDOM, researchers learned that when tenapanor was used alone, it lowered blood phosphate levels, and treated patients experienced acceptable safety and tolerability as determined by the doctors running the study. In the NORMALIZE study, adult patients took a 30-mg tenapanor tablet twice a day, either alone or with sevelamer, for up to 18 months after they completed the PHREEDOM study.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers?The researchers found that one-third of patients taking tenapanor, either alone or with sevelamer, achieved normal blood phosphate levels. This is an improvement from the current standard of care with sevelamer alone to reduce blood phosphate levels. As seen in the earlier studies of tenapanor, the most common adverse event experienced by patients was softer or loose stools. No new safety concerns were reported in the NORMALIZE study.What are the key takeaways?The researchers concluded that tenapanor, used alone or combined with sevelamer, can be used long-term by adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis to reduce the phosphate levels in their blood to within the normal range. Patients who take tenapanor may experience softer or loose stools.This summary was developed by the authors to help adult patients with chronic kidney disease receiving dialysis, and their family members and/or caregivers, better understand the effects of taking tenapanor.[Box: see text]Link to original article here.

Tenapanor: A Phosphate Absorption Inhibitor for the Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With Kidney Failure.

Because of increased risks of cardiovascular disease and death, patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving maintenance dialysis are advised to limit phosphorus consumption and are prescribed phosphate binders in an effort to better control serum phosphate concentrations. Because of large pill size, pill burden, and tolerability issues, phosphate binder adherence is relatively poor. On ingestion, phosphate is absorbed from the intestine via transcellular or paracellular transport. Data show that inhibiting sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3 modulates paracellular phosphate absorption (the predominant pathway in humans). Tenapanor is a first-in-class, minimally absorbed, phosphate absorption inhibitor that selectively inhibits sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3, with a mechanism distinct from, and complementary to, that of phosphate binders. In phase 3 and postregistrational studies, tenapanor conferred statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in serum phosphate in patients receiving maintenance dialysis with hyperphosphatemia. Here, we review the available preclinical and clinical data on the effects of tenapanor on controlling intestinal phosphate absorption.

Patient Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.

Rationale & Objective: In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States federal government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology practitioners across the United States could replace face-to-face visits with telemedicine for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. This study describes patients' perspectives on the use of telemedicine during in-center hemodialysis. Study Design: A qualitative study. Setting & Participants: Thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color) receiving in-center hemodialysis who used telemedicine with their nephrologist during the COVID-19 pandemic. Analytical Approach: Telephone semistructured interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: We identified 6 themes with subthemes: adapting to telemedicine (gaining familiarity and confidence, overcoming and resolving technical difficulties, and relying on staff for communication); ensuring availability of the physician (enabling an immediate response to urgent medical needs, providing peace of mind, addressing patient needs adequately, and enhanced attention and contact from physicians); safeguarding against infection (limiting COVID-19 exposures and decreasing use); straining communication and physical interactions (loss of personalized touch, limited physical examination, and unable to reapproach physicians about forgotten issues); maintaining privacy (enhancing privacy and projecting voice enables others to hear); and supporting confidence in telemedicine (requiring established rapport with physicians, clinical stabilty of health, and ability to have in-person visits when necessary). Limitations: Interviews were conducted later in the pandemic when some nephrology care providers were using telemedicine infrequently. Conclusions: Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.

This study describes patients' perspectives on the use of telemedicine while receiving in-center hemodialysis during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Data are derived from semistructured interviews with thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color). We identified 6 major themes including adapting to telemedicine, ensuring availability of the physicians, safeguarding against infection, straining communication and physical interactions, maintaining privacy, and supporting confidence in telemedicine. These findings suggest that patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.