RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine 2-year efficacy of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI), a novel glaucoma tube shunt in patients with advanced glaucoma. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with glaucoma refractory to maximum medical therapy or previous failed glaucoma surgery. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients who had underwent PGI implantation in a single tertiary institution between May 1, 2017 and March 30, 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was failure defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >18 mm Hg or <6 mm Hg on 2 consecutive visits after 3 months, reoperation for IOP-related indication, explantation of implant or loss of light perception vision. Complete success was defined as unmedicated IOP ≤18 mm Hg or ≥6 mm Hg in the absence of failure. RESULTS: Forty-five eyes in 45 patients were identified, with mean follow-up duration of 24.9±2.0 months. Thirty patients (66.7%) had primary glaucoma and 11 (24.4%) with previous glaucoma surgery. At 2 years following surgery, 8 eyes (17.8%) fulfilled the failure criteria with 32 eyes (71.1%) achieving complete success. Compared with mean medicated preoperative IOP (19.8±6.3 mm Hg), postoperative IOP at 24 months was 13.9±3.7 (P<0.01). Mean number of medications decreased from 3.2±0.8 preoperatively to 0.29±0.65 at 24 months (P<0.01). Significant complications included self-limiting shallow anterior chamber (n=10; 22.2%), hypotony requiring intervention (n=4; 8.9%) and tube occlusion (n=4; 8.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The PGI was able to achieve sustained IOP reduction with reduction of medications at 2 years postsurgery in patients with advanced glaucoma.
Asunto(s)
Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma , Glaucoma , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glaucoma/cirugía , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the refractive outcome of combined cataract surgery and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation compared with trabeculectomy and cataract surgery. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: 206 eyes were enrolled for analysis: 50 had combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy (trabeculectomy group), 50 had combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation (GDD group), and 106 had cataract surgery alone (control group). Refractive prediction error and absolute prediction error of each glaucoma surgery group were compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis was performed in the following axial length (AL) subgroups: short (<22.5 mm), medium (≥22.5 to <25.5 mm), and long (≥25.5 mm). RESULTS: In total, 206 eyes were examined. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall refractive prediction error between the GDD (0.00 ± 0.54 diopters [D]) and the control group (0.10 ± 0.53 D, P = .58). There was significant myopic refractive prediction error in the trabeculectomy group (-0.18 ± 0.88 D, P = .020). In eyes with short AL, a greater absolute prediction error was observed in the GDD group (-0.75 ± 0.43 D, P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from a significant deviation in short AL eyes, combined cataract surgery and GDD implantation demonstrated no significant postoperative refractive prediction error.