Toripalimab (anti-PD-1) versus high-dose interferon-α2b as adjuvant therapy in resected mucosal melanoma: a phase II randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: No standard of care for mucosal melanoma (MM) in the adjuvant setting has been established. Meanwhile, relapse-free survival (RFS) is only ∼5 months after surgery alone. This phase II trial aimed to compare toripalimab versus high-dose interferon-α2b (HDI) as an adjuvant therapy for resected MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2017 to May 2019, 145 patients with resected MM were randomized (1 : 1) to receive HDI (n = 72) or toripalimab (n = 73) for 1 year until disease relapse/distant metastasis, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was RFS. The secondary endpoints included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 26.3 months, the number of RFS, OS, and DMFS events was 51 versus 46, 33 versus 29, and 49 versus 44 in the toripalimab arm and the HDI arm, respectively. The median RFS was 13.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.31-19.02] months and 13.9 (95% CI 8.28-19.61) months in the toripalimab arm and the HDI arm, respectively. The DMFS was not significantly different between the two arms [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00; 95% CI 0.65-1.54]. The median OS was 35.1 months (95% CI 27.93 months-not reached) in the toripalimab arm, with no significant difference in all-cause death (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66-1.84) for the two arms. The median sums of the patients' actual infusion doses were 3672 mg and 1054.5 MIU in the toripalimab arm and the HDI arm, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events with a grade ≥3 was much higher in the HDI arm than in the toripalimab arm (87.5% versus 27.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Toripalimab showed a similar RFS and a more favorable safety profile than HDI, both better than historical data, suggesting that toripalimab might be the better treatment option. However, additional translational studies and better treatment regimens are still warranted to improve the clinical outcome of MM.

[Preliminary effects of toripalimab combined with axitinib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma].

Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with axitinib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Clinical data of 50 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received axitinib combined with toripalimab were retrospectively collected from the database of Peking University Cancer Hospital. ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS were analyzed. Results: Among the 50 patients, 37 were males; median age was 56 (22-73) years; 38 were pathologically diagnosed as clear cell renal cell carcinoma and 12 were non-clear cell carcinoma. Common metastatic sites included lung, bone, lymph node, liver, and so on. 90% of the patients had received at least one-line of systemic therapy. With a median follow-up time of 11.9 months (0.8-24), 27 of the 50 patients are still on treatment, ORR was 34%, DCR was 86%, median PFS was 13.1 months (95%CI 5.8-20.4), and median OS has not yet reached. One-year OS rate was 84.6%. Common adverse reactions were proteinuria, diarrhea, hypertension, abnormal thyroid function, elevated transaminase, and hand-foot syndrome. Most adverse events were grade 1-2. Conclusion: Toripalimab combined with axitinib was efficient in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, and had manageable adverse reactions.

[Impact of first-line chemotherapy on renal function in patients with advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma].

Objective: To observe the impact of first-line chemotherapy on renal function in patients with unresectable/metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC). Methods: A total of 222 (130 males and 92 females) unresectable/metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients were included in the study between January 2005 and May 2017, with age of 29 to 87 (62.4±10.1) years old. The serum creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared before and after first-line chemotherapy. And predictive factors for decreased renal function were analyzed in logistic regression model. Results: After the first-line chemotherapy, the average serum creatinine level increased, with a median changing value of 1.5 µmol/L. Howerver, the eGFR improved, with a median changing value of 0.5 ml·min-1· (1.73 m2)-1, but the differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). In 149 patients who were treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the average serum creatinine level increased by 1.31 µmol/L and eGFR improved by 0.14 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1, but the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In multivariate logistic regression model, age more than and equal to 60 years old (OR=0.88, P=0.745) and cisplatin-based chemotherapy (OR=0.95, P=0.893) did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction after first-line chemotherapy. If the time interval between surgery and first-line chemotherapy was more than 1 year, the risk of renal dysfunction due to chemotherapy decreased (OR=0.54, P=0.196). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Scale≥1 (OR=1.81, P=0.131), anemia before treatment (OR=1.14, P=0.764), the cycles of first-line chemotherapy (OR=1.41, P=0.398) may lead to increase the risk of renal dysfunction, but the differences were not statistically significant. However in the patients who accepted nephrectomy, the risk of renal dysfunction after chemotherapy increased, but the difference was still not statistically significant (OR=3.06, P=0.089). Conclusions: First-line chemotherapy, especially the cisplatin-based regimen, had no significant impact on renal function in the patients with UTUC. Nephrectomy maybe a predictive risk factor for decreased renal function after chemotherapy. Adequate assessment of renal function before treatment, hydration and close monitoring during chemotherapy can effectively protect renal function of the patients.

BRAF inhibitors: efficacious and tolerable in BRAF-mutant acral and mucosal melanoma.

BRAF inhibitors substantially have impressive clinical efficacy in cutaneous melanoma. However, their role in acral and mucosal melanoma remains unclear. Records were reviewed of patients with metastatic or unresectable BRAF-mutant acral and mucosal melanoma hospitalized and administrated BRAF inhibitors during January 2011 and March 2016. Clinical data were collected to determine PFS, ORR, DCR, OS, and safety. Among 28 acral and 12 mucosal melanoma patients treated with BRAF inhibitors, median PFS were 3.6 (95%CI 3.0-6.4) and 4.4 (95%CI 0.8-12.7) months, median OS were 6.2 (95%CI 6.1-12.1) and 8.2 (95%CI 6.6-19.9) months; ORRs were 38.1% and 20.0%, DCRs were 81.0% and 70.0% in acral and mucosal melanoma, respectively. BRAF inhibitors were well tolerated. The most common adverse effects (AEs) were cutaneous and hematological. Grade 3/4 AEs were relatively rare. In conclusion, BRAF inhibitors have acceptable efficacy and good tolerance in BRAF mutant acral and mucosal melanoma.

The natural history and patterns of metastases from mucosal melanoma: an analysis of 706 prospectively-followed patients.

Background: We examined whether mucosal melanomas are different in their clinical course and patterns of metastases when arising from different anatomic sites. Our hypothesis was that metastatic behavior would differ from primary mucosal melanomas at different anatomical sites. Patients and methods: Clinical and pathological data from 706 patients were compared for their stage distribution, patterns of metastases, CKIT/BRAF mutation status, and overall survival for different anatomical sites. Results: The anatomic sites of the primary mucosal melanomas were from the lower GI tract (26.5%), nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (23%), gynecological sites (22.5%), oral cavity (15%), urological sites (5%), upper GI tract (5%), and other sites (3.0%). At initial diagnosis, 14.5% were stage I disease, 41% Stage II, 21.5% Stage III, and 23.0% stage IV. Predominant metastatic sites were regional lymph nodes (21.5%), lung (21%), liver (18.5%), and distant nodes (9%). Oral cavity mucosal melanoma had a higher incidence of regional nodal metastases (31.7% versus 19.8%, P = 0.009), and a higher incidence of lung metastases (32.5% versus 18.5%, P = 0.007) compared to other primary mucosal melanomas. There was a 10% incidence of CKIT mutation and 12% BRAF mutation. Mucosal melanomas from nasal pharyngeal and oral, gastrointestinal, gynecological, and urological had a similar survival with a 1-year survival rate (88%, 83%, 86%), 2-year survival rate (66%, 57%, 61%), 5-year survival rate (27%, 16%, 20%), respectively. Conclusions: The largest sample size allows, for the first time, a comparison of primary melanoma stage and patterns of metastases across anatomical sites. With few exceptions, the presenting stages, incidence of nodal and distant metastases, the site of predilection of distant metastases, or overall survival were similar despite different primary anatomic sites. These findings suggest that clinical trials involving mucosal melanomas and the administration of systemic therapy can be applied equally to mucosal melanomas regardless of their primary anatomic site.

[Efficacy and the multivariate analysis of sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and the influence factors of sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: Clinical data of mRCC patients with sunitinib administered as the first line treatment from August 2008 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy and the influence factors of sunitinib treatment was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In all 166 patients who received sunitinib as first-line treatment, objective response rate was 31.9%, disease control rate was 84.3%. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.0-14.0) and 28.0 months (95% CI: 19.0-33.0), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that pathological types (clear cell carcinoma vs non clear cell carcinoma, HR: 1.889 vs 2.353), time from diagnosis to treatment(<1 year vs ≥1 year, HR: 0.293 vs 0.322) and the number of metastatic sites (1 vs ≥1, HR: 2.360 vs 4.351) were the independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS (P<0.05). Conclusions: The efficacy of sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma is similar to reports at home and abroad. The patients with renal clear cell carcinoma, time from diagnosis to treatment> 1 year, and only one metastatic site would get better PFS and OS.

ZNT7 and Zn2+ are present in different cell populations in the mouse testis.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relation of the spatial distribution between ZNT7 and chelatable zinc ions in the mouse testis. Immunohistochemical results demonstrated a wide distribution of ZNT7 in both seminiferous tubules and interstitial tissues of the testis. The spermatocytes and spermatids in the seminiferous tubules showed strong ZNT7 immunoreactivity whereas zinc autometallographic (AMG) staining was absent. Spermatozoa showed a high level of free zinc, but were void of ZNT7 immunoreactivity. No ZNT7 immunoreactivity and AMG grains were found in spermatogonia. Both ZNT7 and chelatable zinc were detected in Sertoli and Leydig cells. Furthermore, double immunofluorescence study demonstrated that the ZNT7 staining overlapped with that of TGN38 (a trans-Golgi marker), suggesting that ZNT7 was localized in the Golgi apparatus in the ZNT7-positive cells. In conclusion, ZNT7 and chelatable zinc were distributed in different cell populations except for Sertoli and Leydig cells in the mouse testis. ZNT7 may be involved in zinc transportation into the Golgi apparatus for protein packaging in the mouse testis.