RESUMEN
Background & Aims: Rat hepatitis E virus (Rocahepevirus ratti; HEV-C1) is an emerging cause of hepatitis E that is divergent from conventional human-infecting HEV variants (Paslahepevirus balayani; HEV-A). Validated serological assays for HEV-C1 are lacking. We aimed to develop a parallel enzymatic immunoassay (EIA) system that identifies individuals with HEV-C1 exposure. We also aimed to conduct the first HEV-C1 seroprevalence study in humans using this validated EIA system. Methods: Expressed HEV-A (HEV-A4 p239) and HEV-C1 (HEV-C1 p241) peptides were characterised. Blood samples were simultaneously tested in HEV-A4 p239 and HEV-C1 p241 IgG EIAs. An optical density (OD) cut-off-based interpretation algorithm for identifying samples seropositive for HEV-A or HEV-C1 was validated using RT-PCR-positive infection sera. This algorithm was used to measure HEV-C1 seroprevalence in 599 solid organ transplant recipients and 599 age-matched immunocompetent individuals. Results: Both peptides formed virus-like particles. When run in HEV-A4 p239 and HEV-C1 p241 EIAs, HEV-A and HEV-C1 RT-PCR-positive samples formed distinct clusters with minimal overlap in a two-dimensional plot of optical density values. The final EIA interpretation algorithm showed high agreement with RT-PCR results (Cohen's κ = 0.959) and was able to differentiate HEV-A and HEV-C1 infection sera with an accuracy of 94.2% (95% CI: 85.8-98.4%). HEV-C1 IgG seroprevalence was 7/599 (1.2%) among solid organ transplant recipients and 4/599 (0.7%) among immunocompetent individuals. Five of 11 (45.5%) of these patients had history of transient hepatitis of unknown cause. Conclusions: HEV-C1 exposure was identified in 11/1198 (0.92%) individuals in Hong Kong indicating endemic exposure. This is the first estimate of HEV-C1 seroprevalence in humans. The parallel IgG EIA algorithm is a valuable tool for investigating epidemiology and risk factors for HEV-C1 infection. Impact and Implications: Rat hepatitis E virus has recently been discovered to infect humans, but antibody tests for this infection are lacking, making it difficult to gauge how common this infection is. We developed an antibody test algorithm that can identify individuals with past rat hepatitis E virus exposure. We used this algorithm to estimate rat hepatitis E exposure rates in humans in Hong Kong and found that approximately 1% of all tested people had been exposed to this virus previously.
RESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate antibiotic prescribing behavior (APB) among physicians with various specialties in five Asian countries. Design: Survey of antibiotics prescribing behavior in three stages (initial, on-treatment, and de-escalation stages). Methods: Participants included internists, infectious diseases (ID) specialists, hematologists, intensivists, and surgeons. Participants' characteristics, patterns of APB, and perceptions of antimicrobial stewardship were collected. A multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate factors associated with appropriate APB. Results: There were 367 participants. The survey response rate was 82.5% (367/445). For the initial stage, different specialties had different choices for empiric treatment. For the on-treatment stage, if the patient does not respond to empiric treatment, most respondents will step up to broader-spectrum antibiotics (273/367: 74.39%). For the de-escalation stage, the rate of de-escalation was 10%-60% depending on the specialty. Most respondents would de-escalate antibiotics based on guidelines (250/367: 68.12%). De-escalation was mostly reported by ID specialists (66/106: 62.26%). Respondents who reported that they performed laboratory investigations prior to empirical antibiotic prescriptions (aOR = 2.83) were associated with appropriate use, while respondents who reported ID consultation were associated with appropriate antibiotic management for infections not responding to empiric treatment (aOR = 40.87); adherence with national guidelines (aOR = 2.57) was associated with reported successful carbapenem de-escalation. Conclusion: This study highlights the variation in practices and gaps in appropriate APB on three stages of antibiotic prescription among different specialties. Education on appropriate investigation, partnership with ID specialist, and availability and adherence with national guidelines are critical to help guide appropriate APB among different specialties.