The Effects of Different Types of Sleep Disorder on Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

The impact of sleep disorders (SDs), particularly sleep apnea (SA), on the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been the subject of significant research. However, the potential contribution of other SDs to the incidence of CRC remains unexplored. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of SDs on the risk of developing CRC. This study assessed CRC risk among individuals diagnosed with SDs compared with age- and sex-matched unaffected individuals. A longitudinal, nationwide, population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) encompassing 177,707 individuals diagnosed with SDs and 177,707 matched controls. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to determine the relative increased risk of CRC in individuals with SDs and specific subgroups of SDs. The CRC incidences were 1.32-fold higher (95% CI 1.23-1.42) in the overall SD cohort, 1.17-fold higher (95% CI 0.82-1.68) in the SA cohort, 1.42-fold higher (95% CI 1.31-1.55) in the insomnia cohort, 1.27-fold higher (95% CI 1.17-1.38) in the sleep disturbance cohort, and 1.00-fold higher (95% CI 0.77-1.29) in the other SD cohort, after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities.

Comparison Between Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression and Other Decompression Approaches for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis affects numerous people globally. Full-endoscopic uniportal interlaminar decompression (FEUID) for lumbar spinal stenosis results in satisfactory outcomes. In this systematic review, we compared technical methods, surgical outcomes, and complications among different types of surgical techniques and discussed the effect of different surgical skill levels. METHODS: A systematic review of studies published from 1990 to January 2022 was performed. Studies related to FEUID were identified using the keywords "interlaminar decompression," "endoscopy," "uniportal," and "percutaneous." The outcomes measured were operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, complications, visual analog scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores, and the Macnab criteria. RESULTS: Ten of 306 studies were eligible for inclusion. For FEUID, data for 580 patients and more than 367 levels were collected. All the studies reported significant improvement in mean visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores, and the mean overall complication rate was 9.5%. Compared with other surgical techniques, FEUID resulted in lower visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores, complication rates, and blood loss and shorter hospital stay. These surgical parameters were considerably affected by a surgeon's skill level. CONCLUSION: FEUID results in better patient satisfaction with more favorable surgical outcomes and fewer complications. Although more prospective randomized controlled studies are required to confirm these findings, our results indicate that FEUID is a reasonable alternative to traditional lumbar spinal surgery.

Local control of brain metastases with osimertinib alone in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Although osimertinib has excellent intracranial activity in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with exon 19 deletion or L858R EGFR alterations, measures of local control of brain metastases are less well-reported. We describe lesion-level outcomes of brain metastases treated with osimertinib alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with untreated brain metastasis measuring ≥ 5 mm at the time of initiating osimertinib. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence in brain (LRiB) was calculated with death as a competing risk, and univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with LRiB. RESULTS: We included 284 brain metastases from 37 patients. Median follow-up was 20.1 months. On initial MRI after starting osimertinib, patient-level response was complete response (CR) in 11 (15%), partial response (PR) in 33 (45%), stable disease (SD) in 18 (25%) and progressive disease (PD) in 11 (15%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB was 14% (95% CI 9.9-17.9) and was significantly different in patients with a CR (0%), PR (4%), and SD (11%; p = 0.02). Uncontrolled primary tumor (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.78, 95% CI 1.87-7.66; p < 0.001), increasing number of prior systemic therapies (aHR 2.12, 95% CI 1.49-3.04; p < 0.001), and higher ECOG score (aHR 7.8, 95% CI 1.99-31.81; p = 0.003) were associated with LRiB. CONCLUSIONS: Although 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB is < 4% with a CR or PR, 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB is over 10% for patients with less than a PR to osimertinib on initial MRI. These patients should be followed closely for need for additional treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery.