Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 118
Filtrar
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 114(4): 669-76, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25501721

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delay in diagnosis of anaemia during preoperative assessment poses logistic problems, leading to multiple clinic visits, inadequate preoperative management, and unnecessary delay of surgery. Therefore, we tested an instant spectrophotometric haemoglobin (SpHb) measurement technique to facilitate this assessment. METHODS: We evaluated portable instant SpHb vs standard laboratory screening of anaemia between March 2012 and December 2013. Paired Hb measurements were performed on 726 patients using SpHb (Pronto-7, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA) and Hb measured on the same day using an automated analyser. The results were obtained from a group of 638 patients from the pre-anaesthetic clinic with expected normal Hb values, and 88 patients from the oncology clinic with known low Hb. RESULTS: Median (range) SpHb was 129.5 (67-171) compared with 136 g litre(-1) (63-178) Hb measured using the automated system. Identifying Hb below a threshold of 130 g litre(-1) for males had a high sensitivity (93%), while identifying a threshold of 120 g litre(-1) for females had lower sensitivity (75%). The specificity for males (77%) and females (81%) was similar. Mean measurement bias and agreement: tolerability interval ratio was -8.1 g litre(-1) and 2.78 for men and -3.1 g litre(-1) and 2.44 for women. CONCLUSIONS: SpHb was sensitive as a preliminary screening tool for detecting true low Hb values in males, but less sensitive in females. Instant SpHb measurement may enable prompt routine preoperative anaemia management, but its precision was lower than expected. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is approved by the Tasmanian Human Ethics Committee, Australia and was registered prospectively in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ ACTRN12611001256965) and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/trial.aspx?trialid=ACTRN12611001256965).


Asunto(s)
Hemoglobinas/análisis , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Espectrofotometría/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Br J Cancer ; 97(3): 434-9, 2007 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17579618

RESUMEN

Active smoking has little or no effect on breast cancer risk but some investigators have suggested that passive smoking and its interaction with active smoking may be associated with an increased risk. In a population based case-control study of breast cancer in women aged 36-45 years at diagnosis, information on active smoking, passive smoking in the home, and other factors, was collected at interview from 639 cases and 640 controls. Women were categorised jointly by their active and passive smoking exposure. Among never smoking controls, women who also reported no passive smoking exposure were significantly more likely to be nulliparous and to be recent users of oral contraceptives. Among those never exposed to passive smoking, there was no significant association between active smoking and breast cancer, relative risk (RR) of 1.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.73) for past smokers and RR of 1.19 (95% CI 0.72-1.95) for current smokers, nor was there an association with age started, duration or intensity of active smoking. Compared with women who were never active nor passive smokers, there was no significant association between passive smoking in the home and breast cancer risk in never smokers, RR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.64-1.25), in past smokers, RR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.75-1.56), or in current smokers, RR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.67-1.30). There was no trend with increasing duration of passive smoking and there was no heterogeneity among any of the subgroups examined. In this study, there was no evidence of an association between either active smoking or passive smoking in the home and risk of breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Fumar/efectos adversos , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reino Unido/epidemiología
3.
Aust Dent J ; 52(1): 61-6, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17500166

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This report describes the case management of a 32 year old special needs patient with life-threatening odontogenic infection. The combination of schizophrenia, Down and Eisenmenger syndromes presented significant challenges to managing his oral health, particularly within the rural context. In this case, dental treatment was limited to a full dental clearance during a high risk general anaesthesia session. METHOD: A comprehensive work-up prior to general anaesthesia was an essential aspect of care. This included a full medical history and examination, communication between medical specialists, the dentist and family consultation. The anaesthetic procedure was undertaken using a careful regimen of drugs and monitoring to minimize the impact on his cardiovascular system. Techniques to minimize bleeding from extraction sites were also important. RESULTS: Three weeks postsurgically the patient was reviewed and his family reported that he was interacting positively with them after years of surliness and conflict. This was attributed to a managed psychotropic medication regimen and improved dental condition, which has led to a sustained improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The management of acute odontogenic infection for special needs patients in the rural setting requires a local interdisciplinary team approach, careful consideration of related pathophysiology and its potential impact on general anaesthesia, and close consultation with family and carers.


Asunto(s)
Atención Dental para Enfermos Crónicos/métodos , Síndrome de Down/complicaciones , Complejo de Eisenmenger/complicaciones , Absceso Periapical/cirugía , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Adulto , Anestesia Dental/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Población Rural
4.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 35(2): 230-8, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17444314

RESUMEN

In April 2002 our practice ceased routine use of epidural analgesia for colorectal laparotomy in favour of a six-drug multimodal regimen comprising ketamine, clonidine, morphine, tramadol, paracetamol and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. The records of 54 patients who received this multimodal analgesia regimen (MM) after April 2002 were compared to the 59 patients who had previously received epidural analgesia (EPI). Patients had the same surgeon and anaesthetist. Daily pain score (verbal rated 0-10) at rest (mean) over the first three postoperative days was satisfactorily low with both MM (1.2 +/- 1.2) and EPI (0.4 +/- 0.4). Over this period there was little difference between the maximum pain score at rest (MM 2.3 +/- 1.9 vs. EPI 2.2 +/- 1.7, P = 0.58). Major complications and side-effects occurred solely in EPI patients: epidural abscess (1), respiratory depression (2), pneumonia (3), venous thromboembolism (3), delirium (7), high block (7) and motor block (3). Hypotension requiring intervention was 4.8 times more frequent in the EPI group (95% CI 2.1-11). Antiemetic use was similar between groups; on average 13 patients in the MM groups (24%) and 15 patients in the EPI groups (26%) received antiemetics each day. MM patients had shorter anaesthetic preparation time (20 +/- 8 min vs. 32 +/- 8 min, P < 0.001), shorter high-dependency unit stay (0.4 +/- 1.2 days vs. 4.5 +/- 0.9 days, P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (10 +/- 4 days vs. 13 +/- 8 days, P = 0.003). In our practice, changing from epidural to multimodal analgesia produced comparable pain relief with reduction in anaesthesia preparation time, high-dependency unit stay and hospital stay and the requirement for staff interventions. There was also a reduction in the incidence of major complications and side-effects.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia/métodos , Colon/cirugía , Quimioterapia Combinada , Auditoría Médica/métodos , Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Analgesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/inducido químicamente , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Tasmania/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Br J Cancer ; 93(7): 817-24, 2005 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16160699

RESUMEN

We examined the relationship between body fatness, sports participation and breast cancer risk in 1560 premenopausal cases and 1548 controls, from three related population-based case-control studies in the UK. Half of the women with breast cancer were aged less than 36 years at diagnosis. Women who perceived themselves as plump at age 10 years had a relative risk of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.69-0.99, P = 0.03) as compared with those who perceived themselves as thin. Self-reported obesity compared with leanness at diagnosis was associated with a relative risk of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.56-1.06, P = 0.11). Women who reported having been plump at age 10 years and overweight or obese at diagnosis had a relative risk of 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.56-1.01, P = 0.06) as compared with those who reported being thin at age 10 years and at diagnosis. Findings for three related measures of body fatness suggested that obesity is associated with a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer. There was no association between sports participation and breast cancer risk in these premenopausal women. The relative risk for spending an average of more than 1 h per week in sports compared with less from ages 12 to 30 years was 1.00 (95% CI 0.86-1.16, P = 0.98).


Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Ejercicio Físico , Premenopausia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Br J Cancer ; 89(11): 2078-86, 2003 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14647141

RESUMEN

We report results on risk factors for invasive squamous cell and adenocarcinomas of the cervix in women aged 20-44 years from the UK National Case-Control Study of Cervical Cancer, including 180 women with adenocarcinoma, 391 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 923 population controls. The risk of both squamous cell and adenocarcinoma was strongly related to the lifetime number of sexual partners, and, independently, to age at first intercourse. The risk of both types of cervical cancer increased with increasing duration of use of oral contraceptives, and this effect was most marked in current and recent users of oral contraceptives. The risk of squamous cell carcinoma was associated with high parity and the risk of both squamous cell and adenocarcinoma increased with early age at first birth. Long duration smoking (20 or more years) was associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of squamous cell carcinoma, but smoking was not associated with the risk of adenocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to confirm the suggestion from this and other studies of differences in risk related to smoking between squamous cell and adenocarcinomas of the cervix.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/etiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Paridad , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Reino Unido
7.
Br J Haematol ; 123(5): 906-14, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14632783

RESUMEN

Aplastic anaemia is a rare but serious disorder with a high morbidity and mortality rate. The causes of aplastic anaemia are, for the most part, unknown. We report on the hypothesis that aplastic anaemia may be caused by occupational and/or environmental exposures to certain chemicals. The UK Aplastic Anaemia Study was an interview-based case-control study covering the whole of Great Britain. Those patients diagnosed between 1 July 1993 and 20 October 1997, aged < or =75 years and born and diagnosed in the UK were eligible for the study. Two hundred eligible cases of aplastic anaemia were compared with 387 age- and sex-matched controls. A number of occupational exposures showed increases in risk. In a multivariate model of these exposures the odds ratios (ORs) for solvents/degreasing agents, pesticides and radiation were >2 and statistically significant. Reported chemical treatment of houses within 5 years of diagnosis had a significantly raised risk for adults [OR = 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-12.01], particularly for woodworm treatment (OR = 5.1, 95% CI 1.5-17.4). This study identified significant risks associated with self-reported exposure to solvents, radiation and pesticides in the workplace. Self-reported chemical treatment of houses was also associated with an increased risk of developing aplastic anaemia, in keeping with previous literature.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Aplásica/etiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Industrias , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Agricultura , Anemia Aplásica/inducido químicamente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Comercio , Femenino , Pasatiempos , Productos Domésticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Exposición Profesional , Plaguicidas/efectos adversos , Radiación , Riesgo , Clase Social , Solventes/efectos adversos
8.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 30(6): 809-12, 2002 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12500524

RESUMEN

An intellectually impaired adult with a history of escalating violence towards hospital personnel was given an anaesthetic in his home prior to transfer to hospital for surgery. We review the implications and problems encountered, and suggest means by which such a retrieval can occur smoothly.


Asunto(s)
Agresión , Anestesia , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Anestésicos Disociativos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Medicación Preanestésica , Transporte de Pacientes
9.
Br J Cancer ; 87(11): 1257-66, 2002 Nov 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12439715

RESUMEN

The United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study covering the whole of Great Britain, incorporated a pilot study measuring electric fields. Measurements were made in the homes of 473 children who were diagnosed with a malignant neoplasm between 1992 and 1996 and who were aged 0-14 at diagnosis, together with 453 controls matched on age, sex and geographical location. Exposure assessments comprised resultant spot measurements in the child's bedroom and the family living-room. Temporal stability of bedroom fields was investigated through continuous logging of the 48-h vertical component at the child's bedside supported by repeat spot measurements. The principal exposure metric used was the mean of the pillow and bed centre measurements. For the 273 cases and 276 controls with fully validated measures, comparing those with a measured electric field exposure >/=20 V m(-1) to those in a reference category of exposure <10 V m(-1), odds ratios of 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.68-2.54) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, 1.32 (95% confidence interval 0.73-2.39) for total leukaemia, 2.12 (95% confidence interval 0.78-5.78) for central nervous system cancers and 1.26 (95% confidence interval 0.77-2.07) for all malignancies were obtained. When considering the 426 cases and 419 controls with no invalid measures, the corresponding odds ratios were 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.49-1.51) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.56-1.54) for total leukaemia, 1.43 (95% confidence interval 0.68-3.02) for central nervous system cancers and 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.59-1.35) for all malignancies. With exposure modelled as a continuous variable, odds ratios for an increase in the principal metric of 10 V m(-1) were close to unity for all disease categories, never differing significantly from one.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/etiología , Campos Electromagnéticos/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Leucemia/etiología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/epidemiología , Niño , Protección a la Infancia , Preescolar , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Leucemia/epidemiología , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/etiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Proyectos Piloto , Medición de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología
10.
Br J Cancer ; 85(11): 1667-70, 2001 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11742485

RESUMEN

Oesophageal cancer rates in women in the UK are more than 3 times higher than in most other European populations. A population-based matched case-control study of histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus in women was carried out in 4 regions in England and Scotland. Interviews were carried out in hospital or at home and topics included: smoking; alcohol; tea and coffee consumption; medical and obstetric history; and diet. Response rates were 62% for cases and 65% for first-chosen controls. There were 159 case-control pairs. Significant results were found for: eating salads (odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.92 in the highest quartile of consumption) and a light (as distinct from no) breakfast (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.48) were protective; quantity of tea was a risk factor and there was a significant positive trend with temperature at which hot drinks were consumed (P = 0.03). Alcohol consumption was unrelated to risk, but there was a significant trend with years of smoking (P = 0.015). A protective effect of aspirin consumption was confined to the English centres (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.56). Comparison with a parallel study of adenocarcinoma indicated a common protective effect of a healthy diet but otherwise distinct risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dieta , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Estado Civil , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar , Factores Socioeconómicos
11.
Med Educ ; 35(11): 1056-64, 2001 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11703642

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify academic and non-academic predictors of success of entrants to the Nottingham medical course over the first 25 completed years of the course's existence. SETTING, DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retrospective study of academic and non-academic characteristics of 2270 entrants between 1970 and 1990, and their subsequent success. Analyses were undertaken of two cohorts (entrants between 1970 and 1985 and entrants between 1986 and 1990). RESULTS: Overall, 148 of 2270 (6.5%) entrants left the course, with the highest proportion being from the first 6 years (10.7%). Of the 148 leavers, 58 (39.2%) did so after obtaining their BMedSci degree. Concerning non-academic factors, in the 1970-85 cohort, applicants from the later years and those not taking a year out were more successful. However, these two factors had no influence on outcome in 1986-90. In contrast, ethnicity and gender were highly significant predictors of success in obtaining honours at BMBS in 1986-90 but at no other exam nor in the earlier years. Older, mature or graduate entrants were more successful at obtaining a first-class degree at BMedSci for the whole 21 years. However, they were less likely to be successful at passing the BMBS. With regard to academic factors, overall, A grades at Ordinary level/General Certificate of Secondary Education (O-Level/GCSE) were inconsistent independent predictors of success. However, for 1986-90, high grades at O-Level/GCSE chemistry and biology were strong independent predictors of success at BMedSci and BMBS. Very few Advanced level (A-Level) criteria were independent predictors of success for 1970-85. In contrast, for 1986-90 entrants, achieving a high grade at A-Level chemistry predicted success at obtaining a first-class degree at BMedSci, and a high grade at A-Level biology predicted success at BMBS. Over the 21 years, the majority of entrants achieved significantly lower grades at A-Level than predicted. General Studies A-Level was a poor predictor of achievement. CONCLUSIONS: On balance our current GCSE A-grade requirements should remain. Biology should be added to Chemistry as a compulsory A-Level subject. If predicted A-Level grades are borderline then the lower estimate should be used. General Studies should continue not to be used in selection. Performance of more recent mature entrants at BMBS needs further study. The recent gender and ethnic biases in obtaining honours at BMBS is currently being examined. The motivation of applicants planning to take deferred entry should be carefully explored at interview.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Evaluación Educacional , Logro , Estudios de Cohortes , Prueba de Admisión Académica , Demografía , Inglaterra , Predicción , Humanos
12.
Osteoporos Int ; 12(9): 777-87, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11605745

RESUMEN

The associations between a number of reproductive and menopausal factors and bone mineral density (BMD) were studied in a sample of early postmenopausal women. The study included 580 women aged 45-61 years who completed a risk factor questionnaire containing sections on obstetric and menstrual history. BMD measurements were taken at the anteroposterior (AP) spine, greater trochanter, femoral neck, total radius and whole body, along with whole body bone mineral content (BMC). In analyses adjusting for key confounders, number of pregnancies was more strongly associated with increased BMD than number of live births at all sites (p<0.05 at femoral neck and total radius), and menstrual years was more strongly associated with increased BMD than years since menopause (p<0.05 at all sites). Hysterectomized women had a significantly higher adjusted mean BMD than non-hysterectomized women at all sites (AP spine: 0.999 g/cm2 vs 0.941 g/cm2, p<0.001), although there were no significant differences in BMD between hysterectomized women who had a bilateral oophorectomy and those whose ovaries were preserved. Negative associations between the duration of hot flushes and BMD were statistically significant (p<0.05) at the three non-hip sites. In multiple regression analyses containing all reproductive terms, duration of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use, menstrual years and hysterectomy status were significantly associated with BMD at all five sites, whilst oral contraceptive use before the age of 23 years was significantly associated with increased BMD at all sites except the total radius. Breastfeeding duration, the duration of oral contraceptive use and premenopausal amenorrhea were found to have no association with BMD. Results for whole body BMC were consistent with those for the five BMD sites, across all the variables considered here. These findings confirm the importance of HRT use and duration of menses as predictors of BMD, whilst the results for hysterectomy status and early oral contraceptive use require further consideration.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Reproducción/fisiología , Amenorrea/fisiopatología , Lactancia Materna , Anticonceptivos Orales/farmacología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Menarquia/fisiología , Menopausia/fisiología , Menstruación/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paridad/fisiología , Posmenopausia/fisiología , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo
14.
BMJ ; 322(7289): 772-5, 2001 Mar 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11282864

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of antidepressant drugs and generic counselling for treating mild to moderate depression in general practice. To determine whether the outcomes were similar for patients with randomly allocated treatment and those expressing a treatment preference. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial, with patient preference arms. Follow up at 8 weeks and 12 months and abstraction of GP case notes. SETTING: 31 general practices in Trent region. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18-70 who met research diagnostic criteria for major depression; 103 patients were randomised and 220 patients were recruited to the preference arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in mean Beck depression inventory score; time to remission; global outcome assessed by a psychiatrist using all data sources; and research diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: At 12 months there was no difference between the mean Beck scores in the randomised arms. Combining the randomised and patient preference groups, the difference in Beck scores was 0.4 (95% confidence interval -2.7 to 3.5). Patients choosing counselling did better than those randomised to it (mean difference in Beck score 4.6, 0.0 to 9.2). There was no difference in the psychiatrist's overall assessment of outcome between any of the groups. 221/265 (83%) of participants with a known outcome had a remission. Median time to remission was shorter in the group randomised to antidepressants than the other three groups (2 months v 3 months). 33/221 (15%) patients had a relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Generic counselling seems to be as effective as antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate depressive illness, although patients receiving antidepressants may recover more quickly. General practitioners should allow patients to have their preferred treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Psicoterapia/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Can J Anaesth ; 48(3): 279-83, 2001 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11305830

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the cost and effectiveness of small-dose spinal anesthesia (SP) with general anesthesia (GA) for outpatient laparoscopy. METHODS: A retrospective record analysis of 24 patients who received SP were compared with 28 patients who received GA in our Daycare centre. The costs of anesthesia and recovery were calculated, from an institutional perspective, using 1997 Canadian Dollar values. Effectiveness was measured in terms of time for anesthesia and recovery, and postoperative antiemetic and analgesic requirements. RESULTS: Both groups were well matched for age, weight, duration and type of surgery. The mean total cost for the SP group of $53.45 +/- 10.40 was no different from that for the GA group of $48.92 +/- 10.25 (95% CI -10.3, 1.2). Time to administer anesthesia was longer in the SP group with a mean time of 18 +/- 8 min compared with 10 +/- 3 min in the GA group (CI -11.3, -4.7). Recovery time in the PACU was longer in the SP group 123 +/- 51 min compared with 94 +/- 48 min (CI -56.6,-1.4). Postoperative antiemetic requirements were similar: 8% in SP group vs 14% in GA group, whereas analgesic requirements were less in the SP group with 25% receiving analgesia compared with 75% in the GA group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The total cost of anesthesia and recovery using SP is similar to that for GA when used for outpatient laparoscopy. Spinal anesthesia was less effective than GA in time to administer anesthesia and in duration of recovery. Postoperative analgesic requirements were reduced using SP.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Anestesia General/economía , Anestesia Raquidea/economía , Laparoscopía/economía , Adulto , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Br J Cancer ; 84(3): 413-6, 2001 Feb 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11161409

RESUMEN

Researchers and ethics committees are increasingly concerned about the perceived emotional impact on individuals following participation in epidemiologic studies. This attitudinal survey was designed to investigate this issue among 751 of the parents who had already given an interview in the UK Childhood Cancer Study (UKCCS), one of the largest case-control studies ever undertaken to investigate the aetiology of cancer in children. Information was collected by postal questionnaire on their reasons for agreeing to take part in the UKCCS, on whether questions had caused distress or difficulty and what their feelings were immediately after the interview and at the time of this survey. Parents were asked if they felt they had benefited in any way by taking part and control parents were asked if they would have taken part without prior consent of their doctor. 90% of both cases and controls felt glad to have taken part immediately after the interview and few reported any anxiety at having done so; 95% of both cases and controls felt satisfied that they had made a worthwhile contribution. Although 18% of cases felt tense and 14% felt unhappy after the interview, over 90% of them felt glad that they had taken part a few weeks later. Of particular interest is that 38% of cases and 24% of controls said they had positively benefited from taking part in the UKCCS and 96% of control mothers did not mind their family doctor giving permission for them to be contacted.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Neoplasias/etiología , Padres/psicología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Servicios de Salud del Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido/epidemiología
17.
Br J Psychiatry ; 177: 312-8, 2000 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11116771

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a mismatch between the wish of a patient with depression to have counselling and the prescription of antidepressants by the doctor. AIMS: To determine whether counselling is as effective as antidepressants for depression in primary care and whether allowing patients to choose their treatment affects their response. METHOD: A partially randomised preference trial, with patients randomised to either antidepressants or counselling or given their choice of either treatment. The treatment and follow-up were identical in the randomised and patient preference arms. RESULTS: There were 103 randomised and 220 preference patients in the trial. We found: no differences in the baseline characteristics of the randomised and preference groups; that the two treatments were equally effective at 8 weeks, both for the randomised group and when the randomised and patient preference groups for a particular treatment were combined; and that expressing a preference for either treatment conferred no additional benefit on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These data challenge several assumptions about the most appropriate treatment for depression in a primary care setting.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Depresión/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Psicoterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/psicología , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Osteoporos Int ; 11(4): 310-5, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10928220

RESUMEN

Few studies have assessed the relationship between occupational activity and bone mineral density (BMD), although two case-control studies have reported a protective effect of occupational activity on hip fracture. In the present study 580 postmenopausal women aged 45-61 years completed a risk factor questionnaire including a detailed occupational history. For each job, hours spent sitting, standing, walking, lifting and carrying were recorded; these measures, evaluated at ages 20, 30, 40 years, in the current job and over the working lifetime, were used in the analysis. BMD was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and measurements at five sites were used in a multiple regression analysis adjusting for potential confounding variables. There was a significant negative association between sitting at age 20 years and BMD at the radius (p = 0.037), with negative relationships of borderline significance at the anteroposterior spine (p = 0.091) and whole body (p = 0.078). There were significant positive associations between standing at age 30 years and BMD at all five sites (p < 0.05), but no significant linear associations for standing at ages 20 and 40 years. No significant associations were found for lifetime or current occupational measures of sitting, standing, walking and lifting or carrying. The lack of consistency of these significant findings suggests that they may have occurred by chance, and that occupational activity has little if any effect on BMD in postmenopausal women.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Ocupaciones , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Estudios Transversales , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Br J Cancer ; 83(1): 127-32, 2000 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10883680

RESUMEN

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus in British women is among the highest in the world. To investigate its aetiology, we conducted a multi-centre, population based case-control study in four regions in England and Scotland. We included 74 incident cases in women with histologically confirmed diagnoses of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, and 74 female controls matched by age and general practice. High body mass index (BMI) around the age of 20 years (highest vs lowest quartile, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 6.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-28.52) and low consumption of fruit (highest vs lowest quartile, adjusted OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.49) were associated with increases in risk. Breastfeeding by women was associated with reduced risk of their subsequently developing this cancer (ever vs never, adjusted OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.82) and there was a significant dose-response effect with total duration of breastfeeding. The summary population attributable risk from these three factors was 96% (90% if breastfeeding is excluded). We conclude that high BMI in early adulthood and low consumption of fruit are important risk factors for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Breastfeeding may confer a protective effect but this needs confirmation. This cancer is a largely preventable disease in women.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/prevención & control , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Dieta , Registros de Dieta , Dispepsia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/prevención & control , Femenino , Frutas , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactancia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
20.
Br J Gen Pract ; 50(460): 905-6, 2000 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11141877

RESUMEN

We performed a cross-sectional survey of general practice attenders to determine their preferences regarding treatment for depression and characteristics associated with such preferences. Counselling was more popular than drug therapy (antidepressants), particularly among women, those who believed antidepressants are addictive, and those who had received such treatment in the past.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Consejo , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...