Diagnosis of Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow Using Ultrasound - A Comparison to Electrophysiologic Studies.

PURPOSE: Given the relatively high false negative rate of electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) in patients with clinically diagnosed ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), we sought to determine whether an alternative objective test could more effectively detect UNE. Additionally, we proposed to determine the relationship between the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve on ultrasound (US), EDX, and clinical symptoms. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients presenting with symptomatic UNE. The performance characteristics of EDX versus ultrasound were calculated using the clinical diagnosis of UNE as the reference standard. Standard EDX studies and US of the ulnar nerve were analyzed. Maximal CSA of the ulnar nerve and EDX severity were analyzed for patients with each combination of US-positive/negative and EDX-positive/negative findings. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 89 patients and 115 nerves with signs and symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome. In total, 56 (49%) nerves were diagnosed as mild UNE, 32 (28%) nerves were diagnosed as moderate UNE, 17 (15%) nerves were diagnosed as severe UNE, and 10 (8%) nerves were negative for UNE by EDX. Maximal-maximal CSA was highly correlated with disease severity as determined by nerve conduction studies/electromyography. Compared with EDX+/US+, patients with EDX-/US+ showed higher rates of ulnar sensory loss and elbow tenderness with similar rates of positive Tinel and intrinsic muscle atrophy. In this sample of patients with clinically diagnosed UNE, 91.3% of the patients demonstrated positive EDX studies, whereas 94.8% had a positive US. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is an alternative to EDX that could be incorporated clinically in the diagnosis and management of UNE. Ultrasound was able to consistently detect clinically positive cubital tunnel syndrome demonstrating its utility as a confirmatory or supplemental test to the clinical assessment if one is required. Ultrasound additionally may be able to better identify patients with early stages of UNE with negative EDX findings. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic IV.

Where Does Ultrasound Fit in the Diagnostic Algorithm for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a promising supplement to electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) and has potential to be performed by novice operators. Our objective is to understand the discrepancies in assessment between the two modalities and to assess the utility of US in CuTS diagnosis by a novice operator. METHODS: Patients who presented to a single tertiary academic medical center and clinically diagnosed with CuTS were prospectively enrolled. Electrodiagnostic studies were performed along with US measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve by both a board-certified physiatrist and novice operator. Electrodiagnostic study and US outcomes were compared among four diagnostic impression groups: EDX-/US-, EDX+/US-, EDX-/US+, and EDX+/US+. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were classified as abnormal by both EDX and US, 14 were classified abnormal by US only, 3 were classified abnormal by EDX only, and 6 were classified normal by both EDX and US (P = .008, K = 0.14). The EDX+/US+ group had a significantly reduced sensory amplitude compared with the EDX-/US+ (P = .04) group. Diagnostic classifications between a board-certified physiatrist and novice operator were in moderate agreement (K = 0.58, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound detected a greater proportion of patients as abnormal than EDX. A subset of patients with clinical diagnoses of CuTS had normal sensory amplitudes but increased maximum nerve CSAs. Competency in US may be easily acquired with minimal training, suggesting its potential to be extended for use by other members of the health care team.

Combined methylphenidate and fluoxetine treatment in adolescent rats significantly impairs weight gain with minimal effects on skeletal development.

Methylphenidate (MP) is frequently prescribed to treat Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD); however, many patients with ADHD experience depression and anxiety. As such, concomitant administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as fluoxetine (FLX) is common. Our laboratory and others have shown that MP impairs skeletal development in preclinical and clinical settings, and FLX has also been linked to skeletal deficits. Unfortunately, little is known about the effects of combined MP and FLX treatment on skeletal development. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of MP and FLX on bone morphology and biomechanical properties in adolescent rats. Four-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into the following 4 groups: Water, MP, FLX, and MP + FLX. As body weights in the MP, FLX, and MP + FLX groups were all lower than Water, the data were compared directly and after adjusting to body weight via linear regression. The direct comparison revealed that MP + FLX rats had significantly shorter (~12 %) and narrower femora and tibiae (~10 %) compared to most other groups, along with shorter (26-35 %), disorganized tibial growth plates. MicroCT analyses of the trabecular compartment of the proximal tibia identified reductions of 47 % for TV, 86 % for BV, 74 % for BV/TV, 68 % for Tb.N, 25 % in Tb.Th, and 74 % in vBMD concomitant with increases of 44 % for Tb.Sp for MP + FLX compared to Water. Similar analyses of femoral midshaft cortical bone identified reductions of 29 % for Ct.V, 30 % for Ps.V, 30 % for Ec. V, and 51 % for pMOI, as well as increases of 17 % for Ct.Th and 2 % for TMD for MP + FLX compared to Water. Biomechanically, MP + FLX femora were weaker, as indicated by a reduction in ultimate force (14 %) in MP + FLX compared to Water. The microstructural and biomechanical effects of MP + FLX were eliminated after adjustment for body weight, though the detrimental effects on growth plate morphology remained. We conclude that while the adverse microstructural and biomechanical effects of MP + FLX seen via direct comparison are predominantly attributable to reductions in body weight rather than direct effects on bone, MP and FLX, particularly in combination show detrimental effects on growth plate structure and chondrocyte morphology. These findings warrant further research into the effect of these drugs on weight gain, skeletal development and growth plate morphology, as well as consideration by physicians treating children and adolescents with ADHD.