Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Upper Extremity - A Review.

Necrotizing fasciitis is a soft tissue infection that habitually originates from the fascial sheaths, expands at a volant pace, leads to extensive necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues, and eventually ends up in a life-threatening condition with notably elevated amputation and mortality rates. Factors that induce interruption of skin integrity, such as trauma or intravenous drug use, are the most common inciting events. Specific clinical signs heralding its presence are usually absent in the early stages, often resulting in misdiagnosis. Early recognition, prompt and aggressive surgical debridement, antibiotic use, and supportive care constitute the fundamental principles to lean on for a better prognosis. Necrotizing fasciitis of the upper extremity is relatively rare and consequently holds a limited place in the literature. Only a few studies assess it as a separate entity, with most of them being case reports or small case series. We, therefore, performed a review of the current literature, to assemble the dispersed results of different studies and clarify the various aspects of upper limb necrotizing fasciitis. In this systematic review, we present the epidemiological data, the causative events, the most frequent underlying diseases, the risk factors, the amputation and mortality rates, the pathogenic microorganisms, the clinical characteristics, the diagnostic tools, the medical and surgical management concerning necrotizing fasciitis of the upper limb. Finally, the results indicating its differentiation compared to necrotizing fasciitis of other anatomic sites are remarkably highlighted.

Systematic review of distal biceps tendon rupture in athletes: treatment and rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon rupture is a rare injury associated with decreased elbow flexion and forearm supination strength. This impairment is not tolerated by high-demand patients like athletes. PURPOSE: To review treatment and rehabilitation applied to injured athletes and study their impact in return to sports. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus online databases were searched. A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines; studies published on distal biceps tendon rupture treatment and rehabilitation of athletes until June 30, 2021, were identified. A quantitative synthesis of factor related to return to preinjury sport activity was made. RESULTS: Ten articles were identified, including 157 athletes. Mean age was 40.5 years, and the dominant arm was injured in 103 cases (66%). Rupture was acute in 121 athletes (77%), and the mean follow-up was 25.7 months. A hundred and fifty-three athletes (97.5%) successfully returned to sport within a mean time of 6.2 months. Surgical treatment was followed in all cases. One-incision technique was chosen in 115 (73%) and suture anchor fixation in 52 (33%) cases. No postsurgical immobilization was reported in 38 (24%) and immobilization for 2 weeks in 124 (79%) athletes. Decreased supination-pronation and flexion-extension arc was found in 63 (40%) and 27 (17%) cases, respectively. Earlier return to sport was associated with nondominant-side (P = .007) and acute (P < .001) injuries, participation in weightlifting (P = .001), double-incision approach (P = .005), cortical button fixation (P < .001), and absence of supination-pronation restriction (P = .032). Time of return to sport activity was independent of rehabilitation, including immobilization (P = .539) and strengthening (P = .155), and decreased flexion-extension arc (P = .059). CONCLUSION: Athletes sustaining distal biceps tendon rupture have a high postoperative return to sport rate, independently of selected surgical technique or rehabilitation program. However, a relation between the surgical technique and time of return to sport was found. Rehabilitation did not influence time of return to sport.

Floating Elbow in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: We aimed to systematically review all papers examining floating elbow injuries in adults. Material and Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma, PROSPERO, and Scopus databases were searched up to August 31, 2020. Included studies had as a primary or secondary outcome the functional outcomes after a floating elbow injury on patients aged 17 or older. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Results: Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Patients were male at 73,1%. Median age of the patients was 33,0 years and median time of follow-up was 19,5 months. Articular surfaces were affected at 24,4%, whereas 51,2% of the fractures was open. Approximately, 34,9% of the patients suffered neural injury. Ipsilateral and multiple-system injuries were present in 34,8% and 76,3 % of the cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that intra-articular and nerve damage, open fractures and multi-system injuries affected range of motion, union and complications. Sex, age, vascular damage and ipsilateral injuries of the patient did not adversely impact the outcome. All of the included studies were classified as very-low quality of evidence. Conclusions: The current knowledge regarding the characteristics of floating elbow in adults is limited, albeit we were able to provide possible pre-operative predictor outcomes.