An investigation into the impact of volumetric rescanning and fractionation treatment on dose homogeneity in liver cancer proton therapy.

The Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) technique in modern particle therapy offers a highly conformal dose distribution but poses challenges due to the interplay effect, an interaction between respiration-induced organ movement and PBS. This study evaluates the effectiveness of different volumetric rescanning strategies in mitigating this effect in liver cancer proton therapy. We used a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation toolkit, 'TOPAS,' and an image registration toolbox, 'Elastix,' to calculate 4D dose distributions from 5 patients' four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). We analyzed the homogeneity index (HI) value of the Clinical Tumor Volume (CTV) at different rescan numbers and treatment times. Our results indicate that dose homogeneity stabilizes at a low point after a week of treatment, implying that both rescanning and fractionation treatments help mitigate the interplay effect. Notably, an increase in the number of rescans doesn't significantly reduce the mean dose to normal tissue but effectively prevents high localized doses to tissue adjacent to the CTV. Rescanning techniques, based on statistical averaging, require no extra equipment or patient cooperation, making them widely accessible. However, the number of rescans, tumor location, diaphragm movement, and treatment fractionation significantly influence their effectiveness. Therefore, deciding the number of rescans should involve considering the number of beams, treatment fraction size, and total delivery time to avoid unnecessary treatment extension without significant clinical benefits. The results showed that 2-3 rescans are more clinically suitable for liver cancer patients undergoing proton therapy.

Acute Brain Injury in Postcardiotomy Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: Acute brain injury (ABI) is common in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). One of the most common indications for use of VA-ECMO is postcardiotomy shock (PCS). The authors aimed to characterize the prevalence of ABI and its association with outcomes in this population. DESIGN: prospective observational. SETTING: Single-center tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two consecutive patients treated for PCS with VA-ECMO from November 2017 to March 2020. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median age of patients was 64 (interquartile range 44-84), 62% were male. Of 52 PCS patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 38% (n = 20) experienced acute brain injury. Ischemic stroke was the most common (n = 13, 25%). Patients with central versus peripheral cannulation experienced more ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes (8% v 38%, p = 0.04). Patients with intracardiac thrombus experienced more brain injury (n = 4, 8% p = 0.02). The in-hospital mortality in patients with brain injury was 90% (n = 18/20) compared to 78% (n = 25/32) in patients without brain injury. CONCLUSIONS: ABI is common in postcardiotomy VA-ECMO and associated with worse outcome. Patients with central recanalization experienced the majority of acute strokes. Intracardiac thrombus was significantly associated with acute brain injury.

Plan Quality and Secondary Cancer Risk Assessment in Patients with Benign Intracranial Lesions after Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife M6 Robotic Radiosurgery System.

This study was performed to examine the quality of planning and treatment modality using a CyberKnife (CK) robotic radiosurgery system with multileaf collimator (MLC)-based plans and IRIS (variable aperture collimator system)-based plans in relation to the dose-response of secondary cancer risk (SCR) in patients with benign intracranial tumors. The study population consisted of 15 patients with benign intracranial lesions after curative treatment using a CyberKnife M6 robotic radiosurgery system. Each patient had a single tumor with a median volume of 6.43 cm3 (range, 0.33-29.72 cm3). The IRIS-based plan quality and MLC-based plan quality were evaluated by comparing the dosimetric indices, taking into account the planning target volume (PTV) coverage, the conformity index (CI), and the dose gradient (R10% and R50%). The dose-response SCR with sarcoma/carcinoma induction was calculated using the concept of the organ equivalent dose (OED). Analyses of sarcoma/carcinoma induction were performed using excess absolute risk (EAR) and various OED models of dose-response type/lifetime attributable risk (LAR). Moreover, analyses were performed using the BEIR VII model. PTV coverage using both IRIS-based plans and MLC-based plans was identical, although the CI values obtained using the MLC-based plans showed greater statistical significance. In comparison with the IRIS-based plans, the MLC-based plans showed better dose falloff for R10% and R50% evaluation. The estimated difference between Schneider's model and BEIR VII in linear-no-threshold (Lnt) cumulative EAR was about twofold. The average values of LAR/EAR for carcinoma, for the IRIS-based plans, were 25% higher than those for the MLC-based plans using four SCR models; for sarcoma, they were 15% better in Schneider's SCR models. MLC-based plans showed slightly better conformity, dose gradients, and SCR reduction. There was a slight increase in SCR with IRIS-based plans in comparison with MLC-based plans. EAR analyses did not show any significant difference between PTV and brainstem analyses, regardless of the tumor volume. Nevertheless, an increase in target volume led to an increase in the probability of SCR. EAR showed statistically significant differences in the soft tissue according to tumor volume (1-10 cc and ≥10 cc).

Automated drosophila heartbeat counting based on image segmentation technique on optical coherence tomography.

Drosophila and human cardiac genes are very similar. Biological parametric studies on drosophila cardiac have improved our understanding of human cardiovascular disease. Drosophila cardiac consist of five circular chambers: a conical chamber (CC) and four ostia sections (O1-O4). Due to noise and grayscale discontinuity on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, previous researches used manual counting or M-mode to analyze heartbeats, which are inefficient and time-consuming. An automated drosophila heartbeat counting algorithm based on the chamber segmentation is developed for OCT in this study. This algorithm has two parts: automated chamber segmentation and heartbeat counting. In addition, this study proposes a principal components analysis (PCA)-based supervised learning method for training the chamber contours to make chamber segmentation more accurate. The mean distances between the conical, second and third chambers attained by the proposed algorithm and the corresponding manually delineated boundaries defined by two experts were 1.26 ± 0.25, 1.47 ± 1.25 and 0.84 ± 0.60 (pixels), respectively. The area overlap similarities were 0.83 ± 0.09, 0.75 ± 0.11 and 0.74 ± 0.12 (pixels), respectively. The average calculated heart rates of two-week and six-week drosophila were about 4.77 beats/s and 4.73 beats/s, respectively, which was consistent with the results of manual counting.

A Monte Carlo study of bone-tissue interface microdosimeters.

Radiation-induced bone diseases were frequently reported in radiotherapy patients. To study the diseases, microdosimeters were constructed with walls of A150-A150, A150-B100, B100-A150 and B100-B100 interfaces. Monte Carlo simulations of these microdosimeters were performed to determine the lineal energy spectra of an interface site at different depths in water for 230 MeV protons. Comparing these spectra with data of ICRU tissue and bone walls, better agreements were found at shallow depths for protons and delta-rays than deep depths for nuclear interactions.

WITHDRAWN: Cellular uptake and phototoxicity of bioconjugated fluorescent nanodiamonds.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the authors. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.