Delayed Stent Infection after Deployment of a Carotid Dual Layer Stent in Dialysis Cases.

Objective: Infection after carotid artery stenting (CAS) is rare. We report two dialysis cases of delayed stent infection associated with a carotid dual-layer stent (DLS), which occurred several months after deployment of the stent. Case Presentations: Case 1: A 74-year-old man receiving dialysis underwent CAS with DLS. Three months after CAS, the patient developed a high fever, neck pain, and neck swelling. Neck CT and carotid ultrasonography (CUS) indicated an abscess around the inserted DLS. The patient was treated with antibiotic agents and fully recovered. Case 2: A 73-year-old man receiving dialysis underwent CAS with DLS. Two months after CAS, this patient also developed a high fever, neck pain, and neck swelling. Contrast-enhanced neck CT indicated inflammatory effusion with an abscess and a giant infectious pseudoaneurysm. Endovascular stent graft reconstruction was employed urgently under antibiotic therapy to prevent its rupture. However, intracranial hemorrhage occurred postoperatively and left hemiparesis remained. Conclusion: Delayed carotid stent infection is a rare but severe complication. The use of a DLS might be avoided during CAS for dialysis cases.

[A case of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome requiring prolonged intensive care management: a trial of intravenous ketamine and intrathecal dexamethasone therapy].

A 16-year-old male was brought to the emergency room with fever and status epilepticus, and was diagnosed with febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Seizure control was not achieved and the patient developed multiple complications. Ketamine infusion therapy and intrathecal dexamethasone therapy were administered, in addition to other anti-seizure treatment and immunotherapy for super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). The patient was weaned from the ventilator on day 170 and was able to live at home, although he continued to experience monthly focal motor seizures and moderate motor impairment. This case suggests that more aggressive treatment might be an option in FIRES with prolonged SRSE.

Present State of the Infection Protection System and Effects of a Change in the In-Hospital System in Endovascular Treatment for Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Stroke Patients at a Single Institution.

Objective: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke patients during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic requires the implementation of an in-hospital system to guard against infection. Changes to this system may be needed upon aggravation of the epidemic in a particular region. The objective of this study was to clarify the present state of infection protection and the effects of a change in the in-hospital system in EVT at a single institution. Methods: The subjects were consecutive patients treated by EVT under the protocol of infection protection using medical history and chest CT at our hospital between April 2020 and February 2021. For the subjects, background factors, time metrics, including door-to-puncture time (D2P), clinical outcome, and success of infection protection for medical staff were examined. The patients were divided into a group of those with PCR measurement after EVT (Group C; from April 2020 to November 2020) and a group of all with PCR measurement before EVT (Group P; from December 2020 to February 2021). Time metrics and clinical outcome were compared between the groups. Results: There were 69 subjects, including 40 and 29 patients in groups C and P, respectively. The median age was 82, which was higher in group P. The median D2P was 70 min, which did not differ significantly between the two groups, but it was slightly longer in group P than in group C by multivariate analysis. A favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2 at 3 months) was observed in 23 patients (38%), which did not differ significantly between the two groups, but the rate of a favorable outcome was slightly lower in group P than in group C by multivariate analysis. Although medical staff wearing full personal protection equipment were needed for 15 patients (22%), 12 of whom were suspected of being positive and three (4%) were confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR, no staff member who participated in EVT was infected. Conclusion: The median D2P was 70 min and 38% had a favorable outcome of EVT under the present state of infection protection. After a change in the in-hospital system for clinical settings during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, the D2P increased and the rate of a favorable clinical outcome slightly decreased, but both were not significantly affected and infection protection for medical staff was effective. Therefore, the effects of a change were acceptable considering the circumstances.