Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 26(16): 1623-7, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23528153

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of inflatable obstetric belts on uterine fundal pressure in the management of the second stage of labor. METHOD: Between July 2009 and December 2010, 188 nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy at term were enrolled and only one dropped. The participants were randomized to receive either standard care (control group, n = 91) or uterine fundal pressure by the Labor Assister (Baidy M-520/Curexo, Inc., Seoul, Korea; active group, n = 97) during the second stage of labor in addition to standard care. The Labor Assister is an inflatable obstetric belt that is synchronized to apply constant fundal pressure during a uterine contraction. The primary endpoint was duration of the second stage of labor in women who delivered vaginally (control, n = 80 versus active, n = 93). It was not analyzed in women who delivered by cesarean section (n = 14) and delivered precipitously (n = 1). The secondary outcomes are perinatal outcomes and perineal laceration. Participants received patient-controlled epidural analgesia. RESULTS: The 93 women in the active group spent less time in the second stage of labor when compared to the 80 women in the control group (46.51 ± 28.01 min versus 75.02 ± 37.48 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in perinatal outcomes and perineal laceration between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The uterine fundal pressure exerted by the inflatable obstetric belt reduces the duration of the second stage of labor without complications in nulliparous women who receive patient-controlled epidural analgesia.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/instrumentación , Equipos y Suministros , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Adulto , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Paridad , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Presión , Contracción Uterina/fisiología
2.
Int J Med Sci ; 9(1): 40-6, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22211088

RESUMEN

The identification of antenatal depression is critical but poorly conducted. The aim of this study was to construct a simplified depression survey scale and to verify its efficacy as a pre-screening for antenatal depression. A total of 494 pregnant women in the third trimester of gestation who had received antenatal care at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from July 2009 to June 2010 were included. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) questionnaire was completed by them. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: 250 of training set and 244 of validation set. We designed a simplified questionnaire comprising two items of EPDS using the training set. We then validated its efficacy with the training set and reaffirmed the results with the validation set. The sum of item 5 (scare or panic) and item 8 (sadness or misery) explained 75.5% of the total score of the EPDS (AUC = 0.947). Using a score of 3 as a cut-off value of the simplified scale, sensitivity was 92.4% and specificity was 86.3%. The positive and negative predictive values were 56.2% and 98.4%, retrospectively. This study suggests that the simplified EPDS can be an efficient instrument to rule out depression during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Atención Prenatal/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...