Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Health Sci Rep ; 7(6): e2198, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933419

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: Stroke is the leading cause of disability and the second most common cause of death after ischemic heart disease worldwide. Understanding predictors of early poststroke mortality provides opportunities for interventions and favorable outcomes. This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of 30-day mortality among patients admitted with the first stroke at referral hospitals in Dodoma. Methods: A prospective longitudinal observational design enrolled patients with acute stroke confirmed by CT scan or MRI admitted at referral hospitals in Dodoma. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was used to assess stroke severity at baseline. A comparison of risk factors, clinical profiles, and mortality was done using the Chi-square test. A logistic regression model was used to determine the predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with the stroke while the 30-day probability of survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Out of 226 patients with first-ever stroke, 121(54%) were males, and the population mean age was 63(15) years. The 140(62%) had Ischemic stroke, and 154(68%) survived at the 30th day. Patients with a history of smoking 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) (1.0-5.6), p = 0.048], loss of consciousness 2.7 [95% CI (1.2-6.4; p = 0.019] and unequal pupil size 13.7 [95% CI (4.1-58.1, p < 0.001 were significantly more associated with mortality within 30 days. The median survival was 7 (3-9) days, whereas alcohol drinkers and those aged above 60 years had a shorter time to mortality compared to non-alcohol drinkers and those aged <60 years. Conclusion: The study showed a high incidence of mortality within 30 days after the first stroke episode, with the highest proportion dying within 7 days of being hospitalized. Advanced age of ≥60 years, smoking, alcohol use, and severe stroke at admission warrant special attention.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37681810

RESUMEN

Background: Many evidence-based health interventions, particularly in low-income settings, have failed to deliver the expected impact. We designed an Adaptive Diseases Control Expert Programme in Tanzania (ADEPT) to address systemic challenges in health care delivery and examined the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of the model using tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) as a prototype. Methods: This was an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-3 design that was implemented in Dar es Salaam, Iringa and Kilimanjaro regions. The strategy included a stepwise training approach with web-based platforms adapting the Gibbs' reflective cycle. Health facilities with TB services were supplemented with DM diagnostics, including glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). The clinical audit was deployed as a measure of fidelity. Retrospective and cross-sectional designs were used to assess the fidelity, acceptability and feasibility of the model. Results: From 2019-2021, the clinical audit showed that ADEPT intervention health facilities more often identified median 8 (IQR 6-19) individuals with dual TB and DM, compared with control health facilities, median of 1 (IQR 0-3) (p = 0.02). Likewise, the clinical utility of HbA1c on intervention sites was 63% (IQR:35-75%) in TB/DM individuals compared to none in the control sites at all levels, whereas other components of the standard of clinical management of patients with dual TB and DM did not significantly differ. The health facilities showed no difference in screening for additional comorbidities such as hypertension and malnutrition. The stepwise training enrolled a total of 46 nurse officers and medical doctors/specialists for web-based training and 40 (87%) attended the workshop. Thirty-one (67%), 18 nurse officers and 13 medical doctors/specialists, implemented the second step of training others and yielded a total of 519 additional front-line health care workers trained: 371 nurses and 148 clinicians. Overall, the ADEPT model was scored as feasible by metrics applied to both front-line health care providers and health facilities. Conclusions: It was feasible to use a stepwise training and clinical audit to support the integration of TB and DM management and it was largely acceptable and effective in differing regions within Tanzania. When adapted in the Tanzania health system context, the model will likely improve quality of services.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Hemoglobina Glucada , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tanzanía/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/terapia , Instituciones de Salud , Atención a la Salud
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): 497-505, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35731948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rifampin-resistant and/or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) treatment requires multiple drugs, and outcomes remain suboptimal. Some drugs are associated with improved outcome. It is unknown whether particular pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships predict outcome. METHODS: Adults with pulmonary RR/MDR-TB in Tanzania, Bangladesh, and the Russian Federation receiving local regimens were enrolled from June 2016 to July 2018. Serum was collected after 2, 4, and 8 weeks for each drug's area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours (AUC0-24). Quantitative susceptibility of the M. tuberculosis isolate was measured by minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Individual drug AUC0-24/MIC targets were assessed by adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for favorable treatment outcome, and hazard ratios (HRs) for time to sputum culture conversion. K-means clustering algorithm separated the cohort of the most common multidrug regimen into 4 clusters by AUC0-24/MIC exposures. RESULTS: Among 290 patients, 62 (21%) experienced treatment failure, including 30 deaths. Moxifloxacin AUC0-24/MIC target of 58 was associated with favorable treatment outcome (OR, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-11.56; P = .022); levofloxacin AUC0-24/MIC of 118.3, clofazimine AUC0-24/MIC of 50.5, and pyrazinamide AUC0-24 of 379 mg × h/L were associated with faster culture conversion (HR >1.0, P < .05). Other individual drug exposures were not predictive. Clustering by AUC0-24/MIC revealed that those with the lowest multidrug exposures had the slowest culture conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Amidst multidrug regimens for RR/MDR-TB, serum pharmacokinetics and M. tuberculosis MICs were variable, yet defined parameters to certain drugs-fluoroquinolones, pyrazinamide, clofazimine-were predictive and should be optimized to improve clinical outcome. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03559582.


Asunto(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Tuberculosis Pulmonar , Adulto , Humanos , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Antituberculosos/farmacocinética , Rifampin/farmacología , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Pirazinamida/uso terapéutico , Pirazinamida/farmacocinética , Estudios Prospectivos , Clofazimina/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
4.
East Afr Health Res J ; 7(2): 241-248, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39219663

RESUMEN

Introduction: Poor quality of health care services remains an important challenge in health care delivery systems. Here, we validate clinical audit tools and describe audit results of selected clinical standards related to communicable disease (CD) and non-communicable disease (NCD) integration at the primary health care level. Methodology: A multi-methods approach, including a retrospective cohort and cross-sectional design, was deployed concurrently at Health Centres. Separate evaluators assessed the Health Centres using an audit tool and the inter-rater/inter-observer reliability was estimated. The extent of adherence to clinical standards was measured in proportions for: infection prevention control, tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis including advanced TB/Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the diagnosis of chronic lung diseases, and the bidirectional screening and clinical management of TB and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Results: The inter-rater reliability for the clinical audit tools based on 130 individuals' charts was 99.5% (CI:99-100). The total estimated maximum score for infection prevention control was 114 and on average health centres scored 42 (37%). Only 3 (4%) of 80 individuals' medical charts with unexplained productive cough were evaluated for TB. None of the 24 individuals with HIV infection medical charts had vitals measured and only 6 (25%) patients with advanced HIV had a TB test performed, whereas 4 (17%) had a cryptococcal antigen test, and 1 (4%) had a chest radiograph. Also, 24 patients' chart from documented HIV negative with chronic cough had no records of spirometry or peak flowmeter or a chest radiograph. However, a diagnosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as made in 17 (71%) and 7 (29%), respectively. TB was confirmed for 102 patients among whom only 12(12%) were screened for DM. The DM clinics had no TB presumptive registers. Patients with TB/DM (n=2) had a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement done and received appropriate management. Conclusion and recommendation: The developed clinical audit tools were reliable and could contribute to quality measurement for metrics-related integration of CD and NCD in Tanzania. Further investigations will determine if the clinical audit tools widely used in cycles can improve the quality of care in health care delivery systems.

5.
BMJ Open ; 12(6): e061953, 2022 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667721

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sub-Saharan Africa shoulders the highest burden of global sepsis and associated mortality. In high HIV and tuberculosis (TB) prevalent settings such as sub-Saharan Africa, TB is the leading cause of sepsis. However, anti-TB therapy is often delayed and may not achieve adequate blood concentrations in patients with sepsis. Accordingly, this multisite randomised clinical trial aims to determine whether immediate and/or increased dose anti-TB therapy improves 28-day mortality for participants with HIV and sepsis in Tanzania or Uganda. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a phase 3, multisite, open-label, randomised controlled clinical 2×2 factorial superiority trial of (1) immediate initiation of anti-TB therapy and (2) sepsis-specific dose anti-TB therapy in addition to standard of care antibacterials for adults with HIV and sepsis admitted to hospital in Tanzania or Uganda. The primary endpoint is 28-day mortality. A sample size of 436 participants will provide 80% power for testing each of the main effects of timing and dose on 28-day mortality with a two-sided significance level of 5%. The expected main effect for absolute risk reduction is 13% and the expected OR for risk reduction is 1.58. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial will determine the optimal content, dosing and timing of antimicrobial therapy for sepsis in high HIV and TB prevalent settings. The study is funded by the National Institutes of Health in the US. Institutional review board approval was conferred by the University of Virginia, the Tanzania National Institute for Medical Research, and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and in the popular press of Tanzania and Uganda. We will also present our findings to the Community Advisory Boards that we convened during study preparation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04618198).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Sepsis , Tuberculosis , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tanzanía/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1667, 2020 Nov 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33160327

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnostics have revolutionized the diagnosis of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Yet in Tanzania we found delay in diagnosis with more than 70% of MDR-TB patients having a history of several previous treatment courses for TB signaling prior opportunities for diagnosis. We aimed to explore patients' viewpoints and experiences with personal and socio-behavioral obstacles from MDR-TB diagnosis to treatment in an attempt to understand these prior findings. METHODS: The study was conducted in December 2016 with MDR-TB patients admitted at Kibong'oto Infectious Diseases Hospital. A qualitative approach deploying focus group discussions (FGDs) was used to gather information. Groups were sex aggregated to allow free interaction and to gauge gender specific issues in the social and behavioral contexts. The FGDs explored pathways and factors in the service delivery that may have contributed in the delay in accessing MDR-TB diagnostics and/or treatment. Collected data were coded, categorized and thematically interpreted. RESULTS: Forty MDR-TB patients participated in six FGDs. Challenges and barriers contributing to the delay in accessing MDR-TB diagnosis to treatment were as follows: 1) Participants had a different understanding of MDR-TB that led to seeking services outside the conventional health system; 2) Socio-economic adversity made health-seeking behavior difficult and often unproductive; 3) In the health system, challenges included inadequacy of MDR-TB diagnostic centers, lack of knowledge on behalf of health care providers to consider MDR-TB and order appropriate diagnostics; 4) The specimen referral system for early diagnosis of MDR-TB was inefficient. Non-adherence of TB patients to first-line anti-TB drugs prior to MDR-TB diagnosis, given the multitude of barriers discussed, was coupled with both intentional and unintentional non-adherence of health care providers to international standards of TB care. CONCLUSION: Patient-centered strategies bridging communities and the health system are urgently required for optimum MDR-TB control in Tanzania.


Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Grupos Focales , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tanzanía , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico
7.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 395, 2019 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30971228

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) outcomes are adversely impacted by delay in diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Mixed qualitative and quantitative approaches were utilized to identify healthcare system related barriers to implementation of molecular diagnostics for MDR-TB. Randomly sampled districts from the 5 highest TB burden regions were enrolled during the 4th quarter of 2016. District TB & Leprosy Coordinators (DTLCs), and District AIDS Coordinators (DACs) were interviewed, along with staff from all laboratories within the selected districts where molecular diagnostics tests for MDR-TB were performed. Furthermore, the 2015 registers were audited for all drug-susceptible but retreatment TB cases and TB collaborative practices in HIV clinics, as these patients were in principal targeted for drug susceptibility testing by rapid molecular diagnostics. RESULTS: Twenty-eight TB districts from the 5 regions had 399 patients reviewed for retreatment with a drug-susceptible regimen. Only 160 (40%) had specimens collected for drug-susceptibility testing, and of those specimens only 120 (75%) had results communicated back to the clinic. MDR-TB was diagnosed in 16 (13.3%) of the 120 specimens but only 12 total patients were ultimately referred for treatment. Furthermore, among the HIV/AIDS clinics served in 2015, the median number of clients with TB diagnosis was 92 cases [IQR 32-157] yet only 2 people living with HIV were diagnosed with MDR-TB throughout the surveyed districts. Furthermore, the districts generated 53 front-line healthcare workers for interviews. DTLCs with intermediate or no knowledge on the clinical application of XpertMTB/RIF were 3 (11%), and 10 (39%), and DACs with intermediate or no knowledge were 0 (0%) and 2 (8%) respectively (p = 0.02). Additionally, 11 (100%) of the laboratories surveyed had only the 4-module XpertMTB/RIF equipment. The median time that XpertMTB/RIF was not functional in the 12 months prior to the investigation was 2 months (IQR 1-4). CONCLUSIONS: Underutilization of molecular diagnostics in high-risk groups was a function of a lack of front-line healthcare workforce empowerment and training, and a lack of equipment access, which likely contributed to the observed delay in MDR-TB diagnosis in Tanzania.


Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Personal de Salud/psicología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Patología Molecular/estadística & datos numéricos , Poder Psicológico , Tanzanía , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...