Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
J Thromb Haemost ; 8(6): 1230-4, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20175871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The adequacy of thromboprophylaxis prescriptions in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients needs improvement. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis adequacy of various clinical decision support systems (CDSS) with the aim of increasing the use of explicit criteria for thromboprophylaxis prescription in nine Swiss medical services. METHODS: We randomly assigned medical services to a pocket digital assistant program (PDA), pocket cards (PC) and no CDSS (controls). In centers using an electronic chart, an e-alert system (eAlerts) was developed. After 4 months, we compared post-CDSS with baseline thromboprophylaxis adequacy for the various CDSS and control groups. RESULTS: Overall, 1085 patients were included (395 controls, 196 PC, 168 PDA, 326 eAlerts), 651 pre- and 434 post-CDSS implementation: 472 (43.5%) presented a risk of VTE justifying thromboprophylaxis (31.8% pre, 61.1% post) and 556 (51.2%) received thromboprophylaxis (54.2% pre, 46.8% post). The overall adequacy (% patients with adequate prescription) of pre- and post-CDSS implementation was 56.2 and 50.7 for controls (P = 0.29), 67.3 and 45.3 for PC (P = 0.002), 66.0 and 64.9 for PDA (P = 0.99), 50.5 and 56.2 for eAlerts (P = 0.37), respectively, eAlerts limited overprescription (56% pre, 31% post, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: While pocket cards and handhelds did not improve thromboprophylaxis adequacy, eAlerts had a modest effect, particularly on the reduction of overprescription. This effect only partially contributes to the improvement of patient safety and more work is needed towards institution-tailored tools.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Humanos
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 70(3): 407-11, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18242935

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop an expanded version of the ensuring quality information for patients (EQIP) scale to measure quality of patient information documents. METHODS: We added 16 new items to the 20-item EQIP scale. The 36 items addressed document content, structure, and identification data. The new tool was used to rate the quality of 73 leaflets describing medical care procedures, used at a university hospital. Assessment rules were clarified on 25 documents; the remaining 48 leaflets were independently rated by two assessors. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was very good (mean item-specific kappa statistic on 48 documents=0.84). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the global score was 0.95. The mean global conformity score on all items was 44 (range: 21-76, S.D.=10). Most documents stated the purpose of the medical intervention (74% fully adequate), described qualitative risks (64%), used a respectful tone (80%), provided clear information (64%) in a logical order (73%). Fewer quantified risks (7%), were balanced (33%), used everyday language (22%), provided contact details (28%), identified authors (25%) and funding sources (4%). None gave evidence-based references nor clearly mentioned patient participation. CONCLUSIONS: The expanded EQIP scale was reliable, and proved useful for analysis of patient information documents. Documents partially met international standards for quality patient information. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Document producers' efforts should focus on respecting guidelines and including patients.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos , Documentación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Materiales de Enseñanza , Algoritmos , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Recolección de Datos/normas , Documentación/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Guías como Asunto , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Folletos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Semántica , Suiza , Materiales de Enseñanza/normas
3.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 17(1): 31-6, 2008 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18245217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement in healthcare organisations requires structural reorganisation and systems reform, and also the development of an appropriate organisational "culture". Beliefs and attitudes that are thought by experts to be conducive to quality improvement in hospitals include the understanding of healthcare as a complex system, recognition of the importance of coordination of healthcare processes, a positive attitude towards medical error, adherence to the concept of continuous improvement, and a central preoccupation with the patient's welfare. OBJECTIVES: To explore the ideas about quality held by hospital-based doctors and nurses in Geneva, Switzerland. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 doctors and nurses in five hospital departments to explore their ideas about the definition of quality in healthcare, their perceptions about the main barriers to achieving quality healthcare, the factors that facilitate delivery of quality healthcare, and notions of responsibility for ensuring quality healthcare. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Thematic analysis of the interview data suggested that doctors' and nurses' ideas bear little resemblance to models of quality developed by quality experts. Study participants considered quality of care to be primarily the responsibility of individual practitioners. Quality was seen as mainly dependent on the practitioners' mastery of the technical and interpersonal aspects of care. In contrast, the healthcare system was seen primarily as a source of obstacles to good quality care, providing insufficient resources and imposing an excessive administrative burden. The paper discusses the potential implications of these ideas for the implementation of quality management initiatives.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Conducta Cooperativa , Hospitales Públicos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Motivación , Cultura Organizacional , Rol Profesional , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Suiza
4.
Anaesthesia ; 62(11): 1090-4, 2007 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17924887

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of differences in drug label information on injectable drug selection errors. Differences in the display of drug strength information were assessed in a randomised controlled trial involving ward nurses, intensive care nurses, nurse anaesthetists, ward physicians, and anaesthetists. A set of 24 on-screen tasks were constructed. For each task, a label corresponding to an instruction consisting of two from three possible pieces of information (concentration, quantity, volume) had to be selected from a list of 10 items. The set was presented three times to participants using three different label formats. Format A provided two pieces of strength information different from those in the instruction. Format B and C provided all three pieces in a random and a fixed sequence, respectively. The frequency of errors was statistically higher with formats A and B than with format C, and greater in nurses than in anaesthetists. Regulatory bodies should therefore implement a standard requiring that the concentration (expressed in 'mg x ml(-1)'), the amount and the volume of drug be displayed on medication labels in fixed locations.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Etiquetado de Medicamentos/métodos , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Simulación por Computador , Esquema de Medicación , Etiquetado de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , Inyecciones , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/normas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/normas , Suiza
5.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 63(8): 769-76, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17541570

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Designing a safe medication process requires the ability to model its reliability using methods such as probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). However, lack of data, especially on human-error probabilities (HEPs), limits its use. To assess whether small-scale simulations could help generate HEP data, a pilot study was conducted among nurses and anaesthetists. It focused on two core activities, namely, the manual preparation of medications and the arithmetic necessary to prepare drugs. Its specific objectives were to evaluate whether HEPs could be high enough to be measurable and to determine whether these HEPs could be sensitive to individuals and task details. These would give some insight into the level of detail required by PRA analysis. METHODS: Thirty nurse and 28 anaesthetist volunteers were involved in the experiment. Nurses and anaesthetists had to prepare medications for 20 patients and 22 syringes of various drugs, respectively. Both groups had to perform 22 calculations relating to the preparation of drugs. HEPs, distribution of HEPs and dependency of HEPs on individuals and task details were assessed. RESULTS: In the preparation tasks, overall HEP was 3.0% for nurses and 6.5% for anaesthetists. In the arithmetic tasks, overall HEP was 23.8% for nurses and 8.9% for anaesthetists. A statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups. In both preparation and arithmetic tasks, HEPs were dependent on individual nurses but not on individual anaesthetists. In every instance, HEPs were dependent on task details. CONCLUSION: Our study illustrates that small-scale simulations represent an interesting way of generating HEPs. HEPs are, indeed, in the range of 10(-2) and 10(-1). But in most cases, HEPs depend heavily on operators and task details. This dependency means that the influence of these parameters must be determined before advanced PRA analysis. There is therefore an urgent need to develop experimental research into assessing this influence by means of randomised controlled trials.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Errores de Medicación , Probabilidad , Composición de Medicamentos , Humanos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Asistentes Médicos , Proyectos Piloto , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas
7.
J Intern Med ; 257(4): 352-7, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15788005

RESUMEN

AIM OF THE STUDY: To examine the frequency and adequacy of thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients hospitalized in eight Swiss medical hospitals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 1372 patients from eight Swiss hospitals was carried out. After exclusion of patients (275) given therapeutic anticoagulation, 1097 patients were audited. The adequacy of thromboprophylaxis was assessed by comparison with predefined explicit criteria. RESULTS: Of 1097 patients, 542 (49.4%) received thromboprophylaxis. According to the explicit criteria, 644 (58.7%) should have been on prophylaxis (P < 0.001, when compared with the rate observed). The rate of prevention differed widely between hospitals (from 29.4 to 88.6%) with no difference between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. According to the explicit criteria, a substantial proportion (44.9%) of the patients who should have been treated were not. Conversely, 41.3% of the patients were unnecessarily treated. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the appropriateness of the explicit criteria used could be challenged, our data suggest that the current practice is associated with important uncertainty leading to both overuse and underuse of thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized in medical wards. More efforts are urgently needed to develop new or endorse existing explicit, evidence-based criteria and guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in this population of patients.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales de Enseñanza/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Práctica Profesional/normas , Suiza
8.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 11(3): 219-23, 2002 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12486984

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between hospital length of stay (LOS) and quality of care in patients admitted for congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: This observational study was conducted in the medical wards of the Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. A random sample of 371 patients was drawn from the 1084 patients discharged alive with a principal diagnosis of CHF between January 1997 and December 1998. Explicit criteria grouped into three scores were used to assess the quality of processes of care: admission work-up (admission score); evaluation and treatment during the stay (treatment score); and readiness for discharge (discharge score). The association between LOS and quality of care was analysed using linear regression with adjustment for clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The mean proportion of criteria met were 80% for the admission score, 66% for the treatment score, and 76% for the discharge score. Mean (SD) LOS was 13.2 (8.8) days. The admission score was not associated with LOS, but the treatment score increased by 0.5% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.7; p < 0.001) with each additional day in hospital and the discharge score increased by 2.5% (95% CI 1.6 to 3.3; p < 0.001) per day from admission to day 10 but remained unchanged thereafter. Adjustment for potential confounders did not substantially modify these relationships. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHF there is a significant association between LOS and the quality of the treatment provided, as well as with readiness for discharge. Appropriate reorganisation of processes of care should accompany attempts at reducing LOS to avoid detrimental effects on quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/normas , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Suiza
9.
Am J Med ; 109(5): 386-90, 2000 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11020395

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine if early unplanned readmissions of patients hospitalized for heart failure are associated with suboptimal in-hospital care or with the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patient. SUBJECT AND METHODS: We performed a case-control study among patients discharged with a principal diagnosis of heart failure. Cases included all patients unexpectedly readmitted within 31 days of discharge; controls were randomly selected from among those not readmitted. Quality of care was measured using explicit criteria reflecting the admission work-up, evaluation and treatment, and readiness for discharge. RESULTS: Ninety-one cases and 351 controls were included. There was no significant association between early unplanned readmissions and the scores for quality of the admission work-up or evaluation and treatment during the stay. There was a significant association between readiness for discharge and subsequent early readmission: for each 10% decrease in the proportion of fulfilled criteria, the odds of readmission increased by 14% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1. 01 to 1.28, P = 0.04) for all-cause readmissions and by 19% (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.36, P = 0.01) for heart-failure-related readmissions. In a multiple logistic regression model, previous diagnosis of heart failure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.7 to 4.8, P <0.001), age (OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.3 to 8.5, P = 0.01 for patients aged 65 to 79 years and OR = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.6 to 11, P = 0.004 for patients aged 80 years and older), and history of cardiac revascularization (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.9, P = 0.01) showed a stronger association with early unplanned all-cause readmissions than the readiness-for-discharge score (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.31, P = 0.02). Similar findings were seen for heart failure-related readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure, early unplanned readmissions were not associated with suboptimal admission work-up or evaluation and treatment but were weakly associated with readiness for discharge. However, they were strongly associated with the patients' clinical and demographic characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza/normas , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Demografía , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Suiza
10.
Int J Epidemiol ; 27(3): 513-9, 1998 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9698145

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify predictors of inappropriate hospital days in a department of internal medicine, as a basis for quality improvement interventions. METHODS: The appropriateness of 5665 hospital days contributed by 500 patients admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland, was assessed by means of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Predictor variables included patient's age and sex, manner of admission and discharge, and characteristics of hospital days (weekend, holiday, sequence). RESULTS: Overall, 15% of hospital admissions and 28% of hospital days were rated as inappropriate. In multivariate models, inappropriate hospital days were more frequent among patients whose admission was inappropriate (odds ratio [OR] = 5.3, 95% CI: 3.1-8.4) and among older patients (80-95 years: OR = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.7-7.0, versus <50 years). The likelihood of inappropriateness also increased with each subsequent hospital day, culminating on the day of discharge, regardless of the total length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified both the admission and the discharge processes as important sources of inappropriate hospital use in a department of internal medicine. The oldest patients were also at high risk of remaining in the hospital inappropriately. Surprisingly, long hospital stays did not generate a higher proportion of inappropriate days than short hospital stays. This information proved useful in developing interventions to improve the hospitalization process.


Asunto(s)
Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Suiza
11.
Arch Intern Med ; 157(13): 1495-500, 1997 Jul 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9224229

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify patient- and admission-related risk factors for a medically inappropriate admission to a department of internal medicine. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of a systematic sample of 500 admissions to the department of internal medicine of an urban teaching hospital. The appropriateness of each admission and reasons for inappropriate admissions were assessed using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Risk factors included the time (day of week and holidays) and manner (through emergency department or direct admission) of admission, patient age and sex, health status of patient and spouse, living arrangements, formal home care services, and informal support from family or friends. RESULTS: Overall, 76 (15.2%) hospital admissions were rated as medically inappropriate by the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. In multivariate analysis, the likelihood of an inappropriate admission was increased by better physical functioning of the patient (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.1 [for 1 SD in Physical Functioning scores]), lower mental health status of the patient's spouse (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.6), receipt of informal help from family or friends (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.2), and hospitalization by one's physician (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7-7.5). Receiving formal adult home care was not associated with inappropriateness of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate admissions to internal medicine wards are determined by a mix of factors, including the patient's health and social environment. In addition, the private practitioners' discretionary ability to hospitalize their patients directly may also favor medically inappropriate admissions.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Medicina Interna , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Suiza
12.
Arch Pediatr ; 2(7): 622-7, 1995 Jul.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7663649

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The specificity of childhood cancers led to the creation of regional childhood cancer registries. An epidemiological study of childhood cancers in the Auvergne area was carried out over a 6 year-period (1986-1991) in order to create a registry. POPULATION AND METHODS: The population of our study was 252,820 children (0-15 years old), living in the Auvergne region. All malignant neoplasms were included together with brain tumours (whatever grading). Data were collected from medical and administrative sources. RESULTS: The data of 153 cases were collected during this period. World age standardized overall incidence rate was 120.5 cases/milion/year. Age standardized incidence rates were: leukemias 37.6 (ALL 28.01), central nervous system tumours 18.34 (medulloblastomas 4.6, astrocytomas 4.6, ependymomas 3.8), lymphomas 10.0, neuroblastomas 18.6, soft tissue tumors 8.3, bone tumours 6.1 (Ewing's sarcomas 4.1, osteosarcomas 2.0), nephroblastomas 5.5, retinoblastomas 3.1, liver tumours 0.5 and others 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: Our data base in the Auvergne area might be a source of information for epidemiological studies on the role of etiological factors, the survival, the sequelae and the incidence trends.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Programas Médicos Regionales , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Pediatrie ; 48(11): 801-4, 1993.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8058441

RESUMEN

An epidemiological study of neuroblastoma in the Auvergne area of France (departments: Puy-de-Dôme, Allier, Cantal, Haute-Loire) was carried out over a 6 years period (1986-1991). Nineteen cases of neuroblastoma were registered during this period. The annual incidence rate is 1.2 among 100,000 children under the age of 15 years. Similar incidence rates from other studies have been reported in the literature. In the department of Rhône, France, a screening program for neuroblastoma was initiated in 1990. The Auvergne area may constitute a population-based control group.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Neuroblastoma/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Neuroblastoma/prevención & control
14.
N Engl J Med ; 324(16): 1079-83, 1991 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2008181

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) are based on data from patients who have had at least one episode of PCP (secondary prevention). We designed a study to determine the efficacy and side effects of inhaled pentamidine in the primary prevention of PCP. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three patients sero-positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who had the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) but not PCP, who had advanced AIDS-related complex, or who had less than 0.2 x 10(9) CD4-positive lymphocytes per liter received either 300 mg of pentamidine isethionate or 300 mg of sodium isethionate every 28 days by inhaler. The proportion of patients surviving without PCP was analyzed with the log-rank test as a function of time spent in the trial, according to the intention to treat with either placebo or pentamidine. RESULTS: The third of five planned interim analyses showed a significant difference in the occurrence of PCP, with 8 cases in pentamidine group and 23 in the placebo group (nominal P value = 0.0021). There were no deaths within 60 days of the diagnosis of PCP and no significant differences in survival between groups. Approximately 53 inhalations were needed to prevent one episode of pneumonia. Thirty-eight of 114 patients given pentamidine (33 percent) and 7 of 109 given placebo (6 percent) had moderate-to-severe coughing during inhalations (two-tailed P less than 0.00001), which caused 4 patients given pentamidine (3.5 percent) to discontinue taking it. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 300 mg of aerosolized pentamidine given every four weeks was well tolerated and 60 to 70 percent effective in preventing a first episode of PCP in patients with HIV infection.


Asunto(s)
Pentamidina/administración & dosificación , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/prevención & control , Complejo Relacionado con el SIDA/complicaciones , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/complicaciones , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Adulto , Aerosoles , Anciano , Femenino , Seropositividad para VIH/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pentamidina/efectos adversos , Pentamidina/uso terapéutico
15.
Med Klin (Munich) ; 85 Suppl 2: 268-70, 1990 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2197536

RESUMEN

Patients with AIDS but without pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, patients with advanced AIDS-related complex (ARC), and asymptomatic patients with less than 200 CD4-positive lymphocytes/mm3 were randomized to one of two groups: group I: Inhalation of 300 mg of pentamidine every 28 days; group II: Inhalation of placebo (300 mg of Na isethionate) every 28 days. From May to November 28, 1989, 160 patients have entered the trial. Inhalations were well tolerated, with only a 6% use of bronchodilators and a 15% incidence of cough. Until now five patients died, none of them drug related. So far, six patients have developed pneumocystis carinii pneumonia; four of these were on pentamidine, and two on placebo. Five of the six cases occurred before the second inhalation. Recruitment will continue until 250 patients are enrolled.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones Oportunistas/prevención & control , Pentamidina/administración & dosificación , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/prevención & control , Administración por Inhalación , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
16.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 3(4): 641-3, 1984 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6481571

RESUMEN

In this paper we report two cases of extended intestinal aganglionosis in siblings, a condition that could be considered a severe variety of Hirschsprung's disease.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/genética , Colon/patología , Duodeno/patología , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/patología , Humanos , Íleon/patología , Lactante , Yeyuno/patología , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...