Epidemiology of Upper Extremity Firearm Injuries among Major Trauma Hospitals in the United States.

BACKGROUND: As many as 34 percent of nonfatal firearm injuries involve the upper extremity. Although not lethal, these injuries cause substantial morbidity. The authors conducted an epidemiologic study characterizing upper extremity firearm-related injuries presenting to U.S. trauma centers over a 10-year period. METHODS: The authors used the National Trauma Databank from 2007 to 2017 to identify isolated upper extremity firearm-related injuries. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize patient demographic data, firearm type, extremity injury patterns, treatments received, hospital length of stay, and regional variation. RESULTS: The authors identified 48,254 upper extremity firearm-related injuries. The patients were largely male patients (85 percent), and over half were between the ages of 20 and 39 years. Handguns (34 percent) were the most frequently used firearm. Shoulder and upper arm were the most frequently injured areas (54 percent); however, 18 percent of patients injured two or more areas. Patients were most often treated at university hospitals (59 percent) with Level I or II trauma designation. Seventy percent were admitted and/or taken directly to the operating room. The mean hospital length of stay was 3 days. Payer mix among these patients was variable: Medicaid, 20 percent; private insurance, 20 percent; and self-pay, 29 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Upper-extremity firearm injuries are resource intensive, with three-quarters of patients requiring operative intervention and/or hospitalization. Level I and II trauma centers were the site of care for the majority of patients. Targeted gun policy reform and prevention measures directed toward at-risk groups have the potential to limit the unnecessary morbidity and costs associated with these injuries.

Association of Interfacility Transfer and Patient and Hospital Characteristics With Thumb Replantation After Traumatic Amputation.

Importance: Given that 40% of hand function is achieved with the thumb, replantation of traumatic thumb injuries is associated with substantial quality-of-life benefits. However, fewer replantations are being performed annually in the US, which has been associated with less surgical expertise and increased risk of future replantation failures. Thus, understanding how interfacility transfers and hospital characteristics are associated with outcomes warrants further investigation. Objective: To assess the association of interfacility transfer, patient characteristics, and hospital factors with thumb replantation attempts and success. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the US National Trauma Data Bank from 2009 to 2016 for adult patients with isolated traumatic thumb amputation injury who underwent revision amputation or replantation. Data analysis was performed from May 4, 2020, to July 20, 2020. Exposures: Interfacility transfer, defined as transfer of a patient from 1 hospital to another to obtain care for traumatic thumb amputation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Replantation attempt and replantation success, defined as having undergone a replantation without a subsequent revision amputation during the same hospitalization. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to assess the associations of interfacility transfer, patient characteristics, and hospital factors with replantation outcomes. Results: Of 3670 patients included in this analysis, 3307 (90.1%) were male and 2713 (73.9%) were White; the mean (SD) age was 45.8 (16.5) years. A total of 1881 patients (51.2%) were transferred to another hospital; most of these patients were male (1720 [91.4%]) and White (1420 [75.5%]). After controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, uninsured patients were less likely to have thumb replantation attempted (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78) or a successful replantation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.84). Interfacility transfer was associated with increased odds of replantation attempt (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13-1.59), with 13% of the variation at the hospital level. Interfacility transfer was also associated with increased replantation success (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47), with 14% of variation at the hospital level. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, interfacility transfer and particularly hospital-level variation were associated with increased thumb replantation attempts and successes. These findings suggest a need for creating policies that incentivize hospitals with replantation expertise to provide treatment for traumatic thumb amputations, including promotion of centralization of replantation care.

Reliability and Validity of Upper Extremity Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Assessing Traumatic Finger Amputation Management.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome instruments for assessing outcomes in postsurgical traumatic digit amputation patients. The authors hypothesize that the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire are the most valid and reliable instruments. METHODS: The authors studied traumatic digit amputation patients as part of the Finger Replantation and Amputation Challenges in Assessing Impairment, Satisfaction, and Effectiveness (FRANCHISE) study initiated by The Plastic Surgery Foundation. The MHQ, DASH questionnaire, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey were used to assess patients at least 1 year postoperatively. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha and criterion validity with Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Construct validity was tested with four predefined hypotheses. Discriminant validity was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight replantation and 74 revision amputation patients met the inclusion criteria. All instruments demonstrated fair to good internal consistency in both cohorts (0.7 < α < 0.9). The MHQ and DASH questionnaire scores correlated strongly (r > 0.60) in both cohorts. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey had moderate to weak correlation with the remaining instruments, and its mental component had poor discriminant validity (area under the curve, 0.64 to 0.67). The MHQ, DASH questionnaire, and PROMIS demonstrated good construct validity confirming 75 to 100 percent of predefined hypotheses, whereas the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey confirmed only 25 percent. CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire or the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire when assessing patient-reported outcomes in digit amputation patients based on good internal consistency and validity. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System has fair validity and reliability but should be an adjunct instrument. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey should not be used as a primary assessment tool, but as an adjunct to assess overall quality of life.

Thirty-day Emergency Department Utilization after Distal Radius Fracture Treatment: Identifying Predictors and Variation.

Unplanned hospital visits are costly and may indicate reduced care quality. In this analysis, we aim to investigate the emergency department (ED) utilization for patients 30 days after treatment for a distal radius fracture (DRF) with an emphasis on DRF-related diagnoses of complications and examine nationwide variation in returns to the ED after treatment. METHODS: In this population-based analysis, we used the Truven MarketScan database to identify adult patients who underwent treatment for their DRF. We examined primary diagnoses upon ED visits to assess for relation to treatment. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk of DRF-related ED visits and pain-related diagnoses. RESULTS: Of the patients who underwent treatment for a DRF, 2% of surgical patients and 4% of nonsurgical patients visited the ED within 30 days after treatment with a DRF-related diagnosis. The most common diagnoses for all patients were pain-related diagnoses. Patients receiving internal fixation were less likely to experience a DRF-related visit compared with patients receiving other surgical treatments most likely because of no exposed hardware. In addition, patients receiving surgical in the South were more likely to visit the ED with a pain-related diagnosis compared with any other region. CONCLUSIONS: Policy makers should include ED visits after treatment for outpatient hand conditions as indicators of care quality. Given the geographic differences in the ED utilization for this patient population, collaborative initiatives and institutional-level policy may help reduce variation in care for patients after treatment for their fracture care.

Improved transverse flow estimation using differential maximum Doppler frequency.

Conventional Doppler technique can only provide the axial component of the blood flow vector, which is actually a three dimensional (3-D) quantity. To acquire the complete flow vector, estimations of the other two velocity components are essential. For the two dimensional (2-D) Doppler-bandwidth-based transverse estimation, however, accuracy is generally limited because of the complex dependence of the Doppler spectral shape on the flow variation within the sample volume. Two factors that may lead to the Doppler spectral change were considered in this study. One is the position offset of the sample volume and the other is the length of the sample volume. Simulations were performed and experimental data were also collected. Results indicate that the position offset may result in severe underestimation of Doppler shift frequency. Consequently, Doppler bandwidth is overestimated when it is determined by the difference between Doppler shift frequency and maximum Doppler frequency. Compared with the position offset, influence of the length of sample volume on the Doppler bandwidth is minor. To overcome this problem, a novel method, which is based on the differential maximum Doppler frequency, is proposed. Specifically, two beams with different beam widths are simultaneously generated to observe the blood flow and the difference between the corresponding maximum Doppler frequencies is used to estimate the transverse velocity. It is demonstrated that the accuracy and stability of transverse estimation are significantly improved by the proposed method even when the position offset is present.