Cancer Stem Cell Markers, CD44 and ALDH1, for Assessment of Cancer Risk in OPMDs and Lymph Node Metastasis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Tumour heterogeneity in oral cancer is attributed to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs are the most migratory and metastatic cellular subpopulation within tumours. Assessment of CSC markers as significant predictors of lymph node metastasis may prove valuable in the clinical setting. Furthermore, analysis of this panel of putative stem cell markers in oral dysplasia may additionally inform of the likelihood for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) to progress to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The present study aims to assess the significance of CSC markers in the progression of OPMDs to OSCC and assessment of lymph node metastasis in OSCC. CD44 and ALDH1 were assessed immunohistochemically in 25 normal, 30 OPMDs, and 24 OSCCs. CD44 is a membranous marker and ALDH1 is a cytoplasmic marker. The immunohistochemical expression of these markers were compared between OPMDs with and without dysplasia, as well as between low-risk and high-risk dysplasias. Similarly, expression was compared between OSCC with and without lymph node metastasis and among grades of OSCC. Positive CD44 expression was seen in all normal mucosal tissues. The expression decreased from normal epithelium to OPMDs but increased in OSCC. CD44 expression was positive in 21 cases of OSCC (87.5%) and reduced from well-differentiated to poorly differentiated OSCC. CD44 staining index was higher in OSCC without lymph node metastasis (3.59) when compared with OSCC with lymph node metastasis (1.33). There was a statistically significant difference observed in the ALDH1 staining index among three groups (p < 0.05), with highest expression seen in OSCC. Within OPMDs, the ALDH1 staining index was statistically higher in OPMDs with dysplasia as compared to OPMDs without dysplasia. Furthermore, the expression was higher in OPMDs with high-risk dysplasia when compared with low-risk dysplasia, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.82). In conclusion, The CD44 positive population possesses properties of CSCs in head and neck carcinoma, and continuous shedding could be found after CD44 down-regulation. The present study reports differences in ALDH1 expression between OPMDs with and without dysplasia, dysplastic and non-dysplastic epithelia, and low-risk and high-risk dysplasia. These findings may suggest ALDH1 as a specific marker for dysplasia. CD44 demonstrated a difference in staining index in OSCC without lymph node metastasis versus OSCC with lymph node metastasis. These findings may suggest CD44 as a marker for lymph node metastasis. Both proteins may play key roles in the tumorigenicity of CSCs in OPMDs and OSCC.

Oxidative and antioxidative mechanisms in oral cancer and precancer: a review.

Development of cancer in humans is a multistep process. Complex series of cellular and molecular changes participating in cancer development are mediated by a diversity of endogenous and exogenous stimuli and important amongst this is generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Reactive radicals and non-radicals are collectively known as ROS. These can produce oxidative damage to the tissues and hence are known as oxidants in biological system. Many researchers have documented the role of ROS in both initiation and promotion of multistep carcinogenesis. To mitigate the harmful effects of free radicals, all aerobic cells are endowed with extensive antioxidant defence mechanisms. Lowered antioxidant capacity or the oxidant-antioxidant imbalance can lead to oxidative damage to cellular macromolecules leading to cancer. Oral cavity cancer is an important cancer globally and tobacco is the primary etiological factor in its development. Tobacco consumption exposes the oral epithelium to toxic oxygen and nitrogen free radicals that can affect host antioxidant defence mechanisms. Elevated levels of ROS and Reactive Nitrogen Species (RNS) and lowered antioxidants are found in oral precancer and cancer. Protection can be provided by various antioxidants against deleterious action of these free radicals. Treatment with antioxidants has the potential to prevent, inhibit and reverse the multiple steps involved in oral carcinogenesis. This review is an attempt to understand the interesting correlation between ROS and RNS mediated cell damage and enzymatic and non-enzymatic defence mechanisms involved in oral cancer development and its progression and the use of antioxidants in oral cancer prevention and treatment.

Nitric oxide and cancer: a review.

Nitric oxide (NO), is a ubiquitous, water soluble, free radical gas, which plays key role in various physiological as well as pathological processes. Over past decades, NO has emerged as a molecule of interest in carcinogenesis and tumor growth progression. However, there is considerable controversy and confusion in understanding its role in cancer biology. It is said to have both tumoricidal as well as tumor promoting effects which depend on its timing, location, and concentration. NO has been suggested to modulate different cancer-related events including angiogenesis, apoptosis, cell cycle, invasion, and metastasis. On the other hand, it is also emerging as a potential anti-oncogenic agent. Strategies for manipulating in vivo production and exogenous delivery of this molecule for therapeutic gain are being investigated. However, further validation and experimental/clinical trials are required for development of novel strategies based on NO for cancer treatment and prevention. This review discusses the range of actions of NO in cancer by performing an online MEDLINE search using relevant search terms and a review of the literature. Various mechanisms by which NO acts in different cancers such as breast, cervical, gastric,colorectal, and head and neck cancers are addressed. It also offers an insight into the dichotomous nature of NO and discusses its novel therapeutic applications for cancer prevention and treatment.