In Vitro and In Vivo Synergetic Radiotherapy with Gold Nanoparticles and Docetaxel for Pancreatic Cancer.

This research underscores the potential of combining nanotechnology with conventional therapies in cancer treatment, particularly for challenging cases like pancreatic cancer. We aimed to enhance pancreatic cancer treatment by investigating the synergistic effects of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) and docetaxel (DTX) as potential radiosensitizers in radiotherapy (RT) both in vitro and in vivo, utilizing a MIA PaCa-2 monoculture spheroid model and NRG mice subcutaneously implanted with MIA PaCa-2 cells, respectively. Spheroids were treated with GNPs (7.5 µg/mL), DTX (100 nM), and 2 Gy of RT using a 6 MV linear accelerator. In parallel, mice received treatments of GNPs (2 mg/kg), DTX (6 mg/kg), and 5 Gy of RT (6 MV linear accelerator). In vitro results showed that though RT and DTX reduced spheroid size and increased DNA DSBs, the triple combination of DTX/RT/GNPs led to a significant 48% (p = 0.05) decrease in spheroid size and a 45% (p = 0.05) increase in DNA DSBs. In vivo results showed a 20% (p = 0.05) reduction in tumor growth 20 days post-treatment with (GNPs/RT/DTX) and an increase in mice median survival. The triple combination exhibited a synergistic effect, enhancing anticancer efficacy beyond individual treatments, and thus could be employed to improve radiotherapy and potentially reduce adverse effects.

DMPC/Chol liposomal copper CX5461 is therapeutically superior to a DSPC/Chol formulation.

CX5461, a compound initially identified as an RNA polymerase inhibitor and more recently as a G-quadruplex binder, binds copper to form a complex. Our previous publication showed that the complexation reaction can be leveraged to formulate copper-CX5461 inside liposomes, improving the apparent solubility of CX5461 by over 500-fold and reducing the elimination of CX5461 from the plasma compartment following intravenous administration. In mouse models of acute myeloid leukemia, the resulting formulation was more effective than the free drug solution of CX5461 (pH 3.5) currently used in clinical trials. However, the gains observed with the liposomal formulation were minimal, despite significant increases in circulation half-life. Since the formulation technology used relied on liposomes and the fate of most compounds associated with liposomes is dependent on liposomal lipid composition, the studies described here were designed to evaluate how simple changes in lipid composition could affect therapeutic activity. The previously reported formulation method was simplified to ensure an easy scale-up process. In the modified method, pre-measured solid CX5461 was added to copper-containing liposomes prior to an incubation at 60 °C, which enabled copper-CX5461 complexation inside DSPC/Chol or DMPC/Chol liposomes. Efficacy was determined in BRCA-normal (BxPC3) and BRCA-deficient (Capan-1) models of pancreatic cancer. Both liposomal formulations enhanced the circulation lifetime of CX5461 compared to the free drug solution (pH 3.5). Unlike most compounds that are loaded using a transmembrane pH-gradient, the dissociation of CX5461 from liposomes prepared using the copper complexation method were comparable for DSPC/Chol and DMPC/Chol liposomes, in vitro and in vivo. Nonetheless, copper CX5461 prepared using DMPC/Chol liposomes exhibited superior efficacy. The reason for the improved activity of DMPC/Chol copper-CX5461 was not readily explained by the release data and may be due to the fact that DMPC/Chol liposomes are less stable following localization in the tumor. The results indicate that the therapeutic effects of copper-CX5461 will be dependent on liposomal lipid composition and that liposomal CX5461 should exhibit superior benefits when used to treat BRCA-deficient cancers.

Loss of Parkinson's susceptibility gene LRRK2 promotes carcinogen-induced lung tumorigenesis.

Pathological links between neurodegenerative disease and cancer are emerging. LRRK2 overactivity contributes to Parkinson's disease, whereas our previous analyses of public cancer patient data revealed that decreased LRRK2 expression is associated with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The clinical and functional relevance of LRRK2 repression in LUAD is unknown. Here, we investigated associations between LRRK2 expression and clinicopathological variables in LUAD patient data and asked whether LRRK2 knockout promotes murine lung tumorigenesis. In patients, reduced LRRK2 was significantly associated with ongoing smoking and worse survival, as well as signatures of less differentiated LUAD, altered surfactant metabolism and immunosuppression. We identified shared transcriptional signals between LRRK2-low LUAD and postnatal alveolarization in mice, suggesting aberrant activation of a developmental program of alveolar growth and differentiation in these tumors. In a carcinogen-induced murine lung cancer model, multiplex IHC confirmed that LRRK2 was expressed in alveolar type II (AT2) cells, a main LUAD cell-of-origin, while its loss perturbed AT2 cell morphology. LRRK2 knockout in this model significantly increased tumor initiation and size, demonstrating that loss of LRRK2, a key Parkinson's gene, promotes lung tumorigenesis.

Diverse mechanisms of autophagy dysregulation and their therapeutic implications: does the shoe fit?

In its third edition, the Vancouver Autophagy Symposium presented a platform for vibrant discussion on the differential roles of macroautophagy/autophagy in disease. This one-day symposium was held at the BC Cancer Research Centre in Vancouver, BC, bringing together experts in cell biology, protein biochemistry and medicinal chemistry across several different disease models and model organisms. The Vancouver Autophagy Symposium featured 2 keynote speakers that are well known for their seminal contributions to autophagy research, Dr. David Rubinsztein (Cambridge Institute for Medical Research) and Dr. Kay F. Macleod (University of Chicago). Key discussions included the context-dependent roles and mechanisms of dysregulation of autophagy in diseases and the corresponding need to consider context-dependent autophagy modulation strategies. Additional highlights included the differential roles of bulk autophagy versus selective autophagy, novel autophagy regulators, and emerging chemical tools to study autophagy inhibition. Interdisciplinary discussions focused on addressing questions such as which stage of disease to target, which type of autophagy to target and which component to target for autophagy modulation. Abbreviations: AD: Alzheimer disease; AMFR/Gp78: autocrine motility factor receptor; CCCP: carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; CML: chronic myeloid leukemia; CVB3: coxsackievirus B3; DRPLA: dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; ERAD: ER-associated degradation; FA: focal adhesion; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; HD: Huntingtin disease; HIF1A/Hif1α: hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha; HTT: huntingtin; IM: imatinib mesylate; MAP1LC3B: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta; NBR1: neighbour of BRCA1; OGA: O-GlcNAcase; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PLEKHM1: pleckstrin homology and RUN domain containing M1; polyQ: poly-glutamine; ROS: reactive oxygen species; RP: retinitis pigmentosa; SNAP29: synaptosome associated protein 29; SPCA3: spinocerebellar ataxia type 3; TNBC: triple-negative breast cancer.