Exposure-response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS-829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies.

AIMS: Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1-preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure-response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose confirmation based on three phase 3 and two phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic exposures used in ER analyses were derived from population pharmacokinetic analysis. The exposure-efficacy relationships were assessed for efficacy endpoints (ACR20/50/70 and DAS28) over effective area under curve (AUCeff ), the combined exposures of filgotinib and GS-829845 (major, active metabolite), with nonlinear logistic regression models developed. Also, a t-test was performed to compare the exposure between subjects who achieved response and those who did not. For the ER analyses of safety, exposures were examined between subjects who experienced and who did not experience the evaluated safety events, which was conducted separately for filgotinib and GS-829845. RESULTS: The nonlinear logistic regression showed increasing response with increasing exposure, with exposures at 200 mg dose primarily residing on the curve plateau. Also, AUCeff was significantly higher in the subjects who achieved responses compared to those who did not (10 900 vs 9900 h*ng/mL for ACR20, P value < .0001). For exposure-safety analyses, filgotinib and GS-829845 exposures were similar irrespective of the presence/absence of the evaluated safety endpoints, indicating no exposure-safety relationship for common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/laboratory abnormalities and serious TEAEs/infections. CONCLUSIONS: ER analyses confirmed that filgotinib produced more robust therapeutic effects across the exposure range observed at 200 mg once daily compared to lower doses, and collectively with the lack of exposure-safety relationship, the 200 mg once daily dose was supported for commercialization.

Prevalence of Resistance-Associated Substitutions in HCV NS5A, NS5B, or NS3 and Outcomes of Treatment With Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated the effects of baseline hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5A, NS5B, and NS3 resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) on response to the combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2144 participants in phase 2 and 3 studies of patients with HCV genotype 1a or b infection who received the combination of ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) once daily, with or without ribavirin twice daily. Population and/or deep sequence analyses of the HCV NS3, NS5A, and NS5B genes were performed on blood samples collected at baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 16.0% of patients had detectable baseline RASs in NS5A. Among patients with HCV genotype 1b infection, there was no significant effect of baseline RASs in NS5A on sustained viral response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and only a small effect in patients with HCV genotype 1a infection. RASs in NS5A that increased the half-maximal effective concentration to ledipasvir by more than 100-fold reduced the rate of SVR12 in treatment-naive patients given ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 8 weeks (P = .011), but not for 12 weeks. These same baseline NS5A RASs reduced the percentage of treatment-experienced patients who achieved an SVR12 to 12 weeks (but not 24 weeks) ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (P < .001). These RASs had a small effect in patients given ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in combination with ribavirin for 12 weeks. Overall, 2.5% of patients had baseline NS5B nucleotide inhibitor RASs (L159F, N142T, S282G, or L320S) and all achieved an SVR12. Of patients previously treated with protease inhibitors, 53.7% had RASs in NS3 and 96.5% achieved an SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline RASs in NS5A have minimal effects on patient responses to ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy. When these RASs do have effects, they could be largely overcome by extending treatment duration or through treatment intensification.

Concordance of sustained virological response 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-treatment with sofosbuvir-containing regimens for hepatitis C virus.

UNLABELLED: Historically, clinical trials of regimens to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have used, as their primary efficacy endpoint, a sustained virological response (SVR)­defined as HCV RNA levels below a designated threshold of quantification­24 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR24). More recently, regulatory authorities have begun to accept SVR at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) as a valid efficacy endpoint because of its high rate of concordance with SVR24. However, the concordance between SVR12 and SVR24 has not been systematically assessed with new regimens of recently approved direct-acting antiviral agents. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between SVR at various post-treatment time points in phase III clinical trials of sofosbuvir (SOF)-containing regimens. We conducted a retrospective analysis of five trials enrolling 863 patients infected with HCV genotypes 1-6. The concordance between SVR at 4 weeks post-treatment (SVR4) and SVR12, and between SVR12 and SVR24, were determined, as well as positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs). Overall, 779 of 796 patients (98.0%) with an SVR4 also achieved an SVR12, making the PPV of SVR4 for SVR12 98% and the NPV 100%. Of the 779 patients with an SVR12, 777 (99.7%) also achieved an SVR24, making the PPV of SVR12 for SVR24 >99% and the NPV 100%. Of patients who relapsed post-therapy, 77.6% did so within 4 weeks of completing therapy. CONCLUSION: Data from phase III studies demonstrate that with SOF-based regimens, with or without interferon, SVR12 and SVR24 correlate closely. Thus, SVR12 can be used effectively to determine "cure" rates in trials and in clinical practice.